Error message

Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 20 of /home/caucusni/public_html/includes/file.phar.inc).

Grassroots and Docs: Progressives Moves For Medicare for All

Heh. Lot's of rumours about Bernie, will he or won't he. Got a fundraising email from him yesterday asking for donations based on the come. Think I will def wait to see the bill.

Regardless, there is a substantial move afoot to make Medicare For All happen. Now. Even 40% Republicans think it's time.

You might not be surprised that Corpse-a-Dems are throwing caltrops in the way of the Medicare for All steamroller. But a surprisingly strong coalition is kicking @ss and taking names, to change their wicked ways.

My family has gut burn just thinking about my mother losing Medicaid support for the technical nursing center where she resides. A couple of brothers can't or won't afford ACA.

Maybe you have similar stories in your family or community?

A tea nut 'friend' on FB likes all my Medicare for All posts there. People are waking up to the dire straights millions are in. Will they act, take to the streets?

National Nurses, Physicians for a National Health Plan, numerous other groups and coalitions are coming together for this.

The entire post is a good read. Check it out if you have time and interest, pass it on?

Current reality is an economic inequality turbojet engine. Something gotta give.

How the ACA’s Spectacular Defeat Could Open the Way for Single-Payer Healthcare

by Roger Bybee

April 3, 2017/blockquote>

Polling data indicates strong majority support for a single-payer system built around nonprofit insurance entities. Well over half of Americans want to replace Obamacare with a single-payer system. That figure, amazingly, includes 41 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents—even though the wording of the question specifies that the program would be ‘federally funded.’

But reform will not happen without a prolonged and bitter struggle. Think back to 1948, when President Harry Truman began his campaign for universal health care with a solid majority of the public behind him. The fervent assault of the American Medical Association against “socialized medicine”—waged with the assistance of all their allies in the medical industry—stopped the Truman campaign in its tracks. Since then, the insurance industry, Big Pharma, and medical equipment makers and assorted firms have only metastasized in size and lobbying power.

Still, a growing number of doctors and hospital administrators are recognizing the barrier to America’s health imposed by insurance bureaucracy and profit-mindedness. The profound social crisis afflicting working class people aged forty-five to sixty-four—facing insecure, low-paid jobs without health insurance while suffering social uncertainty—will intensify the outcry to expand Medicare to cover this group. (During the ACA debate, Democrats bound to the insurers shamefully blocked this humane and sensible move.)

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

divineorder's picture

up
0 users have voted.

A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.

What I don't get is how stupid or just plain niggardly that group is. Medicare for all and free university and/or vocational training is an economic development program. It benefits business big time. Imagine that liar Obama had bailed out the banks by bailing out the homeowners. There must be a secret law that no law may help the people in addition to the billionaires.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

divineorder's picture

@dkmich on fleeing the poor after elected right up there with DLC crowd and all the comfy corporate Dems.

Yes I remember diary after diary by MB which included the benefits of spending on jobs etc for the economy and thinking ' why why why are they not going for this? . Frankly I still don't have a satisfying answer to that. 'Greed' is obviously part but not all 9f the answer.

Anyway it seems to me that our part in all this tragedy is that we work smart but continue to raise hell and educate others for single payer until we get it however long it takes. Same thing on ending endless war.

up
0 users have voted.

A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.

Big Al's picture

hardcore conservatives are against single payer at this point, and our two political parties, the duopoly of course. But that's a tad depressing reading about how Truman backed it back in 1948 and here we are today with Trump and the repubs, with the democrats help, trying to further institutionalize a bad system. Seventy years later.
As I said before, this is like trying to tackle the military industrial complex. The health insurance/big pharma and medical corporations are just as big and powerful.

up
0 users have voted.
PriceRip's picture

          I will not get my hopes up, because they have been dashes against the shoals too many times.

**Drops Sea Anchor and readies the Bilge Pumps.**
up
0 users have voted.
Mark from Queens's picture

in terms of news coverage, and therefore momentum.

But the most salient, hard-truth (and depressing) point is this: these polls mean nothing legislators. Literally. And it's proven.

The Princeton Study revealed this in such a glaring and jarring way. To me the fundamental truth they uncovered, about exactly which legislation gets passed and doesn't, should be the clarion call to the 99% that this shit is no working. There's no getting around it. Our gov't is an auction, sold to the highest bidder.

To wit:

Using data drawn from over 1,800 different policy initiatives from 1981 to 2002, the two conclude that rich, well-connected individuals on the political scene now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or even against the will of the majority of voters.

The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy," they write, "while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence."

Here's an interview with one of its authors, "Scholar Behind Viral 'Oligarchy' Study Tells You What It Means"

Q: Let's talk about the study. If you had 30 seconds to sum up the main conclusion of your study for the average person, how would you do so?

A: I'd say that contrary to what decades of political science research might lead you to believe, ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does in the United States. And economic elites and interest groups, especially those representing business, have a substantial degree of influence. Government policy-making over the last few decades reflects the preferences of those groups -- of economic elites and of organized interests.

Seems to be the only thing, like you said, is for folks to get out in the streets to #ShutItDown. I get the feeling voting and polls can always be both manipulated and/or ignored, when you have armies of propaganda and big-money, power movers at your back.

up
0 users have voted.

"If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:

THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC"

- Kurt Vonnegut

Shockwave's picture

I've been a Single Payer activist since 2006 and I can see an alignement of planets in favor of Single Payer.

1. Several states, specially California with SB 562, are moving in the Single Payer direction (I'm involved with a support organization)
2. The influence of Bernie Sanders at the national level
3. Trump will sabotage Obamacare if he cannot repeal it (might as well go all the way)
4. Some trumpers have starting talking Single Payer (Will Trump Outmaneuver Democrats on Health Care with Single Payer?)

up
0 users have voted.

The political revolution continues

there was a movement among doctors to cut their prices in half on the condition that their patients pay in cash. They did not accept private insurance. Other doctors agreed to charge cash patients what they charged the insurance companies if they also paid a yearly fee approximately equal to a couple month's premium.
Also, about fifteen years ago the clinic where I get my care said that it might have to close because of the administrative costs of having to deal with the insurance companies.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973