Every Aspect of Russiagate is an Outright HOAX, Crafted by Paid Associates of the DNC, and Abetted by Deep State Russophobes and Their Whores in the Mainstream Media — Read Joe Lauria!
(Originally posted on Medium.com)
People are now starting to realize that the “Trump colluded with Russia” meme is a myth that Obama’s Deep State drove by relying on the third-rate, unconfirmable opposition research on Trump created by Fusion GPS and SECRETLY funded by the DNC and Clinton campaign. This is why, after 18 months or so of investigations that have gravely violated the privacy rights of Trump associates and driven some of them to the brink of bankruptcy, no evidence has emerged to confirm this myth.
So it’s about time for the other shoe to drop. The “Russia interfered in the election” claim, that most Americans now believe as firmly as they once believed that Saddam had massive hordes of WMDs, is likewise, not just an error in justice, but on OUTRIGHT HOAX. Just as Perkins Coie recruited Fusion GPS for Hillary’s campaign, they also referred the firm Crowdstrike to the DNC to examine the alleged hacking of the DNC’s server. Crowdstrike obligingly reported that the DNC had been hacked by Russian intelligence, shortly after Wikileaks announced they would be releasing a trove of emails pertinent to Hillary’s campaign.
And at this point, the “Guccifer 2.0” persona emerges, posting online documents obtained from the DNC and purposely imprinted with “Russian fingerprints” in its meta-data — an evident attempt to back up the claim that Russia was behind the alleged DNC hack. And G2.0 also announced at this time that he was the source for the DNC emails that Wikileaks was about to release. But G2.0 wasn’t sufficiently careful, because, as objectively demonstrated by cyberanalyts Adam Carter and “the Forensicator”, he left clues indicating that he had thumbdrive access to the DNC servers, was using a computer that had once belonged to Joe Biden’s staff and that was set to Eastern Standard Time, and made his internet postings at times suggesting he was in the Western hemisphere. Yet, in their Intelligence Community Assessment of Jan. 6th of last year, written by a couple of dozen or so intelligence analysts hand-picked by the virulent Russophobes James Clapper and John Brennan, G2.0 was “assessed” to be a Russian operative who was a Wikileaks source.
Adam Carter has concluded that, in all likelihood, Crowdstrike was responsible for the creation of the G2.0 fraud. And the evident purpose of this fraud was to characterize Wikileaks as a puppet co-conspirator of malign Russian hackers bent on Hillary’s destruction — thereby distracting attention from the incriminating content of the released emails, which offered further proof that the DNC had loaded the dice against Bernie Sanders. It may also be noted that the CEO and founder of Crowdstrike, Shawn Henry, while serving as the director of counterintelligence at the FBI (under the direction of Robert Mueller!), had attempted to destroy Wikileaks’ reputation by sending them fraudulently altered documents (which Wikileaks was smart enough not to publish).
And, most conveniently, Seth Rich, a DNC employee and Bernie Sanders fan who, in light of several lines of evidence (including statements by an FBI source of Sy Hersh) seems likely to have been the actual source of the Wikileaks DNC emails, and who was uniquely positioned to blow the whistle on the G2.0 scam, was soon thereafter murdered in a “robbery” so “botched” that no valuables were taken.
Since then, our mainstream media have run non-stop with the “Russia interfered” narrative, to the extent that most Americans believe this as a matter of course. And they have embellished this with claims that the Russian government sponsored a social media campaign to decimate Hillary. In fact, while some Russians did post on social media, and some of these may have been paid trolls, there is no evidence that they were working at the behest of the Russian government, and, in any case, an inspection of the ads that were posted by alleged Russians, and of the timing and venue of their placements, lends no credence whatever to the view they were part of a co-ordinated plan to elect Trump. Which is why the Deep State and their media whores had to segue to the claim that the evil Russians were trying to “foment chaos” and cause us to “lose faith in our democracy”.
And have the mainstream media even bothered to tell their public about the cyberanalytic analyses of G2.0 — which are on public record and objectively confirmable? Of course not, as that would crimp the narrative they have fed us for over a year. And here’s another tidbit they won’t mention — Crowdstrike installed their top-of-the-line anti-hacking program Falcon on the DNC computers several weeks before the latest DNC email released by Wikileaks was written — May 25, 2016. But of course anti-hacking programs stop and trace hacks — NOT LEAKS!
As noted, Crowdstrike was a DNC hire. And neither they nor the DNC allowed the FBI to make an independent analysis of the DNC server. And apparently the FBI did not object.
The fact that the “Trump colluded with Russia” story was hatched by Fusion GPS, retained by Perkins Coie on behalf of the DNC/Clinton campaign, and that the “Russia interfered in our election” claim was instigated by Crowdstrike, hired by the DNC on the recommendation of Perkins Coie, has been highlighted in a highly insightful essay by ace journalist Joe Lauria. In fact, this essay was so insightful that HuffPost took it down almost immediately after it had appeared, without explanation. I urge you to take a look:
The Democratic Money Behind Russia-gate
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/29/the-democratic-money-behind-russia...
What makes the “Russia interfered” narrative particularly despicable is that it is triggering a second Cold War. The last time we had a Cold War with Russia, nuclear missiles were nearly launched BY ACCIDENT on three occasions. And of course confrontation with Russia is a great excuse for our military-industrial complex to keep bleeding us dry. But is it worth risking nuclear annihilation and massive unnecessary expense to excuse Hillary’s inexcusable loss, and to expedite a corrupt effort to impeach or at least seriously hobble a duly elected President? Apparently some people think so.
For those wanting more details, here are some of my other pertinent publications on Medium:
What’s Left of Russiagate — Are We Down to the 1,000 Paid Trolls?
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/whats-left-of-russiagate-are-we-down-to...
The Russiagate Hoax — Cutting to the Chase
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/the-russiagate-hoax-cutting-to-the-chas...
Let’s Make it Real Easy for you Mainstream Media — Re Guccifer 2.0
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/lets-make-it-real-easy-for-you-mainstre...
The Dirty Trickery of Hillary’s Campaign is Proving to be of Mind-Boggling Magnitude
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/the-dirty-trickery-of-hillarys-campaign...
The Russiagate Hoax, the Dirty Dossier, DNC Corruption, and DOJ Obstruction for Hillary — A Compendium of Sources
https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/the-russiagate-hoax-the-dirty-dossier-d...
Comments
nice post. Exactly right.
this will blow up spectacularly in the Dems' faces. It's been some kind of tightrope act, where they want the charge to be out there but not really looked into.
When it does blow up I won't have any sympathy for them. They did it to themselves. I expect them to blame lefties.
I just think the Dem establishment doesn't care
about anything but keeping the money flowing from their wealthy donors anyway they can. If that means bashing Trump on a fake scandal, rather than on the many justifiable reasons they should oppose his policies, than that's what they will do.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
they can't really bash the policies
because that would mean having policies of their own. The consultants tell them "don't say anything" because it might drive voters away. They don't realize that the nothingness of the Dem Party is what's doing that.
I saw a thing on Facebook that shows how deluded Dem supporters are. It's clearly not from the Dems but from someone who thinks the Dems must believe what was shown. One cartoon panel was "Trump's plan" with smoke fumes billowing out of a coal plant, fouling the air, the other panel was this idyllic scene called the Democrats Vision, with sunny skies, windmwills turning, people of all races happily living their lives. It was one of those times that I just didn't bother getting into a discussion. But that's the Dem plan. Let people believe what they want to believe without the awkwardness of anything concrete to refer to.
The Dims' plan, if you call it that
double post
because sometimes I'm not sure if I actually clicked "save"
TOP/Russiagate vs. Tulsi Gabbard
Not on the GOS.
I know I posted this in another essay, but it's worth repeating.
TOP link
Right. "For veteran status". No mention of her serving in Iraq.
And OMG! A Russian!
And here's the first comment:
It looks like the GOS has someone to run against Tulsi.
I listened to her interview and while she sounds nice, she sounds like just another centrist liberal that specializes in identity politics.
IOW, the kind of person TOP loves.
This type of nonsense is what stands out there
The first comment states a person's opinion as fact and then everyone agrees with them. This happens all too often and on any subject that they write about. Now we're being told that the republicans are all committing treason or are in Putin's pockets. It's treasonous to release the memo because it's just a way for them to not have to admit that Trump colluded with Putin. This would be funny if it wasn't so damn sad.
Great job, Mark! I read this when you posted it on Medium.
There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?
Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.
she doesn't sound nice, she sounds paid and being happy
about it.
The TOP article is smear, I read the link about the Gabbard's father or grandfather's cult... and all I can say would be ... igitt, no comment.
Yack. Sinking slowly in the muddy swamp with a native smile.
https://www.euronews.com/live
And, sadly, Bernie is
among those cheering
on this Russiagate horse$h!t.
How do you run a serious presidential
campaign still touting this bull$h!t that
has been debunked by anybody with any journalistic
cred?
Russiagate is the line in the sand. You're either on one side or the other, believers or nonbelievers; and if you're on the side of believers you're on the wrong side, can't be taken seriously as a presidential candidate.
Give it up, Bernie, or lose any cred
the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.
This is so true, Wink.
Here we have an immutable reality, impervious to compromise or nuance. The road splits neatly at this point. Down one side is a Constitutional crisis. Down the other is "Crime and Punishment.'
We are living through a coup where one administration used fake evidence to obtain an omnipotent search warrant to destroy another administration, breeching the Democracy of the People's election. This will be the deciding factor in all elections moving forward. And it will overshadow US foreign policy for the rest of the century.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"
Agreed but the coup is failing miserably
Friends don’t let friends Russiagate
Caitlin nails it:
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
I can hardly wait
to see this blow up in the Democrats' faces. I am truly saddened that Bernie has continued to promote it, even as recently as his response to the SOTU. There is nothing to be gained from this insanity and so much for all of us to lose. This is a very dangerous game that the Democrats are playing.
Thank you for posting this, veganmark!
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
I didn't have the information readily at hand
to discuss this Russiagate bull shit until this. I now intend to tell them to read this, then get back to me for an informed discussion.
Thank you. A lot.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
This is a narrative of excellent measure.
Thanks for producing it, Mark. Those writers who held the vision of what's real — with intellectual honesty and without bias — had to fly directly into the headwinds of relentless anti-Russian propaganda. It has been punishing, and the majority of journalists simply collapsed and tumbled along with the propaganda generated by the Neocon coup government.
This Deep State, in collusion with the US media monopolies, have stripped non-compliant journalists of their voices. The technology giants of the Internet kowtowed to the Establishment government and instantly transformed into an insidious "Bureau of Truth and Censorship." They have done everything in their power to silence some of the most courageous evidence-based writers that we have.
The minds of the American people have been harnessed to the dangerous lies of our failing Empire, and they are lost to us in the struggle toward a decent future for mankind. Entire generations have been mentally disabled and sidelined. Even the most popular politicians have sabotaged the path forward. Caity Johnstone puts it this way:
The Deep State will certainly double down again, and they will use their superior powers to gaslight the American people until they can think no more.
I wonder where the truth-speakers go from here? The rest of the world knows what is happening here, but many have been bent to the wheel of the State Department, not by loyalty, but by fear. Hopefully, these much older civilizations will choose themselves.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"
Thanks so much for this
Thanks so much for this comprehensive post and array of links! Spent much of yesterday and today going through these and links within various of those links. Still working on them, but need a break, lol.
Edit: missed a word... usually, I add too many!
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.