The Evening Blues - 10-6-15

Hey! Good Evening!

This evening's music features jazz saxophonist, clarinetist and composer Sidney Bechet. Enjoy!

Sidney Bechet - Blues My Naughty Sweetie Gives To Me

“And now, we have no option. We can't say 'maybe' 'it's possible' 'it looks very probable...' No way! We have to say this is what the Bible teaches! This is fact! May 21, 2011 is the day of the Rapture, it is the day that Judgment Day begins...”

-- Harold Camping


News and Opinion

Here we go again...

Christian group predicts the world will be 'annihilated' on Wednesday

While our planet may have survived September’s “blood moon”, it will be permanently destroyed on Wednesday, 7 October, a Christian organization has warned.

The eBible Fellowship, an online affiliation headquartered near Philadelphia, has based its prediction of an October obliteration on a previous claim that the world would end on 21 May 2011. While that claim proved to be false, the organization is confident it has the correct date this time.

“According to what the Bible is presenting it does appear that 7 October will be the day that God has spoken of: in which, the world will pass away,” said Chris McCann, the leader and founder of the fellowship, an online gathering of Christians headquartered in Philadelphia.

“It’ll be gone forever. Annihilated.”

McCann said that, according to his interpretation of the Bible, the world will be obliterated “with fire”.

The blood moon – a lunar eclipse combined with a “super moon” – occurred without event on 27 September. This was despite some predictions that it would herald the beginning of the apocalypse. Certain religious leaders had said the blood moon would trigger a chain of events that could see our planet destroyed in as little as seven years time.

According to this new prediction, however, there will be no stay of execution. On the day of 7 October, the world will end.

Top U.S. general in Afghanistan: Hospital was ‘mistakenly struck’

Gen. John F. Campbell, the commander of U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan, told lawmakers on Tuesday that the American air attack that killed at least 22 people at a hospital in northern Afghanistan were not intended to hit medical staff or patients.

“A hospital was mistakenly struck,” Campbell said in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. “We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility.” ...

Speaking a day earlier, Campbell said the attack, which took place under confused circumstances in the middle of the night Saturday, was authorized after Afghan troops requested air support from American forces. That contradicted earlier statements from Pentagon officials that the strike was ordered to protect U.S. forces on the ground. ...

On Monday, Campbell told reporters at the Pentagon that Afghan forces “advised that they were taking fire from enemy positions and asked for air support from U.S. forces.” Campbell made it clear that this differed from initial reports that said U.S. forces were under attack and called in the airstrikes for their defense.

Campbell’s remarks differed from two previous comments, including one made by Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter on Sunday that said U.S. forces were under attack.

“At some point in the course of the events there [they] did report that they, themselves, were coming under attack. That much I think we can safely say,” Carter told reporters Sunday.

Dependency on Warlords Led to U.S. Attack on MSF Afghan Hospital

White House: Afghan hospital bombing not a 'war crime'

The White House on Monday avoided describing the weekend attack on an Afghan hospital as a "war crime," citing ongoing investigations.

When asked if the incident was a “war crime," Earnest said, "Well, I wouldn't use a label like that because that is under investigation.

"The events in Afghanistan are a profound tragedy. We're talking about doctors who have left the safety and comfort of their homes, traveled to a remote region of the world that everybody knows is dangerous and they're risking their lives," Earnest continued. "That fact that some of those individuals lost their lives is a profound tragedy."

Afghan Doctor Slaughter Pulls Back Curtain

On Dec. 26, 2009, a U.S. Special Operations team flew from Kabul to Ghazi Khan village in the Narang district of Kunar province. They attacked three houses, where they killed two adults and eight children. Seven of the children were handcuffed before they were shot. The youngest was 11 or 12, three more were 12, and one was 15. Both the United Nations and the Afghan government conducted investigations and confirmed all the details of the attack.

U.S. officials conducted their own inquiry, but no report was published and no U.S. military or civilian officials were held accountable. Finally, more than five years later, a New York Times report on Joint Special Operations Command’s (JSOC) Seal Team 6 named it as the U.S. force involved. But JSOC operations are officially secret and, to all practical purposes, immune from accountability. As a senior U.S. officer told the Times, “JSOC investigates JSOC, that’s part of the problem.”

Accountability for the U.S. attack on the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz on Saturday, killing at least 22 people, is likely to be just as elusive. The bilateral security agreement that President Karzai refused to sign, but which President Ghani signed in September 2014, provides total immunity from Afghan law for U.S. forces and officials. So whoever should be held legally responsible for the massacre at the hospital will only be subject to accountability under U.S. military and civilian legal systems, which routinely fail to prosecute anyone for similar war crimes.

What makes this attack unique is not that U.S.-led forces attacked a hospital or killed civilians, but that, for the first time in many years, a Western NGO found itself operating behind enemy lines in territory controlled by Anti-Coalition Forces (ACF) or Taliban. Doctors Without Borders (or MSF for its French initials) thus found itself subject to U.S. rules of engagement under which Afghans have lived and died in their thousands for the past 14 years, effectively excluded from the protections formally guaranteed to civilians, the wounded and medical facilities by the Geneva Conventions.

How Putin will Win in Syria

The reason Putin will succeed where the US failed in its war on ISIS, is because the Russian air-strikes are going to be accompanied by a formidable mop-up operation that will overpower the jihadi groups on the ground. This is already happening as we speak. The Russian Air Force has been pounding terrorist targets across the Idlib Governorate for the last few days as well as ISIS strongholds in the East at Raffa. On Sunday, according to a report filed by South Front, roughly 700 militants surrendered to members of the 147th Syrian tank brigade shortly after bombers had attacked nearly cities of Mardeij, Ma’arat Al-Nu’man, Jisr Al-Shughour, Saraqib and Sarmeen. This is the pattern we expect to see in the weeks ahead. Russian bombers will soften targets on the frontlines, ground troops will move into position, and untold numbers of jihadis will either flee, surrender or get cut down where they stand. Bottom line: Syria is not going to be a quagmire as the media has predicted. ...

According to South Front: “Lieutenant General Andrey Kartapolov, head of the Main Operation Directorate of the General Staff of Russia’s armed forces, said the strikes have significantly reduced the terrorists’ combat capabilities.” In other words, the Russian offensive is already producing positive results. This is no small matter. By most accounts, the conflict had deteriorated into a stalemate. Now, with Russia in the picture, that’s changed. Now the table is clearly tilted in Syria’s favor. ...

There was an article in the Guardian on Sunday that caused quiet a stir among people who are following events in Syria. Here’s a clip:

“Regional powers have quietly, but effectively, channeled funds, weapons and other support to rebel groups making the biggest inroads against the forces from Damascus…..In a week when Russia made dozens of bombing raids, those countries have made it clear that they remain at least as committed to removing Assad as Moscow is to preserving him.

“There is no future for Assad in Syria,” Saudi foreign minister Adel Al-Jubeir warned, a few hours before the first Russian bombing sorties began. If that was not blunt enough, he spelled out that if the president did not step down as part of a political transition, his country would embrace a military option, “which also would end with the removal of Bashar al-Assad from power”.

Saudi Arabia poses no real threat to Putin’s operation in Syria. The Saudis may talk tough, but they already have their hands full with a crashing economy (due to plunging oil prices) and a war in Yemen they have no chance of winning. They’re certainly not going to get more deeply involved in Syria. ...

The only country that could make a difference in the outcome, is the United States. And, the fact is, Washington’s neocons don’t have the cojones to take on Moscow mano-a-mano, so Putin’s clean-up operation is going to continue on schedule.

Saudi Clerics Urge Jihad Against Syria, Iran, and Russia

Statement Calls for Backing Islamist 'Holy Warriors' in Syria

Reflecting the ever-growing sectarian nature of the Syrian Civil War, a group of 53 Saudi clerics, including some prominent Islamists, have issued a joint statement calling on the public to support a jihad against both the Assad government and their allies in Russia and Iran. ...

Sectarian agitation is always fairly successful in Saudi Arabia, but doubly so at the moment with the government engaged in an explicitly sectarian war in neighboring Yemen, and publicly endorsing a holy war in general terms for regime change in Syria.

So while the kingdom itself may admonish its citizens against backing al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria, their talking points appear to be setting the stage for calls to arms like these which will do exactly that, and advances a narrative in which nations like Russia, in fighting ISIS, are “taking sides” with the Shi’ites against Sunni Islam.

Syrians Skeptical of Turkey’s Promised War Against ISIS

US officials and a lot of pro-US rebels were loudly welcoming Turkey’s official involvement in the war against ISIS when it was announced in late July, but months later many are expressing growing doubt about whether Turkey intends to do anything at all against ISIS.

After brief clashes at the border, Turkey quickly changed focus to a separate war against the Kurdish PKK, which spans southeastern Turkey and northern Iraq. This war appears to be virtually the sole focus of Turkey’s military ever since, with nothing really happening on the ISIS front.

Oh my, another NATO numbskull that likes to catapult the propaganda and rattle his little sabre at Russia:

NATO Secretary-General: Russia's Violation of Turkish Airspace 'Does Not Look Like an Accident'

NATO's Secretary-General said today he doubted Russia's explanation that its weekend violations of Turkey's airspace was a mistake because there were two such incursions and they lasted longer than just a few seconds.

"I will not speculate on the motives but this does not look like an accident... and we have two of them," Jens Stoltenberg told a news conference on Tuesday, referring to the incursions and noting their duration.

Stoltenberg said the US-led NATO alliance, of which Turkey is a member, had not received "any real explanation" of what happened. He said he had not had any direct contact with Moscow but NATO has discussed the possibility of using its military lines of communication with Russia. ...

Meanwhile, Russia's NATO envoy said that he thought the military alliance was using the accidental incursion to distort the aims of Moscow's air campaign in Syria, according to the TASS news agency.

"The impression is that the incident in Turkish airspace was used to plug NATO as an organization into the information campaign waged by the West to distort the aims of the operations carried out by the Russian air force in Syria," Alexander Grushko was quoted as telling reporters in Brussels.

Who is behind Syrian Observatory for Human Rights? RT finds Western media's key source on Syria

Is a third Palestinian intifada on the way – or has it already begun?

A weekend of febrile violence in the West Bank and east Jerusalem has led to growing fears of a third Palestinian intifada. One of the latest victims was a 13-year-old boy killed by Israeli forces during clashes outside a refugee camp in Bethlehem.

Abdel Rahman Shadi, who lived in Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, was struck in the chest by Israeli fire and died after undergoing emergency surgery in Beit Jala hospital on Monday – the second youth to be killed in 24 hours.

There is concern among diplomats and analysts in the region that the escalating violence could turn into a new intifada, or uprising. Four Israelis were killed in attacks by Palestinians on Friday and Saturday.

The front page of one mass-circulation newspaper on Sunday stated simply: “The Third Intifada.” Elsewhere in the Israeli media, columnists were more circumspect. Some asked whether the latest events fitted the pattern of the two previous intifadas, which began in 1987 and 2000, and if not, how the current escalation could be curbed before becoming one.

Not only in the Israeli media has the question been asked. The issue was given added urgency by the Facebook posting of Muhanad Halabi, a 19-year-old Palestinian student who stabbed two Israeli men to death in the Old City on Saturday, who linked his actions directly to a “third intifada”.

Speaking to Palestinian Radio on Sunday morning, Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian peace negotiator, said he was reminded of the first days of the second intifada. “These events are reminiscent of September 2000,” he said. “Experience shows us that Israel cannot prevent Palestinian freedom by forceful measures.”

Israel demolishes homes of Palestinian attackers as clashes escalate

Binyamin Netanyahu promises ‘harsh’ action after days of rising violence

Israeli security forces have demolished the homes of two Palestinians behind lethal attacks on Israelis last year, and sealed off another, following prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s threat of “harsh” action amid sharply mounting unrest.

The acceleration of the controversial policy of house demolitions was one of a package of measures announced in recent days by Netanyahu to quell days of escalating violence between Palestinians and Israelis, amid mounting criticism of Netanyahu’s leadership.

The houses destroyed were the former homes of Ghassan Abu Jamal and Mohammed Jaabis. Abu Jamal, with his cousin Uday Abu Jamal, killed four rabbis and a police officer in a bloody attack on a Jerusalem synagogue in 2014, before being shot and killed.

Jaabis rammed an earthmover into a bus in August, killing an Israeli and wounding several others. He was shot dead by police at the scene.

The demolitions took place hours after several thousand largely right-wing Israelis demonstrated outside Netanyahu’s home to protest his handling of the crisis.

The protest was attended by prominent figures in Israel’s national religious and right-wing political communities, including MPs from Netanyahu’s own Likud party, amid concern that the current tensions are in danger of being transformed into a new intifada (uprising).

Drone Flies Over NSA Complex in Germany, Dropping Leaflets

A group of activists flew a drone over a key National Security Agency complex in Germany on Friday, dropping leaflets encouraging the intelligence workers inside to quit in protest over invasive surveillance.

The site of the drone fly-by, the Dagger Complex, is a U.S. military installation south of Frankfurt. It houses the European Cryptologic Center — a major source of signals and communications intelligence in Europe for the NSA. According to German media, its 1,100 employees monitor massive amounts of communications with tools such as XKEYSCORE, one of the programs revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The group behind the drone mission, Intelexit, made headlines last week when it drove moving billboards past intelligence agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The billboards, framed by picturesque scenes of sunsets and American flags, include catchphrases such as “Complicit in mass surveillance and drone wars?” and “Listen to your heart, not to private phone calls,” directing observers to “exit intelligence.”

The Real House of Saud - Saudi Arabia's Oil-For-Tyranny

Saudi Arabia Continues Hiring Spree of American Lobbyists, Public Relations Experts

Saudi Arabia is in the market for a better reputation in Washington, D.C.

In September alone, foreign lobbying disclosure documents show the Saudi government signing deals with PR powerhouse Edelman and lobbying leviathan the Podesta Group, according to recent disclosures.

Edelman, the largest privately owned public relations agency in the world, is known for helping clients win favorable media coverage on mainstream outlets. The Podesta Group is a lobbying firm founded by Tony Podesta, a major fundraiser for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

The new signings are the latest in a year-long hiring spree by the Persian Gulf state as it further builds up its already formidable political arsenal inside the Beltway. ...

Edelman’s contract calls for the firm to “engage with opinion influencers, establish media engagement opportunities for [sic] principal, and assist in opinion editorial placement” on behalf of the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority.

The Saudi regime is currently facing yet another public relations crisis as the Kingdom moves to execute Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, the young son of a government critic.

The nation also faces international outcry over the widespread killing of civilians in Yemen. Since March, Saudi Arabia has led a coalition that includes the U.S., U.K., Egypt and several Persian Gulf nations to support the Yemeni government in its war against the Houthi rebels. The Saudi-led coalition has repeatedly attacked schools, hospitals, and other civilian targets, including recent reports of a wedding party that was bombed, killing over 100 people.

The Revolutionary Age

Obama Has 38 Billion Reasons to Veto the Senate’s Defense Spending Bill

Congress is set to approve the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) later this week — the massive bill that sets the annual budget for the Department of Defense — but the White House says President Barack Obama will veto the $612 billion piece of legislation because of the unorthodox way it would fund the Pentagon.

American lawmakers sidestepped mandatory budget caps on 2016 defense spending by adding roughly $38 billion to the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, an account that is not subject to sequestration and technically reserved for incremental costs associated with fighting wars. Defense Secretary Ash Carter has said he finds this "objectionable," while Obama and the Democrats want any increase in defense spending to be met with an equal increase in domestic spending.

The NDAA is an "irresponsible way to fund our national defense priorities," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters last week. "If the president got this bill, he'd veto it."

Obama has threatened to veto every NDAA since he took office but has yet to follow through, but this time his message "could not be clearer," Justin T. Johnson, a senior policy analyst for defense budgeting at the Heritage Foundation, told VICE News. "I expect the president will veto the NDAA, which will be a pretty historic event."

Facebook row: US data storage leaves users open to surveillance, court rules

EU court ruling that privacy is being compromised could force many digital companies to relocate operations


US data storage systems operated by Facebook and other digital operators do not provide customers with protection from state surveillance, the European court of justice has ruled.

The declaration by the EU court in Luxembourg that privacy is being compromised will have far-reaching consequences for the online industry and could force many companies to relocate their operations.

Declaring the American safe harbour scheme invalid, the ECJ – whose findings are binding on all EU members states – ruled that “the United States … scheme thus enables interference, by United States public authorities, with the fundamental rights of persons.”

Safe harbour is an agreement between the European commission and the US that provides guidance for US firms on how protect for the personal data of EU citizens as required by the European Union’s directive on data protection. There are negotiations going on to upgrade the framework and provide better privacy for online users.

Liberal Leader Would Change When Canada’s NSA Could Spy

Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has pledged to change the way Canada's foreign intelligence agency — often described as "Canada's NSA"— is able to spy on Canadians with a warrant if he's elected prime minister later this month.

According to the party's official election platform, released earlier in the day, an elected Liberal government would "limit Communications Security Establishment's powers by requiring a warrant to engage in the surveillance of Canadians."

VICE News originally reported that meant the Liberals intended to give the Communication Security Establishment (CSE) new powers, since the agency is currently prohibited from "directing" surveillance at Canadians for domestic purposes. But the party insisted that is not the case.

Asked several times during a special town hall in Toronto hosted by VICE Canada to clarify his stance, Trudeau emphasized that CSE would be subjected to oversight.

Mimicking Media Outlets, DOJ Will Finally Attempt Tally of Killings by Police

Database will not require police to report people they kill

Mimicking major media outlets, and following pressure from Black Lives Matter campaigners, the Department of Justice announced Monday that it will bolster its efforts to record killings by police using information compiled from multiple sources.

The undertaking, however, will not require police departments to report people their officers kill, and is strikingly similar to the approach employed by the Guardian, which in June launched its own database, The Counted.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), which will house the initiative, said it will improve its data by "surveying police departments, medical examiners' offices and investigative offices about the reports that it identifies from open source and using data from the multiple sources to obtain a more accurate factual account of each incident." The agency claims it will "complete its methodology study by late 2015/early 2016 and then begin to stand up a national program on arrest related deaths."

Similarly, The Counted combines "Guardian reporting with verified crowdsourced information," including tips and media reports, to monitor police killings.

California Cops Are Pissed About the State’s New Racial Profiling Law

California cops will soon be required to document and make public the ethnicity and race of individuals they stop while patrolling — and they're not happy about it.

Civil rights groups praised the sweeping racial profiling bill signed into law this weekend by Governor Jerry Brown, but the law enforcement community claims it will unduly burden officers. The law, called the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015, requires departments to log data for each stop of a citizen, including the time, date, location, and reason, as well as the "perceived race or ethnicity, gender, and approximate age of the person stopped," and whether the officer took any actions or searched the person.

The data will be turned over to the state attorney general and a Racial and Identity Profiling Board that will oversee the law. The data will also be made public. ...

California police unions came out in force against the bill, with one spokesperson, Lieutenant Steve James of the Long Beach Police Officers Association and the national trustee for the California Fraternal Order of Police, telling the Los Angeles Times that, "There is no racial profiling. There just isn't. There is criminal profiling that exists."

Outrage Stirred as Police Deploy Snipers to 'Observe' Anti-Austerity March in UK

As more than 60,000 people marched against Tory's attack on the economy, sharp-shooters took up positions on rooftops

As the national Conservative Party in the U.K. held its annual meeting in Manchester over the weekend, an anti-austerity demonstration against the ruling party's economic policies attracted not only tens of thousands of people to march peacefully... but a few police snipers to keep "watch" over those who oppose the government's gutting of the public sector.

Outrage resulted as images surfaced showing how police had dispatched sniper teams to rooftops in the city as an estimated 60,000 people, including families with young children, followed a route through the city center.


In response to the public outcry, a Greater Manchester Police spokesperson told reporters the sniper units were only being used for "observation" purposes. "[The guns]," the official said, "are used for their powerful sight, which is stronger than any pair of binoculars. They are not there to shoot people."


China's yuan jumps to fourth most-used world payment currency

Recently devalued currency overtakes Japan’s yen in terms of world payments, and now only comes behind the US dollar, euro and sterling

The yuan has surpassed seven currencies in the past three years as a payment currency and now only comes after the US dollar, the euro and the sterling.

Overall, global yuan payments increased in value by 9.13% in August, while payments across all currencies decreased by 8.3%, according to Swift.

The yuan reached a record high market share with 2.79% of global payments for the month, compared with 1.39% in January 2014.

More than 100 countries used the yuan for payments in August, but more than 90% of flows were concentrated in 10 countries. Singapore processed 24.4% followed by the UK with 21.6%.

Breast Cancer Patient Arrested for Protesting TPP: "This is Price Gouging at the Cost of Lives"

Obama faces TPP deal balancing act as Congress considers approval

President looks to quell criticism of trade agreement from the likes of Bernie Sanders on the left and Senator Orrin Hatch on the right after international talks

The White House began lobbying Democrats to take a fresh look at a controversial free trade agreement on Monday after concessions aimed at appeasing some critics on the left risked fracturing fragile support among Republicans.

Despite narrowly securing congressional approval to negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement with 11 other countries, Barack Obama still has to persuade a majority of US lawmakers to pass the final deal, which aims to remove thousands of import tariffs. ...

“While the details are still emerging … I am afraid this deal appears to fall woefully short,” said Orrin Hatch, chair of the finance committee, which is responsible for trade, in the Senate. ...

The deal was also slammed by critics on the left, particularly presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who called it “disastrous” despite the minor concessions on tobacco and pharmaceuticals.

“I am disappointed but not surprised by the decision to move forward on the disastrous Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement that will hurt consumers and cost American jobs,” said the Vermont senator in a statement.

“Wall Street and other big corporations have won again. It is time for the rest of us to stop letting multinational corporations rig the system to pad their profits at our expense.” ...

“Its fate in Congress is highly uncertain given the narrow margin by which trade authority passed this summer, the concessions made to get a deal, and growing congressional and public concerns about the TPP’s threats to jobs, wages, safe food and affordable medicines and more,” said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch.

NAFTA on Steroids: Consumer Groups Slam the TPP as 12 Nations Agree to Trade Accord

Rise Up, Precariat! Cheap Labour is Over

Just three weeks before the Canadian federal election comes a report from Morgan Stanley that should remind everyone, especially the parties running for office, that it’s still about the economy. The the message of the paper is as unambiguous as it is surprising: the era of cheap labour is over. It all has to do with demographics, which are changing, and public policy which so far has not.

I have written more than once over the years about the devastating impact of so-called “labour flexibility” policies – devastating to employees, families, productivity, equality, communities, the birth rate (yes, the birth rate) and the economy as a whole. ... For all the talk about what will grow the economy – and leaders’ debate on the topic was worse than useless, it was embarrassing – the key component to future economic growth is rising wages and salaries. ...

The percentage of the global population who were working experienced a huge increase in the last three decades of the twentieth century due to the post-war baby boom in developed countries and the entry of China and Eastern Europe into the capitalist system. That abundance of working age people created the conditions for the cheapening of labour and the reduction of its bargaining power. That, says Charles Goodhart, a former member of the Bank of England’s rate-setting committee, is already ending. “…population growth in the rich world, which was 1% a year in the 1950s, has fallen to 0.5% and should drop to zero by 2040.”

Governments eager to advance the interests of large corporations took advantage of this labour surplus by developing convenient theories to justify a broad assault on wages and salaries – and unions. Things like labour standards, generous Unemployment Insurance and poverty reducing welfare schemes made labour “inflexible” the argument went – by which they meant uppity workers demanding their fair share. ... The twenty-five year pursuit of cheap labour across the developed work has resulted in what has been called the “precariat” – those working in precarious, low-paying jobs with little or no protection from ruthless employers.

The Morgan Stanley paper contains a warning to employers – that if they continue to mistreat and underpay their employees they will pay the price with an increased militancy as labour shortages kick in and workers’ bargaining power increases. Goodhart recommends that employers get out ahead of the curve: “The synergies are stark: if the global economy needs a return to higher-paid work, then attacking precarity is the quickest way of achieving that.” I can’t see that happening any time soon and personally I’d like to see a little militancy for a change.



the horse race


Dissent on Israel Not Permitted at Bernie Sanders Event

This past Saturday, when Bernie Sanders, an increasingly viable contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, held one of his biggest campaign rallies to date, drawing more than 20,000 people to an event at the Boston convention center. Among those visitors were a number of young activists from Boston Students for Justice in Palestine, who were curious about Sanders’ position on the occupied territories. They had a sign with them; in a playful nod to one of Sanders’ campaign slogans, it simply asked, “Will Ya Feel The Bern For Palestine?” The activists say they were well-received by other Sanders supporters in the crowd.

But staffers working for a candidate widely viewed as one of the most progressive members of the Senate were apparently not happy. Security was made aware of a threat: Some students who support Sanders were holding a sign with a question on it. A tactic right out of the Bush campaign “playbook” went into action.

“They told us to either put the sign away or leave,” said Sana Hashmani, one of the student activists. “We asked why, and they said that Bernie’s campaign staff had said the sign had to go.”

There had been no signs of trouble previously. The pro-Palestine group was doing nothing unusual — except, perhaps, for daring to question Sanders about territories occupied by Israel, of which Sanders has been a not-entirely-progressive supporter. “When we got there and entered the overflow space with our sign, people were supporting us and taking pictures, and other people had signs talking about various social issues as well,” Hashmani said.

In a brief cell phone video of the incident, security staff can be seen threatening to arrest the students if they didn’t leave the premises.

Two days after the students were ejected, a day after the group posted about the encounter on Facebook, a Sanders 2016 spokesperson acknowledged a campaign staffer was behind the ejection and that an error had been made. “What happened was a poor decision by a low-level staffer and doesn’t reflect campaign policy,” the spokesperson said.



the evening greens


In the fight to stop climate change, forests are a vital weapon

Forests are undervalued assets in meeting the twin global challenges of our time: achieving prosperity and safeguarding climate stability. It’s time we gave them the attention – and finance – that they deserve. ...

If tropical deforestation were a country, it would rank somewhere between China and the European Union as a source of current annual greenhouse gas emissions. So halting deforestation would be a giant step toward taming climate change. ... If we were to stop tropical deforestation tomorrow, allow damaged forests to grow back, and protect mature forests, the resulting reduction in emissions and removal of carbon from the atmosphere could equal up to one-third of current global emissions from all sources.

The good news is that climate negotiators have already agreed on a way to make this happen. It’s called Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation or REDD+, in which rich countries reward developing countries for reducing deforestation on a pay-for-performance basis. ... The few REDD+ agreements already in place have priced avoided CO2 emissions at only $5 per ton, truly a bargain compared to most other options.

New science suggests that forests support agriculture by regulating weather at continental scales, in addition to the shade, forage, and pollination they provide to adjacent farms. This means that deforestation of the Amazon rainforest threatens to deny rainfall to faraway crops in Brazil’s agricultural heartland. Forested watersheds fill reservoirs behind hydroelectric dams and extend their lives by controlling erosion, ensuring that millions of people have access to modern energy. And all these services are in addition to the harvest of timber and non-timber forest products such as charcoal, which provide, on average, one-fifth of household incomes in communities that live in and around forests. ...

Rich countries should think about paying for forest services as a utility. We are willing to pay electric bills in return for keeping the lights on; we should be willing to pay for tropical forest conservation as one way to ensure climate stability, while also promoting development benefits. But so far, rich countries have only pledged about a billion dollars per year for REDD+. Americans spend 20 times that amount on pet food. We can do better than that. And we should.

Chernobyl Study: 'Amazing Illustration' of How Destructive Human Civilization Has Become

If you think that life for a wild animal would be more horrendous and hazardous inside an "exclusionary zone" in the shadow of a melted-down nuclear plant than living in a world beset with deforestation, hunting and poaching, and the nearly non-stop encroachment of humanity's industrial expansion—a new study may have you thinking twice about such assumptions.

Published in the journal Current Biology on Monday, the new research shows that despite nearly three decades of living within the Belarus sector of the Chernobyl "exclusion" zone, the relative abundances of large mammals—including elk, deer and wild boar—are similar to those in four "uncontaminated" nature reserves in the region. Moreover, the study found, that the population of wolves was more than seven times higher inside the exclusion zone, compared to outside.

As the Guardian's reporting on the study notes, its findings run counter to previous hypothesises—not to mention everyday common sense—regarding how chronic long-term exposure to radiation might influence animal populations. But as Professor Jim Smith, professor of environmental science at the University of Portsmouth and one of the paper's authors, explained to the Guardian, the research findings do not show that living within a nuclear contamination zone is good, but simply highlights the widespread dangers and downward pressures contemporary society is having on the planet's wild mammal populations.

"What we do, our everyday habitation of an area – agriculture, forestry – they’ve damaged wildlife more than the world’s worst nuclear accident," Smith explained. "It doesn’t say that nuclear accidents aren’t bad, of course they are. But it illustrates that the things we do everyday, the human population pressure, damages the environment. It’s kind of obvious but it’s an amazing illustration of it."

'Not Protesters — Protectors': Fracktivists Descend on Colorado Governor's Mansion

Anti-fracking activists in Colorado erected a 20-foot mock oil derrick in front of Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper's mansion in a Denver neighborhood on Monday, demanding an end to drilling in their state.

About 230 people joined the demonstration—which made stops at several "Hall of Shame" locations including Halliburton's Denver office, the state capitol, and the EPA's regional headquarters—calling for a ban on hydraulic fracturing and a shift to cleaner fuels.

They specifically targeted Hickenlooper, whose pro-fracking stance has helped encourage an extraction boom in the state. According to the Denver Post, three activists were ticketed for blocking traffic at the governor's mansion, which was the final stop of the day.

"Under Hickenlooper, Colorado has been reckless in its development of shale gas reserves," the grassroots organizing coalition Flood the System, which supported Monday's action, wrote on its website. "Over 55,000 wells are currently in production and industry's cozy relationship with the governor continues to maintain business as usual."

Will BP's Record Gulf Spill Settlement Amount to a Record Tax Break?

Groups are warning that much of the $20.8 billion in settlement payments could be written off as the 'cost of doing business'

As the U.S. Department of Justice announced on Monday a final settlement with BP over the devastating 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, groups are warning that the oil giant may still nab a substantial tax break under the deal.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the $20.8 billion settlement agreement marks the "the largest settlement with a single entity in American history." The resolution includes $5.5 billion to settle civil claims under the Clean Water Act; $7.1 billion in natural resources damages claims under the Oil Pollution Act, in addition to the $1 billion previously committed for early restoration; and $4.9 billion in economic damages claims to the five Gulf states and up to $1 billion for local governments.

However, reporting by the Times-Picayune highlighted the little-noticed detail that, while the DOJ has explicitly forbidden BP from deducting its Clean Water Act penalties, no restrictions have been placed on the billions labeled natural resource damages payments, restoration, and reimbursement to government, which it can treat as a business expense.

U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) says this amounts to $15.3 billion that can be written off as the "cost of doing business"—$5.35 billion of which can be claimed as a tax windfall.


Also of Interest

Here are some articles of interest, some which defied fair-use abstraction.

Fatal shootings by police around the US are being ruled suicides. Are officers avoiding scrutiny, or just being used as weapons?

Reddit launches aggregated news site Upvoted

US strike on MSF hospital in Kunduz poses tough legal questions

Reflections on ‘Deep Poverty’

The blood of El Salvador’s massacres stains America

Coal Executive Finally Brought Up on Criminal Charges

Free Trade Is Elites Betraying Their Own Populations

Bernanke Tries to Rewrite the Financial Crisis in New Book

In rural America, a startling prospect: Voters Obama lost look to Sanders


A Little Night Music

Sidney Bechet - St.Louis Blues

Sidney Bechet - Si tu vois ma mère

Sidney Bechet - Blue Horizon

Sidney Bechet + Louis Armstrong + Django Reinhardt 1952, La Route Du Bonheur

Sidney Bechet - Muskrat Ramble

Sidney Bechet - I Had It, But It's All Gone Now

Sidney Bechet - Egyptian Fantasy

Sidney Bechet - Tin Roof Blues

Sidney Bechet - Bechet Creole Blues

Sidney Bechet - Dans les rues d'Antibes

Sidney Bechet - Petite Fleur

Sidney Bechet - Blues In Thirds

Sidney Bechet - Saturday Night Blues



Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

link

Just when you thought rent was too damn high, more evidence now shows that childcare costs are too damn higher.

Among families with two children, the price of care exceeds rent in 500 of 618 areas, according to data compiled by the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, a resource group that advocates for workers. Families in Binghamton, New York, are the worst off. There, childcare is almost three times as expensive as checks to landlords...
A booming population of millennials, now entering prime child-bearing years, has added to demand for daycare that's outpacing supply. That's pushing those childcare costs up faster than overall inflation, and has some economists worried that either consumer spending or labor-force participation (already quite low) could suffer as a result.

Nationally, the costs of childcare and nursery school have surged 168 percent since the end of 1990 compared with a 76 percent increase in total consumer prices, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

This could explain in part the falling labor force participation rate.

up
0 users have voted.
MarilynW's picture

I've noticed in major Canadian cities a lot of new immigrants are going into the childcare business, filling in a gap.
Canadians don't seem to like the job. The places for kids are so scarce here, we only got my grandson in a very good
daycare because his mother is a manager in one of them. Home daycare has been proven to be the best situation
for the child. I'm surprised more people don't get into that. The restrictions may be the cause. The layout of the home,
access to the yard all have to fit specifications. Then the person has to have taken Early Childhood Education courses.

Of course it should be subsidized by government because it's a necessary service.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

NCTim's picture

She could have become a childcare worker and her compensation would have paid the cost of college over about 200 years. She went back for her MSW and worked in the schools reducing the payback period to about 50 years.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

NCTim's picture

We were both career professionals. I have two ex-children. The last year they were both in daycare, 1995, we spent $11K for childcare.

Minimum wage, no taxes of other expenses, full time 20 hours a week, no time off = 2080 * $7.25 = $15,080

Those people have the audacity to buy things like refrigerators and air conditioning. /

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

mimi's picture

at the ecole maternelle in Berlin (school of the French Allied Forces in Berlin in Germany at that time) nothing at all. It was quality care.
For baby's daycare (under age of 2 1/2 years old) I spent in a German "KITA" fulltime something like 45 DM (Deutsche Mark, about 20 dollars). The care was not to my liking because I didn't like to let babies in the care of others for more than four to five hours a day. I was poor at that time and had a monthly income of around 700 DM/month as a teaching assistant at the university. At that time women were not much respected if they didn't take care of their small children in the first two years.

When I came to the US in 1982, I was in for a huge "culture" financial/economic shock.

So, basically, don't ask me what I think of your country, ok? Because it would be insulting to your ears. I also had a shock, because all people I met in the first six to 12 months in 1982 only wanted to know from me "what I was doing". If I had answered, which I didn't, I take care of my child and home and husband, they would have lost their small talk capabilities with me. How uninteresting and weird not to work (those dudes had no clue how difficult they make it to work in the US on a VISA that has restrictions of the weirdest kind).

OK, that's history. My son can barely survive on the salary he has as a single person and only, if they don't cut his hours. He certainly couldn't take care of a child and a woman. This is not the way to build families and communities, it's a desaster in the making. The darn thing is, woman still get babies, but couples/partners don't build families and if they do, they break up for the darnest reasons and then fight each other over money for the children they apparently never intended to take care of in the first place.

Houston America, you have a problem.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

Sweetie and I get. It's like a woman in a wheelchair, who can not speak, should not be allowed out in public.

We stopped at a local brew pub and as Sweetie motored to our table, some schmuck stood in the aisle talking and blocking her way. Another guy got out of his seat and pushed their table over to allow her to pass. Thank goodness, I was close to going to the schmuck and saying, "What's your problem?". I had settled on "What's your problem?", after considering "Get the fuck out of the way!".

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

mimi's picture

when it comes to staring; someone told me once the Germans stare a lot, but it's that stare without really looking, so as if you are not aware that you stare at a person and your eyes actually look somewhere into the nowhere. I realized that I did that myself. Nowadays I pay more attention to not stare at something unconsciously, while being somewhere with my thoughts.

I guess I had difficulties too to settle down on "What's your problem" in that situation. Sigh.
So, I need to think about something happy now.

up
0 users have voted.
MarilynW's picture

very impolite to stare at people. Then I moved out West and almost everyone stares. I still find it unnerving. When I am on the bus or train
I find it more interesting to look out the window. You don't need to be extraordinary to attract staring here.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

joe shikspack's picture

i would imagine that whatever you might say about the us as related to raising children here would probably be no surprise to anyone who has raised a child here. the us is not a child friendly country, particularly if the child has "chosen" to be born to people of modest means.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

means, that's how much it detests the parents with privilege and how they use it.

You are right, the whole thing is just a surprise to foreigners from Western Europe. They have no clue about the hardships and "means" (or lack of means) most Americans have. Unfortunately. May be they don't want to see it.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

particularly if the child has "chosen" to be born to people of modest means.

Is brown, sick, does not speak English, has two moms, is not Christian, is left handed, displays recessive biological traits, is transgender, is gay, is not attractive, ...

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

mimi's picture

and always make you happy.

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

child care system, IMO.

For instance, Base/Military Installation Education Offices oversaw what is (or was) one of the most excellent child care/educational systems in the US. It provided military, and, on some installations, civilian employees with heavily subsidized child day care/schooling. At some Bases, the service fee was structured somewhat like [many] Community Health Centers--on a sliding scale. But, of course, the services one's child received were the same/equal.

As we speak, our bipartisan neoliberal lawmakers are negotiating "tax reform" which will continue to redistribute wealth upward. Allowing them to implement a new (neoliberal) federal system is simply another opportunity for the PtB to fleece everyone--everyone but the wealthy, that is.

I say, "no thanks." Make the employer responsible for financing this service. If they are not going to raise wages (to speak of), they should at least be forced to provide some basic and/or essential services to their employees.

IOW, mandate this service as an employer function for both large and small businesses, with perhaps a federal subsidy to assist small business owners, as needed. (The same for contract workers, and the self-employed.)

The subsidy funding could come out of General Revenue--no need for a newfangled funding source. A dedicated funding stream would probably be best. (Personally, I wouldn't even consider agreeing to another neoliberal program on the plane of the ACA.)

Heck, we are already holding our breath--waiting to see what our premium increase will be for 2016. Increases are expected to be very sizable, in many regions. And, of course, they extend to all insurance premiums/plans, not just the individual insurance market.

Experts see big price hikes for Obamacare
Premiums could rise more sharply in 2016.

BTW, the only reason that a surtax was implemented on higher income folks was because the PtB intended to continue slashing the marginal tax rates for both corporations and the wealthiest Americans.

Therefore, you can bet your "Sweet Bippy" that, when lawmakers produce the new "tax reform" package, the small surtax that has been levied will be more than offset by the tax cuts for this cohort.

Also, Long-Term Care and "senior day care" should be made a part of a robust Expanded Medicare-For-All insurance program.

Mollie


"The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt with the heart."--Helen Keller

"Integrity and courage are powerful weapons. We have to learn how to use them. We have to stand up for what we believe in. And we have to accept the risks and even the ridicule that comes with this stance. We will not prevail any other way."

Chris Hedges, Journalist/Author/Activist, Truthdig, 9/20/2015

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

gulfgal98's picture

If we were to go to an employer financed child care system, aren't we doing exactly the same thing we did with health insurance? In other words, we are leaving child care to the market place which means unequal outcomes. For example, a lot of large corporations like WalMart and fast food companies keep their employee hours below thirty hours a week so that they do not have to pay benefits. So we are becoming a low wage part time economy for many of the lower wage workers who have no assurance of health insurance, sick leave or vacation days. This is all due to the market place extracting the most profit at the lowest costs. And the additional costs are being borne by the workers, one way or another. I could see the same thing happening with child care if we force the businesses to provide it.

IMO, raising taxes on corporations to fund public childcare is a far better route. I believe small businesses should not be burdened with additional costs as they already have a hard time competing with the mega corporations. We have public schools for grades one through twelve, why not public childcare for pre-school children? Am I missing something here?

Maybe I have misinterpreted your comment and if so, I apologize in advance.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

mimi's picture

there is no equal quality standard for childcare centers provided by the employer's "good will". Who guarantees they don't end up making a profit with those centers. Small employers could not afford to provide those centers.

Public day-care centers like public schools for babies to toddlers to five years. Full-time. Quality standards must be guaranteed by law. Every child has a right to be accepted in those centers. Prices must be adjusted to income levels. Poor people should pay according to their limited resources. Student parents and disabled parents should be paying according what they can afford. Rich folks can pay for their private cadillac day care centers, if they wanted to, otherwise they pay also according to their income levels.

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

except it "ain't gonna happen," I'm afraid. At least, not while we have corporatist Dems in control of the Government, and, I assume, the same would hold true for corporatist Repubs.

From The Financial Times, here's what PBO had to say in the Spring of 2013:

According to participants in closed-door meetings last week between Mr Obama and congressional Republicans, the president said he was committed to a revamp of US corporate taxes that would lower the top rate from its current level of 35 per cent, which is among the highest in the developed world.

Crucially, Mr Obama reassured Republicans that he was looking to make the effort “revenue neutral” – meaning it would be fully paid for by curbing or scrapping tax breaks, but it would not seek to hit corporations with additional revenues for deficit reduction, which the liberal wing of the Democratic party would like to see.

This is also what the Administration's Budget reflects--year after year.

I'm going to crosspost this blurb at your OT for today, just so folks don't miss it. I think I've referred to this FT piece in the past.

(I'll link to this article after I've had a chance to 'Tweet' it, so that I'm not left with a possible dead link--and therefore, no reference.)

As for the 'current' Dem Party proposal for Pre-K, I can't support it, unless, or until, they propose another funding stream. (I'll explain when I address this topic during the Debates.)

Right now, I'm swamped with new duties related to our Family firm, and my blogging time is somewhat [temporarily] limited.

Don't usually drag my personal or family matters into policy discussion for obvious reasons, but, our family business (a financial services firm) provides child care to all employees, and has been doing so for more than a decade. I'll elaborate on this when I have a bit more time to explain it--but, I assure you, the employees love it!

Pleasantry

Anyhoo, this is an excellent issue to explore, and I hope that we can pick back up on this topic after the first Dem Party Debate (assuming that this issue is addressed).

Again, I'm not against establishing a system for Pre-K, etc., but "the devil is in the details" (as they say). And the neoliberal models that I've seen thus far, normally pass along the costs to the masses--either marginalizing, or entirely eliminating, the responsibility of corporations, or the One Percent--or wealthiest Americans. One example of this is the federal portion of the 'CHIP' Program.

The same goes for a single-payer system. I'm not in favor of any of the current single-payer proposals which have been introduced, because they would actually eliminate our Title XVIII health care program--Medicare.

I am in favor of an expansion of our current (1960's model) Medicare program--there is a huge difference.

I hope that the Democratic Party candidates will discuss some of their domestic policy proposals during the upcoming October 13th Debate. IMO, it's time to move on to policy discussions--as opposed to the Horse Race.

Mollie


"The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt with the heart."--Helen Keller

"Integrity and courage are powerful weapons. We have to learn how to use them. We have to stand up for what we believe in. And we have to accept the risks and even the ridicule that comes with this stance. We will not prevail any other way."

Chris Hedges, Journalist/Author/Activist, Truthdig, 9/20/2015

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

link

Most utilities that are able to switch to cleaner burning and cheaper natural gas have already done so, resulting in coal losing 10 percent, or 80 million tons, of demand, BB&T Capital Markets said in a report Tuesday.

President Barack Obama’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, which were implemented this year, spurred a rash of coal-fired power plant closures. Meanwhile, natural gas prices that have dropped 37 percent in the past year made that fuel more attractive than coal for electricity generation. In July, gas eclipsed coal as the primary fuel for power for the second time in U.S. records.

“The good news is that we can’t even fathom a fall in coal demand in 2016 that resembles anything like what happened in 2015,” wrote Mark Levin, an analyst at BB&T in Richmond, Virginia. “In order for that to happen, we think the U.S. would have to be in a full-out disastrous recession.”

Some blowback from the fracking boom.

up
0 users have voted.

simply lost too much money

Bain Capital is liquidating its Absolute Return Capital hedge fund after more than three years of losses, citing a “challenging” environment for macro trading.

The fund, run by Jonathan Goodman and Jeff Woolbert, had about $2.2 billion in assets as of Aug. 1, including $552 million of internal money, according to an investor presentation dated August 2015. The fund was down 13 percent this year through July, which would be its worst year since inception in 2004.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

well, at least the employees know when to pack it in due to a downbound market.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

Bain didn't lose anything and the principles walked off with other people's money. It's how hedge funds operate. Do you think the fund managers gave back their compensation?

In fact it is how the rich roll.

Family Outraged After Carly Fiorina Stole $30,000 In Pay From Campaign Worker Who Died On Job

'In Financial Circles, It's Pretty Well Known That Trump Is a Deadbeat'

Tax Deadbeat Romney Calls Working People Leeches

Here's How Mitt Romney Stole $10 Billion

By the way, our tax dollars are being used to bailout the pension funds bankrupted by Bain leveraged buyouts. Do you want to talk about free stuff?

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

MarilynW's picture

We don't know what to do about it especially when they are smiling at us.
Oct2015-079.jpg

Don't go recommending Roundup, you know that's bad stuff.

I missed our newspapers this morning. I got to the café late and they had already been stolen. No problem because Joe has
the best lineup of news that there is. Yesterday I heard a summary of neoliberalism or Corporate Government. It explains a lot
and I guess we should not be surprised at its full blossoming during our times. Example: Our Internal Revenue Department called
CRA, Canada Revenue Agency was investigating a crooked company while at the same time our PM Stephen Harper invited the
CEO of the crooked company to Ottawa for a hug fest and feasting. It's sickening but that's what Corporate Governments do.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

joe shikspack's picture

that's a pleasant looking imp you've captured there in a lovely old tree.

neoliberalism and elite corruption seem to complement each other well and avoid the problems of too much democracy. i guess it's a no-brainer that neoliberalism caught on with the elites.

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

problem gets compounded by that much. Super cute pic and lovely description . Grand kid?

up
0 users have voted.
MarilynW's picture

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

hecate's picture

really nauseating to read these consistent critics of the US' application of state violence, today giddily, gleefully, getting the blood-lust on, now that it is Russia applying state violence.

Pepe Escobar informs us that "I love the sound of a Su-24 bombing 'Caliphate' goons in the morning," marveling that there are "so many wonders you can operate with a couple of Su-24s, decent sat intel, decent ground intel, and political will."

And the Counterpunch writer you link above happily ejaculates that "Putin is going to cut through these guys like crap through a goose"; "the Russian airforce will also make every effort to cut off supply lines and escape routes so that as many jihadis as possible are liquidated within Syria’s borders"; "the jihadi thugs will be given every chance to die in battle as they wish, but getting out alive is not going to be so easy"; "[the Russians have] been kicking ass and taking names since Day 1"; "Putin is not going to stop for anything or anyone. He’s going to nail these guys while he has them in his gun-sights, then he’s going to wrap it up and go home . . . Putin’s going to be blowing kisses from atop a float ambling through Red Square in Moscow’s first tickertape parade since the end of WW2."

Such people were never against state violence. They only pretended to be. In truth, they are only against US (and allies) state violence.

We have of course been here before. And will be again.

We are all drowning in filth. When I talk to anyone or read the writings of anyone who has any axe to grind, I feel that intellectual honesty and balanced judgement have simply disappeared from the face of the earth. Everyone's thought is forensic, everyone is simply putting a "case" with deliberate suppression of his opponent's point of view, and, what is more, with complete insensitiveness to any sufferings except those of himself and his friends. The Indian nationalist is sunken in self pity and hatred of Britain and utterly indifferent to the miseries of China, the English pacifist works himself up into frenzies about concentration camps in the Isle of Man and forgets about those in Germany etc. etc. One notices this in the case of people one disagrees with, such as Fascists or pacifists, but in fact everyone is the same, at least everyone who has definite opinions. Everyone is dishonest, and everyone is utterly heartless towards people who are outside the immediate range of his own interests and sympathies. What is most striking of all is the way sympathy can be turned on or off like a tap according to political expediency. All the pinks, or most of them, who flung themselves to and fro in their rage against Nazi atrocities before the war, forgot all about these atrocities and obviously lost their sympathy with the Jews etc as soon as the war began to bore them. Ditto with people who hated Russia like poison up to 22 June 1941 and then suddenly forgot about the purges, the GPU etc the moment Russia came into the war. I am not thinking of lying for political ends, but of actual changes in subjective feeling. But is there no one who has both firm opinions and a balanced outlook? Actually there are plenty, but they are powerless. All power is in the hands of paranoiacs.

—George Orwell, April 1942
up
0 users have voted.

it comes to Putin, I think he puts up a DroolFest, time & again.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

fold. i would guess that the assumption is that the empire will not go quietly and that there is genuine hostility towards it amongst those who so gleefully chronicle the violent confrontations. i can't blame them for their hostility, but obviously, i don't share their glee.

i'm sure that it is wishful thinking that the putin government is any better than the us government, or, if endowed with power in the wake of the us empire's demise would use it more charitably and wisely. it's just another set of competing business interests comporting as a nation, after all.

that said, the embrace of a particular viewpoint and approval of state violence is no more than a mirror image of much of the american "news coverage" which dismisses "collateral damage" and never questions whether the empire has a divine right to bomb anybody it pleases, anywhere it pleases or depose (with extreme prejudice) any elected or unelected government or leader in another sovereign nation.

with that out of the way, i generally just look for the information and analysis of events and note the differences between the propaganda of one side versus the other.

up
0 users have voted.
hecate's picture

slagging you for including the counterpunch piece. ; )

As the Swanson story lotlizard elsewhere links eloquently intimates, it's tough to find stuff in the "alt" media that is not orgasmically letting slip the dogs of war. Now that it is the Russians, rather than the US, unleashing the hounds.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

that can only be achieved by force at this point. i wonder if there is any way to get to peace without significant violence (likely a genocide), even assuming that we could get all of the foreign governments to stop bombing, withdraw all of the foreign fighters and stop arming the local contesting forces.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

in the 1950 - late 1960 ies. Apparently our Uber-genocide was responsible for that, as all the foreign governments increased all their bombing the hell out of Germany and increased all their troop levels involved to stop Germany from genocide and bombing them. So, I guess the logic is, kill everyone you happen to not like, envy or fear, then provoke the world to kill and bomb the hell out of those who started the genocide and after everyone is as good as dead, you can enjoy the peace (from the graveyards). Ok. just my usual silliness. /s

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

to many of you. It's my kind of bitter, dark humor/sarcasm, I guess. It's just that I often try to think about how fundamental change against any oppression can be achieved without a violent fight and simply can't find the answer. That makes me cranky.

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

I don't think it's possible.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

thanks for posting the link.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Over at the GOS, people were dancing in the aisles after Obama announced the discovery and killing of Osama Bin Laden.

When David Swanson posted a diary suggesting that all the bloodlust and self-congratulation was unseemly, the tip jar got over 125 HRs.

This was one of those things people need to know about us Americans. When we feel in the mood to celebrate our triumphant warriors, reason and compassion have no place, only instinct and thirst for revenge. To fail to desecrate corpses with sufficient ingenuity and vigor is to risk severe punishment.

Perhaps we all need to put this sticker in our bathrooms somewhere.

WARNING: PERSONS IN THE MIRROR MAY BE BLOODTHIRSTIER THAN THEY APPEAR
up
0 users have voted.
MarilynW's picture

state sanctioned violence and domestic violence like the mass shootings?

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

joe shikspack's picture

and the slow but steady rise of authoritarianism which will culminate in full-blown fascism after a little more time.

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

We as a society have been so steeped in violence and fear, here and globally since 9/11 that it amazes me that no one in the media or our leaders speak to the underlying concept of might makes right that fuels all this killing and violence. The correlation would require people to stop thinking the way we have been carefully programmed or softened to the killing grounds we are living though, both here and across the world. Cheney's turn to the Dark Side seems to have found fertile ground in the American psyche. Everywhere actually as history seems rife with humans willing to kill, destroy and generally reek havoc on humanity and then planet for no damn good reason.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

up
0 users have voted.

armrebel.jpg

up
0 users have voted.

that the Russian embassy (or whatever in UK) was mocking US/West on Twitter using this.

up
0 users have voted.

police murders are suicides.... Today in Amureekan NewSpeak. Warlords or not, I doubt if the results would have been any different - US army operations are notorious for fucking up.

Good one on the Syrian "human rights" group.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

the propaganda is getting pretty thick these days, isn't it?

i wonder if the government is going to build a euphemism factory to churn out new terminologies as the old ones become worn and threadbare from overuse.

up
0 users have voted.

very revealing :

www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-hillary-clinton-emails-20150930-st...

An email involving passport applications was notable for the raw nerve the issue of gay rights seemed to touch. Clinton expressed anger that the application form had been changed from its reference to traditional parents, and she demanded to know who was behind it.

"Who made the decision that State will not use the terms 'mother and father' and instead substitute 'parent one and two'?" she wrote.

"I am not defending that decision which I disagree w and knew nothing about in front of this Congress. … We need to address this today or we will be facing a huge Fox generated media storm led by Palin et al."

up
0 users have voted.

"obliterate Iran". But don't have the guts to face down Fox Spews and Pitbull with Lipstick.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

to be able to reach out and hurt her. the great media wurlitzer, on the other hand, could make a mess of hillary's chances to be president one day.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

Every time the snowbilly grifter opens her booze hole she removes all doubt.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

NCTim's picture

Another NOLA feature artist!

Outrage Stirred as Police Deploy Snipers to 'Observe' Anti-Austerity March in UK

During the last HKONJ that I attended had roof top observers in SWAT gear. I didn't see any rifles, but feel sure they were there. The crowd was full of violent radicals like Reverend Barber and Mark Thompson.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

joe shikspack's picture

i feature a lot of nola artists because there are so many incredible artists that came from nola. it is surely one of the great wellsprings of musical ferment and culture.

i'm sure that the rifles were near to hand. because terrorism.

i've been to tons of demos in dc over the years many of them near the white house where you can watch the snipers watching you from the roof. it's pretty spooky.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

joe shikspack's picture

it's good for the soul.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

Ivan Neville -> Art's son.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

NCTim's picture

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

joe shikspack's picture

to hold close. i'm so glad that you were able to get to jazzfest together and have a great time.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

I missed Stevie Wonder. Sad

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

joe shikspack's picture

as little stevie wonder this time, i really like his early harmonica playing which is very obviously informed by the blues.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

joe shikspack's picture

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

for playing Sidney Bechet.I discovered him thanks to the EB and just can't get enough of his New Orleans jazz. Almost counteracts the depressing daily news stories. Thanks for the news also even though it's hard to take. About the end of the world tomorrow, It seems God didn't hit the predicted deadline on in May 2011 later revised to September 17 this year.

The eBible Fellowship, an online affiliation headquartered near Philadelphia, has based its prediction of an October obliteration on a previous claim that the world would end on 21 May 2011. While that claim proved to be false, the organization is confident it has the correct date this time.

The expectation of the world ending this fall stems from an earlier prediction by Harold Camping, a Christian radio host who was based in California. In 2011 Camping used his radio station, Family Radio, to notify people that the world would end on 21 May of that year. When that turned out to be incorrect, Camping revised his prediction to October 2011. That also turned out to be incorrect, and Camping retired from public life soon after. He died in 2013, at age 93.

McCann believes that Camping’s 21 May 2011 prediction did have some truth, however. That day was declared to be “judgment day” because it was actually the day God stopped the process of selecting which churchgoers will survive Wednesday’s massacre, McCann said.

Following 21 May 2011, God turned his attention to deciding which non-churchgoers to save, according to McCann. The eBible Fellowship believes that God said he would devote 1,600 days to this task – bringing us to 7 October 2015.

Last night I dreamed of the predicted great earthquake here in OR. that has everyone freaking out. I tossed and turned as the Teutonic plates shifted and could not figure out which room including the basement was the best place to run to. I couldn't figure out how to get the supplies like bottled water to the room I needed to run to. Outside I finally thought, screw the bottled water and duct tape just go out and stand where nothing will crush you. Perhaps this was because I lived in SF during the 89 SF earthquake or perhaps it was due to daily infusions of apocalypse now in every varying forms we read about daily.

The end of the world as we know it happens daily and I for one do not want worry about the varying risks of my house crushing me. All the more reason to rip up the street I live on and plant veggie gardens where the dirt will roll but not bury you. I was watering my backyard garden in SF when the big one hit and me and the cat got in the middle of the yard and rode it out. Bricks are the main thing to avoid as they fly right off. So paranoia runs deep into your life it will creep. Even still this is absurd.

up
0 users have voted.
NCTim's picture

Best place is outside, not in a structure. In a structure, stand in a doorway.

The basement is tornadoes. An earthquake will bury you under rubble.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

mimi's picture

actually pretty much hate them and never look at them for more than three minutes.

I heard that that is not normal. Most people love those.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

i think that i'm just gonna predict the end of the world on every calendar date from now to infinity. sooner or later my prophecy is bound to come true thanks to the likelihood of a supernova eventually. B)

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

[video:https://youtu.be/eepfRldptT8 width:560 height:315]
[Dog Train Fort Worth, Texas Famous, YouTube]

Man Builds 'Dog Train' To Take Rescued Pups Out On Little Adventures

By Stephen Messenger, 22 September 2015

. . . The lively 80-year-old Fort Worth, Texas, native says he never planned on dedicating his golden years to helping needy pets. Instead, it was a duty thrust upon him by the heartlessness of others. "We live down on a dead-end street, where me and my brother have a horse barn," Bostick told The Dodo. "People sometimes come by and dump dogs out here, leaving them to starve. So, we started feeding them, letting them in, taking them to the vet to get them spayed and neutered. We made a place for them to live."

Over the years, Bostick has taken in countless abandoned dogs. But more than just keeping them safe, he's found an adorable way to keep them happy, too. . . .

Once or twice a week now, Bostick and the nine dogs currently under his care can be seen puttering down quiet streets around town or through the forest near their home, or stopping by a local creek for some fresh air in the custom dog train. It's something the formerly unloved dogs have come to relish in their happy new lives.

"Whenever they hear me hooking the tractor up to it, man, they get so excited," said Bostick. "They all come running and jump in on their own. They're ready to go."

This story definitely made me smile--hope it brightens up your evening!

Biggrin

Now, for the "Bad News." Just kidding. Actually, I don't have any "Bad News" this evening, but I'll probably have a comment or two regarding a couple of EB topics.

Thanks for the excellent roundup, Joe!

Mollie


"Integrity and courage are powerful weapons. We have to learn how to use them. We have to stand up for what we believe in. And we have to accept the risks and even the ridicule that comes with this stance. We will not prevail any other way."

Chris Hedges, Journalist/Author/Activist, Truthdig, 9/20/2015

"The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt with the heart."--Helen Keller

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

joe shikspack's picture

thanks for the good news in a dog-eat-dog world. B)

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

NCTim's picture

She wanted to get on the computer to check some medical stuff and I left this running.

She sat and watched puppy videos for about a half hour and was feeling much better.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

Unabashed Liberal's picture

About the only thing cuter than a dog, is a little dog, or puppy!

Pleasantry

Mollie


"The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen or even touched. They must be felt with the heart."--Helen Keller
up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

link

The 500 largest American companies hold more than $2.1 trillion in accumulated profits offshore to avoid U.S. taxes and would collectively owe an estimated $620 billion in U.S. taxes if they repatriated the funds, according to a study released on Tuesday.

The study, by two left-leaning non-profit groups, found that nearly three-quarters of the firms on the Fortune 500 list of biggest American companies by gross revenue operate tax haven subsidiaries in countries like Bermuda, Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

Thanks for providing the links to a lot of news I may have missed.

The war crimes that the U.S. has gotten away with is disturbing. No one was held accountable for the massacre of the family back in 09, and there's been plenty of other articles about troops doing these things during both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. And no one will held accountable for the collateral murder video that Manning showed the world.

I'm happy to see Putin destroying ISIS's supply lines. I've seen photos of large convoys coming out of Turkey, yet for some reason, the U.S. couldn't or wouldn't blow them up? It seems like they want ISIS do get those supplies. If we blew them up, then we'd have to spend more money supplying them.
Isis is funded by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel, the UK and the U.S.
I've seen both photos and articles about the UK dropping supplies for them from planes.
And as it's been noted before, we are working with Al Quada to help us overthrow Assad.
The whole bogus war on terror/terrorists is bullshit.
Remember when we went into Afghanistan to fight Al Quada? When did it turn to fighting the Taliban?
Some one needs to create a score card so I can keep up with who the real enemy is.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.