@randtntx

Here’s an interesting article from Alex Berneson.

If you are a vaccine company executive, it's time to slam the brakes

Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla sees the dangers ahead, as his very carefully worded interview (worthy of close review) with CNBC yesterday shows.

Here’s what Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s chief executive officer, said on Monday in an interview on CNBC:

The hope is that we will achieve something that will have way, way better protection, particularly against infections because the protection against the hospitalizations and the severe disease, it is, it is reasonable right now, with the current vaccines as long as you are having let’s say the third dose.

Read those words very carefully.

Protection against “severe disease” is “reasonable right now” for people who have taken a “third dose” of Pfizer’s vaccine.

Put aside the fact that even those words are at best an optimistic interpretation of current data.

Put aside the fact that Pfizer has NEVER compared a three-dose vaccine regimen to a placebo in a clinical trial.

Put aside the fact that “reasonable right now” suggests that any effect of a third dose will not last.

What the chief executive of Pfizer is telling you is THAT IF YOU RECEIVED TWO DOSES OF HIS COMPANY’S VACCINE LAST YEAR, YOUR PROTECTION IS GONE.

Even against “the hospitalizations and the severe disease.”

You need to be “having let’s say the third dose” for protection against those.

Most people don’t understand yet how badly they were conned.

But they will.

The raw numbers are stark - in Ontario, for example, 76 percent of hospitalized people and 56 percent of those in intensive care are now vaccinated. Both the raw numbers and the percentages have soared in the last two weeks.

The flip side is adverse events. We don’t know how bad those are after a third dose, much less a fourth or fifth or more. (How can we? Remember, the companies didn’t test three doses against placebo.)

What? In the same interview where Pfizer’s CEO warned people not to expect long-lasting protection from a third shot - “reasonable right now” - he also pivoted away from more boosters?

Instead Bourla talked up Paxlovid, his company’s new $530 per treatment antiviral. “This is where most of the effort of most of the governments is moving.”

Actually Paxlovid is basically unavailable right now; Pfizer has promised 120 million doses worldwide in 2022, but as of 10 days ago, only 180,000 were available.

So what’s Bourla’s game? Doesn’t he want to sell as many vaccines as he can?

Maybe not. Especially not with a drug that potentially can be huge ($530 x 120 million = $62 billion, give or take, and Pfizer won’t have to share it with BioNTech).

More important for Bourla, the real risk to Pfizer - and to him - comes from side effects. People will be angry when they figure out that they’ve been conned into taking vaccines that didn’t work. But most of them won’t be furious, especially since Omicron appears much milder than earlier variants. Zero efficacy probably won’t destroy Pfizer or get anyone indicted.

But side effects might. People will be FURIOUS if they think they been conned into taking vaccines that didn’t work and potentially hurt them, or their parents, or their kids.

Well I’ll be damned. Is this why Fauci and Walensky and others are now flipping the script and admitting a lot of truths that we have been documenting here since this started? Admitting that lots of people are in hospital with Covid and not from it? That people who are infected can still go to work or just quarantine for only 5 days and not have to test negative anymore? Can unjabbed nurses now work without getting jabbed because people won’t have a choice not to have an infected nurse working on them?

BTW Pfizer’s drug shouldn’t be used if people are on too many drugs and Merck’s drug causes cancer and birth effects which was why it wasn’t used for another disease. Will the CDC, Fauci and Walensky ignore the adverse effects people get by taking them like they have for the ‘vaccines'?

I do question the numbers from Ontario. How many people are there for other issues, but tested positive because they were tested? I think that’s a fair question.

We have seen a continual readjustment of original pronouncements of the CDC. So much so that the twitterverse is full of mockery towards our public health institution. Yesterday Director Rochelle Walensky said that Covid-19 vaccines are no longer effective at preventing transmission of the virus.
As we all know, that was not the original advertisement for the vax. It was lauded as preventing transmittion and infection.

So here we are, with an ineffective vax. Next up, when will they admit to the fact that the vax is unsafe?

Thanks ggersh for the dose.

@randtntx
in those that have recovered from the virus. Keep in mind that the primary vaccines in China are of the killed virus types. It would be efficacious to compare data.

Wuhan long Covid study gives rare insight into pandemic’s lingering effects in China
25 Nov, 2021

Nearly one-third of patients who suffered only mild Covid-19 still had symptoms like shortness of breath, fatigue and joint pain a year after infection, a study in Wuhan has found.

Although the study was small, involving just 120 patients, it offers a rare glimpse into the long-term health of survivors of Covid-19 in China, especially those who were not severely ill.
...
More than 56 per cent of the patients who originally had symptoms that were not severe still showed abnormal findings in their CT scan nearly one year after infection, including ground-glass opacities, bronchiectasis, nodules and fibrosis.

But compared to the residual lung lesion volume in a previous study six months after the onset of the symptoms, it showed significantly less volume of bilateral pulmonary lesions. It suggested that, although some patients showed abnormalities in the radiographic images, the intensity of damage was small and the lesions were still healing.
...
In May, China published a guideline on rehabilitation to help heal patients who are free of the virus but still suffer lingering symptoms in their heart and lungs, body movement and mental health.

The problem may lie in the spike protein being pathogenic in itself, whether it comes from the disease or from the mRNA therapy as Dr Malone has long asserted.

Be aware of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: There is more than meets the eye

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid production of vaccines aimed at the production of neutralizing antibodies against the COVID-19 spike protein required for the corona virus binding to target cells. The best well-known vaccines have utilized either mRNA or an adenovirus vector to direct human cells to produce the spike protein against which the body produces mostly neutralizing antibodies. However, recent reports have raised some skepticism as to the biologic actions of the spike protein and the types of antibodies produced. One paper reported that certain antibodies in the blood of infected patients appear to change the shape of the spike protein so as to make it more likely to bind to cells, while other papers showed that the spike protein by itself (without being part of the corona virus) can damage endothelial cells and disrupt the blood-brain barrier. These findings may be even more relevant to the pathogenesis of long-COVID syndrome that may affect as many as 50% of those infected with SARS-CoV-2. In COVID-19, a response to oxidative stress is required by increasing anti-oxidant enzymes. In this regard, it is known that polyphenols are natural anti-oxidants with multiple health effects. Hence, there are even more reasons to intervene with the use of anti-oxidant compounds, such as luteolin, in addition to available vaccines and anti-inflammatory drugs to prevent the harmful actions of the spike protein.

is discussed by Ian Welch. Our "let-it-rip" policy could be very bad news.
https://www.ianwelsh.net

The figures I have seen for Long Covid start at about 10%. You can have Long Covid without knowing it: there can be organ damage, including brain damage, without it having symptoms, but that damage will affect your future health and lifespan. Ironically, it may create a co-morbidity if you get Covid again and it will be considered you were part of a vulnerable population.

A few societies chose to try and limit the spread of covid and they appear to have a better outcome.

Letting Covid run wild through the world was a choice. We made it. A few societies didn’t.

Ironically (or not?) the Chinese Communist Party decided to not let their population die in droves and get long term health problems (the number for China would be 112 million at the conservative end.) Most western “democracies” chose to have mass deaths and long Covid.

@CB

The problem isn't at all that "we" were "duped" or "hoped for" something we didn't get.

"We" were FORCED, bullied, coerced, threatened, imprisoned, fired. I promise you 90% or more of the people shot up with this shit aren't mentally ill internet fanatics- they just had their jobs, kids, and freedom threatened. (We can argue about whether their capitulation makes them weak).

They weren't excited about "safe and effective." They were forced.

All of this is about the fact that allegedly free nations became fascist states overnight and forced an innocent, 99% safe populace to take a drug at legal gunpoint.

I could give a shit about someone who seeks out and buys heroin and sticks it in our arm.

We had drug dealers come to our house and tell us they'd take the house and our children and lock us in the backs of their cars if we didn't stick it in our arm.

THE VAXX IS A STATE-SPONSORED RELIGION
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXsxvdF481I]
Covid has become a religion. Vaxxers are its main sect. Vaxxers, more accurately labeled “injectors,” believe in something they don’t understand. Injectors don’t understand that the injections don’t resemble conventional, prior vaxxes. They can’t explain the mRNA mechanism by which the injections are said to work. They’re also unaware that the number of near-term post-injection deaths after 9 months of Covid injections exceeds the death tolls from all vaccinations combined over the past 30 years. They know nothing about the long term safety of the injections, nor of data revealing breakthrough deaths in the US and abroad. Nor do they know, after 19 months of media fearmongering, that the vast majority of people are at functionally zero risk from Covid. They watch too much TV.

Nonetheless, most Americans believe in the injections because the injections have been marketed with the halo-effected label, “vaccines.” Many Americans see the injection as a modern, magical talisman, a technological sacrament that enables them to walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. Never mind that they would have been fine without the ritualistic injections.
...
Injectors haven’t reviewed, and would not understand, the injections’ clinical trial data. They recite, like a creed, that the injections are 95% effective, though they can’t explain what that means. The Injection Taliban supports mandatory injections because some nominal doctors on TV ads and interviews assert that the injections are “safe and effective.” They’re unaware that many other doctors, whom the media suppresses, instead explain on the Internet, backed by data and logic, why the injections are unsafe and unhelpful. This latter group of physicians resemble latter day Martin Luthers, who are not invited by corporate TV stations to post their Theses. And when these injection blasphemers post on the Net, the latter day Vatican, i.e., Big Tech, censors them.

The core, suppressed truth of the past 19 months is this: even without treatment, over 99.98% of uninjected, normal weight people under 70 survive Coronavirus infections; with basic, inexpensive outpatient treatment, even more do.
...
The injection end game is this: if everyone injects, there will be no control group, and Biden and Fauci will claim that the injections saved humanity. Thus, the shots are a deceitful backdoor effort to falsely justify the purported—but utterly failed— Covid Commandments: lockdowns, arbitrary social distancing, mass testing, contact tracing and mask mandates, and to obscure the inexorable protection bestowed by natural herd immunity.
...
But America doesn’t—or at least didn’t use to—take away people’s basic civil rights and livelihoods because they don’t share the beliefs of an official state religion. Rather, Americans recoil at the notion of theocracy; it’s fundamentally anathema, characteristic of Iran or Saudi Arabia. The Orthodox injection crusaders must not be allowed to foist their mistaken beliefs on the infidels who have studied and know the injections are, at best, a scam, and who wish to apply their knowledge in the exercise of their natural law sovereignty over their own bodies.

The lockdowns, mask mandates, school closings and absurd social distancing rules have already done far too much deep, irreversible harm. The injection jihad must end.