Donald Trump's Biggest Con

During the campaign Donald Trump demonized Goldman Sachs and the politicians it controlled.

"I know the guys at Goldman Sachs. They have total, total control over him. Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton," Trump said of Cruz, whom the real estate mogul also called a "total fraud" and "the biggest liar I've ever seen."

And if you believed that, I have a bridge to sell you.

President-elect Donald Trump will nominate Wall Street lawyer Jay Clayton as his Securities and Exchange Commission chairman, his transition team said Wednesday....
Clayton will be the latest member of Trump's incoming cabinet and cabinet-level advisers whose career was on Wall Street, joining fellow investment honchos Steve Mnuchin, the former Goldman Sachs partner who is now the Treasury secretary designate; Stephen Bannon, a former Goldman banker who is Trump's chief White House strategist; Wilbur Ross, the Commerce secretary designate who enjoyed a decades-long career in private equity; and Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohn, who will head Trump's National Economic Council.

By all means, let's keep focusing on Trump being a "Putin Puppet", because apparently by Trump's actions that means Putin is a Wall Street banker.

Which is a Hell of a lot scarier.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Oldest Son Of A Sailor's picture

Until we bring out the punt gun...

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7FeeamC4qk]

up
0 users have voted.
"Do you realize the responsibility I carry?
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."

~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
Pricknick's picture

like blowing shit to dust.

up
0 users have voted.

Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.

Oldest Son Of A Sailor's picture

To have an open season on corrupt politicians...

up
0 users have voted.
"Do you realize the responsibility I carry?
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."

~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
asterisk's picture

up
0 users have voted.

edited cuz stupid

up
0 users have voted.

With their hearts they turned to each others heart for refuge
In troubled years that came before the deluge
*Jackson Browne, 1974, Before the Deluge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SX-HFcSIoU

SparkyGump's picture

but they're okay with it because he's "their guy". For me, willful ignorance is the hardest to overcome.

up
0 users have voted.

The real SparkyGump has passed. It was an honor being your human.

Donald Trump makes no sense at all. Anyone who knows anything about economics, politics, the environment, mathematics, etc. knows that Trump lives in Trump's fantasy world. America chose this over the tried and true world of corporate Democrats and Republicans for a reason.

However ...... it looks like he might be an administrator. He is putting together a seasoned cabinet of very experienced administrators. It looks to me like he wants to hit the ground running on January 20. The question is: running where?

We don't know enough yet to form an opposition to his policies. Certainly we will want to. What should be the strategy? This is a serious problem since those who marginalized him as a kook failed miserably, just as I predicted. I think that we need to be focused, well informed, serious and not abrasive, that's right, hold the shit cannon it doesn't work. I know that serious environmental organizations are working on this problem right now. I would rather be the persuasive opposition than the abrasive opposition. Can he be persuaded? We just don't know yet. Apparently he told Congress to leave the independent ethics body in place. They listened. Who is Trump and what will he do?

We are witnessing a revolution. I don't think that the oval office has ever had an occupant anything like Donald Trump. He will get things done. Let's hope that he succeeds at the good things and that we can help common sense to prevail and get him to back off on the destructive policies.

up
0 users have voted.

Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.

But we'll know for sure soon enough.

up
0 users have voted.
divineorder's picture

up
0 users have voted.

A truth of the nuclear age/climate change: we can no longer have endless war and survive on this planet. Oh sh*t.

Big Al's picture

and the republican majority house and senate will follow. We know Trump and his foreign policy appointments are very anti-Iran, anti-Muslim, they want to increase the military budget greatly, go after China and rule the world militarily. We know they want to privatize everything they can including Social security and medicare and education, continue the corporatization of health care, continue austerity on social programs, and continue to funnel money to the very rich with tax loopholes that Trump loves, and deregulation.
You're right, it is shaping up to be a revolution. A revolution of billionaires against the Serfs. We need to oppose everything, particularly this political system that gives us zero say.

up
0 users have voted.
Roy Blakeley's picture

When Trump tries to do worthwhile things support him. We he tries to do harmful things, oppose him. Trite and obvious, I know, but still sensible. I agree that a good approach is to be focused, well informed, serious and not abrasive. Feigning horror every time he says something offensive obviously does not work. Pussy grabbing is bad, but is it really worse than creating chaos in the middle east resulting in 10s of thousands of deaths, or enabling narco dictatorships in latin America? Our real goal, in my opinion, (and others will disagree) should be to do whatever we can to undermine and remove the corporate Democrats in leadership positions so that in two years and four years we can elect people that will actually do some good. In the long run the corporate Dems are probably more harmful than the Republicans because they create a situation in which we are only allowed to choose between two corporate/MIC parties. This precludes the election of progressive populist governments of the sorts we need for the planet and the beings that inhabit it.

up
0 users have voted.

I hear all this Ding ding ding ding going off in my head.

Our real goal, in my opinion, (and others will disagree) should be to do whatever we can to undermine and remove the corporate Democrats in leadership positions so that in two years and four years we can elect people that will actually do some good.

Roy,... you hit the jackpot.

I tell people, I'll vote Republican, ... When they completely change and become descent human beings.
It pisses me off that I feel so closely the same about Demorats (formerly Democrats).
If you want me to vote D, it better be a damn good D.
Ya best hear me D, I ain't playin.

up
0 users have voted.

With their hearts they turned to each others heart for refuge
In troubled years that came before the deluge
*Jackson Browne, 1974, Before the Deluge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SX-HFcSIoU

Kurt from CMH's picture

What kind of President will Trump be? I am looking for other Presidents in the past whom he could be analogous to, and three come to mind: Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Warren G. Harding. In terms of political support, he might be most like Andrew Jackson, who won fame as a general in the War of 1812 and struck populist views about Indian policy and the Second Bank of the United States, then the country's reserve bank. But Trump doesn't have a serious public service background and is not from a modest background-- quite the opposite.

If he is really committed to striking out on a different road from the corporate Republican establishment, he would be like TR, the trust-busting reformer who crusaded against the excesses left over from the Gilded Age. However, this seems unlikely considering who he is appointing to his cabinet and his promises about deregulation. We will see some differences from the Republican establishment in trade and foreign policy.

But I believe the President that Trump will most closely follow is Harding, who started out as a successful newspaper editor and then was elected to the Senate and then the Presidency. He ran as a pro-business conservative touting "Normalcy", enacting tax cuts for the wealthy and promoting a policy of American withdrawal from world affairs. His legacy is now overshadowed by the Teapot Dome scandal and his affair with two mistresses. Like in Harding's presidency, I think the potential for scandal in Trump's administration is high.

up
0 users have voted.

For at least another hundred years we must pretend to ourselves and to everyone that fair is foul and foul is fair; for foul is useful and fair is not. Avarice and usury and precaution must be our gods for a little longer still.
John Maynard Keynes, 1930

he needs an administration of tough sons-of-bitches who can control large organizations. The neoliberals and neocons and warhawks are dug in really deep, and have no scruples at all.

There are two questions there: 1) is that what he intends? and 2) can he control his administrators? We know that Obama couldn't do that. Trump's campaign manager was asked about the difference between his campaign stands and those of one appointee, and she said that X understands that he will be implementing Trump's agenda. We'll see.

And Hillary and her hangers-on (including Obama) look worse the longer their win-at-all-costs-even-if-you-destroy-what-little-faith-in-our-system-is-left scorched earth campaign goes on. Even Joe McCarthy didn't go as far as they have. She really does want war with Russia - US policy now is that nuclear war is winnable, you know. No more MAD.

Looking at actions, before getting into office, Trump has bullied a few corporations into reversing some outsourcing plans, got the GOP to drop plans to weaken the Ethics office, and counseled the GOP to slow down on dismantling Obamacare. Could be a lot worse, so far. Let's not panic yet.

up
0 users have voted.
blazinAZ's picture

Trump has bullied a few corporations into reversing some outsourcing plans, got the GOP to drop plans to weaken the Ethics office, and counseled the GOP to slow down on dismantling Obamacare.

All the companies with "outsourcing plans" have denied that they were planning to do what Trump said they were going to do, or they denied that he had any effect on their plans. Carrier, the only one that blackmailed him into giving them a subsidy or tax break or something, has already said that they're going to use it to automate -- so no jobs saved there.

And Trump did not get the GOP to dump the gut-the-ethics plan. Thousands of outraged voters calling and emailing their representatives did that. He just questioned the timing of the bill, not the content of it.

As for the ACA, we have yet to see any effect from his "counsel." Maybe he'll get the Republicans to support Medicare for All. Yeah, right.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice in America, but it is the fight for justice that sustains you.
--Amiri Baraka

Hawkfish's picture

Scott Adams had his usual strange take on the Clipper thing. He said it was a "new CEO move." The idea is that when a CEO takes over at a company, he does some stuff that may not be effective long term but convinces everyone he means business.

Adams is a borderline climate denier so I tend to treat a lot of his rants like toxic sludge, but I find some of his explanations of Trump to be interesting. And he did predict not only that Trump would win but how, so I keep reading...

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

MsGrin's picture

This one is PRETTY BIG, but there are so very many from which to choose for (as Jonny Dore calls him) Donny TinyHands.

up
0 users have voted.

'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member