@Arrow

Otherwise, electronic counters can be rigged--um, hacked--and small groups of bipartisan observers in key areas can be bought. We now have TV and the internet. There is no reason for any lack of transparency in the counting. The most recent election proved we can live without determining national election winners before the polls on the West Coast close.

Look at us, solving this before an expensive bipartisan commission chews through bundles of tax dollars, only to come up with a pile of nonsense findings and conclusions.

Us Paper Ballots

...and we're done here.

Thanks for this Amanda.

@Socialprogressive

the fox guarding the hen house.

@snoopydawg And Her Highness BLAMED THE VICTIMS.

Talk about (pardon me, this always riles me up) fucking misogyny.

Yet one in about 3,000 other reasons I twice did not, nor would ever, vote for Her.

Why Hillary Clinton Is Really Unpopular – Again

Hillary Clinton is even less popular now than when she was running for president.
That puts Clinton at odds with every losing presidential candidate since 1992. Except for Clinton, the defeated candidate saw an increase in favorability ratings after Election Day, according to Gallup data.

The Bloomberg poll didn’t get into reasons for Clinton’s decline in favorability. But there is, of course, one thing that sets her apart from the pack of failed candidates: Clinton is a woman.

It doesn't matter what reason people gave for not like Her, it still all comes down to the reason why people don't like Her is because they are sexist, misogynistic assholes who just don't like powerful women.

Geebus, when I first heard Her speak back in 2006, I thought that she was a very intelligent woman and admired her.
But then I read about her policy view points especially her foreign policy ones and read about what happened to families after Her and Bill pushed for welfare reform and the crime bill.

Then I watched as she went from the preferred candidate in 2008 to the biggest whiner and creepy spreader of lies about Obama because people like him more.
Funny how no one blamed sexism or misogyny for her loss back then, isn't it?

When she announced that she was running again, my mind was already made up. She would be a horrible candidate because she stood for everything that I stood against.
Especially, unending war, misery and death for people that were no threat to me or this country. No the reason they had to die was because Hillary, Obama and a bunch of bloodthirsty neocons pronounced that they should.
This was enough for me to do everything I could to keep her and her husband out of the White House. They did enough damage their first run.

Funny isn't it? People have a problem with the way Trump sees women, but one rarely hears about Bill's escapades with woman after woman after woman...........................
especially the women that he met at Jeff Epstein's (the registered sex offender because he had sex with under-aged girls)parties in his New York home and on his private jet that was flying men out to his private island that was stocked with women and girls (boys?)>

Both men are perverts and neither should be seen in the light of day or the dark of night. But then, we know that money can buy influence as well as affluence, but it can never buy class.

@snoopydawg Let me post an addendum to your sig code:

A noun, a verb, the proper noun Hillary, and sexist.

Why Hillary Clinton Is Really Unpopular – Again

Hillary Clinton is even less popular now than when she was running for president.
That puts Clinton at odds with every losing presidential candidate since 1992. Except for Clinton, the defeated candidate saw an increase in favorability ratings after Election Day, according to Gallup data.

The Bloomberg poll didn’t get into reasons for Clinton’s decline in favorability. But there is, of course, one thing that sets her apart from the pack of failed candidates: Clinton is a woman.

It doesn't matter what reason people gave for not like Her, it still all comes down to the reason why people don't like Her is because they are sexist, misogynistic assholes who just don't like powerful women.

Geebus, when I first heard Her speak back in 2006, I thought that she was a very intelligent woman and admired her.
But then I read about her policy view points especially her foreign policy ones and read about what happened to families after Her and Bill pushed for welfare reform and the crime bill.

Then I watched as she went from the preferred candidate in 2008 to the biggest whiner and creepy spreader of lies about Obama because people like him more.
Funny how no one blamed sexism or misogyny for her loss back then, isn't it?

When she announced that she was running again, my mind was already made up. She would be a horrible candidate because she stood for everything that I stood against.
Especially, unending war, misery and death for people that were no threat to me or this country. No the reason they had to die was because Hillary, Obama and a bunch of bloodthirsty neocons pronounced that they should.
This was enough for me to do everything I could to keep her and her husband out of the White House. They did enough damage their first run.

Funny isn't it? People have a problem with the way Trump sees women, but one rarely hears about Bill's escapades with woman after woman after woman...........................
especially the women that he met at Jeff Epstein's (the registered sex offender because he had sex with under-aged girls)parties in his New York home and on his private jet that was flying men out to his private island that was stocked with women and girls (boys?)>

Both men are perverts and neither should be seen in the light of day or the dark of night. But then, we know that money can buy influence as well as affluence, but it can never buy class.

@MrWebster I feel the same reasoning was behind why the Democrats let Florida/2000 slide. Don't know if the intent was to use it against the Republicans or deplorables in the Democratic Party, but what we saw last year convinced me they watched and learned.

Good comment, Btw.

So two failed party hacks are going to lead a group of military and intelligence officials from the deep state so they could basically stop those evil Russians? Yah sure. They will come up with secret super duper techniques to prevent technical idiots like Podesta from falling for simple phishing attempts? Which yes, a fat guy on his bed could easily implement. It would not surprise me if the project recommends putting election machines under the protection and purvey of the deep state intelligence agencies.

After working many an election, who exactly is going to this stop the real cheating--which is from people inside the system. Gonna stop caging or state officials from expunging legitimate voters from the rolls? Is this going to stop democrats who during the primaries changed party affiliation of potential independent Bernie voters so they couldn't vote in the primaries? They going to stop fractional voting?

This group of patriots will not touch anything which prevents partisans from either party from being able to cheat in their areas of control.

Just as a side point. The gop establishment will I predict seriously look at how the democrats cheated Sanders so they could control their own primaries. The tea party was able to knock off some highly visible incumbents in primaries, and would have been good to have the cheating down to prevent Trump from winning.