A base Jonesing for a lesson

I tend to watch Westerns only under duress. Fortunately, though, I saw Along Came Jones. As I recall, heroine Cherry thought that hero Melody had shot her fella, Monte, with intent to kill. However, Melody's intent had been to inflict only a superficial wound, which Melody had done. (Spoiler alert: Cherry ends up “sweet on” Melody.) The life lesson that I learned from Along Came Jones: No matter how it may seem to onlookers, people with skills often hit pretty much what they aimed at.

This life lesson is especially useful if I remember it when people try to fool me, as I believe Democratic politicians in D.C. tried to do for a time. They appeared to miss their targets repeatedly, even when they held the greatest majority they were likely to have for a very long time. Republican politicians in D.C. seem more powerful, even when in the minority. At the very least, they seem able to stop whatever they want to stop.

Since Hoover, if not before, Republican politicians have openly opposed tax increases and "government handouts," while being "strong" on big business, "law and order," and (snort) "defense." Much of that description fits Democratic politicians in D.C., too. The Democratic base, however, continued seeing Democratic politicians in D.C. as strong on unions, the "working stiff," social safety nets, consumer-oriented government regulation, as well as equal rights for women and minorities. Republican politicians in D.C. avoided angering their base irreparably by performing pretty much as their base expected. Democratic politicians in D.C. avoided angering their base irreparably because the Democratic base imagined that Republicans were thwarting and outsmarting Democratic politicians. (Br’er Fox, please don't fling me in that briar patch.)

Either way, rich and powerful private citizens get what they want; and, in turn, take care of both Democratic and Republican politicians, and maybe also their relatives. Even after politicians who played the game leave office, they get all kinds of well-paying positions, if they wish: Wall Street, lobbying, executive positions with organizations that could use a good influence peddler, advocacy, think tanks that depend upon donations, speaking engagements, whatever. In or out of office, they get taken care of. However, those who are not rich and/or powerful and their loved ones keep.getting.screwed.--and often while claiming that Democratic politicians are clueless and/or spineless. Maybe. Or maybe D.C. politicians are getting pretty much what they aimed to get.

Whether by design or accident, time worked in favor of New Democrats. Over time, New Democrats so terrorized us about the “demon” right that some Democratic voters have been running to the polls for the privilege of holding their noses very tightly to vote for the allegedly lesser evil. After passage of time, Americans know that any good-paying job that possibly can be offshored will be offshored and offshored jobs will not return to the U.S.--ever. Meanwhile immigrants are invited to fill those job positions that Americans supposedly do not awant or supposedly are not qualified for. (Of course, the immigrants will be offered lower wages.) Over time, Democrats came to expect little more of Democratic politicians than the appearance of greater sanity and egalitarianism than Republican politicians. Time also thinned the ranks of those damn hippy Boomers who expect more, while allowing Democrats to pick up enough "sane" indies and Republicans to win elections.

IMO, D.C.'s New Democrats thought that they could be more straightforward right around 2016. So now, we have Democrats in Congress proudly stating that they stand for "American values" (whatever that means) without feeling a need to add a single other word. (Values are the province of politicians? HA!) But, surprise! Today's largest demographic, Millennials, seem a lot like Boomers. Which is to say, Millennials seem a lot like human beings who want stuff like jobs and drinking water that does not brain damage their kids and who know that government can do much better for the 100% than it does. But, I digress (maybe).

Point is, I don't think we are where we are because Rhodes scholar Bill Clinton or Harvard Law grad Barack Obama and all other D.C. Democrats are clueless. I think that, like Melody Jones, they hit what they actually aimed at, while we onlookers imagined they were aiming elsewhere. And, like Melody, they end up with what they actually want (which usually means we don't).

19 users have voted.


dkmich's picture

Without the unions, Planned Parenthood, Bill McKibben, Sierra Club, Colbert, TOP, and a whole of other veal pen participants, the mirror would crack. I think these people are hitting what they aimed at too.

11 users have voted.

*donate *follow us on Twitter *like us on Facebook *dump Google


For far too long, I aimed at getting Democrats elected, naively believing they would take care of the 90%, while Republicans took care of the rest.

Dash 1

We need to figure out how to get what we're aiming for.

I know voting "pragmatically" for the alleged lesser of two evils is not the answer. I think the answer may lie in forming a coalition around an issue, then another coalition around another issue, and so on. We have to find ways to undo the division that serves politicians and no one else.

6 users have voted.
Wink's picture

to the 0.001% (of any and every stripe) want everything. Whether or not what they want affects the 99% is of no concern. Many of the Town Halls have expressed that. "I feel your pain (barely). I just don't give a fuck." "I know it sucks to be you, and you, and you, but I just don't care." "Be prepared to embrace even more suck."

9 users have voted.

the little things you can do often are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-1.9) All about building progressive media.


A nutrition directive from the Democrat who presided over the fastest transfer of wealth to the rich in recorded history! And that includes giving the Dutch the deed to Manhattan!

6 users have voted.
The Aspie Corner's picture

House Republican writes letter to constituent's employer complaining about her progressive activism

Say what you want about Super PACs, but this is just fuckin' wrong.

4 users have voted.

@The Aspie Corner
And a lot of court decisions.

There's is no end to the awful stuff they do in D.C.

3 users have voted.
SnappleBC's picture

For me, that was the incontrovertible proof. The man is self-evidently quite intelligent, motivated, and capable. I assume he got a lot of what he wanted to get.

0 users have voted.

A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard