On Thursday, April 23, I finally got around to reading Caitlin's column of April 3. It was immeidately obvious that it was quite relevant and arguably a neccessary addendum or refinement to my column of Wednesday April 22. I decided to do this follow up including all or at least part of it, possibly with editorial additions and commentary, depending upon how this works out. It took me back to some fundamentals of investigating, researching, learning and reporting on same that I had learned way back as a kid. So, I'm thinking that this has 3 parts. Recap yesterday's article, which will be last week's by the time this is done; toss in some prefatory material on the 5Ws (plus H, I know), including why one should be mostly ignored or elided today; and Caitlin's material. Piece of cake, heh, he says. So, gonna give it a try.

Recap:
Last Wednesday's column was written in the context of the fact that we are continuously bombarded by an endless stream of propaganda from a vast number of sources. I asserted that we need to build out our own network of reliable, reality based information sources that rely on evidence, facts, logic and science. I further asserted that in order to have such a network in this day and age, we must become it and become conscious of the fact that it is our job to do so.

Traditionally if one were researching, investigating, trying to understand or trying to explain something or anything, there were allegedly 6 elements you had to determine, understand and explicate: The 5 Ws plus "how". That is possibly still the case with some caveats. Some or all of those are more and more the focus of propagandists and opportunistic liars, so various numbers of grains of salt need to be applied to one's findings and one's reportage. Who, What, When, Where, Why, and, of course, How. Ok, raise your hands if you are both old enough to remember that stuff and young enough to still remember it. Got it.

Fine, but let's look at them.

Who? Is it possible that it isn't Commies, Russia, Russia, Russia or even China? It simpler times Fred Smith got in a wreck or fell off of a roof or bridge. But those simple stories aren't the narratives being pushed these days. and, to some degree, not for a long time (9 out of 10 dentists are bullshitting you about wonderpaste). So maybe keep an eye on who and look for evidence proving that we have the real who, Horton, ok?

What? Uh yeah, somebody just blew up the Maine, it didn't just happen, ya know, or did it? What, today, is also full of pitfalls. Did he really fall or was he pushed? Did he really get 37% of the vote? As of when? Here again today's narratives are seldom about simple events but about complex scenarios, and getting to the bottom of things might not actually be possible. Qualifiers and disclaimers may be necessary.

When? Might be one of the safer data points, depending upon the complexity of what.

Where It makes a big difference if the alleged answer is Baton Rouge or Moscow, and I'll just leave it at that.

Why? Bwahahahaha. The thing failed because the joints used an inferior grade of rivets, or winds set up harmonic oscillations or the designers used the wrong figure for the likely pressures it would experience; well enough, as far as it goes. This happened or was done because the evil doctor from Caracas wanted to destroy our way of life? Almost certainly bullshit, and afactual at any rate because cannot be proven. Today "why" still sometimes is about physics, biology or engineering. Mostly, however, it is about alleged motives and is presumed to be utter horseshit. Except where science is involved, real science, why is best simply skipped. Most US laws, like the bills that spawned them have some high sounding purpose and most of the time a close reading of the law will make it clear that said purpose or motive is a crock of shit.

How? With a candlestick to the back of the head. Or how about by taking out a minuscule number and dollar value of facebook ads? Like the rest, this is no longer a simple straight forward factual assertion in most cases.

The principal point is that we are no longer seeing "John hit an inside the park homer at doodah field at 3:45 pm or march the whatever 2020, but some complex narrative full of hidden assumptions and assertions, unstated premised and allegations of complex series of events, interactions, causes and effects. So, yes, we want to and need to pin down these elements, but we need to be willing to just give up and to fill our own narratives with qualifiers like alleged, putative, purported, asserted and the like. About that -- eschew adjectives. Fred saw a black footed hare is an allegation of fact. Fred saw a ravenous, enraged, horny psychotic Hare is not. It isn't even wrong, it is simply garbage. The adjectives eliminate all likelihood that the statement could be correct. When I spot such statements I more often than not move on, surmising that the chance that I could find some kernal of actual information buried in whatever narrative the author is spewing is negligible. Some times I might try going through and crossing out all of the adjectives and many of the adverbs and seeing if I thereby discern factual matter, but ample use of adjectives is generally a symptom of opinion and editorializing, not of fact.

Ok, so here's Caitlin's Update:

How To Tell Real News From Useless Narrative Fluff
by Caitlin Johnstone
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/04/04/how-to-tell-real-news-from-usele...

When Zen teacher Issan Dorsey was asked to describe the essence of Zen art, he answered, "Nothing extra."

"Nothing extra" is also of course the essence of Zen living itself: perceiving life as it actually is, as opposed to perceiving it through a bunch of believed narrative filters about yourself, about others, about reality, and so on. These narrative filters are an extra pile of layers that are added on top of the actual experience of life, and they give a distorted view which causes a lot of confusion and suffering. Relinquishing belief in them brings clarity and peace.

This is also the essence of clearly understanding what's really going on in the world. Like so much else, the approach to the large is the same as the approach to the small, which is to say the approach to seeing clearly in the big picture is the same as the approach to seeing clearly as an individual: you need to learn to look at it without the extra narrative overlay.

Because the news media are controlled by plutocrats who have a vested interest in protecting the status quo upon which their kingdoms are built, almost everything in the news is useless narrative fluff. It doesn't tell you what's really going on, it rather tries to influence what's going on by manipulating the perceptions of the audience. It does this by either (A) distracting from what really matters by focusing on what doesn't matter, or (B) actively working to manipulate how the audience thinks about a given issue.

When you strip away all the empty fluff and manipulative spin, there are basically only four often-overlapping pieces of information that really matter in the big picture: (1) where the money is going, (2) where the resources are going, (3) where the weapons are going, and (4) where the people are going. When it comes to understanding world dynamics, accurate information about these four things is the only real news you'll ever encounter. Everything else is empty narrative spin meant to justify, distort, or distract from information about these things.

If you ignore everything else and only focus on finding the most accurate information possible about these four items, you will have an infinitely clearer understanding of what's really going on in the world than someone who trusts news reporters to walk them through it.

Watch where the money is going because you can trust the raw numbers of financial transactions a lot more than you can trust the stories people are telling. A massive percentage of daily news coverage goes toward analyzing the latest foam-brained gibberish that came out of Donald Trump's mouth even though we all know he's going to contradict himself two days later, but the fact that he's been heavily funded by an oligarch who happens to have been a longtime proponent of the Iran policies this administration has been advancing is much more solid.

Zoom out and watch where the money is going in the big picture and you'll see that a grossly disproportionate amount of it is moving away from the general public and toward a very small group of people, which we just saw illustrated in the historically unprecedented multitrillion-dollar wealth transfer in the US corporate bailout. If you watch this small group and pay attention to the projects, candidates, think tanks and media outlets they pour their wealth into, you will notice that they exert an incredible amount of influence on all four crucial factors: where the money goes, where the resources go, where the weapons go, and where the people go.

Watching where the resources are going gives you an even clearer image of what's going on because resources, unlike money, are completely independent of narrative. There is no such thing as "money" without the thoughts that humans agree to collectively think about it, but oil would still be oil even if all humans were wiped off the face of the earth. When you see the US ramping up escalations against Venezuela, ignore the narratives about "drug trafficking" and what a bad, bad man Nicolás Maduro is, and look at what resources lie beneath the ground in that nation to find out what this is really about. Mentally "mute" the soundtracks the political/media class spout about who's doing what to whom and just watch where the resources are going, and who's controlling them. That way you'll be able to discern the powerful from the disempowered and the takers from their victims.

Watch where the weapons are going because those are another non-narrative factor which exerts a huge influence on the world; a bullet will stop a beating heart regardless of what the mind thinks about it. Ignore the irrelevant narrative fluff about where the coronavirus originated and whether or not it's racist to say "Wuhan virus", and look at the ring of US military bases encircling China and the way the Marine Corps is shifting its attention onto that nation. Ignore Trump's gibberish about ending wars and note that he's been expanding them and increasing foreign troop presence. Ignore the Democratic Party's nonsense about Trump having loyalties to Russia and watch his administration's many dangerous nuclear escalations against that nation. Ignore international finger-wagging at humanitarian abuses by Israel and Saudi Arabia and look at who's still selling them weapons and supporting them militarily.

Watch where the people are going for another important piece of real information that isn't dependent on narrative. Where are the prisoners? Where are the refugees, where are they going, and what are they fleeing? Where are people moving to, and what do they want?

With each of these four items you can simply watch raw data and ignore all the stories the establishment spinmeisters tell about that data. As long as you make sure you're getting the most accurate data possible, it's like you're looking at a globe and watching lines in four different colors moving around in it from place to place and person to person. And without anyone's stories tainting your view.

You will notice that there's a heavy degree of overlap between these four items. You see the weapons moving toward China and you notice that's the nation with the US hegemony-threatening Belt and Road Initiative (where the resources are moving) and the key player in the US dollar-threatening Shanghai Cooperation Organization (where the money is moving). You see Julian Assange locked in prison (where the people are going) for exposing US war crimes (where the weapons are going). You see US troops illegally occupying Syrian oil fields (where the weapons and resources are going) to prevent the Syrian government from using it to rebuild the nation (where the money is going). And so on.

Nearly everything that makes it to the top of the daily news churn is either propaganda distortion or distracting drivel, and either way you can safely ignore it. Just watch where the money is going, where the resources are going, where the weapons are going and where the people are going, and ignore all the narrative chatter.

Nothing extra.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2020/04/04/how-to-tell-real-news-from-usele...

be well and have a good one

Title Image Calling; picture captured by Ryan McGuire of Bells Design and free of copyright restrictions.

It's an open thread, so have at it. The floor is yours
.

EDITED to add link to article on Caitlin's blog