But I don't see any huge rallying at the Bernie reddit sites to Go Green. If you do, please share. And on the twitter, you see some occasional Go Green posts but nothing near what Bernie got before he turned.

I received a telephone robo-poll yesterday where every significant Presidential Candidate was discussed -- except Stein.

I hung up. Fuck them and the horse they rode in on!

recruiting activists you may be disappointed.

Derision is not an effective technique, nor is shaming, if anything it creates negative push back.

Ask Hillary Clinton how well talking bad about people who's support you may end up needing is working out for her.

The chiding tone of your comment was a bit off putting even to me and I am a Stein supporter and already plan on casting my ballot for her in Florida provided it isn't a close race, if it's close I may have to hold my nose. (To vote Trump.)

While I want to see the greens succeed in growing their party, I fear the things Clinton will do with a willing congress and senate over what Trump will accomplish with both parties and the judicial branches against him.

I just thought I would say something because we do need people to help badly, but that approach is way too reminiscent of something that would come out of the mouth of a Clinton surrogate ( I'm not suggesting you are a Clinton "Sleeper".) and likely to do more harm than good.

But that's just my opinion, and it's not like I haven't been wrong in the past as my sig line so aptly shows, lol!

1. While the Corporate Media is doing everything they can to quell the voices of third parties, they are giving Johnson significantly more coverage than Stein, albeit also at a pathetically low level.

2. The Greens have a lot of negative stigmata attached to their name, some earned, most not.

Number two is one of the biggest reasons I support creating a new party for the movement going forward rather than hitching our wagons to the green parties yoke. That, and potential infighting from the long time Greens who may feel that the "Sanders People" are trying to co-opt their party. (Rumblings of which I have already heard from some.)

before I vote for either Clinton or Trump.

Because

A. Trump is a fanatic, bigoted, loud mouth whose bellicose threats and pronouncements could conceivably go so far beyond the pale that he provokes an horrific response from some country or terrorist group because they feel overtly threatened. What he was talking about today in terms of rights of the accused makes me think he is one step behind what is going on in the Philippines where everyone seen as an "undesirable" is ending up dead in the streets in some sort of mass executions. He is the scariest politician of my lifetime and in American history simply because the capability of modern technology has outpaced our ability to restrain it.

B. Hillary is seen as corrupt and as someone who played fast and loose with transparency, the truth and National Security and as someone who has used her public office to profit privately. If you want to see how unpopular she is, simply read the comments section of any publication or site that still allows comments. Additionally, she and her Party have insulted and/or taken for granted people whose votes they need. In a reverse Rumpelstiltskin, she is miraculously turning gold into straw by turning blue states into swing states. Good luck Hillary, you're gonna need it to pull this out.

That leaves Johnson and Stein.

Johnson has political experience as both a Senator and a Governor and has a VP who was also a Governor. Libertarians are thought of as socially liberal fiscal conservatives who are also isolationists as a result of their fiscal conservatism. In our current environment, this could be a winning combo, especially as we don't have Bernie Sanders to offer the progressive alternative vision.

Stein is a Green with no government or political experience who has as her running mate a person most people have never heard of also without any relevant experience. She supports a liberal agenda, similar to Bernie, but she's not Bernie and does not seem to be developing any particular momentum as the Bernie substitute.

My conclusion is that a lot of people are going to pull the lever for the Libertarian because he's:
Sane (as far as anyone knows), not corrupt (as far as anyone knows) and has experience in both state and federal politics.

I think the Libertarian Johnson is LUCKY to not be allowed in the debates where he could repeat something like his Aleppo gaffe. He can sit on the sidelines and write commentaries and tweet and go on talk shows.

Also, IMO, Trump is close to madness and if the Republicans were strong, prudent, and moral, they would still escort him off the stage and announce all Party support and money is ending as of this moment and tell their supporters to vote for the only remaining Republicans in the race, Johnson and Weld or go ahead and vote for Clinton since a lot of mainstream bigwig Republicans seem to like her just fine.

Is it their fault that they just can't see the non-billionaire poors as real people rather than as fungible and disposable human resources? Plus, psychopathic Greeds are just so much smarter and 'more equal' than the rest of us lowly plebes, they can always fool/browbeat us easily. So, what's wrong with us that it isn't working?

the other latest drama with her Majesty.

in that same malodorous basket with Trump supporters.

Remember this one?

And they wonder why people think she is a fake.

Makes me want to sigh...

I have heard the lesser of two evil supporters say, okay vote for Stein if your votes does not effect the outcome because you state is heavily red or blue. Otherwise, vote Hillary. Nope. Will never vote for her. I thought at one time I could if I drank heavily and punched my face as hard as I could--nope, why waste good booze--the face maybe an improvement.

If anybody around me blames me for Hillary losing because of my vote for Stein, I will say "thanks for the compliment".