From the cartoon bomb Bibi presented to the UN in September 2012, to today, perfectly stated by CIA head, William Burns:

"The spy agency has no evidence Iran has decided to pursue a nuclear weapon."

As has been stated for the past decade by multiple sources. Including the OP, Wendy Davis, and me.

So if the "nuclear bomb threat" is bogus, what Is Israel so desperate about? That's my question and so far the answers I can guess about are unsatisfactory.

Here is the real problem, the US doint want countries to be able to tell other countries what they can and can't do in a number of important areas. Unless we do that we cant put forward arguments saying its okay for say Israel to have nuclear weapons for self defense and not Iran.

At least I think thats probably whats going on.

We also want to keep human rights out of trade. Currently countries cannot boycot other countries for human rights reasons, as faras I know. Nomatter what they do to their own people within their own borders. There is something wrong with that stupid change. We should be making nuclear weapons illegal for everybody, and push for human rights to be allowed in trade law like the WTO. Make it legal for things like wages (minimum wages) to be legal in WTO law. Right now GATS Article 16 prohibits many things that speak to labor standards and minimum wages. But we are not allowed to boycott countries businesses because they pay people almost nothing. (as long as it isnt nothing)

I suspect we'll be on thin legal ice if we tried to make wages or worker safety issues in trade, since its barred, we cant, We totally sold all humanity out. We threw away the boycott option. Oligarchs can do whatever they want. We threw away our minimum wage laws, we threw away our safety standards. Buy or die. We may have to let countries do all the jobs if they are cheapest, and if we tried to argue their wages were too low to require we only traded with countries that paid a living wage" or even a minimum wage of any kind, we would almost certainly lose a suit in the WTO.. Its barred by GATS.

What kinds of arguments could we use to allow a boycott on Iran due to a nuclear program there?

We likely couldnt. Because we don't want such restrictions on trade. Slavery is even legal in the US, if somebody is duly convicted of a (any?) crime.

Nuclear war is a crime. Most of its victims are the weak, people who couldn't be held responsible for our corporate agendas.

America is open for business. Nomatter what. If somebody leaves work because of a life threatening situation the employer can fire them! Remember September 11, 2001.

The dust was extremely dangerous. That dust killed a great many of the first responders. It also was so fine it would have gone through most masks. Just like virii.

It should have been possible to predict that increase in mortality in advance with a dark-field microscope.

Suppose we were attacked by terrorists - with a nuclear device.

The cost of one nuclear device being detonated in an American city would be so high that it would bankrupt this country. Insurance doesnt cover it. It woud be a total loss.

We have to recognize the fact that nuclear weapons must be prohibited, they must be unthinkable and prohibited for all countries.

Use of nuclear weapons would make food so much more expensive that billions of people, especially children would die.

WHo would pay that cost? Not insurance companies. We all would. Nomatter who was to blame, we all would pay a huge price. And the horrible fact is that we really could not prevent it with the level of security people think. Turning the world into a police state, what thge olgarchs and billionaires want, cant be allowed.

Look at the thinking that went into the decision to bomb the cities in Germany and Japan.

Who died in World War II? The poor. Who got rich in World War II? The richest families in GHermany and Jap[an. They remained the same before and after the war. None of them paid for the war. They stayed on top. All the families who made fortunes on slave labor in WWII remained the richest families.

And many of them went on funding fascism..

How do we prevent nuclear terrorism? Being human and altrusitic and fair to one another? In other words be human, not monsters.

Yes. No violence. That would only make the risk higher. The kind of thinking we seem to espouse in trade seems to be making extreme poverty worse. Everywhere.

Countries now have M economies, where there is no middle class. Instead they have very rich and very poor. And nobody in the middle. Because the oligarchies in the popor countries are getting rich paying almost nothing. Its their right. They may refuse to pay workers a living wage, when they can get away with that. And they do.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVGJDwEWIrI]
Thats what we're headed towards here. Thats what the billionaires want. A race to the bottom, now. They say human labor is worth less. Because of automation, human labor is worth less. Labor saving technology is like workers who work for free. Its economic effect is similar. We cant avoid that.

(Despite all they try to tell us, the fact is so called "free trade economics" logic is fallacious. We also claim that that i how and why we were (supposedly) so successful. But thats not at all true. All the arguments they use to arge for neoliberalism are based on misinformation. We did not espouse "free trade" during the periods of growth in the US. The US was actually protectionist all that time. So was the UK.

Its all bullshit.

The reason they want what they call "free trade" is that they want to take the resources of the developing countries, under extremkely advantageous circumstances.

We dont want them being able to say no, "No, we don't want to sell you our unobtainium" "we need it"

.. we can't do that. What will be the future? Depends on your money. No money, no honey.

Politicians already gave away the store. To their fellow oligarchs.

What about the vote? It cant do anything. They already gave away the store.

It sowed the seeds of humanities destruction. This hatred will never go away until Israel goes way.
Technology will continue to grow and nuclear holocaust will becone inevitable.

The only way to defuse it is to remove Israel and stop sowing hate in foreign nations.