It’s likely that the Russians have every piece of email that went through Hillary’s server.

How can she expect any leverage with the Russians as President of the US when Putin can leak whatever embarrassing tid bit he wants about any number of scandals both governmental and private whenever he likes?

And that goes double for the Chinese, the Iranians, the Israelis, and anybody else who had even a semi-competent signals intelligence capability during Obama's first term.

Hillary's security catastrophe as SoS disqualifies her to be President. It is as simple as that.

          They are the bad guys, right? So nothing they say can be trusted, right.

          [snarky] Just to be clear in case of confusion: Competent IT people from my time were/are hackers. Time constraints were the only reason I didn't develop those skills. I am related to a very skilled practitioner of the art. So, while for the general public "hacker" is a pejorative, they are our (often silent) friends.

I logged in to thank you for posting this. It's a great piece and rings absolutely true to my experience with medical servers for clinics and doctors offices.

I don't know who else has been following this, but Clinton's bestie, Sidney Blumenthal, was hacked by "Guccifer." That's how he found the clintonemail.com server. There was never any doubt to me that it was hacked onlyonce.

This was entirely preventable with a SOCKS proxy and the same kind of encryption mandated by HIPAA.

Isn't it ironic?

Spearheaded by then First Lady Clinton, HIPAA was established in 1996 to improve privacy of personal health information, referred to as protected health information, or PHI. It requires health care providers, known as “covered entities,” and their vendors, contractors, and agents with access to PHI, known as “business associates,” to comply with certain privacy standards under its “Privacy Rule,” and with certain security standards under its Security Rule,” in order to protect sensitive health information that is held or transferred in electronic form.

.

Thanks again. It's so refreshing to just be honest and not fight the force-fed orange Kool-Ade.

If so, wouldn't someone have noticed some strange things going on? Even WJC's SS detail, or is it only their duty to the body?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/05/intel-vets-urge-fast-report-on-clintons-emails.html

A most excellent letter to the president.

So the question is not whether Secretary Clinton broke the law. She did. If the laws are to be equally applied, she should face the same kind of consequences as others who have been found, often on the basis of much less convincing evidence, guilty of similar behavior.

What's to stop the Republicans from immediately starting legitimate impeachment hearings once she is in office?

...impeachment will happen either way. It's really a matter of the chances of success going to 100% if there is a legitimate reason behind it...

We're having a big, top secret information open house. Come on down to Hillary's server and help yourself to the most sensitive information from the highest level of the World's super power. Find out what the US government is up to in your neck of the woods.

Krebs is THE go-to guy on security -- hardly a 'hacker'.

Your headline calls Krebs and his commentors 'hackers'. My guess is that the comments are from other security professionals.

The point that Krebs and commentors agree on is that Clinton's system was set up with stupid beginner mistakes that left her system wide open.

that some Bernie supporters hope she gets indicted. By the way, I'm one of them who hopes that, too.

He's not about to expose such access unless it was vital to a greater issue. He'd let her win election THEN compromise her if that proved necessary.