ONLY SOS to use a homebrew server: but equivocates prolifically
Submitted by sorrowforhumans on Thu, 05/26/2016 - 7:07am
Her "convenience" trumps national security. The equivocation and lies around this are just mind numbing, and some of the consequences look like this:
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-terrorism-philippines-thai...http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-email-terrorism-philippines-thailand-bill-johnson-state-463605
She won't debate because she can't stand the light of accountability.
Comments
"Her "convenience" trumps national security."
I don't tend to be a conformist, but this REALLY bothers me. Is it merely extreme narcissism or is it an aspect of sociopathy?
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
It's about "seeing her email before anyone else does"
so she can cover her ass and destroy potential evidence if necessary (see: "debate schedule", "superdelegates", anything with the word "Foundation" in it, that sort of thing)
So this is a hoot - your Newsweek story
When I clicked on this story, one of those awful Hillary Victory Fund ads came up asking me to join the official campaign on top of THIS article:
EXCLUSIVE: HILLARY CLINTON AND HER STAFF MAY HAVE COMPROMISED COUNTERTERROR OPS WITH ‘SLOPPY’ COMMUNICATIONS
This of course sounds just a tad ominous:
Interesting thing to me about THIS HVF ad is that earlier versions listed all the states which had signed on to HVF. This one does not.
'What we are left with is an agency mandated to ensure transparency and disclosure that is actually working to keep the public in the dark' - Ann M. Ravel, former FEC member
Sounds like the Intelligence Community
has no respect for her at all. Too many are horrified, beyond the ones who suspect State leaks. How can State not work with Intel?
Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.
Hubris and horrible judgement
The Great Orange Satan by forcing her is ensuring that the great orange satan is elected.
There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties.. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.--John Adams
Clinton's judgment was poor.
Whether she insisted on it herself, or took advice from others, she made the decision. That's on her.
And where is the comparison criticism for the carryover in how that poor judgment reflects on a potential POTUS.
This is another example of the poor and haphazard leadership Clinton wants to foist on us all. An it is also yet another example of the disregard and annoyance Clinton has for what she considers unimportant and beneath her.
The American People - Server Security - Having Integrity - No real difference. What does any of it matter anyway? She has important things to worry about, and these things just don't measure up.
See, whenever mistakes are made or things go badly - those things are automatically 'in the past' so since those things in the past, we already know where Clinton stands when others try evaluate what has occurred. be it questioning on server security and stonewalling by not being cooperative, or anything else - the rules do not apply to her.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpQ6X4ojHws width:420 height:350]
Some people are just more equal than others. As far as anything that goes south…What difference does it make? It's in 'the past' after all. Right?