Resilience: The Return Of DC Power? Introducing Low-Tech Magazine

Resilience1.jpg
Hello resilient friends, I would like to introduce to you Low-Tech Magazine: Doubts On Progress and Technology, one of the most resourceful (stuffed with resources, in fact :=) free online magazines out there.
Here is today's email delivery: an intriguing article on the return of DC power and it's potential. An extract and the link below.

On a bit of a ZZ Top roll today :=)


http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2016/04/slow-electricity-the-return-of-lo...

Slow Electricity: The Return of DC Power?
Early Power Station-krisdecker.jpg
Early power station
In today's solar photovoltaic systems, direct current power coming from solar panels is converted to alternating current power, making it compatible with a building's electrical distribution.
Because many modern devices operate internally on direct current (DC), alternating current (AC) electricity is then converted back to DC electricity by the adapter of each device.
This double energy conversion, which generates up to 30% of energy losses, can be eliminated if the building's electrical distribution is converted to DC. Directly coupling DC power sources with DC loads can result in a significantly cheaper and more sustainable solar system.

However, some important conditions need to be met in order to achieve this goal.
Brush Electrical Coy power plant krisdecker.jpg
Picture: Brighton Electric Light Station, 1887. Stationary steam engines drive DC generators by means of leather belts. Source.

Electricity can be produced and distributed using alternating current or direct current. In the case of AC electricity, the current changes direction periodically, while the voltage reverses along with the current. In the case of DC electricity, the current flows in one direction and voltage remains constant. When electrical power transmission was introduced in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, AC and DC were competing to become the standard power distribution system -- a period in history known as the "war of currents".

AC won, mainly because of its higher efficiency when transported over long distances. Electric power (expressed in watt) equals current (expressed in ampère) multiplied by voltage (expressed in volt). Consequently, a given amount of power can be produced by a low voltage with a higher current or by a high voltage with a lower current. However, power loss due to resistance is proportional to the square of the current. Therefore, high voltages are the key to energy efficient power transmission over longer distances. [1]

The invention of the AC transformer in the late 1800s made it possible to easily step up the voltage in order to carry power over long distances, and then step it back down again for local use. DC electricity, on the other hand, couldn't be converted efficiently to high voltages until the 1960s. Consequently, it was impossible to transmit power effectively over long distances (> 1-2 km).

Brush_central_power_station_dynamos_New_York_1881Illustration: Brush Electric Company's central power plant dynamos powered arc lamps for public lighting in New York. Beginning operation in December 1880 at 133 West Twenty-Fifth Street, it powered a 2-mile (3.2 km) long circuit. Source: Wikipedia Commons.

A DC power network implied the installation of relatively small power plants in every neighbourhood. This was not ideal because the efficiency of the steam engines that powered the dynamos depended on their size -- the larger a steam engine, the more efficient it becomes. Furthermore, steam engines were noisy and produced air pollution, while the low transport efficiency of DC power excluded the use of more distant, clean hydro power sources.

More than a hundred years later, AC still constitutes the basis of our power infrastructure. Although high-voltage DC has been gaining ground for long-distance transportation, all electrical distribution in buildings is based on alternating current, either at 110V or 220V. Low voltage DC systems have survived in cars, trucks, motorhomes, caravans and boats, as well as in telecommunication offices, remote scientific stations, and emergency shelters. In most of these examples, devices are powered by batteries that operate on 12V, 24V or 48V DC.

Renewed Interest in DC Power
Recently, two converging factors have renewed interest in DC power distribution. First, we now have better alternatives for decentralized power generation, the most significant of these being solar PV panels. They don't produce pollution and their efficiency is independent of their size. Because solar panels can be located right where energy demand is, long distance power transmission isn't a requirement. Furthermore, solar panels "naturally" produce DC power, and so do chemical batteries, which are the most practical storage technology for PV systems.

Solar PV panels naturally produce DC power, and a growing share of our electric appliances operate internally on direct current

Secondly, a growing share of our electrical appliances operate internally on DC power. This is true for computers and all other electronic gadgets, as well as for solid state lighting (LEDs), flat screen televisions, stereo equipment, microwave ovens, and an increasing amount of devices operated on DC motors with variable speed operation (fans, pumps, compressors, and traction systems). Within the next 20 years, we could see as much as 50% of the total loads in households being made up of DC consumption. [2]
DC plant Hippodrome Pariskrisdecker.jpg
DC Power plant of the Hippodrome in Paris. A steam engine runs multiple dynamos that power arc lamps. Source unknown.
In a building that generates solar PV power but distributes it indoors over an AC electrical system, a double energy conversion is required. First, the DC power from the solar panel is converted to AC power using an inverter. Then, AC power is converted back to DC power by the adapters of DC-internal appliances like computers, LEDs and microwaves. These energy conversions imply power losses, which could be avoided if a solar powered building would be equipped with DC distribution. In other words, a DC electrical system could make a solar PV system more energy efficient. Continued at site - link above.

It's a fascinating read and I enjoy receiving Low-Tech Magazine's articles via email - http://www.lowtechmagazine.com.
I would love to hear your thoughts about and experiences of DC Power. Both at home in a RE system and in local power grids of neighbourhood size.

I have some stuff in my mac's gizzards somewhere on local power grids and a book about it. I'll hopefully get to writing something about it for us.

Peace be with us, if we liberate our homes and neighbourhoods form the national grid,
gerrit

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Sandino's picture

for all sorts of devices, and as a DC charger standard connector, replacing the venerable 12v cigarette lighter standard. USB DC power outlets are even available in hotels, cars, trains, planes, etc. The explosion of small battery-powered devices is driving DC adoption.

p.s. I think USB has 5v and 12v DC. As always though, it's the current that'll get you.

up
0 users have voted.
Gerrit's picture

I look forward to learning more.

And TY also for the caution. I know little about electricity and need to learn lots more so as never to have a personal encounter with the current (yikes).

It is real good to meet such knowledgeable people here on c99. Thanks, Sandino.

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

Sandino's picture

The 'It's the current that'll get ya' line is sort of a double entendre, in that it is a standard phrase among people working with high voltage it seems, and it is also the likely reason your USB hubs or outlets won't power everything you want, but may die trying.

You may get a better intuitive understanding of basic electric circuits by using plumbing as an analogy (or compressed air!!). You would be in good company, since Maxwell himself actually built water circuits to work this stuff out.
With water, the voltage is analogous to the pressure, current, to the volume of water flowing. Resistance is equivalent to constriction in the pipes, increasing pressure and reducing flow. Power, the rate of energy delivery, is voltage times current, or pressure times volume... I'm visualizing of those tiny water-jet cutters as extremely high voltage low current device, a fire hose as high voltage and high current, a slow brook babbling peacefully through a big flood conduit for low voltage high current, and a dripping faucet as low voltage low current. You can make a battery too, but the details are left as an exercise for the reader.

up
0 users have voted.
Sandino's picture

http://xkcd.com/927/
Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

(Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.)

up
0 users have voted.
Gerrit's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

detroitmechworks's picture

Was just having a discussion with people yesterday with regards to the higher sound quality of older recording mediums as opposed to MP3.

I do remember the difference in sound between a record and a tape. Now I recall the difference in sound between a tape and a CD, and the difference between a CD and an MP3.

There's a lot of bands I'd LOVE to hear on a good old vinyl.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Gerrit's picture

I don't hear as well as I used to, so I've thought it was just me. But others like you who know tech say vinyl sounds better.

I've also wondered if it was worth it to buy an old record player and collect the good old stuff again. My main reason is actually convenience. As a teen, I used to know where all my records where: in the old stereo system's filing drawer. Plus, it always worked and it didn't up and die so often. I don't even listen to my music anymore. I don't understand iTunes anymore; it's scrambled all my music. I have it on backup somewhere, but honestly it's a pain in the arse. My cds are scattered everywhere in the house. Argh!

Would you consider a record player again? What do you think?

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

detroitmechworks's picture

But it requires MUCH higher use of bandwidth. Essentially the reason MP3's sound like crap is because they use so LITTLE info and it's compressed so much.

The solution I would seek is a return to a dedicated piece of hardware inside computers that functions similarly to the old Soundblaster cards. Essentially dedicating processing power exclusively to sound. It would require a HELL of a lot more bandwidth, but with enough tracks playing simultaneously you should be able to approximate the sound of a vinyl recording in a digital format. (IMHO, 120 tracks should be enough to effectively create the sound properly. In essence we should be thinking of our sound like our monitors. We should be trying to INCREASE resolution instead of trying to reduce space and fidelity. In my opinion, each track is the equivalent of a few hundred pixels in auditory format.)

Proof of concept idea for this would be to individually record several tracks for each instrument, calibrated to either high or low notes and sounds, and then combine them to try to get the best approximation of the true sound.

Yes, this idea has many other applications besides just good sound quality. (Immersive environments for simulation and games comes to mind) However, I think it's a viable technology to go after, IF the funding people would be willing to pay money for a theory which might not pan out, but shows every possibility of succeeding.

However, For just Listening to music as opposed to getting technical, (Because I'm a geek and tend to think Hi-Tech) I'd absolutely consider a record player/stereo. It has many advantages, and considering I don't listen to music CONSTANTLY as background noise, the enjoyment factor would be amplified. Course, the problem is the record industry shies away from anything that involves not forcing people to pay extra money for the same product over and over again... but what they fail to realize is that Records would be better at protecting their business model than any current recording format. The emphasis needs to be on the QUALITY of the music, rather than the convenience of it.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Gerrit's picture

a lot of the tech, but I hear a business idea in there. Could you develop it as a business project? Get some advice and financial help from all those organizations that help veterans readjust? That would be real cool.

I think I'm gonna follow your advice and look for an old record/stereo system on Kijiji or at Value Village. VV sells records for a buck or two. The heck with this other over-engineered audio tech. TY, eh.

I could also use the record/stereo system to rest my old rotary phone on :=)

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

detroitmechworks's picture

A lot of people have suggested that I put together a kickstarter for it, or a Patreon or something similar. My major problem with that is that the theory also involves a new style of surround sound involving multiple speakers of various sizes on a pair of headphones (Built for robustness and durability, because this project is about love of music, not making money, although the money would be nice)

Ideally, I'd love to borrow a few concepts from old module designers in RPG games in order to help plot out how the sound affects each speaker and the ways in which movement affects the sounds, etc. (Doppler effect and echoes... other things we don't think about when just listening, but make a HUGE difference in the way a sound comes across.)

I admit this is a concept that is a bit "Over-engineered" but at the same time, it's an attempt to gain what we had in the past with sound. Records were a physical medium, and physical mediums have a level of resolution that is very hard to approximate digitally. When we start thinking about sound the same way we think about visuals, the improvement will come, IMHO.

(Got a lot of proof of concepts I'd like to do, including a virtual simulation of a concert hall playing THIS: (Complete with the sound changing slightly as you moved around the environment.)
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxsDpY7TFI8]

A walk through a virtual woods with sound coming from all angles...
And working with a game composer to create a similar experience to "Peter and the Wolf" in a virtual narrative form)

(Sorry, this is my Pet Project, so it's one of those that I'd love to see come to fruition.)

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Gerrit's picture

graduating from his 2-year game programming diploma in a few days. Then he's going to Ireland in the fall, to turn it into a BSc in game computing. He's fascinated by game sound and he really enjoyed is game sound course. We should talk over the summer; see if he knows anything about this stuff. Maybe it could help? Who knows.

I'm real glad for you that you're running with this project. It's very creative and that is always the best kind of work. And magic things seem to happen when it's the right thing. Good luck with this, mate. It would be so cool if it works out for you.

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

detroitmechworks's picture

But I'll happily talk it over with anybody who can help. Smile

Right now I'm discussing it mostly with Tony Manfredonia http://www.manfredoniamusic.com/ Who's an acquaintance of mine and works in game music for a lot of indie developers. Very talented guy and it was his frustration with the toolset he has available which led to my theories/ideas.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

WoodsDweller's picture

lots of people used DC for solar. It leaned heavily towards RV gizmos. Appliances were hard to find, selection very limited, and hiring someone to do work for you (like installing a DC well pump) was hopeless. Not to mention using incandescent turn signal bulbs for indoor lighting.
Inverters (DC to AC) are reliable, efficient, and not all that expensive. You can then use off-the-shelf appliances, saving money and getting maximum flexibility.
The only reason I can think of for domestic DC is a simplified system, such as lighting only. If you can find suitable LED lighting that runs at the same voltage as your batteries, your system won't need anything more complicated than a charge controller to run. Seems like a good choice for lighting for a storage building or garden shed where lighting is the only power need you have.
On the other end of the spectrum they are talking about using very high voltage DC for transcontinental power transmission. I don't know why DC is supposed to be better for that, but that's what I've heard.

up
0 users have voted.

"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function." -- Albert Bartlett
"A species that is hurtling toward extinction has no business promoting slow incremental change." -- Caitlin Johnstone

Gerrit's picture

insight on the, ahem, AC/DC lineup :=) I've been collecting little nuggets on DC appliances, like refrigerators, but it's a mess and I don't know anything. So I have a lot to learn. Learning in public is a great education, because of experts like yourself.

Do you have anything more on your vision for underground living? Where could I get more info? You got my attention right away with your comments when we discussed underground greenhouses. I'm real keen to learn more and pass it along to my children for when we build their earthship house. I'm rapidly hoisting aboard the concept of human underground living during the initial phases of rapid climate change.

Thanks for stopping by and best wishes,

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.

WoodsDweller's picture

on starting your Resilience group. I've noticed your posts, but have not read them. Too many other things vying for my attention, and I promised here that I wouldn't just be Joe Doomer whenever someone has a little hope to offer. Love the logo you chose.
Efficiency of the DC->AC->DC process is a factor, but the real factor is overall system efficiency. Also, solar is dirt cheap now, efficiency isn't the issue it used to be.
Even if you run directly on DC, you probably don't have the right voltage. You'll need a DC-DC converter, which while pretty efficient loses some power. Computer power supplies produce about 5 DC voltages.
Your choices of DC refrigerators (likely the big energy consumer in a solar home) are crap, you can probably find a more efficient AC model these days that will make the overall DC->AC->appliance cycle more efficient.
If you want more info on underground living I guess I'll have to write some. I don't think anyone else is thinking along those lines.
There are two reasons to go underground - first is temperature stabilization without massive energy inputs, and the second is resistance to severe weather.
Genetically modern humans existed in the previous interglacial, but they didn't accomplish much. They domesticated dogs, but not sheep/goats/chickens/turkeys/cattle/horses/yaks. My theory (I haven't seen anyone else mention it) was that the climate was too unstable to stack two stone blocks together without some crazy wind coming along to blow them over, much less being stable enough for agriculture. They were always on the run from megastorms.
We're about to rediscover the ways of our distant ancestors - keep an eye on the horizon and when the black clouds gather, find a place to hide.
The immediate pressure on greenhouse horticulture will be from water shortages. Drip is good, hydroponics are better, aeroponics are best. Look at what happened in Sao Paulo and California - they diverted the water to the cities. What else are they going to do? That's fine, but begs the question "what are you going to eat?". Growing more with less water is the first step.
C3 and C4 plants (practically everything humans eat) cease photosynthesis at 38 C. Forests also become carbon sources instead of carbon sinks. That's a reversible reaction, when it cools down they start up again. It's just a matter of how many hours out of the growing season are lost. It's cool at night, but no sunlight. Generally if there is a heat wave there is also a drought, and reduced crop yields or failure is attributed to the drought, but even if you find enough water they still won't grow.
Encapsulate your plants in a greenhouse to limit transpiration. Maybe even recover some of the humidity with a dehumidifier.
At 55 C (roughly the current high temperature record for Death Valley, there's a reason they call it that), the proteins in plants denature - cook. That is not a reversible reaction, any more than you can uncook an egg. A few hours of a heat wave like that will kill every plant. If the ground gets to that temperature, even the seeds will die. Then you go straight to a dust bowl. The interior of continents should average 5-7 C above the planetary average, and you pile extreme weather events on top of that.
Rather than try to air condition an above-ground greenhouse you put it underground (the roof is glazed). That should prevent the worst of heat extremes, as well as facilitate winter cultivation (4 season gardening, more food per square foot, less work canning and drying).

up
0 users have voted.

"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function." -- Albert Bartlett
"A species that is hurtling toward extinction has no business promoting slow incremental change." -- Caitlin Johnstone

Gerrit's picture

when I'm more awake :=)

up
0 users have voted.

Resilience: practical action to improve things we can control.
3D+: developing language for postmodern spirituality.