Bernie needs to make up ground elsewhere, where much more of the vote remains to be counted.

I am not alone. And New York makes no difference to me.
Candidate, write in, third party, Bernie gets my vote.

gap. This reminds me of 2000. By the way, re: vote fixing: I owe an apology to the Republican party. They've been saying the Democratic Party fixes elections for years, and I was such a partisan I couldn't see it. I see it now. This smells to high heaven. I will never vote for Hillary Clinton. And that is not in any way due to Bernie Sanders or to anything he said. I've been watching that woman and her husband since 1992, and they are sleaze.

The sound of her voice grates on my nerves.

It will be a long 4 years if she is prez

People who haven't voted deserve to be heard. Then we need to give the corporatists all the hell we can muster at the convention. They need to understand that we -- not Bernie, WE -- are not going away.

She's giving her victory speech right now

suppression, and a Lot of dirty tricks. Who counts votes matters more than who votes or even how, IMO.

... not to mention basic electoral incompetence. The obstacles remain yuge, but it's been that way since the beginning.

Read some tweet where Hill says the ol' "we have more in common than what divides us" schtick. Um, no.

Onward.

It doesn't matter what the delegate count is.

As long as he has the funds, he will continue until all the states have seen and heard his message. People are transforming everywhere. He's empowering these newest generations, the people under 55 who examine alternative news and who have facts at their fingertips.

The majority of folks 55+ rely on the media monopolies for news. They do not fact-check in order to neutralize the brainwashing and propaganda. They only know what the establishment tells them. This side of the divide overwhelmingly votes their fears, not their hopes.

This is a huge gap in consciousness and awareness, that came as a result of the tremendously disruptive technology of the personal computer. The minds of those who were empowered by computers during their learning years process information in a very different way. (Learning how to email late in life is not the same thing.)

Big-picture thinkers know that in 2016, winning delegates doesn't matter. They know that Bernie is engaged in a great historic struggle against the Democratic establishment and a rogue federal government that only serves itself. Every day he remains engaged, the establishment is laid open and exposed for all to see. Believe me, the American people are in a state of shock from what they are actually seeing for the first time. This nation is recoiling with disgust and the result is an explosion of public awareness. The Great American Coma is coming to an end.

People under 55 will not forget. People older will soon move on. They are already outnumbered by the Millennials and the 21st Centurists, who have been gravely harmed and betrayed by them in every way.

The establishment Parties are already dead. You might just see what that looks like at the Conventions, regardless of how this disgraceful Primary season plays out. Every rally he holds for the people, and every appearance that Bernie makes is a crippling blow to the establishment. Stay tuned and keep Bernie rolling until the end.

In all the counties Hillary is winning in the country side the gap in votes between HRC and Bernie is around 3 - 6%, including Orange County. But in the counties Rockland, Westchester, Richmonds, Bronx, New York County, Kings, Queens, Nassau and Suffolk County the gap is much larger.

Why is that? Why would the population in these counties vote so differently from the counties in the rest of the state? In which counties were the irregularities the highest? I haven't caught up or don't remember what kind of irregularities happened that caused the law suit, but I wonder if they happened in those counties with high gaps between HRC and Sanders more than in the other counties.

Was at a Bernie Sanders Campaign HQ in my neighborhood tonight for phone banking and a NY primary result watch party and could talk to some people. The disappointment was palpable.

I asked several people what they would do and what they suggest Bernie should do, if he doesn't get the nomination. Some said they would leave the country, when Hillary would lose in the GE, others said, they would push Bernie to continue to run as an independent and if he would lose in the GE, they would work more than ever for the movement he has started to bring out in the open through his campaign.

Others (and I still think those are problematic) still will vote to prevent the Republicans from winning out of fear. No third party voting was considered by anyone. These were seasoned campaign supporters and activists for a decade or much more, and now for Bernie.

One of the lead Bernie Sanders campaign manager in that office came from SC and is a very soft-spoken Afro-America. I asked him what he thinks about Rev. Barber's Moral Monday movement. He said "hmm, nah ..." and it became clear that he believed Rev. Barber is not courageous and radical enough to really resist and fight for changes as many on the radical left supporting Sanders would want to. He said one has to build the movement, if Bernie would lose not only the primaries, but also if he would lose the GE running as an independent, after losing the Democratic primaries.

I would clearly push Sanders to not commit to his former pledge to support the democratic nominee HRC and run instead as an independent in the GE by himself.

The only reason why Hillary could win is because of the fear factor of the Republicans among the democratic voters (I guess that's decades of manipulation of voter due to the awful electoral college and party duopoly you have) and because none of them gives a damn about foreign policies, it seems, (strange if one considers how many enlisted military and Veterans are there among the Democrats, one would think they would like to have a little less aggressive foreign policy involvements around the world, as they have to suffer the consequences of US war activities).

Most of the Americans I talked to seem to relate to foreign countries through their ancestry and what they know about the hardship and atrocities their ancestors went through in Europe before they immigrated to the US, often this goes back two hundred years. That seemed to dominate their thinking about current affairs in those countries more than actual current conflicts occurring now around the world.

It's amazingly difficult to understand who thinks what and why for me. I hope they scrutinize those votes in those counties where the gap between HRC and Sanders are so irregularly high that it seems there is a not so benign reason for it.