verizon dilemma
Submitted by ngant17 on Thu, 04/14/2016 - 6:16pm
i feel a little guilty about my verizon plan, and the ceo is downright nasty against bernie and the union strikers.
i'm ready to bail out, but i don't know if that would help the strikers. i support cwa and i organized unsuccessfully for them many years ago in a small telecom cable company. but i will support the workers first and foremost. should i switch or wait this one out?
Comments
the best thing you can do as a customer right now is to write
to the top dog of the company and demand that he settle with the strikers immediately.
Perhaps give him a certain amount of time after which you plan to find another plan.
this is only a suggestion on my part. I do realize that some folks are locked into their plans. Of course you could always threaten to not renew.
but the most important thing is to call, write, or email the company. Perhaps send them a twitter message also. Best thing there is that it's public.
Customers can be some of the best supporters for the strikers, because companies like to keep their customers happy esp if they are in the business of making sales to those customers.
Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth.-Lucy Parsons
As much as I'd like to "Stand in Solidarity with CWA"
I can't afford to go with the lack of coverage other carriers have around me.
It's critical that I have voice communication and can get on the net for accurate up to date real time weather for my work...
I can't afford to drive 10 miles to the nearest hill top, stand on one leg while spinning, with my arm raised overhead saying, "Can you hear me now?"
If where you work, live, and travel the other carriers have adequate coverage then why not tell em piss off...
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,
I would wait
a bit but let Verizon know where you stand if they don't come to an agreement within a few weeks I would go elsewhere There are plenty of other reliable carriers now, but that's just me.
Is Sprint decent in your area?
If you are just talking about cell phone plans, you might want to look into Credo Mobile, which uses Sprint's network but also uses some of their profits to fund a lot of awesome things. That said, Sprint is horrible where I live so every time I've switched over, I've ending up switching back to AT&T out of frustration; but it if works well, then Credo is a great choice.
Voiding Verizon
I dropped Verizon a couple of years ago for the same reasons you are thinking of dropping them now. I took Credo instead. Credo cost more but they donate to organizations with which I agree. Unfortunately, they use non-union Sprint as their carrier. It seems that no matter what one tries to do, the money grubbers are there first. That being the case, I think Credo is ok if you don't mind the non-union bit.
-Greed is not a virtue.
-Socialism: the radical idea of sharing.
-Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962
i picked verizon because of cdma network
which is the wireless network i'm using for my startup m2m business with Monnit.com based in utah. iot, you know. internet of things. that's not hype, the market is really there. so i'm sure that it will eventually vector out into the other wireless networks but right now it seems to be cdma.
fortunately, i'm not locked into contract, i'm pay as i go with verizon, $30 bucks/month not counting a data plan. i was happy with the company until this ceo makes a jerk of himself and the strike is on.
i'm loyal to cwa but don't think they got union running in another cdma network, not sprint or us cellular. and besides i don't think credo is cdma and union anyway.
so i'll guess i'll have to check with monnit people about what to do for future plans.
If you're satisfied with the service, stay with Verizon
as others have suggested. Write the CEO, remind him you and a whole lot of other people pay his salary, let him know you support the union in their pursuit of decent wages, benefits, and working conditions, and say it would be worth the few more pennies a day required so fellow Americans would have a fair shot at a decent life. That carries moral weight, as long as you are polite, but firm in your statements. Writing while not being a customer makes you an outside agitator, which doesn't carry the same ethical heft.
Where I live, it's Verizon or Comcast, and Comcast has been so utterly abysmal it's been worth what few hassles we've had with Verizon. FWIW, we had a problem with the FIOS main power backup system over the past weekend: PEPCO cut power to our area for a few hours during the day last Thursday. The initial power surge through the wires when they turned it back on took out the FIOS back-up unit, which took out our Internet, TV, and phone. We arranged for a service call to fix it, with the earliest available time on Sunday. On Saturday, my SO picked up a battery from Home Depot and installed it in the back-up unit to get us back on-line faster. We had service for a few hours before the real problem (bad power supply) manifested itself and our FIOS cut out again. When we checked, the Sunday service call was canceled, and my SO (who loves yelling at people on the phone, so I let him rail on this one) arranged a service call on Monday. Turns out, Verizon tests all home connections on a rotating basis. If the service comes back on, and a service call is outstanding for that unit, the existing trouble ticket is automatically canceled. Just one more way they shaft their service workers: put them on the hook to work on the weekend, then cancel with little notice or explanation. So, I think the Verizon strikers deserve all the support they can get.
littlevoice
posted a thread on my verizon
https://community.verizonwireless.com/thread/909140
noted that i already got a response: "the Verizon strike is for the Verizon landline/Fios business. There are VERY FEW Verizon Wireless employees represented by the unions on strike..."
And that would be mostly true
I work for one of the other ones, won't say more, try hard not to. While the two are different divisions, the Wireless is the money maker, so they now are trying to shaft land line. While the big revenue is in the wireless, that wire line is a vital component of their whole network - its really only wireless from your handset to the tower, after that most of the time you're back on copper wire, fiber, etc. So it's a lame excuse but technically true. But without that land line employee maintaining that network, they can't run effective Wireless.
Wireless is their money maker, and they won't want to lose Wireless customers. Writing them cannot hurt.
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
Oh so they are trying to say...
That Verizon isn't Verizon?
Ummm OK... Fail!
I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
~John F. Kennedy~
Economic: -9.13, Social: -7.28,