@MrWebster

a dirty bomb, the way to do it would not be to attack the containment structures of any of the reactors. The way to do it would be to attack the spent fuel pools, which are much softer targets: a cruise missile fuzed for second contact could punch through the roof, splash through the water, and detonate near the bottom of the pool, lifting the contents out and distributing it around the neighborhood.

It would not be as toasty-hot as the fuel still undergoing the initial post-shutdown cooling in the reactors, but it would be quite hot enough to do the job. Especially if that was combined with an effort to kill the last of the cooling for the reactors themselves by knocking out the one remaining power feed to the plant and the diesel backups: the initial fuel-scattering would render the site inaccessible and unrepairable, and then it would just be a matter of time until the hottest of the reactors boiled dry to join the fun (one is still generating steam and power for the site and the nearby community of Energodar). Not something for those seeking instant gratification, of course, but it'd make a fine, permanent mess. It'd just take a little longer to happen than it did at Fukushima.

I'm reminded of Mercutio's speech: "Marry, 'tis not so deep as a well, nor so wide as a church-door, but 'tis enough, 'twill serve: ask for me tomorrow, and you shall find me a grave man."

Just today really. Maybe not the best of news but hopefully derails at least for the time being a full blown war in Europe.

US sees no signs that Russia is ready to blow up nuclear power plant or use nuclear weapons – Kirby

The good news here is that Biden admin signaling to Graham and Zelinsky not to damage the nuclear power plant to create a reason for direct NATO intervention into the Ukr/Russia war.

US Senate proposes that radioactive contamination of NATO territory caused by Russia be considered as attack on Alliance

Zelensky kept warning that the Russians would deliberately create a massive act of environmental terrorism by bombing the nuke plant. Ukraine even had drills in case this fictional even happens. Pretty obvious Zelensky working directly with Graham to pull us into a direct war with Russia. I would guess the Biden admin is not happy with some crazed senator deciding when the US should go to war.

The second good piece of news is that the Russians have fairly secured the plant to stop any sort of Chernobyl event.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/nuclear-falseflag-on-zaporozhye-npp

But, can they really do it? Firstly, a potential ZNPP attack invokes images of Chernobyl, vast exclusion zones and thousands poisoned and dead. But there are very large differences.

Firstly, Chernobyl exploded with an unprecedented force after its pressure vessel reached immense pressures due to a concatenation of highly improbable events. The explosion was so powerful as to generate discussion amongst experts to this day whether the reactor had actually gone ‘critical’—meaning, fission had actually occurred thereby creating a mini nuclear explosion at the reactor.

My point is that such an explosion is hardly possible at the ZNPP. For one: the power plant, as I understand it, is in some form of cold shutdown. This means that the rods have been retracted and the danger of any sort of mass catastrophe of this sort is very low. You’re not going to recreate the power of the Chernobyl blast with manmade means. I don’t know how many tons of TNT you’d have to put there, but it would be a lot—and where would you put them? Underneath the containment vessel itself? A lot of the prospects don’t make much sense.

Much of the disaster and ensuing contamination from the Chernobyl incident was due to the power of the explosion and how far it sent all the radioactive pieces of the core. There were chunks of Uranium being found tens of kilometers or more, and the radioactive dust, etc. had plumed everywhere. This would be extremely difficult to achieve at the ZNPP, particularly with any “ordinary” strike. Even a severe cruise missile strike on the reactor itself, as an example, would not achieve anything even remotely resembling the Chernobyl incident, and in fact would only create a ‘localized’ disaster.

With that said, we should not ignore the fact that it doesn’t matter how bad the disaster actually is, the West will ‘manufacture’ the scale which suits them. So even if a minor blast were to occur, with a minor release of radiation, the West and its corrupt lapdog agencies will manufacture whatever false ‘data’ is necessary to push the agenda that, for instance, ‘massive plumes of radiation have gone into Poland/Europe/NATO’, etc.

Thus, one idea for the falseflag is that it doesn’t actually need to create the catastrophe itself, but rather the appearance of one.

The irony of course is that the UK has sent depleted uranium tank shells to the Ukrainians.

@MrWebster

It’s on the potential false flag attack on the nuclear power plant. Alex thinks that this video of Budanov was computer generated.

A.I. Generated Madman Cyberdanov

I really never ever thought about the possibility that a computer-generated Nazi, who is most likely already dead, would ever threaten the world with a nuclear catastrophe. I’m more than baffled.

* The destruction of a Russian nuclear power plant is being considered as a nuclear attack against Russia. ZNPP is a Russian nuclear power plant according to the Russian constitution. Blow it up and you attacked Russia with a nuke. Think of all the contamination, radiation and fallout on Russian soil. It doesn’t matter if you cover it as a false flag and blame Russia for having blown up its own NPP where its own troops are stationed.

As mentioned NATO has already planned to attack Russian targets with depleted uranium, but it’s presumed that Russia already blew them up, but Biden has authorized us to send them too. And remember that Lindsay Graham recently met with his BFF Zelensky and said some weird things and now he’s introduced legislation that says if Russia does blow it up then that will be an excuse for NATO to invade. Or maybe put NATO peacekeepers there. Graham and Bluementhol should be the first 2 removed and sent for psychiatric evaluation.

Just today really. Maybe not the best of news but hopefully derails at least for the time being a full blown war in Europe.

US sees no signs that Russia is ready to blow up nuclear power plant or use nuclear weapons – Kirby

The good news here is that Biden admin signaling to Graham and Zelinsky not to damage the nuclear power plant to create a reason for direct NATO intervention into the Ukr/Russia war.

US Senate proposes that radioactive contamination of NATO territory caused by Russia be considered as attack on Alliance

Zelensky kept warning that the Russians would deliberately create a massive act of environmental terrorism by bombing the nuke plant. Ukraine even had drills in case this fictional even happens. Pretty obvious Zelensky working directly with Graham to pull us into a direct war with Russia. I would guess the Biden admin is not happy with some crazed senator deciding when the US should go to war.

The second good piece of news is that the Russians have fairly secured the plant to stop any sort of Chernobyl event.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/nuclear-falseflag-on-zaporozhye-npp

But, can they really do it? Firstly, a potential ZNPP attack invokes images of Chernobyl, vast exclusion zones and thousands poisoned and dead. But there are very large differences.

Firstly, Chernobyl exploded with an unprecedented force after its pressure vessel reached immense pressures due to a concatenation of highly improbable events. The explosion was so powerful as to generate discussion amongst experts to this day whether the reactor had actually gone ‘critical’—meaning, fission had actually occurred thereby creating a mini nuclear explosion at the reactor.

My point is that such an explosion is hardly possible at the ZNPP. For one: the power plant, as I understand it, is in some form of cold shutdown. This means that the rods have been retracted and the danger of any sort of mass catastrophe of this sort is very low. You’re not going to recreate the power of the Chernobyl blast with manmade means. I don’t know how many tons of TNT you’d have to put there, but it would be a lot—and where would you put them? Underneath the containment vessel itself? A lot of the prospects don’t make much sense.

Much of the disaster and ensuing contamination from the Chernobyl incident was due to the power of the explosion and how far it sent all the radioactive pieces of the core. There were chunks of Uranium being found tens of kilometers or more, and the radioactive dust, etc. had plumed everywhere. This would be extremely difficult to achieve at the ZNPP, particularly with any “ordinary” strike. Even a severe cruise missile strike on the reactor itself, as an example, would not achieve anything even remotely resembling the Chernobyl incident, and in fact would only create a ‘localized’ disaster.

With that said, we should not ignore the fact that it doesn’t matter how bad the disaster actually is, the West will ‘manufacture’ the scale which suits them. So even if a minor blast were to occur, with a minor release of radiation, the West and its corrupt lapdog agencies will manufacture whatever false ‘data’ is necessary to push the agenda that, for instance, ‘massive plumes of radiation have gone into Poland/Europe/NATO’, etc.

Thus, one idea for the falseflag is that it doesn’t actually need to create the catastrophe itself, but rather the appearance of one.

The irony of course is that the UK has sent depleted uranium tank shells to the Ukrainians.