Some thoughts on Republican logic
CPAC speaker sparks alarm with call for trans people to be ‘eradicated’
Honestly, this is the sort of thinking that brings the Church Lady to mind:
Now CPAC, well, I guess PBS cared enough to do this short film about them:
One of the most amusing things about Ben Meiselas' hatchet job on CPAC is the point at 5:45 of his video where he shows the half-empty CPAC convention room. Practically nobody attends CPAC -- maybe it's that the mass public doesn't really want to look all that closely at who these people really are.
I suppose it's obvious though. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to "protect children." But what from? Malnutrition? No. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to protect children from "transgender ideology."
And let's turn Michael Knowles' argument around a bit. Knowles argues that transgenderism isn't real. From the Independent article at the top:
Mr Knowles has said in the past that his rhetoric isn’t genocidal because he doesn’t believe trans people exist, Jezebel noted.
“There can’t be a genocide,” he said on his programme last week, adding that “it’s not a legitimate category of being. They’re labouring under a delusion. And so we need to correct that delusion”.
It seems more valid, however, to argue that Republicans don't exist, that being a Republican isn't a legitimate category of being, and that they are -- indeed -- laboring under a delusion. Should we eradicate Republicans? No, because then we would become like Knowles.
After all, it's quite clear why the Republicans are doing what they do. They don't really want what the CPAC people want, at least not all of it, but they invariably end up coddling them and putting them in power in places like the Supreme Court.
Here are a couple of historical afterthoughts for reflection. One wonders what Hitler's place in history might have been had there not been nice conservatives like Franz von Papen or Paul von Hindenburg in power in Germany at the beginning of 1933. All they wanted to do was to bring the monarchy back, and Hitler seemed the easiest route, as indeed he was. And then, on a lesser note, I suppose, there was John B. Floyd, secretary of war under nice Pennsylvania conservative James Buchanan, who appears to have sent immense quantities of arms just before the Civil War to places where Confederates would later seize them. (Floyd later became a Confederate general.) It's the slippery slope, you see. Elect a conservative, get something worse.
As for trans people, it's also quite clear that they're not doing it so they can enjoy those dreadful suicide statistics. Dear Republicans: has it crossed your minds that the trans people might possibly be sincere in their intentions?
Okay? Okay.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3412d/3412dff4982afb53f5871c5f3f9d4edee5947de1" alt="Share"
Comments
Honestly, though --
This bunch is more like "let a million Brett Favres bloom"...
"The Democratic Party has been focused too much on pleasing people who matter too little in this society." -- Chris Cuomo
I keep expecting Trump to veer left
confuse the righties, get some support from the lefties and win in a landslide
R's have been doing this for years
Pick something to be wronged about, or you find distasteful, gays, trans, happy holidays. Paste it on something "good", traditional marriage, straight people, Christmas. Blow it up into a war against religion, pedophiles, whatever. Go way over the top in victim hood, vow to fight to the death. Blame everything on the left . Wash, rinse, spin cycle, repeat.
It would be nice --
"The Democratic Party has been focused too much on pleasing people who matter too little in this society." -- Chris Cuomo
We could ditch it
Why have a country if it only benefits a few citizens? Because within those borders they can sway everything. Who fights and dies to protect these "borders", in Germany and Korea and everywhere else. In many countries the people vote to give themselves a better life, and to give their fellow citizens a better life. Health care, education, working conditions, rights. Here it's called communism, fascism, leftism, the mortal enemy of democracy.
And so here some kids live in cars with their parents, have welfare lunch at school, hang out at Mickey D's to use the internet and have to beg for what much of the developed world takes for granted. Houses stand empty, fortified by tax write offs and mortgage deductions so people can live under bridges and on the streets.
So far, to me, it feels like the only reason we have borders and a country is to give the 1% a safe place to grow their wealth and have a populace to pay for their crimes.
We do this here too
It just doesn’t work because our representatives aren’t there to represent us, but they are there to represent their donors.
Jefferson warned about taxes and central banks and even made sure that we had unalienable rights that the government couldn’t touch and yet through the years all those things have been changed by many congressional acts and signed by numerous presidents. Anyone who tried fighting against was either removed from government or from life itself. The Kennedy’s, King, and gawd only knows who else. Protest against your government and get beaten or killed by the military police force they created to get around posse comitatos.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Republican logic
Sounds like an oxymoron to me. Then again, any time you're talking about politicians whether R or D, the word moron comes to mind.
We come from dust. We will return to dust.
That's why I don't dust. It my be someone I know.
That is the operational definition
of mental illness.
But somehow, I can’t work up any pity or understanding. He (and all his ilk) need to be institutionalized before this brand of stochastic terrorism takes root.
Twice bitten, permanently shy.
Extra Credit: and here's Democracy Now on the topic
"The Democratic Party has been focused too much on pleasing people who matter too little in this society." -- Chris Cuomo