Could someone explain to me Robby Soave's comment?

Since it's all worth seeing, I'm not going to bookmark it. Soave's comment is at the six-minute mark.

"I absolutely reject that a US president can order this kind of action without a declaration of war.."

Have any of these nice young journalists who want to carry the hip scoop for Seymour Hersh bothered to, y'know, read any history? Let's go to the most egregious two examples: Lyndon Johnson has a story fabricated about a "Gulf of Tonkin Incident." Nobody investigates. Congress greenlights Johnson's invasion. A couple of million dead bodies later, Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger have Cambodia bombed with a couple of million tons of ordnance. As a result, the Khmer Rouge take over Cambodia, and produce a couple of million more deaths. Most of Congress: yawn. And that was before Congress was completely sold out for a mess of pottage.

Y'know?

Share
up
10 users have voted.

Comments

Yes, this twirp looks preposterously naive -- or disingenuous -- with that comment. He is either ignorant of -- or is pretending to be -- the long standing practice of amending the Constitution by pretending that it does not exist. The language about how the country may go to war has been nullified for decades. The same with the First Amendment's provisions about freedom of speech and the press. To enforce the Constitution, some party with "standing" has to sue within the Federal Court system, and persuade a judge to issue an Order to contravene the action that violates the Constitution. This tedious process is easily ignored and few if any Federal Judges have the chutzpah to order the end of a war or the freeing of a reporter who publishes disapproved information about a war in progress.

Just like the anti-trust laws, The Constitution has outlived its usefulness to the people who fund politics. So it is also ignored as a matter of course.

up
12 users have voted.

I cried when I wrote this song. Sue me if I play too long.

Cassiodorus's picture

@fire with fire was to push through Congress the "No Child Left Behind Act," an amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act which started under Johnson. What the NCLBA did was to require each state to create an array of idiotic tests that each student had to pass in order to advance.

I have to imagine that the new crop of journalists were affected by the stunting of America's education systems resulting from the NCLBA.

up
6 users have voted.

The ruling classes need an extra party to make the rest of us feel as if we participate in democracy. That's what the Democrats are for. They make the US more durable than the Soviet Union was.

QMS's picture

@Cassiodorus

says a lot about intelligent thoughtfulness
of course he is an old guy and missed the
NCLBA programming
\
[video:https://youtu.be/xZXMmRg9ZcU]

up
5 users have voted.

question everything

Cassiodorus's picture

@QMS The reality of the UN delegates, as well as of the political class that pull their strings, is the one described by Dylan Riley and Robert Brenner:

This new electoral structure is related to the rise of a new regime of accumulation: let us call it political capitalism. Under political capitalism, raw political power, rather than productive investment, is the key determinant of the rate of return. This new form of accumulation is associated with a series of novel mechanisms of ‘politically constituted rip-off’. These include an escalating series of tax breaks, the privatization of public assets at bargain-basement prices, quantitative easing plus ultra-low interest rates, to promote stock-market speculation—and, crucially, massive state spending aimed directly at private industry, with trickledown effects for the broader population: Bush’s Prescription Drug legislation, Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Trump’s cares Act, Biden’s American Rescue Plan, the Infrastructure and chips Acts and the Inflation Reduction Act. All these mechanisms of surplus extraction are openly and obviously political. They allow for returns, not on the basis of investment in plant, equipment, labour and inputs to produce use values, but rather on the basis of investments in politics.

Yeah, sure, the details of the politically constituted rip-off differ from nation-state to nation-state. But they, the political classes of each nation, are so engrossed in this rip-off that it's a wonder they bothered to make time for Roger Waters. I would have clapped when his speech was over.

As for the NCLBA, it isn't programming so much as it is a monstrous waste of time. The younger kids see education as play, and they do their real learning in the times of day when they are granted the right to play. Sometimes play can be a repurposing of the time the grownups have made for "study"; this is what the grownups call "goofing off." The goofing off is the real learning. This is a game the grownups can win, though they rarely did so even before the NCLBA. The older kids see the educational institution as a place to make friends or to pursue "college prep." Nobody really gives two hoots about dumb NCLBA tests, but everyone, student, teacher, and principal alike, is forced to do so, so waste of time it is.

As Frank Zappa said, long before W. was President: "“Drop out of school before your mind rots from exposure to our mediocre educational system. Forget about the Senior Prom and go to the library and educate yourself if you've got any guts." Robby Soave needs a library -- perhaps we could all send him copies of some William Blum or Noam Chomsky?

up
5 users have voted.

The ruling classes need an extra party to make the rest of us feel as if we participate in democracy. That's what the Democrats are for. They make the US more durable than the Soviet Union was.

River Rover's picture

A free and independent press

A legitimate government

Honest money

Rule of law

up
9 users have voted.

Rivers are horses - and kayaks are their saddles