Terrorism is whatever we say it is

There is no internationally agreed upon definition of terrorist.
Dropping thousands of tonnes of bombs on a civilian population from 30,000 feet certainly terrorizes a population, but it's never considered to be terrorism.

However, just because a nation's military does it, doesn't mean it isn't terrorism. The U.S. keeps Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on a terrorist blacklist, along with the governments of Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Israel (but no one else), despite it being clearly a military unit.
Meanwhile, Israel's military is assassinating civilians in Iran and bombing civilian areas in Syria, but for some reason that isn't terrorism.

But this essay isn't about Iran. This essay is about Russia.

According to a report from Politico, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told Secretary of State Antony Blinken to designate Russia as a “state sponsor of terrorism” or else Congress would do it.

The Politico report cited two sources familiar with the call who said the conversation happened earlier this week. As secretary of state, Blinken has the authority to designate a state as a sponsor of terror, and Congress could also do it by passing legislation.

The designation is meant to expand sanctions on the targeted nation. Currently, only Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria are designated by the US as state sponsors of terror. Cuba’s designation was lifted by the Obama administration but was reimposed during the final days of the Trump administration.

Since the US has already hit Russia with so many sanctions, the designation would have little impact on Moscow. But designating a state as a sponsor of terrorism opens up sanctions on other countries that do business with them. The move would also signal that US-Russia relations won’t be repaired for years to come as such designations are usually difficult to reverse.

Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) are pushing for the designation and introduced a resolution that would call on Blinken to enact it.

Exactly what terrorism has Russia conducted? The same terrorism that Cuba and North Korea has done. Nothing.
All this will do is make certain that there will be no calming of tensions with Russia - ever. There will never be a lifting of sanctions. There will never be a scaling down of troop levels.
Maybe those politicians in Washington think that eventually Russia will fold. This isn't the 1980's. The U.S. isn't nearly as strong as it was 40 years ago, and the world isn't as enamored with the U.S. as it once was.

Share
up
11 users have voted.

Comments

is a state sponsor of terrorism, not Russia. As documented by the United States Department of Defense Information, our government supports terrorist organizations, including Al Qaeda, in Syria.

https://shoebat.com/2015/08/08/former-defense-intelligence-agency-chief-...

... Lt. Gen. Flynn, speaking safely from retirement, is the highest ranking intelligence official to go on record saying the United States and other state sponsors of rebels in Syria knowingly gave political backing and shipped weapons to Al-Qaeda in order to put pressure on the Syrian regime:

... The  DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:

• Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria

• The West identifies with the opposition

• The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)

• The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government

• “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war’; see 7.B.)

• Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)

• A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)...

up
12 users have voted.

@Linda Wood
Don't you know how unpopular facts are in Washington?
you'll never get elected if you keep that up.

up
11 users have voted.

on Gen. Flynn precisely because of his willingness to expose the Deep State agenda- AKA doing his job and telling the truth.

And feared his appointment as Trump's national security adviser - which would have put him in a position to kick butt and take names. Flynn, knew his way around the military-intelligence complex and where the bodies were buried - or at least where to start digging.

Hence the entrapment and bogus prosecution - now they (the authors of the real coup) want to frame him as a coup plotter/insurrectionist.

The ever more expansive and selectively applied definition of 'terrorism' has been a growing problem at least since the Clinton Administration. It is clearly out of hand under the third Obama Administration. But all too many, even here, seem to be tolerant or downright encouraging of such abuse - as long as it's directed at Trump supporters.

On January 6, 2021, Matthew Perna walked through an open door in the U.S. Capitol. Two police officers manned the door. They appeared welcoming. For 20 minutes, Perna walked through the halls, took videos, and shouted “USA, USA.” Then he left.

Last Friday night, Perna went into his garage in little-town Pennsylvania and hung himself. Perna had become the victim of Joe Biden’s Justice Department and the FBI. He was hounded for a year, rejected by friends, lost his job, and was subjected to widespread ridicule. And he was on the cusp of receiving upward of six years in prison. All this for walking through an open door, not causing any damage, not threatening anyone, taking a few videos, and shouting patriotic slogans.

Balance here (Perna pled guilty lacking resources to fight the charges and expecting a sentence of a few months - but the government then decided to seek a domestic terrorism 'enhancement' for a potential six years.)

'The government', in this case being Matthew Graves - the DC Federal Prosecutor. Also having a leading role there is Lisa Monaco - a Russiagate architect and the person who initiated the idea of charging Gen. Flynn under the Logan Act...

Why Has a Federal Prosecutor Been Given Power of Life and Death Over Jan. 6 Defendants?

up
6 users have voted.

@Blue Republic

all of this. From the start, I have felt that getting Flynn out of government was the most important goal of the Russiagate effort. I felt they could handle Trump with no problem, but the fact that Trump could be influenced by Flynn was a threat to the deep state like no other. You have described why Flynn was so dangerous to them better than anyone I've read.

And thank you for the information about Matthew Perna. I have paid zero attention the January 6th issue because I'm obsessed with Ukraine, and our political leadership calls the coup there a peaceful revolution, during which 100 people were shot to death by snipers, government buildings were burned down, and the president's car was blown up. At the same time, they call January 6th an insurrection. I just feel like throwing up if I pay any attention to what they're saying.

up
6 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

but also where and when we say it is.

up
5 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

QMS's picture

@TheOtherMaven

in the middle of a created conflict with the 'freedom fighters' becoming terrorists and vice versa.
ISIS, Wahhabi, Sunni, Shiites, Taliban, et.al are all perfectly willing to declare Jihad against the
imperialist Great Satan. Some can be bought and trained with weapons to fight against a perceived
threat to western hegemony. Perhaps confusion, propaganda, or memory loss can be blamed on how
in one conflict each group is either labelled friend or foe, when in the next nation of conquest, the roles
are reversed. Meddling in other countries affairs requires lying to the public to justify the expenditure of
blood and treasure. Eventually the lies catch-up and contradict. The narrative then exposes itself as misinformation
and the trust in the broadcasting institutions diminishes.

up
4 users have voted.

question everything