Dr. King
https://original.antiwar.com/martin_luther_king/2017/01/15/why-i-am-oppo...
Martin Luther King
"Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"
April 30, 1967, Riverside Church, New York
The sermon which I am preaching this morning in a sense is not the usual kind of sermon, but it is a sermon and an important subject, nevertheless, because the issue that I will be discussing today is one of the most controversial issues confronting our nation.
… I preach to you today on the war in Vietnam because my conscience leaves me with no other choice. The time has come for America to hear the truth about this tragic war.
… I cannot forget that the Nobel Peace Prize was not just something taking place, but it was a commission–a commission to work harder than I had ever worked before for the brotherhood of Man. This is a calling that takes me beyond national allegiances. But even if it were not present, I would yet have to live with the meaning of my commitment to the ministry of Jesus Christ. To me, the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why I am speaking against the war. Could it be that they do not know that the Good News was meant for all men, for communists and capitalists, for their children and ours, for black and white, for revolutionary and conservative. Have they forgotten that my ministry is in obedience to the One who loved His enemies so fully that he died for them? What, then, can I say to the Vietcong, or to Castro, or to Mao, as a faithful minister to Jesus Christ? Can I threaten them with death, or must I not share with them my life? Finally, I must be true to my conviction that I share with all men the calling to be the son of the Living God. Beyond the calling of race or nation or creed is this vocation of sonship and brotherhood. And because I believe that the Father is deeply concerned, especially for His suffering and helpless and outcast children, I come today to speak for them. And as I ponder the madness of Vietnam and search within myself for ways to understand and respond in compassion, my mind goes constantly to the people of that peninsula. I speak not now of the soldiers of each side, not of the military government of Saigon, but simply of the people who have been under the curse of war for almost three continuous decades now. I think of them, too, because it is clear to me that there will be no meaningful solution until some attempt is made to know these people and hear their broken cries.
… Now they languish under our bombs and consider us, not their fellow Vietnamese, the real enemy. They move sadly and apathetically as we herd them off the land of their fathers into concentration camps, where minimal social needs are rarely met. They know they must move or be destroyed by our bombs. So they go, primarily women, and children and the aged. They watch as we poison their water, as we kill a million acres of their crops. They must weep as the bulldozers roar through their areas preparing to destroy the precious trees. They wander into the towns and see thousands of thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals. They see the children degraded by our soldiers as they beg for food. They see the children selling their sisters to our soldiers, soliciting for their mothers. We have destroyed their two most cherished institutions: the family and the village. We have destroyed their land and their crops. We have cooperated in the crushing of the nation’s only noncommunist revolutionary political force, the United Buddhist Church. This is a role our nation has taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolutions impossible but refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that comes from the immense profits of overseas investments. I’m convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, militarism and economic exploitation are incapable of being conquered.
… A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth with righteous indignation. It will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say, “This is not just.” It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say, “This is not just.” The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war, “This way of settling differences is not just.” This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation’s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into the veins of peoples normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.
… It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of communism, our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch anti-revolutionaries.
… A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class, and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing, unconditional love for all men. This oft misunderstood and misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of mankind. And when I speak of love I’m not speaking of some sentimental and weak response. I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life. Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality. This Hindu-Muslim-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of John: “Let us love one another, for God is love. And every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God is love. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his love is perfected in us.”
… With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to speed up the day when justice will roll down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream. With this faith we will be able to speed up the day when the lion and the lamb will lie down together, and every man will sit under his own vine and fig tree, and none shall be afraid because the words of the Lord have spoken it. With this faith we will be able to speed up the day when all over the world we will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, “Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we’re free at last!” With this faith, we’ll sing it as we’re getting ready to sing it now. Men will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. And nations will not rise up against nations, neither shall they study war anymore. And I don’t know about you, I ain’t gonna study war no more.
Transcript by Gary Handman, UC Berkeley Media Resources Center, 2006
YEMEN
Comments
how many of us marched with him?
I imagine that many of us did. Many of us are old enough and many of us believe the same sorts of things now as we did then.
My march with Dr. King was in NYC in 1967. There must have been 100,000 people involved. We gathered in Central Park and then marched to the UN building where he gave a speech against the US involvement in Vietnam.
I remember at one point during that speech thinking "well, that's kind of obvious".
the voice of reason, truth and empathy
has lived on since the MLK assassination.
Those of us old enough to remember the
reverberations still cling to that inspired hope.
Damn the oppressors.
We shall overcome.
question everything
"Why America May Go To Hell"
King’s last speech that he never delivered.
.......
Thanks for posting this, Linda. Imagine if all 3 of them had lived? How would things have changed for the better?
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Hard to believe that he is now a neoliberal icon
You will never hear his actual beliefs from the MSM as they heap praise on him. Yet that is symbolic of where our country has gone, identity issues - good, moral issues - bad. It's really simple and I bet that every member of the C99 community gets it. We have substituted the worship of American Style Democracy (not democratic by any reasonable test) and an aggressive, dangerous elitism for moral behavior. We're not moral, we are deadly killers, from the top to the bottom. No one thinks - are we destroying societies and killing people? How do you justify dropping bombs on children? Just what exactly goes through your mind as an American?
The most aggressive, deadly society of the 20th century was the Nazis. Adolf Hitler managed to kill some 40 million Europeans, soldiers and civilians. The only thing that stopped him was the USSR, their determination and enormous sacrifice. Yet we not only ignore that, but we crap all over Russia, even voting against their anti-Nazi resolution in the UN, along with our good Nazi pals in the Ukraine. Some have the US causing a death toll at this time of 30 million, direct and indirect deaths due to discretionary wars post WWII. Have you ever seen any American official pay a price for that? If we were moral, then that would have happened. I predict that by 2050 we will have passed Hitler's toll of death and destruction. How dare rioters disturb our hallowed halls of Congress, where military action was authorized and financed?
We can't change until we come to a realization of who we really are. MLK saw this clearly.
Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.
Good questions
True
I do.
I can not.
That we are immoral and deadly killers and not enough people acknowledge it.
I read about France accusing Iran of working on a nuclear weapon because they are enriching......(forgot the name) to 20% after Trump pulled out of the deal. Almost every comment on it was against Iran because they are not trustworthy and they lie and lots other xenophobic comments. No one asked why shouldn’t Iran have nuclear weapons? Israel does as well as other countries that are not our allies. Biden is going to pull a Trump and tell Iran that if they want back into the deal then they will have to give up their ballistic weapons and stay out of Syria. Syria INVITED Iran into the country to help defend it from us. Iran told Biden that they will reenter the deal if it’s the same one as Obama got. I think that’s fair. Israel says that they will attack Iran if Biden signs the new deal. But why do Americans actually think that we are exceptional in our foreign policy? Don’t they ever see the death counts? Guess not if they watch mainstream media. I’ve always been curious about the news.
True dat
MLK's statue was built in China for gawd’s sake and it’s subpar for someone as important as he was and iirc the statement on it wasn’t one of his best. I’ll look for it.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Very timely article
The black caucus is pretty worthless to black communities. Look at the poor black communities and see who their congress members are. I remember Trump calling Baltimore a 3rd world country and the black person over that district tried to defend himself. Trump showed footage of the neighborhood. But then this goes for every member of congress. How many forgotten people are they supposed to be looking out for? We’re talking people so poor they aren’t even counted as citizens. Poor people in the hill areas of the country where they live off grid? Hillbillies, but not really. You know who I’m talking about?
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
In honor of the Russian sacrifice
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=it6dTgt_RtY]
Very cool!
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981