In summary, the evidence cited in the essays and videos below suggests that Joe Biden extorted President Poroshenko of Ukraine – by threatening to withhold a billion dollars in US loan guarantees which Ukraine desperately needed – to force the firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who was in the process of investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden for corruption. In particular, Shokin had recently received information from Latvia that Hunter’s company had received millions of dollars in laundered funds from Burisma – in addition to the $83K/month in above-board funds Hunter was receiving for serving on Burisma’s board.

Prior to Joe’s intervention, Ukrainian officials – including Andrii Telezhenko – had been present at a White House meeting in Jan 2106 hosted by Eric “Whistleblower” Ciaramella. According to Telezhenko’s testimony, US officials at the meeting asked Ukraine to drop their investigation of Burisma and hand it over to our FBI (where the Clinton email case went to die, as you’ll recall). Why is it that we didn’t want to allow Ukraine to investigate its own corruption? It was well known to our State Dept at the time that Hunter Biden was serving on Burisma's board.

When the Ukrainians failed to comply with this request, Joe resorted to extortion to force the firing of Shokin. Shokin claims that Poroshenko repeatedly asked him to drop the Burisma probe, stating that this had been demanded by Joe Biden. When Shokin refused to do so, Joe eventually brought the hammer down, and Shokin was fired.

Joe claims that Shokin was corrupt, and was FAILING to investigate corruption – this appears to be a lie. Shokin – unlike many other Ukrainian officials – has never been prosecuted for corruption. And the French documentary cited below concludes that Shokin had actually been one of the more effective prosecutors in the recent history of Ukraine. Moreover, Lutshenko, who replaced Shokin after his firing, with Joe’s warm approval, had already served prison time for corruption – and had never had any legal training. Several months after Lutshenko’s appointment, the Burisma investigation was dropped after Burisma agreed to pay a tax penalty.

So it appears that Joe is simply lying regarding his motivation for demanding Shokin’s removal.

At Shokin’s request, Ukraine has recently initiated a formal criminal investigation of Joe for interference with Ukraine’s judicial process.

Our MSM has lied repeatedly and routinely that Ukraine’s investigation of Burisma had already been concluded when Joe intervened to force Shokin’s firing (see Moon of Alabama’s timeline). Which is why the imbeciles who still rely on MSM for their news are convinced that Joe has nothing to fear from pending investigations.

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/11/a-timeline-of-joe-bidens-intervent...

https://consortiumnews.com/2019/09/21/if-the-facts-come-out-it-could-spe...

https://consortiumnews.com/2020/02/17/part-four-of-ukrainegate-inconveni...

https://www.statedepartmentwatch.org/2019/11/17/huge-whistleblower-eric-...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/latvian-government-says-it-flagged-suspic...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRFtijtoV6I&list=PLM_tVXBx-AAM-rQsWrqMWp...

https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/643674.html