Warren had her own 'wine cave' event
NEW: Turns out @ewarren had a big wine fundraiser of her own. Donors were treated to a Melissa Etheridge concert and those who gave $1,000+ got a souvenir wine bottle. It was part of a conventional fundraising operation she only recently opted to reject https://t.co/Y8mmImFuJE
— Brian Slodysko (@BrianSlodysko) December 21, 2019
Warren’s souvenir wine bottle pops up in big donor debate
On a Saturday evening in June 2018, with temperatures in the 70s and the Red Sox playing at Fenway Park, supporters of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren gathered at the City Winery Boston for a fundraiser.
They were treated to songs by the Grammy-winning artist Melissa Etheridge and heard remarks from Warren, who was months away from announcing her campaign for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. For the top donors, those who could contribute or raise $5,400 per couple or $2,700 a person, there was a VIP photo reception and premium seating.
For them and others who gave at least $1,000, there was also a gift: a souvenir wine bottle.
In Thursday night’s Democratic presidential debate in Los Angeles, Warren lit into rival Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, for attending a fundraiser at a “wine cave” in California’s Napa Valley where he dined and sipped under a chandelier with Swarovski crystals and where a novelty large bottle of wine can cost $900.
“Billionaires in wine caves should not pick the next president of the United States,” Warren said. Later, she added, “I do not sell access to my time.”
-----
For Sanders, that’s largely been his practice for decades. For Warren, as the Boston event shows, it’s come more recently. She used more than $10 million from her Senate campaign account, some of it raised at large donor events, to help seed her presidential bid, a fact Buttigieg eagerly pointed out.Past Warren donors say she was an engaging presence at those events, asking questions of her wealthy patrons and listening intently to what they had to say.
She also made it personal. She bestowed awards on those who were successful at tapping their personal networks to raise money for her. Those who bundled large amounts under $50,000 for her Senate campaign earned a silver pin, while those who brought in more were awarded a gold one engraved with her signature. Her campaign says it’s a practice she discontinued in 2012.
As Warren considered a White House run, she held a series of small meetings at her home to court top Boston-area donors who raised large sums for Hillary Clinton and to gauge their interest in supporting the senator’s potential bid, according to a past contributor who attended one of the meetings. The donor spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private matters.
“When we made the decision to run the campaign this way, the players in the usual money-for-influence game dismissed it as naive,” Warren spokesman Chris Hayden said in a statement. “We’re pleased that our 100% grassroots strategy has been so effective that they’re now threatened enough to be attacking us for it.”
-----
Even after her pledge not to hold private fundraisers, Warren has continued to attend the very kind of events for which she has criticized others. She has headlined fundraisers for the Democratic National Committee in settings that raise handsome sums, and she said she would continue to do that if she were the nominee, so that Democrats would not be at a financial disadvantage against President Donald Trump.Those kind of events are at odds with her self-proclaimed image of a candidate who would rather be taking down-to-earth selfies with supporters who send her campaign $5 than being among the party’s donor elite.
-----
Warren and Sanders have made scorning the big money part of a broader campaign to rid what they say is its corrupting influence in politics.For Sanders, that’s largely been his practice for decades. For Warren, as the Boston event shows, it’s come more recently. She used more than $10 million from her Senate campaign account, some of it raised at large donor events, to help seed her presidential bid, a fact Buttigieg eagerly pointed out.
Warren has a disclaimer on fundraising:
“I’ve said to anyone who wants to donate to me, ‘If you want to donate to me, that’s fine, but don’t come around later expecting to be named ambassador,’ because that’s what goes on in these high-dollar fundraisers,” Warren said during this week’s debate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3412d/3412dff4982afb53f5871c5f3f9d4edee5947de1" alt="Share"
Comments
Response to this
To which I replied...
"Except that she transferred millions from her senate campaign."
I still see hypocrisy.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
She's well known
by those who pay attention, to be a shape shifter.
Or like hilldabeast......a windsock.
Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.
The claws came out for Tulsi
Meow!
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Divert attention whenever possible!
If memory serves correctly, Hillary Clinton criticized Barack Obama for taking Big Money in his senate run and then disavowing it when he ran for the nomination/presidency. He was all aw shucks well it's wrong and I won't do it anymore (which was fucking rich considering how many times he later folded to special interests). I mean, tale as old as time, but Warren has nowhere near the appeal and charm Obama did. I can't wait to see how this plays out.
We need her to quit
She will not get the nomination and needs to continue her good work in the senate. Meanwhile she is allowing ByeDone to have the appearance of a strong front-runner, whereas his 20-25% is objectively very weak. Any progressive candidate will need a very strong performance to overcome the neoliberal backlash from within the Democrat party. If you are a progressive you need to be strongly committed to win. I wish it were Tulsi, but it really seems unlikely. So it's got to be Bernie.
Capitalism has always been the rule of the people by the oligarchs. You only have two choices, eliminate them or restrict their power.
It wasn't six weeks ago that she was the frontrunner
Doesn't mean she won't be again if ByeDone stats looking real stupid again. Or ByeDone could really crater if there is an actual impeachment trial and ByeDone becomes the focus and his corruption is exposed. If a trial is televised then the media won't be able to spin ByeDones' corruption as a nothingburger.
Just way too premature here for Liz to back out. She would get most of ByeDone's vote and Buttigieg's if the impeachment trial exposes ByeDone, which it will.
That is why Trump wants his day in Court. All Liz needs to do is hang around and she will be back in first place after the trial starts. Of course Nancy really doesn't want the trial to start because Warren is perceived to be too liberal and the Dem establishment can't have one of those running.