Bipartisan anti-immigrant rampage
Image of drowned father and daughter sparks global outrage against US anti-immigrant rampage
The photo of a young Salvadoran worker and his 23-month-old daughter washed up on the shore of the Rio Grande has gone viral on social media and sparked world-wide outrage against the sadistic assault on immigrants being carried out by Trump, with the full assistance of the Democratic Party.
The photo of Oscar Alberto Martinez Ramirez and his daughter Angie Valeria, taken Monday by journalist Julia Le Duc, encapsulates the human toll of the fascistic and dictatorial policies being carried out by the Trump administration. The two victims succumbed to the powerful currents of the swollen river one day after having sought to apply for asylum, along with Oscar’s wife Tania Vanessa Avalos, at the legal port of entry between Matamoros, Mexico and Brownsville, Texas.
The father and his daughter were among the many thousands of Central American workers fleeing violence and poverty in their home countries, the legacy of a century of US imperialist subversion and exploitation. The young family was prevented from applying for asylum as a result of Trump’s “metering” policy, which effectively strips immigrants of their internationally guaranteed asylum rights by forcing them to wait in Mexico for weeks or months in sordid, prison-like camps. The family then decided to risk the dangerous river crossing. Vanessa Avalos could only watch in helpless horror from the Mexican side as her husband and daughter drowned.
The image has been published in newspapers around the world, intensifying the popular hatred, including among American workers and youth, for the Trump government.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) issued a denunciation of the Trump administration, comparing the photo to the picture of the three-year-old refugee child Aylan Kurdi, who drowned in the Mediterranean and whose body washed up on a beach in Turkey in 2015. The comparison underscored the international character of the attack on immigrants being carried out by capitalist governments across Europe and elsewhere. This includes Mexico, where Mexican President Lopez Obrador has mobilized 20,000 national guardsmen to serve as Trump’s anti-immigrant enforcers on the Mexican side of the border.
Also on the weekend, US Border Patrol agents found four bodies along the Rio Grande in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, about 55 miles west of Brownsville—one toddler, two infants and a 20-year-old woman.
The Democratic Party has responded to the escalating war on immigrants by voting overwhelmingly to grant Trump another $4.5 billion dollars to build more detention facilities, shore up the US military presence on the border and otherwise strengthen Gestapo-like anti-immigrant agencies such as Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
On the same day the photo of Oscar Alberto Martinez Ramirez and his daughter was published, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed a $4.5 billion funding bill that allocates $788 million for new CBP facilities to hold asylum-seeking families and children. It provides $866 million for facilities run by the Health and Human Services Department (HHS) where unaccompanied children are sent after they are released from CBP jails. It also includes $128 million for ICE.
In the vote on the House bill, all but four voting Democrats voted “yes.” The four supposed “progressives” who cast “no” votes—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib—did so only after having assured passage of the measure by voting to bring it up for a floor vote. Of the four House members who did not vote, three were Democratic presidential candidates—Tulsi Gabbard (Hawaii), Eric Swalwell (California) and Tim Ryan (Ohio)—who ducked a vote for crass electoral reasons.
Seven of the eight non-voters were Democratic presidential candidates, including Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Michael Bennet, Amy Klobuchar and Kirsten Gillibrand. None were prepared to register opposition to practices that have repelled millions of workers and youth who never thought such Nazi-like methods would be seen in the United States, and who, unlike the big business politicians of both parties, retain a deep commitment to democratic rights.
The Senate bill is even more overtly repressive than the House version, including fewer token restrictions on the brutalization of immigrants and an additional $145 million for US military operations on the border—a tacit legitimization of Trump’s illegal and indefinite deployment of active duty troops to aid police actions within the borders of the US.
On Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi telephoned Trump to assure him that the House Democrats were prepared to accept most, if not all, of the Senate bill’s provisions in order to avoid a threatened presidential veto. The Democrats are eager to secure a deal before the week-long Fourth of July recess, which begins on Thursday.
This “human rights” treacle to justify Gestapo attacks on defenseless foreign workers and children mirrors the justifications used to support one neo-colonial war after another in the Middle East and Africa—wars that have destroyed entire countries, killed millions and created the conditions for the biggest wave of refugees since World War II.
The same day, while the House Democrats were preparing to vote for the administration’s border war money, acting CBP Commissioner John Sanders resigned and Trump officials let it be known that the White House had selected acting ICE Director Mark Morgan to replace him.
Morgan, who served as assistant commissioner of CBP under Obama, has made no bones about his hatred for undocumented immigrants and desire to drive them out of the country. As acting head of ICE, Morgan had authored the plan for mass raids in US cities that Trump has postponed. He reportedly clashed with acting head of the Homeland Security Department, Kevin McAleenan, when the latter urged Trump to hold off on the raids.
Morgan spent 11 years in the Marine Corps and 20 years in the FBI. A government source told the pro-Trump Washington Examiner: “Ultimately, it’s Trump’s decision. McAleenan won the last fight, and now it looks like [Stephen] Miller’s gonna win this fight.” The anti-immigrant fanatic and fascist Miller directs immigration policy in the White House.
While out of government, Morgan appeared regularly on Fox News. In one appearance, he said of child incarceration, “They’re not cages. They’re actually really nice facilities.”
He said of vigilante militia groups on the border: “Why are they doing it? Because they’re there and they see what the rest of us are seeing, that the southwest border is being overrun. Border Patrol and other law enforcement entities there are overwhelmed and they feel like they have no choice.”
He has also boasted of looking into detained children’s eyes and seeing that they are “soon-to-be MS-13 gang members”.
Warren was asked to go to a detention center in Florida to protest against what's happening there and of course people say that this is what all democratic candidates should do. But where was her outrage before she went there? Or any ones? Never mind I know the answer....
I will not be silent on the heinous act that our government is doing to desperate people who are fleeing from the conditions that this country has inflicted on theirs. If our government can treat immigrants and especially children the way they are then imagine what they could do with us. Too many people see nothing wrong with the way these people are being treated. I find that not only sad, but frightening.
Comments
Outrage?
At Trump? Well he deserves it, but what about at Reagan, who supported the death squads that these people were fleeing? All right, Reagan is dead, well then how about a man who's still alive and is licking the blood from his hands, John Bolton? Being outraged over Trump's racism while forgetting to be be outraged against America's historic and greater evil is hypocrisy, nothing but support of the capitalists who started and perpetuate this evil for their own profits.
On to Biden since 1973
How about outrage at Obama and HRC
outrage
This essay's very author was quite elaborate (and strident!) about that very outrage, especially during the 2016 elections.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
How about some outrage
How about some outrage for the people protesting Wayfair donating beds for the detention centers? Yes, liberals are outraged about donations of beds to help these people. First dems are all outraged about the lack of beds, but now they protest. This just proves their lack of good faith re: illegals.
Further, how about some outrage at the idiots who are endangering their children? My dad took good care of us kids - he would have never put us at risk like these so-called parents are doing.
dfarrah
And I am just now
Wow.
dfarrah
Reminds me of the
Anybody here want to start a beds for illegals movement? I would bet other stores, like Ikea would donate.
dfarrah
I guess the dems and repubs
dfarrah
Did you even bother to read this essay?
In case you didn't notice the democrats just passed a bill to fund the fucking border stuff.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Which is like putting a bandaid on a compound
basically anythingnot attacking Iran in that the democrats are the lead war/imperialism/neoliberal capitalism party at this point which is the primary reason for the border problems in the first place.And I'm not saying you are giving them credit sd, just saying.
And as for that news about the votes and who and why, all I can say is weasels. A bunch of weasels and that includes Gabbard. She's been skipping out on key votes since shortly before she announced. Maybe that's normal for those types, but it's still being a weasel.
yes, she'd skipped
the vote on 'the defense of nato'; the senate never even asked for a roll call vote, and declared that Aye was the sense of the senate. hey, bernie.
gotta say i'd seen aoc joining the wayfair boycott. it reminded me that she took a thousand curtain calls for being The One who'd nixed amazon from creating another major hub in queens. (she'd been (ahem) photographed while chalking NO Amazon on the sidewalk. the tankie twittersphere collectlively split a gut when they saw the invoices for supplying her new congressional office: she'd bought ever doggone thing from...wait for it: Amazon! from furniture to paper clips.
I don’t think they are donating the beds.
If the government is buying
The people protesting Wayfair . . .
are Wayfair employees who are protesting Wayfair's acceptance of a $200,000 order to SELL (not donate) bedroom equipment to companies that are making a bundle off incarceration of people. (Search the NYT.)
Do you read the sort of information you write here in a conservative blog somewhere, or does your mind transpose the facts of a situation into something more compatible with your pro Trump ideology.
And yes, consistent with her opposition to US policy re immigrants, Tulsi Gabbard endorsed their action.
Liberals? I don't think so!
As OPOL (One Pissed Off Liberal), Mollie (Unabashed Liberal), and many other locals hereabouts can tell you, the current crop of Dem congresscreatures are about as genuinely liberal as Genghis Khan or Vlad "The Impaler" Tepes. Not to be confused with neoliberal, please note well.
I only know of two members of the current United States Congress who can claim to be genuine liberals, Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard.
By my late 1970s standards, the entire Congress -- both houses -- is GOP.
My genuinely liberal Democratic maternal grandparents are both dead. And with this kind of crap coming from today's Dems, they're grateful.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
I wonder
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMrHm4GFvpg&t=2s]
How exactly did your family come to this country to begin with?
It's shit like this that created MS13 in the first place.
But don't tell that to the average American. They just don't give a fuck.
Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.
Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.
MS 13 was created in America
not across the pond.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
I know that.
Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.
Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.
At the rate we're going...
...it seems like a toss-up as to which would be easier: Turning the Democrats back into the party of FDR, or turning the GOP back into the party of Lincoln.
At least Republicans fear their base a little...but it has become a textbook abusive relationship between Blue Team and its base.
In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.
Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!
Political revisionism--if only...
Don't we all love being in abusive relationships, like the Dupolistic ones? "Yes, honey, I love you. I promise I'll be good. Just give me one more chance--please, please. And by the way, where did you hide my baseball bat?"
Does anyone here wonder
why the people who are financing the migrants apparently cut off aid the minute the migrants reach the US?
Here are all these well organized migrants, all with their backpacks, tents, etc., yet they land in the US and poof! It all disappears.
Does anyone here wonder why none of the open borders groups aren't sending truckloads of provisions to these migrants?
dfarrah
Because the capitalist pigs need cheap labor.
Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.
Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.
Is there any chance you could stay on topic
instead of constantly saying that you support what is happening at the border? This essay is about the bipartisan bills making their way out of congress.
You have made it very clear that you have no problem with what is happening there.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
So, you don't recall
I believe the diary was discussing how it would be done (military, dept of human services, dept of home security).
I think the migrants should stay in their home countries; I think the US should provide more aid for economic development (as he has mentioned).
Further, I am not going to back down over horrible parenting. That guy had no business trying to cross the Rio Grande with his child. That was child abuse. People die from those attempts. I don't view him in any better light than people who kill their kids by leaving them in hot cars.
I would appreciate it if you would cool your rage. You are not the only person who feels rage over the situation. I feel a lot of rage over people who are choosing migrants over our own citizens. But I don't keep expressing rage-full tones.
To me, that choice is as bad as what the neo-libs, neo-cons politicians and companies did when they sold out the US.
dfarrah
Still off topic
You aren't saying anything that you haven't said lots of times before. I already admitted that I know where you stand on this issue.
Anything to say about this topic? You were complaining about the democrats not giving Trump any money for the border and now they not only passed a bill in the house they signed on to the senates bill.
BTW I'm not raging out. I'm thoroughly disgusted with what is happening to children by our hands. I am not choosing migrants over US citizens. I've admitted that this issue is complicated, but that doesn't mean that we should commit crimes against humanity which is exactly what is happening to the children.
I have mentioned this numerous times here that Trump cut off aid to the Central American countries that the immigrants are fleeing from. I have posted links to this and yet you are still saying that he is going to be giving them aid.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
wonder
What I wonder is why nobody has ever posted any direct evidence of these alleged "people who are financing the migrants". You know, contact names, exact amounts and vector pathways for these alleged funds, etc.
That an occasional migrant happens to possess a tent, or intact clothing, etc., is not evidence of the external "financing" you claim to exist. Neither is any other circumstantial crap. Only direct evidence will do. Sorry.
Please either post the direct evidence, with your own hands directly into c99, or please stop treating the "people who are financing the migrants" stuff as fact. Without real, direct evidence, it's not fact and shouldn't be so treated. Just because you beLIEve something doesn't make it so, either.
(My apologies to snoopydawg for the threadjack.)
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
That ship sailed with the first comment and went from there
and then there was an armada....
Appreciate what you said here though.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Give me a break.
So tell me, where are all these naked migrants? All the pictures I've seen show people in colorful, even stylish clothes, nice back packs, blankets, etc. They are largely young and healthy, with some obesity with the women.
They are all so, so, so very poor, yet they have all of this stuff. So where did all the stuff come from?
If I had jurisdiction, you better believe I would be digging into the financing. I am sure some intrepid reporter(s) are trying to do that right now. But even then, how would you expect to find out what cash goes where when you have countries that shelter funds?
They look downright great compared to real refugees you see in African or other eastern countries.
And I suppose you have never heard of the open border groups?
dfarrah
This reminds me of welfare Cadillacs
"Why is that lady who is on food stamps driving a Cadillac? Damm woman should look destitute!"
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
Just to chime in,
El Salvador
El Salvador used to make good quality clothing for the US market. Then the globalists discovered they could get cheap shit from Asia about a buck cheaper (i.e. next to nothing) and the American public would buy it. So, bye-bye jobs in El Salvador.
Someday Canadians may read stories like this about illegal Americans desperate for jobs.
What goes around comes around.
I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.
What goes around comes around.
And, as usual, the American 99%, who had nothing to do with these decisions, takes it in the "you know where" while the less than 1% who are actually to blame keep making those sweet, sweet profits.
Real Karmic justice would be whereunder the criminals get emmerced of all their merce, while the suffering ends for everybody.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
it's sad that the Great Hope AMLO
took the trumpster's
moneygrift to arrest/turn away would-be immigrants at the southern border, just as pena nieto'd done for obomba.telesur english has been so freaking high on AMLO that i was surprised that they'd admitted that in the past couple days.
Eh?
not sure what you're saying here...
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
from your wsws
article: 'This includes Mexico, where Mexican President Lopez Obrador has mobilized 20,000 national guardsmen to serve as Trump’s anti-immigrant enforcers on the Mexican side of the border.'
although it may be that AMLO's (Lopez Obradors's acronym) also turning immigrants back at the southern border of mexico, as well. dunno if i can find the telesur piece again, as much like RT articles are chimeras: they appear, and disappear.
telesur never sees amlo's darker sides; others sure do, esp.the zapatistas in chiapas. that's all.
glad i kept the tab open.
it's up again:
and so on.
telesur english, today
See my comment below, please.
So, you oppose Mexico from protecting its own borders?
sorry, gator.
i ain't gonna take that bait, esp. as it contains so many straw men and caveats such as "well-researched opinions supported by facts" (what an utter nonsensical empty set that phrase is). please think about that.
AMLO's the hopey-changey guy, as Obomba was. and i ain't about to write half a book-long comment to feed you with swamp food. you've made your position quite clear as a nationalist though. ; )
Thank you for recognizing my nationalism
But, pray, dear butterfly, what straw men did I erect in defending AMLO's protection of Mexico's national sovereignty? And you conveniently overlook the "No third Nation" protocol, preventing legitimate asylum seekers traveling through a second country en route to a third--unless those seekers request asylum the second country. Those who choose not to seek asylum in Mexico are not seeking asylum in the U.S. They are seeking economic opportunity.
not even if you paid me
200 amerikan dollars...well, we're purdy broke right now... no srsly, i only engage in such specious
tautological arguments unless i can't help myself. and i can help myself as it turns out; there are so many burning issues afoot...and i need to prepare some dinner. ; )
but yanno; thanks for the chance.
Anytime, wendy
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OOUY1Z_XOQ]
not even for you,
sir gator, lol. "Pay for a complete one-way trip to the Rio Grande?" if that's not a solipsistic straw argument, ay yi yi.
(ach, i just deleted an unfair I/P analogy....)
Trump said: "Shit!"
No, methinks that wendy davis wants Mexico to "assert its own national prerogatives as a supposed independent nation". Specifically, the national prerogative as a supposed independent nation of not having the USA President set its security priorities.
Trump said: "Shit!" and AMLO answered "What color, sir?". That's not Mexico asserting its own national prerogatives as a supposed independent nation; that's AMLO doing the Drumpmeister's bidding. And that tariff threat from the Drumpmeister is naught besides high school bullying.
It is to this servility on AMLO's part that wendy davis objects. And it is a reasonable objection.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
thank you.
plus, i'm socialist, and ardently support human rights for all of the oppressed around the globe, and in this case those fleeing from the terrors in the south that amerika has caused.
never mind how many campaign promises he's broken once office. like obomba, like the now comprador alexis tsipras...long list, i'm sure.
One could interpret AMLO's move as servile
yeah, some woman
on TRRN is white-washing: 'AMLO's between a rock and a hard place: higher tariffs or following DT's orders?'. that's what so many did with obomba the comprador.
scylla and charybdis
Yeppers, just like any other victim of extortion or high school bullying. AMLO really is between a rock and a hard place, a Scylla and a Charybdis.
And Trump is being an extortionist. These same actions, when committed interpersonally instead of internationally, are felonies. People go to prison for doing these things.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
yes indeed.
TINA! so obomba-esque.