psa: UK RT tweets re: julian assange
Police arrives to seize Assange's belongings from Ecuadorian embassy pic.twitter.com/ppCnlrx2aa
— RT (@RT_com) May 20, 2019
Demonstrators have gathered outside the Embassy of Ecuador as police are expected to collect Julian Assange’s possessions. pic.twitter.com/YYDzLPnh7b
— RT UK (@RTUKnews) May 20, 2019
"What has happened to him is a travesty"
Whistleblower advocate and @wikileaks supporter @auerfeld hits out at Ecuador after police arrive at Embassy of Ecuador, London to retrieve Julian Assange's belongings. pic.twitter.com/zbpep6yYvh
— RT UK (@RTUKnews) May 20, 2019
there are a couple things in here i hadn't known:
Perfect timing? RT's @DanhawkinsDh reports on former foes Ecuador and US finding common ground on Julian Assange case. pic.twitter.com/QoEFY70198
— RT UK (@RTUKnews) May 20, 2019
and no, papa assange: not just the loan; look at that grocery list, and manafort again?
but what in the wide world of sports do you make of the frenzied word-salad piece at the sun? via wikileaks on twitter. and this? "Mr Melzer said after his meeting: “I will be trying to assess the risks of torture and ill treatment Mr Assange might be exposed to.”
but he hasn't reported on what he'd found?
and uh-oh, i've just spotted a couple new things:
For the record: confidential and unsupervised interviews with inmates is not a “privilege” given to #JulianAssange, but worldwide standard TOR for @UN_SPExperts country visits and #SRTorture prison visits. https://t.co/NhLE0pMqWc
— Nils Melzer (@NilsMelzer) May 19, 2019
Press release: Ecuador hands over Assange's entire legal defense, manuscripts, to US prosecutorshttps://t.co/oEoe6g9xV9 pic.twitter.com/Fvdv8iWK0H
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) May 20, 2019
i may need to bring a few of the subtweets.
That is DICTATORSHIP!!!!!
They stand above the law with their dirty tricks.
Its a shame whats going on.
Free Julian Assange IMMEDIATELY #FreeJulian #FreeAssange #Assange #NoUSExtradition #NoExtradition pic.twitter.com/OtC76t5uLo— Free Press! Free Julian Assange (@FreeWikiPress) May 20, 2019
Wish I could be there, I would not laugh & chat, I would SCREAM like hell #FreeJulian !!!!!! Video courtesy of @pinkfloyd and @rogerwaters creatine mine https://t.co/CwPV5AueJ1
— (@SnowdogChampion) May 20, 2019
As #Ecuador hands over #Assange possessions- incl legal material -to the US, Garzon urges international bodies to intervene in “an unprecedented attack on the rights of the defence, freedom of expression and access to information” @UNHumanRights https://t.co/tbL7SPBiDr
— Jen Robinson (@suigenerisjen) May 20, 2019
Comments
I guess this calls for that
the old saying. "We'll give him a fair trial, and then we'll hang him".
More like "Sentence first, trial afterward"
Quite consistent with the Alice-in-Wonderland "logic" that has permeated this whole case.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
kangaroo court
before twelve hangin' judges.
This is so damned discouaging
On a side note John Walker Lindh is up for parole 3 years early on good behavior. Dems want blood.
'washed its hands', oh my yes.
scott morris was re-elected and laughs when he's asked about repatriating julian, as i remember it.
eeep, small wonder, but i didn't remember lindh's story fter bingling and reading this at the wapo, wish i hadn't accidentally wasted my click.
but fingers doing the walking and all that: 'Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison affirmed that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will not be receiving "special treatment" following his arrest and potential extradition to the US.', april 12, 2019
on edit: i just remembered, as i'd used a few of bibi's tweets on my recent diary on the resistance in gaza:
from the press release
and just to show the extent of the perfidy and massive illegality afoot:
Ecuador to hand over Assange's entire legal defense to the United States:
The chain of custody has already been broken. Assange's lawyers will not be present at the illegal seizure of his property, which has been "requested by the authorities of the United States of America".
then statements of outrage by assange attorneys Aitor Martinez and Carlos Poveda. and may i point out we still don't know what nilz meler discovered about julian's condition and/or torture. his mama and papa must be going bonkers. i'd neglected to check in with her; i will now.
from mama assange's account:
dunno which husband, she'd apparently divorced Richard Brett Assange long ago; but how hard.
i haven't read it yet, but craig had opined earlier that he hopes julian IS extradited to sweden to clear his name. i'd thought that sweden and amerika had a 'fast-track' extradition treaty...maybe he'll put my mind at rest on that count.
How to write to chelsea.
from craig murray,
and no, he'd never mentioned the fast-track extradition treaty, but this is the missing step mind-boggling epic rubbish (in part):
(then the lying headline, 'Only Because Assange', and more.)
and who are the terrorists?
As far as I am concerned the U.S. has no right to Julian's belongings, or to view anything on his devices. It only proves our government has gone full fascist stasi. This is what brute bullies America has become, world cops. Our government is the enemy of its own people, and anyone else that doesn't repeat the party line. Those that question it, will pay the price. Those that expose its fraud must die. After compulsory torture of course. I'm sure Gina Haspell is pretty excited about it.
Sad to see our government has devolved to this... the foxes run the henhouse now.
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.
both - Albert Einstein
well, at least you'd
chosen the right screen-name, but you may need to jigger it to add 'fascist' in there somehow. of course the US, nor ecuador, nor anyone else but those he might have permitted, have any right to his possessions. did they copy everything possible for the son of a bitch lenin moreno? imagine rafael correa's apolplexy again this week; my stars.
but yeah with gitmo, supermax florence, and gina in the mix, it's hard to even imagine how this ends well for julian. may the gods (and julian) forgive me for putting too fine a point on it.
Regrettably,
The empire is focusing all its efforts on making a few nonentities. Unfortunately, more of us are paying attention. That might lead to some, shall we say, difficulties.
may i take it that you
hadn't been offended by my use of the sword of damocles over his head, then? in a way, i'd hated to have been putting such negative energy out there... i'm not quite sure what you mean here, skod; might you explain?
wsws had a few things to add
this morning, including five photos.
‘On the spot report: Ecuador’s government colludes with Washington to seize Julian Assange’s possessions’, Robert Stevens and Chris Marsden, wsws.org, 21 May 2019
Does Sweden's request for extradition take precendance
over the US's ?
"Without the right to offend, freedom of speech does not exist." Taslima Nasrin
no one really knows,
except the UK home secretary savid javid (or however it goes) is supposed to be the one who decides, based on greater or lesser 'charges', and as hannah johannson is quick to point out, julian has never been charged, and the swedish prosecutor wants to 'reopen the investigation' again...or 'reinvestigate'? here, let me go grab her tweet o another tab to get it right.
ah: 're-open a preliminary investigation' (how orwellian...)
14 hrs ago, but i'm guessing they're not just 'photographing his belongings'....
and as per the WL press release above: the timing of the search and seizure is just three weeks before the June 14 deadline for the US to file its final extradition request to the UK.
This is interesting....
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange may prefer to face rape charges in Sweden from nearly a decade ago because a provision in that nation's extradition treaty with the U.S. protects him from being sent to Washington to answer for conspiracy charges, according to Judge Andrew Napolitano.
"Judge Andrew Napolitano made that case Monday on "America's Newsroom," saying that the Swedish government has a "political defense" provision, which precludes extradition for reasons "connected to politics."
"The extradition treaty the U.S. has with Sweden provides for political defense. Meaning, if the reason for the extradition is connected to politics, and there are statements from the president and from Secretary Pompeo to support that, they won't extradite him," Napolitano said.
If Assange is successful with such a "political defense," Sweden would not be required to send him to the United States", he said.
"Without the right to offend, freedom of speech does not exist." Taslima Nasrin
i've read about that provision
as well. but i) napolitano is wrong: assange has never been charged with rape, ii) that so many laws have been broken already in the US, UK, and sweden that it's easy to believe that extreme pressure from Washington could trump what's left of the Rule of Law in any of those nations, an iii) julian won't have any choice in the matter.
that he can't even talk to his swedish lawyer per samulelson on the phone doesn't bode will as far as due process.
added to which, we were told that the amerikan grand jury that's
mishandling his case had been about to issue subpoenas to both joushua shulte (the alleged leaker of the CIA files), and to assange detractor domsheit-berg (he'd even written a movie and a book about it) , former member of wikileaks, and they'd be offered immunity from their deeds by testifying against assange.they've done their best to stitch a case of espionage/treason together that it's unprecedented in history, we've been told. next thing we may hear is after the evidentiary hearing on may 14. well...unless...who knows?