Democratic National Committee Backtracks On Its Ban Of Fossil Fuel Donations

Boy, you sute can depend on these gius. For about as long as someone waves a dollar bill under their nose.

Democratic National Committee Backtracks On Its Ban Of Fossil Fuel Donations

The move comes just two months after the party adopted a resolution to prohibit oil, gas and coal company contributions.
By Alexander C. Kaufman
08/10/2018 02:59 PM ET

The Democratic National Committee passed a resolution Friday afternoon that activists say effectively reverses a ban on fossil fuel company donations.

The resolution introduced by DNC Chair Tom Perez states that the party “support[s] fossil fuel workers” and will accept donations from “employers’ political action committees.” It was approved by a 30-2 vote just two months after the committee adopted another resolution prohibiting donations from fossil fuel companies by a unanimous vote.

The new resolution nods to “forward-looking employers” that are “powering America’s all-of-the-above energy economy and moving us towards a future fueled by clean and low-emissions energy technology, from renewables to carbon capture and storage to advanced nuclear technology.”

“I am furious that the DNC would effectively undo a resolution passed just two months ago just as the movement to ban fossil fuel corporate PAC money is growing (and Democrats are winning),” said R.L. Miller, president of the super PAC Climate Hawks Vote, who co-sponsored the original resolution.

*

Party activists ― including Christine Pelosi, the main author of the first resolution and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s daughter ― hoped the DNC would consider a second proposal this month to stop accepting contributions over $200 from individuals who work for the fossil fuel industry. That, the thinking went, would limit the influence of high-paid executives while remaining open to the working class that Democrats aim to champion. The original resolution, which Perez voted for in June, barred the DNC from accepting contributions from corporate PACs tied to oil, gas and coal companies. But it allowed for the DNC to continue accepting individual donations from workers in those industries.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b6dddd4e4b0530743c9ca67/amp

I was trying to figure put how effective that ban on pil company money really would be. I mean, if ‘employees’ can donate, like CEOs, etc., won’t they still be raking in the bucks? Individuals cangive a candidate $2700 and a multi-candifate PAC $5000. But I digress...

They’re craven money grubbing parasites who have got themselves a nice paycheck compliments of the American taxpayer. And they don’t think they owe us one damn bit of honesty or loyalty.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

WaterLily's picture

Per usual. But also too, especially because I've been involved in a discussion argument just today about climate change, Democrats and incrementalism. This is perfect corroboration for my position. (FWIW, I actually think the other participant in this argument might actually be receptive).

[Edited for typo]

up
0 users have voted.
Amanda Matthews's picture

@WaterLily

worth. (Like we didn’t know how worthless it was already)..People need to open up their eyes. This is why the right points and laughs st them.

And they claim everyone else is s liar.

up
0 users have voted.

I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa

one can deny that they are the Party of principle, not convenience.

Well, maybe they are the party of prinvenience with a side of con.

up
0 users have voted.