The Secession of the Super Rich

This article was forwarded to me by joedemocrat over at Daily Kos. It's an excellent article, though it was published at The American Conservative and therefore cannot be posted at Daily Kos without having to listen to a deafening chorus of whining.

Despite its source, I recommend reading the whole thing. Here's a taste:

Revolt of the Rich - Our financial elites are the new secessionists.

There have been numerous books about globalization and how it would eliminate borders. But I am unaware of a well-developed theory from that time about how the super-rich and the corporations they run would secede from the nation state. ... What I mean by secession is a withdrawal into enclaves, an internal immigration, whereby the rich disconnect themselves from the civic life of the nation and from any concern about its well being except as a place to extract loot. Our plutocracy now lives like the British in colonial India: in the place and ruling it, but not of it. If one can afford private security, public safety is of no concern; if one owns a Gulfstream jet, crumbling bridges cause less apprehension—and viable public transportation doesn’t even show up on the radar screen. With private doctors on call and a chartered plane to get to the Mayo Clinic, why worry about Medicare? ...

In both world wars, even a Harvard man or a New York socialite might know the weight of an army pack. Now the military is for suckers from the laboring classes whose subprime mortgages you just sliced into CDOs and sold to gullible investors in order to buy your second Bentley or rustle up the cash to get Rod Stewart to perform at your birthday party. The sentiment among the super-rich towards the rest of America is often one of contempt rather than noblesse. ...

While there is plenty to criticize the incumbent president for, notably his broadening and deepening of President George W. Bush’s extra-constitutional surveillance state, under President Obama the overall federal tax burden has not been raised, it has been lowered. Approximately half the deficit impact of the stimulus bill was the result of tax-cut provisions. The temporary payroll-tax cut and other miscellaneous tax-cut provisions make up the rest of the cuts we have seen in the last three and a half years. Yet for the president’s heresy of advocating that billionaires who receive the bulk of their income from capital gains should pay taxes at the same rate as the rest of us, Stephen Schwarzman, the hedge fund billionaire CEO of the Blackstone Group said this about Obama: “It’s a war. It’s like when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939.” For a hedge-fund billionaire to defend his extraordinary tax privileges vis-à-vis the rest of the citizenry in such a manner shows an extraordinary capacity to be out-of-touch. He lives in a world apart, psychologically as well as in the flesh.

The super-rich have seceded from America even as their grip on its control mechanisms has tightened. ...

After the 2008 collapse, the worst since the Great Depression, the rich, rather than having the modesty to temper their demands, this time have made the calculated bet that they are politically invulnerable—Wall Street moguls angrily and successfully rejected executive-compensation limits even for banks that had been bailed out by taxpayer funds. And what I saw in Congress after the 2008 crash confirms what economist Simon Johnson has said: that Wall Street, and behind it the commanding heights of power that control Wall Street, has seized the policy-making apparatus in Washington. Both parties are in thrall to what our great-grandparents would have called the Money Power. One party is furtive and hypocritical in its money chase; the other enthusiastically embraces it as the embodiment of the American Way.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

NCTim's picture

The term white noise is sometimes used in the context of phylogenetically based statistical methods to refer to a lack of phylogenetic pattern in comparative data. It is sometimes used in non technical contexts, in the metaphoric sense of "random talk without meaningful contents".

The real problem is they ruin a reasoned conversation with blather.

up
0 users have voted.

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself. - Friedrich Nietzsche -

Big Al's picture

Imperialism.

Stuff nobody really wants to talk about. I've seen quotes and essays very similar to this written back in the later
1800's and early 1900's. You can go back to the founding father dudes and see talk about the dangers of the
super rich. Until humans are ready to accept a complete shift in how we live on this planet, it will remain this way.
The longer it goes on, the harder it is to stop.

This is why I'm against the two major political parties in this country, they work for the super rich. The article mentioned
how the two parties work as "political handmaidens" for the super rich. I wonder how those like joedemocrat can still vote for
the democratic party after reading something like this. Or for that matter, participate on a blog like Daily Kos. What is
the purpose? To change the Democratic party? That isn't going to happen.

I truly believe you have to get mad, Howard Beale was right. If you're not mad about this, you're part of the problem.

up
0 users have voted.
joe shikspack's picture

I wonder how those like joedemocrat can still vote for the democratic party after reading something like this. Or for that matter, participate on a blog like Daily Kos.

one of the things that i found interesting about this article was that it offers evidence that there is a process that you might almost call radicalization going on for regular people (formerly?) aligned with both major parties that have come to realize that they are without representation. the other thing that i noted is that there is a certain amount of common ground amongst both of the "outcast" groups.

whether anything comes of that, well who knows? perhaps as long as they remain well-fed, warm and dry there won't be much action.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

That if you don't think that there is a difference between the 2 parties, then get the fuck off of this site.
I've seen commenters state that Obama knows what he is doing by pushing the TPP. And many there supported his war on Libya, even tho it went against the Nuremberg principles.
What they saw what was wrong when Bush did it is ok now that Obama is doing it.
Look at the Snowden diaries.
How people can pretzelize they thinking is amazing.
There just as bad as those that defended Bush n
There was a diary yesterday where the diarist can sleep at night because Obama is anti war.
Good god, I had to stay out of that. After someone made a comment about all the countries he's droning, they were accused as being an Obama hater.

up
0 users have voted.

“When out of fear you twist the lesser evil into the lie that it is something good, you eventually rob people of the capacity to distinguish between good and evil.”
~ Hannah Arendt

mimi's picture

Russell Herman Conwell ... I just wonder how the Baptist Church in Birmingham became then later a center for the civil rights movement of the impoverished and rightless blacks.

The article gives a terrific historical timeline. This was written by whom? Populist Omaha platform in 1892 ???

We meet in the midst of a nation brought to the verge of moral, political, and material ruin. Corruption dominates the ballot-box, the Legislatures, the Congress, and touches even the ermine of the bench. The people are demoralized. … The newspapers are largely subsidized or muzzled, public opinion silenced, business prostrated, homes covered with mortgages, labor impoverished, and the land concentrating in the hands of capitalists. The urban workmen are denied the right to organize for self-protection, imported pauperized labor beats down their wages. … The fruits of the toil of millions are boldly stolen to build up colossal fortunes for a few, unprecedented in the history of mankind, and the possessors of these, in turn, despise the Republic and endanger liberty. From the same prolific womb of governmental injustice we breed the two great classes—tramps and millionaires.

..or three not so great classes, the trailerpark tenants and mansion owners and former inhabitants of forclosed, empty houses for the middle class and people living one check to the nest wrestling with the threat of total joblessness and/or homelessness.

If you have conservatives analyzing the situation this fashion, I am at a loss to know how to evaluate "conservatives" in this country. Well, I really don't want to do that, but it's amazing what is written in this article. Lots in there to go back to for further reading.

up
0 users have voted.
Unabashed Liberal's picture

that hedge fund managers, CEOs, and the uber-rich, in general, ought to cough up more tax revenue.

But, this paragraph from a linked article also caught my eye:

But in globalized postmodern America, what if this whole vision about where order, stability, and a tolerable framework for governance come from, and who threatens those values, is inverted?

What if Christopher Lasch came closer to the truth in The Revolt of the Elites, wherein he wrote, “In our time, the chief threat seems to come from those at the top of the social hierarchy, not the masses”?

Lasch held that the elites—by which he meant not just the super-wealthy but also their managerial coat holders and professional apologists—were undermining the country’s promise as a constitutional republic with their prehensile greed, their asocial cultural values, and their absence of civic responsibility.

It is in keeping with a couple of articles that I've read recently.

IOW, "536 billionaires"--while they should be forking over substantially more in federal income taxes--can't carry the entire nation of 318 million plus US residents.

[I'll try to find and post one of these pieces once Family has come and gone.]

Somewhat surprisedly, one piece was written by a younger conservative "elite"--meaning Harvard educated professional, but not a Rockefeller or Gates, by any means--who criticized the millions of "millionaires" in the US who are more than willing to point a finger at the top "536," yet have massive armies of lobbyists working for them (small business and/or professional lobbies, like the AMA, etc.) to keep their tax burdens to a minimum.

A quick Google search rendered the following:

536 "Billionaires" In US

9-16 Million "Millionaires" in the US between 2007 and present, usually not counting primary residence in the calculation.

(I do understand that hedge fund managers get off with a tax rate a little more than "half" that of wages. Obviously, that should be 'fixed.')

Bottom line, unless the US government decides to get out of the business of 'military adventurism,' this entire cohort--billionaires and millionaires--should have their tax burdens increased.

Substantially.

Mollie

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.