(DNC caught lying again): Sanders campaign document reveals fundraising relationship with DNC
Sanders campaign document reveals fundraising relationship with DNC
A joint fundraising agreement between the Bernie Sanders campaign and the Democratic National Committee -- obtained Friday by ABC News and signed at the start of the primary campaign for the 2016 presidential election -- does not include any language about coordinating on strategic decisions over hiring or budget, unlike a fundraising memo between the Hillary Clinton team and the DNC.
Former Sanders staff members argue that the Sanders-DNC agreement refutes the claim by the DNC that the two campaigns were offered similar treatment by the party. What's more, the Sanders team posits that the joint fundraising agreement they signed with the party was never acted on.
FIRST ON ABC - Fundraising agreement btwn Bernie Sanders campaign & DNC (1/2) https://t.co/ql8CxTY8Ew pic.twitter.com/8MSVQG7Utz
— MaryAlice Parks (@maryaliceparks) November 4, 2017
Aren’t their attempts at playing ‘they did it too’ getting more desperate by the day? Why make claims when it’s easy to prove them false? Or is it because they’re desperate and think they have nothing left to lose?
This whole mess just amazes me. Watching it all play out is like watching a Fellini movie (which were big back in the day). I was never sure of what was going on then and i’ll be darned if I can figure out what these crazies are doing and why now.
I generally put most everyone’s motivation down to what Cyndi says...
Comments
Came back to add!!!
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
They're never desperate
Clintons don't lose. The Democratic Party does not lose.
We are Winning!
Oh, wait...
Prof: Nancy! I’m going to Greece!
Nancy: And swim the English Channel?
Prof: No. No. To ancient Greece where burning Sapho stood beside the wine dark sea. Wa de do da! Nancy, I’ve invented a time machine!
Firesign Theater
Stop the War!
Oh but,
Bernie isn't a Democrat. They don't owe him anything. Assholes.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
@dkmich
Lol, much like they don't owe Dem nomination voters even a fair election.
Wait, let me retract that lol...
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Where is all this coming from?
Not that I'm complaining of course; just curious how/why it's all breaking now.
Who's behind it?
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Maryalice Parks is a blue check talking head on ABC
Sanders campaign document reveals fundraising relationship with DNC
here is the article she tweeted:By MaryAlice Parks
Lol it's the same template everywhere. No imagination from Brazile's book tour PR department, but I guess that is not needed at all by now. Just spread whatever, wherever. Classic Putin, to spread confusion and doubt in the electorate, as billionaires take everything private. Classic. lol
Edit: to be clear, I think all this noise is to "create buzz" for Brazile's upcoming book flop. It is PR for Donna, and page hits for all.
THAT’S what I want to know. Who’s
Brazille working for? What’s she want, a VP spot on a future (imaginary) Sanders ticket?
Could she have found her conscience?
Nah.
I don’t understand any of this.
I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks
Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa
Book sales.
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
Et tu, Barry?
Here's the tell:
Obama hasn't gone away. He's just Biden his time until Hillary implodes so he can take over the party infrasrtucture.
Donna's book helps that process along.
If you think about it, perhaps Obama set up his parallel party apparatus in the first place BECAUSE the DNC was already overrun with Hillbots.
That would explain his apparent neglect of the DNC: he figured it was Hillary's turf so why shouldn't she pay for it.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
The Hillary Victory fund scam in b & w
first off, let's not forget that she ran on campaign finance reform. I'm sure that the only people who believed her can be found on ToP and the other websites that have lost their minds.
The most prominent comment there was, "Hillary has to take lots of money so that she can win the election, become president and then she can work on overturning citizens united."
This lame crap was giving Hillary their permission to get lots of money.
This article breaks down the deals she made with state's democrats and the people who were appointed as super delegates.
How Hillary Clinton Bought the Loyalty of 33 State Democratic Parties
snip
snip
This was the point that we were making about her Wall Street speeches, but her supporters refused to admit that she was corrupt. She always had been.
Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.
That's always the excuse with Her:
It's always "Hillary has to do this thing directly against the alleged values of the Democrats/her own alleged values/the 99%/etc. so she can get elected president and then work on reversing that very thing she had to do to get elected that she expressed no more than lip service at best concern about before the election." Exact same 11th dimensional chess that we kept getting served during Obama's years, except Her is much worse at selling it.
And regarding the paid speeches, remember when Her just shrugged Her shoulders and said "that's what they were willing to pay" and that was somehow good enough for Her minions? Pick any other politician in the history of ever and I strongly doubt the Hillbots would act as if that money somehow wasn't going to influence them even a teeny tiny bit.
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
Does it remind you of someone else?
Add in 11 dimensional chess, he's just trying for bipartisanship and all the other excuses people gave him for years while he was going back on his campaign promises.
Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.