Charlottesville and the Crisis of Identity and Tribalism in America

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeqNo7dwNwU]

Essay to accompany video below.

I've given a great deal of thought to the events that went down in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 12th, when the now infamous "Unite the Right" rally degenerated into a street fight as police stood by and did nothing. We all know the end result. One young woman killed and nineteen other people injured when a man with white nationalist and neo-Nazi sympathies drove his car into a crowd of counter protestors.

But most of that story has been covered from every conceivable angle. I doubted what I could add to the conversation. What could I say that would further that discussion, and what larger meaning could I find in Heather Heyer's murder and the violence we saw break out in Charlottesville that day.

What led me to record the video I posted to You Tube was an article I came across: "Identity and Its Consequences," posted at The Scientific Skeptic in May of this year. Reading it helped me further develop my views as to what the tragedy in Charlottesville means in the larger context of American society at this moment of time. A few excerpts:

We see ourselves as members of various tribes, and depending on the context, we behave, in large part, based on particular tribal loyalties and affiliations. [...]

If you are discussing politics, your loyalty and behavior may likely be the outcome of the party that you affiliate with or the candidate that you favor. [...]

If you affiliate with a particular religion, your loyalty and behavior may likely be the outcome of that tribal affiliation.

Other tribal loyalties include so-called race, gender, kin, sexual orientation, ethnicity, language groups, socio-economic groups, companies, villages, education level, scholastic groups, clubs, etc., etc., etc.

Anyone who went to high school will probably understand this phenomena.

This is the truth that is being used by the wealthy elites to dismantle our society and to literally lead millions of Americans to fear, hate and distrust their fellow citizens. The great American myth is that we are a nation of individualists who live in a land of freedom and liberty where through hard work and perseverance anyone can succeed. Nothing could be further from the reality. Our history has been one of competing "identities" and "tribes" if you will, some of which were literally invented to justify genocide and slavery. Americans have always associated themselves with various identities and tribal affiliations from competing religious sects to political parties, from "nativist" movements versus immigrants, and even more broadly through conflicts and coalitions among various groups aligned along identity and tribal associations based on race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, class - you name it.

I was raised to view America has a great melting pot, when in fact we are one of the most diverse nations, of not the most diverse on the planet. And the tribal divisions among us have often led to strife and demonization of our fellow Americans. These tribal affiliations are so important to our individual sense of self, and they have always been manipulated by the most powerful in our society to keep us divided and at each others' throats. This is the American story, despite the occasional transcendent leaders who have appealed to the ideals of equality and justice - the idea that we need to see everyone as first and foremost a human being, who deserves dignity and our respect regardless of whatever stereotypes and prejudices may exist in our collective psyche. Instead we generally remain tied to the values, beliefs and norms of the tribes with which almost all of us identify.

I don't mean to dismiss or ignore the reality of the harms that have been done to a great many people because of the labels put upon them by "tribes" with more power or larger numbers. Far from it. We must never forget the many atrocities suffered by Native Americans, including the most recent example of the horrific violence committed by law enforcement agencies and thuggish mercenaries against the Water Protectors who opposed the drilling of the NoDAPL pipeline project.

Nor should we dismiss the legitimate grievances of so many African Americans, brought to this country to be slaves. Even after they received their "freedom" many suffered horribly as a result of outright and blatant discrimination, bigotry and violence perpetrated against them by means embedded in the American justice system, and by continuing institutional and individual acts of oppression committed outside the sanction of the law. It should shock no one that, regardless of your opinion of them, the Black Lives Matter movement arose in response to both outright and systemic violence by the police and others against people of color.

As Robyn documents everyday, Transgender people suffer from vastly higher rates of homicide and suicide, and face discrimination by our governments and numerous other "tribes" despite their small numbers relative to the rest of the population.

And let us not ignore the plight of poor whites either, such as those in Appalachia, The corporate media and the mainstream centrist left frequently derides and denigrates for their lack of education and intelligence, their religion, their politics, and their backward and unsophisticated culture. They suffer from declining mortality rates and an opioid addiction crisis. Yet many on the so-called left laugh at their problems, mocking them and perpetrating the same types of bigoted and hateful stereotypes/a> that they would roundly criticize if it were directed at any other group.

Our problem is not solely that that our media outlets often ignore or dismiss the legitimate grievances of many of our "American tribes," or exploit their suffering for political gain. The problem is that too few of us break out of our identity and tribal boxes to attempt an honest dialogue with other groups. Indeed, at present we are seeing factions within the so-called progressive movement in this country fighting with one another rather than build alliances and coalitions to build a strong progressive movement in America, solely based on our species profound and deeply rooted desire to affiliate ourselves with and organize ourselves into tribes.

For various and complex reasons, even when we acknowledge the issue of identity and tribalism, and how the powerful elites manipulate these tendencies to keep us divided, we fail to break those chains holding us back. Yet there are small signs that our past and present tendencies create our own identities based on those tribes with which we feel comfortable and safe, to the exclusion of others who, despite some differences are suffering as much or more than we are, is not necessarily our future. There remains hope that we can get past our need to align our identities with tribes of people for whom we feel an affinity, and broaden our definition of who we include as part of our "family."

I leave you with this recent example from the world of sports. Last year an African American professional football star athlete, Colin Kaepernick, began a protest in support of BLM and its goals by kneeling during the national anthem. Though other black players also took up his protest, he was the first, and thus he became the scapegoat. Demonized and ostracized by many for his stand, his contract was not renewed at the end of the season, and he has yet to find another job in the NFL despite the fact that he is a very talented player. However, other black NFL stars have continued the protests he began, and this year, little by little they are being joined by their white teammates in a show of solidarity, such as this example involving two players of the Seattle Seahawks, Michael Bennnet, a black defensive lineman and his white teammate, Justin Britt, an offensive lineman:

As he had said he would, Seahawk defensive lineman Michael Bennett again sat during the national anthem prior to Seattle’s preseason game against the Vikings Friday night at CenturyLink Field.

But this time he was joined at least symbolically by center Justin Britt, who stood next to Bennett with his right hand on Bennett’s left shoulder ...

Britt, a fourth-year player from Missouri, then hugged Bennett as the anthem ended and Bennett stood up.

Britt said after the game he made the decision after talking with his wife, Alicia.

“It was something me and my wife talked about and discussed, and we both wanted to show support to Mike,” said Britt, a native of Lebanon, Mo. “I talked to him before, made sure it was all right with him, and of course it was. I feel like what I did, I believe in it, and I’m going to continue to educate myself and try to understand why things are going on.”

Added Britt: “I want to support him. I want to support what he’s standing for and his beliefs. I’m not foolish. I’m from Missouri. I get things are different in that area than it is in some other areas. I’m not against what the flag means and veterans. My dad was in the Army. I’m not putting any disrespect to them. I’m just trying to understand the issues, trying to educate myself more in that regard and showing support. I’m going to continue to understand what’s going on in the world and why it’s happening, because none of it’s right. None of it is what should be happening. I’m going to continue talking with Mike and exploring and just helping myself understand things. I’m wanted to take a first step tonight, and that’s what I felt I did.”

If two NFL football players from radically different backgrounds can find common ground to breach the divide between white and black, then we also can learn to do the same. Without denying the identities that all of us have created and to which we are all subject to some degree, we also can learn to also reach across those issues of tribalism and identity politics that "the powers that b"e rely upon to keep us from uniting in solidarity as equal members of the human species, because all human lives matter. Failure to accomplish this is simply not an option considering the many potential life threatening catastrophes we as a species face, whether from disaster capitalism, climate change and/or the constant wars which benefit the few at the expense of the many.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

a large dose of mongrel, a socialist and a non-theist Buddhist. My partner Marie-Louise French, Malian, Martiniquais, Indo-Martiniquais, socialist and Catholic.

Mainly I go woof and chase the postman

Our sexuality is not an identity, like my dyslexia.

Wink

up
0 users have voted.

@LaFeminista
I would identify more by being a fluid dynamicist, chemical engineer and by those I love and who love me.
Marie Louise lives and breathes being a Doctor and clinical psychologist and the one who keeps me sane.

up
0 users have voted.
detroitmechworks's picture

@LaFeminista just because of the fact that people still strongly discriminate against sexuality.

Ran into this recently with my about to turn 15 daughter, who has come out as bisexual.

She's dealing with a lot of erasure and people not accepting her, instead insisting that she needs to "Make a choice" or "it's a phase".

As a result, unless she makes it a part of her identity, STRONGLY, people will minimize and negate that portion of her life, assigning her to whichever group they choose, despite her clear difference from that group identity.

I think our sexuality is a part of our identity, except when it doesn't have to be. There are still many people who deal with discrimination and violence because of perceived identity. The emphasis doesn't need to be IMHO on group identification of sexuality, as our culture is obsessed, but rather the acceptance and separation of sexuality from politics as a whole.

Of course, that's just my 2p.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

@detroitmechworks various forms of prejudice wish to define us. Hell, I know sexist and racist people in the LGBT community.

up
0 users have voted.
detroitmechworks's picture

@LaFeminista
It shouldn't have to be a part of our every moment and personal choice. Just is a big factor in my life and my daughters life right now, so it is part of my identity by osmosis. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

@detroitmechworks come to terms with her own identity, sadly too many still cannot/are not allowed to.

up
0 users have voted.
Centaurea's picture

@detroitmechworks That describes the concept of "privilege", in a nutshell. Members of the dominant demographic group don't need their dominant-group characteristics to be a conscious part of their every moment. They're just living their lives, without having to think about the ways in which they're "different".

It shouldn't have to be a part of our every moment and personal choice.

up
0 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone

detroitmechworks's picture

@Centaurea It's Basic Human Rights.

It's not a Privilege to not be discriminated against, to not be shot, to not be abused. It's the baseline that we should extend to one and all.

Rich people have the real privileges. The privilege to dictate policy, privilege to never even be stopped by a cop. The privilege to "Surrender yourself and be released" as most white collar criminals do. The privilege to have your case heard by the highest corridors of power, with just a phone call and a lunch date.

The pigs want us to think of ourselves as fortunate, with "Privileges". That's so when they are taken away, we don't argue.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Centaurea's picture

@detroitmechworks

It's Basic Human Rights.

It's not a Privilege to not be discriminated against, to not be shot, to not be abused. It's the baseline that we should extend to one and all.

Oh, very definitely. I don't disagree with you about that. Being able to live one's life as one's self should be a basic, ordinary fact of human life, not something special only granted to certain people, those who fit the mold. That phrase in the Declaration of Independence, "inherent and inalienable rights" -- this is what I think that phrase refers to.

Actually, as far as I can tell, you and I aren't in disagreement here about anything, except for the use of the word "privilege".

There is an actual thing that, since the 1960s, has been referred to as "white privilege". Technically, this a correct use of the word "privilege", although whoever coined the phrase might not have made the best choice, since it seems to be a loaded word for so many people.

No matter what you call it, though, it is a real phenomenon, and it consists in what you and I are talking about here. Same for "straight privilege", "male privilege", "class privilege" and those pertaining to other dominant demographic categories in our tribalistic culture.

It doesn't refer to special privileges, as, for example, in "Why do those gays want special rights?!" which we often hear from people who oppose gay marriage. Gays don't want "special rights" or "special privileges". They just want what straight folks have: the right to live a normal life without constantly having to think about their sexual orientation.

up
0 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone

detroitmechworks's picture

@Centaurea however, the use of that concept have been turned to destructive ends.

Rather than create the idea of a right which has been taken, instead it becomes the idea of a special dispensation of some kind. As a result the calls to "Check your privilege" are NOT in fact a call to reflect on the lost rights, but rather more a direct and blatant attempt to silence the person speaking.

These calls may have originated in good faith, but through ad nauseum repetition have become a joke among those they are directed to, and nearly a catechism among properly apologetic people who just happen to fall into the dominant cultural tribes and yet want to be inclusive.

Loss of rights? Now that's something that will not divide the lower classes. Which is why the MSM is very careful to never phrase the peoples conflicts with the PTB as a "Rights" issue. The ONE thing the NRA might have gotten right is phrasing it as a Rights issue. If we pushed police brutality, moves against assembly and redress of government, and seizure of property as Rights issues, we'd get a lot more support across the board.

And yes, that would probably include some Right Wingers/Libertarians. When you speak their language, it's amazing how few of them are as evil as the MSM presents them.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

A lot of people try to tell us who we are, often delighting in their "well" considered opinions be they positive, negative or just plain weird. Even when they don't know us.

up
0 users have voted.

I am sick to death of the identity politics, divide and conquer so I can steal everything you own. I do not deny history or tribalism. We can never resolve or compensate/apologize enough to erase what was or change who we are.

I also want to make a point that never gets made and will likely piss off a lot of people. But as long as history is somehow demanding more contrition, it has an obligation to be complete. Slavery, like war, was first and foremost a business. Black people were stolen and sold into slavery by black Chieftains and European and Arab slave traders. What the traders and chieftains did to millions of black people had nothing to do with racism, it had to do with greed.

Traditional African rulers whose ancestors collaborated with European and Arab slave traders should follow Britain and the United States by publicly saying sorry, according to human rights organisations.

The Civil Rights Congress of Nigeria has written to tribal chiefs saying: "We cannot continue to blame the white men, as Africans, particularly the traditional rulers, are not blameless."

The appeal has reopened a sensitive debate over the part some chiefs played in helping to capture their fellow Africans and sell them into bondage as part of the transatlantic slave trade.

The congress argued that the ancestors of the chiefs had helped to raid and kidnap defenceless communities and traded them to Europeans. They should now apologise to "put a final seal to the history of slave trade", it said. [more]

I bring this up not to negate the horror of what was done to black people by their chieftains and the European and Arab slave traders, but to complete the history being discussed. There is overwhelming blame and shame in our human past. We leave a trail of tears everywhere.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

detroitmechworks's picture

@dkmich that the MSM want to create:

Southerners who didn't vote for Hillary are Racist slimebags who must be hunted down and forced to endure the torments that their ancestors inflicted on saint like innocents.

That isn't a historical story... that's an Original Sin argument.

I don't know about you, but I find the concept of extending guilt to ancestors with no sense of context to be rather... inquisitorial.

Can't wait till the corporations get in on this, because you know they'd be chomping at the bit to apply the debts of corpses to their descendants. Ooooh, I bet you could get slavery reparations fast tracked if you got a PIC co-sponsor who argued that everyone who benefited from slavery in some manner be charged a reasonable fee... and if they can't pay the fee, well of course, they'll have to work it off in totally NOT Slavery Prison.

Yes, I am taking this to the logical extreme. Because how else are they going to make money once people stop borrowing? Why, collecting on debt that people owe, even if they've never once borrowed... Oh, man, can you just imagine if they start doing "Infrastructure Legacy" charges? Thank God I'm not a sadistic Bastard with a few million to donate to a politician.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Meteor Man's picture

@detroitmechworks
Everyone who is charged for Legacy Infrastructure debts and everyone who collects for historical deprivation must pay a nominal swipe fee to MeteorMan LLC. Easy breezy.

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

@dkmich different tortuous reasoning's.

up
0 users have voted.

@dkmich And I think that's just part of being human. I don't think I have any slave owning ancestors, but I'm pretty sure some of them fought Native Americans. I'm told I have a tiny fraction of Seminole, and I also have a distant relative who may indeed have taken part in wars against them and one can imagine the rest. One participated in the Gold Rush, which wasn't pretty either. All we can do is learn from our history. I would like to learn a bit more about my own ancestors and I'm sure it wouldn't all be pretty. But it would be interesting.

up
0 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur