The Politics of Abortion
As we fight the same old cultural battles of the 60's all over again, it's reassuring to see that Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood, is not giving an inch. From The Atlantic: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/531726/
Planned Parenthood Still Believes It Can Win The Culture Wars
"It’s more important than ever that we stand loud and proud for the ability of any woman—regardless of her income, her geography, her immigration status, her sexuality, her sexual orientation—to access the full range of reproductive health care,” Richards said. “We’ve got to pull the curtains back and be open and honest about this procedure that one in three women will have at some point in their lifetime, and their right to make that decision.”
.
She is not alone. Sister Simone enters the fray over at Common Dreams: https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/06/26/sister-simone-republicans-t...
"This bill preys on the most vulnerable!...Medicaid dollars benefit seniors residing in nursing homes, including many Catholic Sisters who have served their entire lives tending to the most vulnerable. It also affects people with disabilities, whose care can be too expensive for a family to manage. But, Republican efforts to cut Medicaid funding arbitrarily will jeopardize their lives and well being."
.
This article from Huff Post in 2015 contains my favorite quote from my favorite nun, Sister Joan Chitister:
No One Is Pro Abortion: http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/7957558
I do not believe that just because you’re opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don’t? Because you don’t want any tax money to go there. That’s not pro-life. That’s pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is.
I'll wrap this up with a link to Sister Joan Chitister's Huff Post Blog:
Comments
Cecile Richards supported Clinton's opposition
to single payer. Understandably, there would be no reason for PP if there was Medicare to all.
This comment got me hide rated at GOS.
But you can't be FOR the best healthcare for women, and against Medicare for all.
Neither Russia nor China is our enemy.
Neither Iran nor Venezuela are threatening America.
Cuba is a dead horse, stop beating it.
Single-payer would be a boon to PP.
Single-payer means exactly that: One source of payment. It reflects only the demand side of the equation. The supply side, which is where PP lives, would get paid and paid and paid, because millions of women would suddenly be able to see a physician for regular reproductive health maintenance services.
Richards' support of Clinton represented a shocking abandonment of the actual interests of her organization, in favor of playing the insider politics game (with a hefty measure of identity politics thrown in as well).
The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.
While I obviously support abortion rights and birth control,
I am not fan of Planned Parenthood. If the GOP takes every dime, it will be just dessert.
I am also in favor of changes to the abortion laws. As technology advances, it becomes more and more important for abortion to be "the" last resort and for birth control to be freely available. I also think the rights of men to be or not to be fathers have to be given more weight.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
Why ?
Why?
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
I too ask why?
I detest Cecile Richards, but Planned Parenthood does a lot of other very important work with family planning and helping those who have little get decent healthcare. The abortion work is but a fraction of the overall scope of PP.
Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.
How do you "win" when you give away
everything that you claim to be fighting for?
Edit: Canada does just fine without any laws regarding abortion at all. Maybe we should go and do likewise.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
no laws on abortion at all
We'd have to rid ourselves of roughly one-third of our population -- devout Catholics and the various flavors of hyper-Evangelical Protestants -- in order to pull that one off.
One example: Oklahoma has a law which requires married women to obtain their husbands' consent to medically necessary hysterectomies. Today. In 2017.
There is absolutely no reason behind any such law any atheist would accept as real. None whatsoever. That law exists solely to pacify preachers. Period.
And gak!!
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
We wouldn't have to get rid of anyone.
We have to outvote them. We'd also need a movement led by people who aren't willing to accept compromises that anointed politicians believe will add to their vote totals. Bernie Sanders had a 100% vote rating from Planned Parenthood. Hillary Clinton changed her position on late term abortion depending on the particular electorate from which she was seeking office.
I damn well do have other places to go.I wish Cecile Richards would find one.
As well as hammering on the point
Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
Yet somehow Canada managed it, despite also having
1/3 of their population being devout Catholics.
One of my father's closest friends was almost murdered by that American whackjob, standing in his own living room about a mile from my Dad's house (in Canada). The bullet ruined his shoulder and ended his practice -- a man who helped deliver literally thousands of babies over his career.
The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.
Religion is the weapon of the misogynists, not the source.
Which is not intended to be a defense of religion, generally.
The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.
Quality Healthcare For All
I am an ardent supporter of Father's Rights, which is the primary reason for my enduring contempt for Sheila Keul, who was a big pusher of the "deadbeat dad" narrative and punitive child support collection practices:
http://www.iwf.org/blog/2426540/When-%22Deadbeat-Dads%22-Aren't-Even-the-Real-Dads
One of the most depraved aspects of family law is the idea that absentee Father's should be punished for not making child support payments by repealing trade and business licenses as well as drivers licenses. I also believe that it is a travesty that courts enforce child support payments even when the mother denies visitation rights.
There is a lot of controversy over exactly what services Planned Parenthood provides. Here is a Wiki summary:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood
I can't agree with giving a prospective father or anyone else authority to deny a woman the right to make a very difficult decision based on medical consultation and her own informed conscience. Compelled child birth is not an acceptable demand to impose on any woman.
Peace Out
(my reply to dkmich insists on being a new comment. I don't know why)
"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn
rubber, meet road!
Regardless of how one feels about Fathers' Rights et al, this is where the rubber hits the road:
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides