Trump Meets with Stanford University's own War Criminal, Condoleeza "Don't forget about Me!" Rice
(I still can't say it) Trump met on Friday with Stanford University's special war criminal, Condoleeza Rice. Why is a question but Trump has made a habit out of meeting with people who can better help him understand his criminal responsibilities for U.S. imperialism.
https://sputniknews.com/us/201703311052172670-condoleezza-rice-trump/
I watched some of the NCAA women's basketball tournament the last couple weeks in which the Stanford University women's basketball team participated. Condoleeza Rice, a proud Stanford graduate, has been a regular at their games especially during the championship tournaments. The media invariably highlight her attendance and flower her with words of praise. "It's so special to have someone so important at the game cheering like a regular fan!" It makes me sick. It makes me even sicker to see the sheeple give her an ovation for being among them. It makes me wish I was there with a big fat sign that said, "Condoleeza Rice is a Murderous War Criminal. ARREST HER!!"
I wonder how long they would let me stay.
Rice was George W. Bush's first National Security Advisor and second Secretary of State, after Colin Powell. The Secretary of State position, like the President, the V.P, the Ambassador to the United Nations, the National Security Advisor, the Secretary of Defense, and a number of other positions, is inherently a war criminal position. There's no avoiding that since every secretary of state since the Civil War has been instrumental in administering the war machine of U.S. imperialism which has killed between 20-30 million people since WWII while invading at least 37 countries, the vast majority illegally and based on lies.
It's hard to stomach these people walking around free, giving lectures, meeting with the 26%'s President! It's even harder to listen to the stupid ass sports announcers with their praising of "a great American" who is partly responsible for killing millions of people. It's infuriating people can't put this together, won't put this together.
Would you shake Condoleeza Rice's hand? I wouldn't.
Tony Blair, Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, Rice, Bush, both Bush's, ALL the Bush's, Cheney, and now, Obama, Clinton, both Clinton's, Kerry, Susan Rice, Nuland, etc., the list goes on and on with people, our supposed government "leaders" who are responsible for immense killing and destruction in the name of democracy under the umbrella of U.S. imperialism and the insane quest to rule the world. They walk free, get special treatment and ovations from the sheeple. While those of us that know the truth seethe and plot for justice.
If there's a reason to keep going, it's justice for the victims of U.S. imperialism.
Comments
Nauseating
Cheney. Bush. Rice. Tenant. People who will burn in hell if there is a god.
@GusBecause Socially acceptable words
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
Has there been a president that hasn't been a war criminal?
I don't know much about Adams and the other earlier presidents, but I do know a bit about Jefferson and what he did to the native Americans and the slaves.
Wasn't it Monroe who decided that this country should get Latin American's resources and signed the Monroe doctrine.
I have been having fun going after commenters who are saying that Trump is doing bad things to people in other countries and telling them that one good thing about Trump being president is that people are finally waking up to what this country has been doing during the last 8 years under Obamas's leadership. I'm getting a lot of flak and being called a Putin lover or apologist.
It's so damned amazing that people gave Barack a pass on everything he did and how many people he killed.
president
Nope.
And that's not restricted to presidents of the United States, either.
If you are the head of a Nation State, it's what you do. It's what you must do. It's an occupational hazard of that job.
Consider the position of the Christian Kings and Emperors in the first 500 years of the religion's existence. The most common practice for these kings was to hold off on receiving Baptism until either death was imminent, the successor was already in power, or both. The reasoning behind this was that bloodshed and war crimes were occupational hazards of kingship, and the kings of that era tended to reserve the complete slate-blanking of Baptism for after they were done rendering their souls filthy with these crimes. The most famous example of this was Roman Emperor Constantine I. The first major king to break the pattern, if I recall correctly, was Clovis of the Franks, whose chaplains were willing to assert that God understood that war crimes and bloodshed were occupational hazards of kingship, and weren't sinful in and of themselves when committed by a "legitimate" king. (!)
My answer to all of that, of course, is: "First Samuel, Chapter 8"
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides