Trouble with the help

Workers Rise; Seize Control In Cities
   - NY Times headline, March 16, 1920

   There has been nothing more inspiring to the working class than a popular movement of the people, taking over the streets, flexing their muscles by sheer numbers, and sweeping away all that oppose them. And nothing is more terrifying to the entrenched power than this scenario.
   Class struggle has been with western society since the dawn of civilization, and it will continue as long as there is inequality in the world.

Rome at the beginning of the Republic was not a democracy by any means. The rich were preying on the poor.

 The plebeians were oppressed by hunger, poverty and powerlessness. Allotments of land didn't solve the problems of poor farmers whose tiny plots stopped producing when overworked. Some plebeians whose land had been sacked by the Gauls couldn't afford to rebuild, so they were forced to borrow. Interest rates were exorbitant, but since land couldn't be used for security, farmers in need of loans had to enter into contracts (nexa), pledging personal service. Farmers who defaulted (addicti), could be sold into slavery or even killed.
   Some patricians were making a profit and gaining slaves, even if the people to whom they lent money defaulted.

 The first recorded general strike happened in Rome in 494 BC. Because General Strike was not a term that had been invented yet, the term used was Secessio plebis - in which all the plebians (i.e. working class) simply left the city until the patricians (i.e. aristocracy) gave in. The name of this conflict was known as the Conflict of the Orders.
   While the appearance of this conflict was labour related, in fact it was a direct class conflict.

  It didn't happen often, but Secessio plebis was extremely effective when it was used. The plebians used it in 494 B.C. to force the patricians to create the political office of tribune.

 There, without any commander, in a regularly entrenched camp, taking nothing with them but the necessaries of life, they quietly maintained themselves for some days, neither receiving nor giving any provocation.
    A great panic seized the City, mutual distrust led to a state of universal suspense.

 Without the working class cooking, cleaning, and protecting them, the aristocrats were powerless.

  In 449 B.C. it was used to force the creation of a written and published legal code, something the authorities vehemently opposed.
   In 287 B.C., the last time Secessio plebis was used, the working class managed to force the patricians to abolish debt slavery, laws forbidding the marriage of a plebian and a patrician, gave plebians final say in all legislative matters, and allowed any plebian to hold any political office.

  In other words, a non-violent general strike was far more successful for the average, working class person than any armed revolt in history.

An Unusual Worker's Compensation Agreement

  Work on the High Seas in the 17th Century was dangerous and unrewarding. Its for these reasons more than any other that piracy spread. Generally the person who had the most to fear from being captured by pirates was the captain of the ship.
   According to The Many-Headed Hydra, the pirate vessels of the days were incredibly progressive in their egalitarianism (all captains were elected) and race was not a factor in duties or rank.

  Given this, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise to discover that pirate ships were pioneers in the idea of workers compensation.

 It was the custom to draw up articles of agreement before the commencement of a voyage, and it can be certain that the men who joined [Captain] Kidd on the Adventure Galley  at London signed such an agreement. These articles regulated the various charges and payments to all members of the crew. Esquemiling, in the Buccaneers of America, writes of such agreements in the following terms:

[snip]
 Lastly, they stipulate in writing what recompense or reward each one ought to have that is either wounded or maimed in his body, suffering the loss of any limb, by that voyage. Thus they order for the loss of a right arm 600 pieces-of-eight, or 6 slaves; for the loss of a left arm 500 pieces-of-eight; or 5 slaves; for a right leg 500 pieces-of-eight, or 5 slaves;  for a left leg 400 pieces-of-eight, or 4 slaves; for an eye 100 pieces-of-eight, or one slave; for a finger of the hand the same reward as the same eye.

Trouble with the help Part 2; the cradle of labor activism

the first unauthenticated strike in America may have come from the most unlikely of sources. The Charleston Gazette on October 29, 1763, has a very unusual news report.
   It seems that Negro chimney sweepers "had the insolence, by a combination amongst themselves, to raise the usual price, and to refuse doing their work, unless their exorbitant demands are complied with."

  Philadelphia was first in another major milestone in labor history - the general strike.

"The blood sucking aristocracy stood aghast; terror stricken they thought the day of retribution had come."
  - John Ferral, union leader

   The idea of a general strike was first circulated by a man named William Benbow. Benbow was an English socialist, but his radical ideas about "common concerted job action across occupational lines" began circulating in pamphlet form on the east coast in 1831.
   Seventeen trade unions struck for a 10-hour day in Baltimore in 1833, but the strike was quickly crushed. Shortly afterwards a similar effort was made in Boston, and met a similar fate.

  Word travelled from city to city. By June 1835, Philadelphia was ready.

 Three hundred armed Irish longshoremen marched through the streets calling workers to join them on strike. Leather workers, printers, carpenters, bricklayers, masons, city employees, bakers, clerks and painters joined in, carrying their tools.

 In all, 20,000 workers walked off their jobs and idled the city in a general strike for a 10-hour day. In what might be called the first "concern troll" in history, the Germantown Telegraph fretted for the well-being of the workers.

 the brevity of only a sixty-hour week would be harmful to workers, that all the extra time would be "applied to useless and unworthy purposes."

After a week the city government caved. City workers would now only work 10 hours, from 6 A.M. to 6 P.M., with one hour for lunch and one hour for dinner. Three weeks later the other employers in the city gave in to the general strike. The 10 hour day was adopted throughout the city along with some wage increases.
    The success of the general strike electrified the labor movement, and a wave of strikes swept the east coast. By the following year the 10-hour day was the standard for skilled workers. In 1840 President Martin Van Buren instituted the ten hour day for federal employees.

Trouble with the help Part 3, or On Strike Against God

  The most noteworthy of firsts in labor history has to be the very first recorded strike. Unfortunately there is no way of knowing what day this occurred.

 toward the end of the reign of the Pharaoh Ramses III widespread corruption and inefficiency had made Egypt barely governable, and construction at the city of Thebes had apparently severely depleted the grain reserves used to pay the workers at the royal necropolis. On the 21st day of the second month, in Ramses's 29th year, the scribe Amennakht personally delivered a formal complaint about this situation to the royal mortuary temple that was part of the large administrative complex of Medinet Habu. The workers implored,

"We are hungry: eighteen days have elapsed in the month."

Although a payment was soon made, the poor conditions continued, and in the sixth month of that year the workers organized the first recorded strike in history. The men of the two crews stopped work and marched together to one of the royal mortuary temples, where they staged what would today be called a sit-in. The men insisted,

"It was because of hunger and thirst that we came here. There is no clothing, no ointment, no fish, no vegetables. Send to Pharaoh our good lord about it, and send to the vizier our superior, that sustenance may be made for us."

The workers repeated their protest on the following day within the complex of another temple, and possibly a third, until their complaints were recorded by the priests and sent across the river to Thebes. Only then were the rations owed finally distributed. However, similar protests were repeated before the reign of Ramses III ended; and even in the reigns of subsequent Pharaohs workers had to go on strike in order to receive payment.

 This was around 1158 or 1157 B.C.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

sojourns's picture

Interesting stuff. BUT what if you're a left handed pirate?

Now the police are sporting military gear. People are still getting out to protest regardless. So. We may see more of that.

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

Deja's picture

Totally off topic, but I once read an article where someone claimed ultrasounds might "cause" left handedness lol. And when I read it, I literally laughed out loud - in front of a high school English teacher grading papers while waiting for her car to get fixed at my, then, boyfriend's shop. I read the claim to her, and we both had a good laugh.

We, people, are a strange lot. That's all I can say.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"

Bisbonian's picture

I'm saving the text of this one.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

Deja's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Your essay made me wonder, are there many (or any?) historical examples of former soldiers joining strikes or protests, as the Vets recently did at Standing Rock?

up
0 users have voted.
Mark from Queens's picture

I had no idea how extensive the dissension was during the ranks. This film was a big eye-opener of something the Armed Forces seats of power were very afraid would get out and turn into full blown mutiny.

The website for "Sir! No Sir!" is a treasure trove of the dissent that went on:

In the 1960’s an anti-war movement emerged that altered the course of history. This movement didn’t take place on college campuses, but in barracks and on aircraft carriers. It flourished in army stockades, navy brigs and in the dingy towns that surround military bases. It penetrated elite military colleges like West Point. And it spread throughout the battlefields of Vietnam. It was a movement no one expected, least of all those in it. Hundreds went to prison and thousands into exile. And by 1971 it had, in the words of one colonel, infested the entire armed services. Yet today few people know about the GI movement against the war in Vietnam.

The Vietnam War has been the subject of hundreds of films, both fiction and non-fiction, but this story–the story of the rebellion of thousands of American soldiers against the war–has never been told in film.This is certainly not for lack of evidence. By the Pentagon’s own figures, 503,926 “incidents of desertion” occurred between 1966 and 1971; officers were being “fragged”(killed with fragmentation grenades by their own troops) at an alarming rate; and by 1971 entire units were refusing to go into battle in unprecedented numbers. In the course of a few short years, over 100 underground newspapers were published by soldiers around the world; local and national antiwar GI organizations were joined by thousands; thousands more demonstrated against the war at every major base in the world in 1970 and 1971, including in Vietnam itself; stockades and federal prisons were filling up with soldiers jailed for their opposition to the war and the military.

Yet few today know of these history-changing events.

Sir! No Sir! will change all that. The film does four things: 1) Brings to life the history of the GI movement through the stories of those who were part of it; 2) Reveals the explosion of defiance that the movement gave birth to with never-before-seen archival material; 3) Explores the profound impact that movement had on the military and the war itself; and 4) The feature, 90 minute version, also tells the story of how and why the GI Movement has been erased from the public memory.

I was part of that movement during the 60’s, and have an intimate connection with it. For two years I worked as a civilian at the Oleo Strut in Killeen, Texas–one of dozens of coffeehouses that were opened near military bases to support the efforts of antiwar soldiers. I helped organize demonstrations of over 1,000 soldiers against the war and the military; I worked with guys from small towns and urban ghettos who had joined the military and gone to Vietnam out of a deep sense of duty and now risked their lives and futures to end the war; and I helped defend them when they were jailed for their antiwar activities. My deep connection with the GI movement has given me unprecedented access to those involved, along with a tremendous amount of archival material including photographs, underground papers, local news coverage and personal 8mm footage.

Sir! No Sir! reveals how, thirty years later, the poem by Bertolt Brecht that became an anthem of the GI Movement still resonates:
General, man is very useful.
He can fly and he can kill.
But he has one defect: He can think.

up
0 users have voted.

"If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:

THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC"

- Kurt Vonnegut

Lookout's picture

I appreciate the tip about "Sir, No Sir" , Mark.

And gjohn what a great essay. Think we might be able to institute a general strike today? Seems it is time.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

in my brain. TPTB were quite successful at making us forget I guess.

Interesting. I'm willing to bet that the GI movement is a big reason why the American educational system became so "dumbed down".

up
0 users have voted.
Jazzenterprises's picture

in a galaxy not so far away, I was in Buenos Aires one year after the crash, and Argentinian society was still reeling and uncertain of the future. Did the unions and workers retreat? Nope. My first day there, I was in the small roadways near the center, looking around, taking it all in. A small protest went by but very loud and active, and there was a lot of union presence. I kept going and mosied around for about an hour and headed back to my hotel. I had to cross the main Plaza where the madres of the missing do their weekly vigil, and I could barely cross the street. What started as maybe 200 people had turned into 10,000 in front of the Presidential palace and growing. I asked what the protest was about, and to a person everyone said the same thing: workers rights. Three hours later the people started dispersing, and I was filled with hope for the workers movement... at least here.

Next day, same time, couldn't cross the square. Same thing next day. They took the weekend off. Back on Monday. I moved out of the center and went further into the city, so I lost track if this continued daily, but in a country that had little hope and even less money, in a very right-wing country, it had a thriving workers movement fighting for their rights, no matter the political or economic situation. I was really impressed and saddened to be reminded how passive and unresistant we have become.

A small story of hope in a land far away.

up
0 users have voted.

Progressive to the bone.