If you see signs of voter intimidation at your polling location use video and call the FBI's hotline
http://aclj.org/us-constitution/voter-fraud-election-hotline

Third Debate question suggestions:

Junior Wallace's' incompetentcy for real-time fact checking known liars aside. There are items of interest for average Americans that haven't been answered in the previous debates. We've come to fully understand what body/skin/face type is preferred for diddling by deplorably dinky digits and the shortcomings of using a private basement network server for government correspondence but inquiring minds want to know: (odious cynicism alert!)

"The US has come to be seen as the arms supplier of choice for both sides of exponentially increasing global conflict (ie $100B for Saudi Arabia - the paragon of stability in the middle east and $38B for Israel's homesteading efforts), how will you assure an anxious merican public that the profits from these sales will be properly taxed and not be offshored to a PO box in Panama?"

"Lobbying efforts by anyone calling themselves a pharmaceutical company, international drug cartels and small arms suppliers have prolonged a $1,000,000,000,000 (not counting social costs) unwinable mor-on-drugs. If elected, how can you assure these pennies on the dollar/return on investment, scions of industry and commerce, that their 5 year revenue projections are sound?"

"It is postulated that the average assault weapon owner replete with high capacity magazines, has an IQ of 85. Is there a minimum level of mental facility to brandish mobile arsenals?"

"The Midwest and Western states have become Swiss cheese terra-firma for fracking enhanced aquifers. A two-part question. If elected can you assure race fans that a limitless supply of cheap gas will continue to be available, or if not, have your advisors identified additional pipeline routes through Native American nations territory that we can move tar sand oil through? And now that we have become energy independent will there be any surcharge for refining the sands here for export, or will subsidies placate your donors? Same question for clean coal, you first madame secretary."

"For-profit annual religious tithing has surpassed Google's market capitalization, with many good works, we're sure. Mr tRump as one the nation's hughly charitable benefactors and preeminent tax expert, are you satisfied with the current deduction as it applies to itemization toward personal taxable income, verses corporations (as they are people too) to recognize a similar deduction with a concealed contribution to a 501(c)4, if it is for these important civics lessons so lacking in public education these days?" Crackle, crackle in jr's ear-piece "he'll think you're talking about see4, and he's still checking out hills ass, switch to favorite sharpie colors."

Tonight's moderator has been graciously supplied by an Australian advertising maven to fairly balance the Clinton News Network paid surrogates, enjoy. Please contribute to the discourse with additional questions for jr Wallace.