The originals, also from wikileaks, were from question and answer sessions and I immediately wondered if they were mislabeled as her "speeches". Was she paid a quarter million for a Q and A session at a symposium? Personal enrichment for vacuous campaign symposium fluff while she avoids free public debate (California)?

I couldn't follow the original's vacuous blah blah blah without going cross-eyed and wondered WTF did her campaign allow them to become an issue for. The organization into topics by the wikileaks staff helped locate the warmonger bullshit about militarily encircling China and her stupid remark about the USA owning Hawaii because USA has a receipt for buying it. And of course, her blah blah blah about making sure the world is fracked (to death). But, I question if these are the "speeches"

There are some pretty interesting "leaks" coming from "Anonymous" about the up and coming videos, one of which "Anonymous" claims to be a graphic one from Epstein's collection that was found on his island. Might be utter bullshit, but...

We have an email organizing genius here who I have personally been waiting for an essay from on the Podesta leaks.

While I am at making my coffee, let me mention that trump came out with his insane idea of raising sentences for non-violent drug offenses, apparently to cure the epidemic of addiction to prescription pain killers. Geez one would think these fascists would make the pain killers free to assure that huge swaths of the population are in a opium induces haza... but I expect they need more slaves in prison.

And I can't seem to get anyone to switch from choosing between two evils. They don't even know about the alternatives. Dominicans (half of Dominicans live in the USA) strongly opposed to the Clinton's because of what Bill did to destroy our banana industry and having become aware of the rip-off of Haitian relief funds. And there is a worry that the radiation from a USA/Russia nuclear dust-up would kill us all here in the Lesser Antilles.