Dan Rolle was a candidate in NV who did some videos around the time of the infamous chair-throwing spectacle (the one that caused Barbara Boxer so much fear of Bernie delegates that her finger went straight up in the air as she fled for her life). He has been very busy in the interim, and the Dem's and Debbie are NOT going to like what he is exposing. Here are a couple of his Reddit posts; they are hard to read, hopefully will be pulled together better soon.

Dan Rolle Leaks Part 1 : How the DNC created the perfect storm for VAN abuse, as exposed by Guccifer 2.0, the Obama Year through December 2015

https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCleaks/comments/52y5e1/danrolle_is_tweeting_h...

Sorry this is such a jumble. He did a Periscope video, if you can view that.

https://www.periscope.tv/w/1yoKMrkEQNjGQ

tl/dr: In 2008, Hillary lost to Obama, but between '08 and '16, Hillary utilized Mooks and Debbie to force all state Democrat parties to surrender their proprietary data over to VoteBuilder & VAN. Now, in '16, unlike in '08 (as exposed by Guccifer 2.0) the DNC gained 100% control over every voter database in the country, meaning that 1 person federally could alter any and all voter registrations, while simultaneously knowing exactly who you'd likely vote for (based on phone bank data, such as "Can Bernie count on your support?"). However, they needed a scandal in order to complete the process, queue the DNC and media create VAN Scandal of December 2015.

VAN Scandal Explained
tl/dr: Here I will go over the basics of the Voter Activation Network (related to VoteBuilder), known as NGP VAN, owned by close associates of Hillary. In short, VAN had an 'incredulous' security flaw : Anyone who logged in during 4-hour blocks of time ("during maintenance") could steal 100% of the phone banking data from their opponent. The fix proposed by VAN was to use the honor system among the 10,000 persons who had access. A Bernie IT guy logged in, and was by default, granted access to 100% of the phone banking data. This was characterized as 'hacking'. He then received no benefit whatsoever, as he 'downloaded' files to the VAN server, and never attempted to retrieve them from their server, or view them. - And what's more, Hillary's IT people did something similar in '08, and not a word was said about it, but this time it created a national crisis.

Neither party want a lawsuit, mostly because it would destroy the Democrat Party, I hope he goes through with it however.
Many of you know how Hillary Clinton has actively worked with Google, Twitter, and some other online search engines to suppress information and search results. And I'll show you one instance.
Google Hillary Clinton Barack Obama 2008 VAN scandal or whatever
You won't find jack. But political junkies know that a Hillary Clinton staffer during the Presidential primary accessed Barack Obama's files. It was on the news and in several papers. The details were unclear, because VAN (or whomever, they change names a lot), choose not to release the details, and settle the matter with a quick warning and I'm not even sure if the staffer was fired. I believe the idea as that 'she was young, people make mistakes', and little more was said (technically she was 'fired' and immediately rehired in another position, if I recall).
Conversely when Bernie's staffer did it, VAN shut down his campaign for 2 or 3 days, immediately prior to the NH debate, and made several false and inflammatory statements, which they continuously retracted, near hourly. I kept linking to their site and quoting them, but they kept retracking their statements.
Their initial statement was "Bernie staffer illegally accessed Clinton data", when in reality it was "Bernie staffer performed a search, and at this time any search result would return both Bernie and Clinton data combined, as the site was malfunctioning."
Likewise, they should add that they knew of the malfunction, and instead of preventing access, they choose to 'monitor' activity, over a 4 hour period, to see what would happen. Anyone who's a political junkie knows that the way VAN and DNC, handled the situation was completely at odds with their commitments to neutrality, and likewise worlds different than how they handled it with Clinton just 8 years before.
But good luck finding anything on that, as that has been removed from the internet, apparently.
Short list of all the suspicious activity surrounding the event:
Dramatically different reaction 2016 vs 2008 (no reaction 08, public smear campaign 16)
VAN publicly disparaging the campaign, example:
Repeatedly they used the word "hacked" when it was actually the default result for anyone with a login. This would be equivalent to you logging into reddit tomorrow and having moderator rights everywhere, all over reddit, and then Reddit declaring you 'hacked reddit', when all you did was log on.
Repeatedly stated Sanders "searched Clinton data", when it was all data. All data was a default setting that could not be removed. In fact, it likely showed 'Bernie only', but returned all. So, it was impossible for him to search 'Clinton data', the only results were all or none.
Repeatedly VAN addressed this as a "short down time, or brief period", when it was about 4 hours. The staffer only accessed it a brief period, but the maintenance was over 4 hours, which is much longer time frame than most people associate with a 'brief period' in computer terms. A brief period sounds like 5 to 10 minutes, when you mean literally all your data was exposed and you choose not to prevent access.
Repeatedly VAN said Sanders "downloaded Clinton data" when in fact they 'downloaded it to VAN', not their own. And VAN knows that they could not have printed the reports, or that they ever opened their 'downloaded' files, and at most the staffer would have had to either have memorized the data or hit print+screen (a bazillion times), but that's the only way he could of kept the data. Sanders team downloaded data the same way I have downloaded Imgur.
VAN's treatment of 'maintenance' and 'downtown' issues are suspect.
VAN said that they were 'unaware' that during all 'maintenance' periods that any level of staff, if they logged on, would be granted full access rights by default, until a Bernie Sanders staffer mentioned it. At this point VAN claimed to fix the problem, yet it persisted (and had never been addressed). VAN solution, rather than prevent access during maintenance, has been (and perhaps still is), was to simply send out an email "About to perform maintenance exposing all your data to your opponent, please don't log on".
During this time, I believe it was Thursday 8am to Noon, with the debate Saturday. This was going to be a HUGE NH debate, and Bernie was gaining momentum. Anyways, so VAN sent out their maintenance thing. Maintenance went on longer than usual (preventing phone banking type activity), and about 3 hours in the staffer log on. VAN reportedly saw him log on, and instead of disconnecting his account or preventing access, VAN choose to install a tracker to track his movements. That's just an odd reaction.
VAN released a series of confidential information
VAN is required to be a neutral party, however after the event, VAN proceeded to release the titles of folders he created, and search terms or whatever. Things that there is no way the public would know without VAN releasing the information. Likewise, you really got to ask, why, would they do that? Is there any good to come of it, other than to disparage?
The DNC choose to react too, and again smear Sanders. This is only relevant as they defended Hillary in 08 and called Obama 'anti-young people' when he pushed to have the details of what the staffer did released (which they never were).
During the debate Sanders was only allotted 23 minutes of speaking time, with 10 minutes consumed by the breach, for a whopping 13 minutes on issues.
That's about the sum of it. What the staffer did was wrong, unquestionably, but the 'setup' and the 'reaction' are just so at odds with anything anyone has ever seen before. Just think for a second; in America we got one who served on the Board of Walmart 20 years ago, who essentially founded VAN, the most powerful US voter database in the world, running against a guy who annually strolls the heifers and campaigned in Iowa with just tape.
And many would say by most accounts he must be feeling pretty, pretty awesome.

The Democratic Party is a parasite.