Tuesday Open Thread - 10-27-2015

Good Morning, all, here are some random musings about the remote life and confusions.

She Kills People From 7,850 Miles Away

Her name is ‘Sparkle.’ She operates a drone. She is sick of whiny boys. And she is perfectly OK with dealing out death.
...
Anne, an Air Force staff sergeant, was—and still is—a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) sensor operator or “sensor.” At Creech, she is assigned to a reconnaissance squadron flying missions over Iraq and Afghanistan.
...
As she rode to work, Anne—or “Sparkle” as she’s known to her fellow drone operators—wasn’t focused on the desert outside her window. It was 2009 and President Obama was sending troops in a surge to Afghanistan. Sparkle’s mind was on a desert 7,000 miles away. Over the next 24 hours she would track an insurgent, watch as he was killed by a Hellfire missile, and spy on his funeral before ending her night with a breakfast beer and a trip to the dog park.
...
The RPA has become the symbol of America’s ongoing wars, from Afghanistan to Somalia to Syria. And, 14 years after a U.S. “drone” first fired a missile at an al Qaeda operative, the morality and legality of remote strikes remains a matter of intense controversy.
...
But for all the attention paid to RPAs, the men and women who operate the 21st century’s most divisive weapons system remain largely hidden from public view—except for reports about strikes, especially when a missile kills civilians. The Daily Beast interviewed more than two dozen Air Force officers and airmen in the RPA community last year at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico the RPA’s training base.
...
She was flying with Patrick, a tall, lanky former B-1 bomber pilot. Patrick’s father-in-law, a former F-4 weapon systems officer, talked him into joining the Air Force with stories of low-level flying. Patrick deployed with a B-1 squadron and dropped bombs in Afghanistan, but because six months was too long to be away from his family, in 2009 he volunteered to fly MQ-9 Reapers instead. The RPA community, he thought, would be the best of both worlds. He could be home and still fly combat missions. Known as “Spade” at the squadron, the call sign comes from being a family man.
...
Sparkle liked flying with Spade. He was laidback and trusted her to do the job. She had worked at a casino in Louisiana before she joined the Air Force for help in paying for college.
...
“I use it to emasculate the enemy in the afterlife,” Sparkle said. “Many radical jihadists believe that being killed by a woman means they will not enter heaven. Considering how they treat their women, I’m OK with rubbing salt in the wound.

...

Ok, I don't know why I picked this article to post here. I recommend reading it all. There is something that makes people who engage in "remote actions" lose their moral conscience and compass. May be it's the old problem of choosing to lose your job or to lose your morals. You can't eat without a job, so I guess people rather lose their moral conscience than their jobs. Like most "Good Germans" choose to hold their work while losing their morality in The Third Reich. I don't know how to get over that issue. It's one of those things that linger in my mind. Anyhow, it disturbs me a lot.

Well, there is a lot I can't grasp. For example Russia and Putin. So, I am aware of the anti-Russian propaganda and msm usually smearing Russia and Putin, as if they were still in Soviet Union times and in the cold war. I also couldn't ignore that RT is considered by many and probably is to a not negligible extent a biased pro-Russian news outlet. And I know, I don't know nothing about the whole thing, really. I read and forget and it all goes in and out without being processed, understood, researched, questioned, or retained in my mind. While reading, I get mad and then just drop the idea to research it in depth to make up my mind. It's just too much. But then, there is the EB and I still think I read the right sources ... Smile

Some little stuff from how I grew up and the little bit I learned about the Russians.

In my childhood "the Russians" were the guys my mother's generation of women fled from during WWII. They were the guys, who raped my aunt in front of her father. But I got a very nice, kind and always helping cousin out of it (who silently as an adult helped some East Berliners to crawl through the tunnels into West Berlin. But that was so secret that we all learned about it only after his death). So, on my father's side, there was his younger brother, who got killed during the WWII by the Russians. My father was POW in Russian camps, but he lost his arm to US bomb attacks in Rumania. The only thing I remember my father saying about Russians is that "they have great souls and are wonderful people and can be very good friends, as long as they are not drunk". With regards to him being a POW in their prison camps, he said, it was all a matter of having bad luck or good luck in war. That's all. Not much, heh. But my father's library was full of books and they were all political. He just worked too hard and always fell asleep over them. Now I have those books and I fall asleep over them the same way. Sigh.

Communism (I didn't learn about the differences between Communism and Socialism, I just knew Social Democracy) was for me "East Germany", that meant being scared and angry passing from West Germany to West Berlin through East Germany. Police stopped you regularly, searched your cars, you had to hide news papers,("Der Spiegel" you better didn't take with you in the car. That's why I have still believe that "Der Spiegel" has been a good weekly news source for Germany for several decades now). East Germany to me as a child meant that the East Germans were not allowed to choose their professional fields, were not allowed to move freely, constantly had simply either not enough or bad food (my mother regularly sent care packages with food to the extended family members living in East Germany), were not allowed to get news from outside of East Germany, police officers would shoot anybody who tries to flee East Germany. You watched from the observation platforms over "The Wall" and into the "no-man's land" behind, stayed mum and turned around going on to do your daily business. I never gave a though about how East Germany felt to an East German kid. First time I thought about it, was when I read a bit about Merkel's biography. Another book I have to read. As a student I could have studied Marx, Lenin and Mao, Trotzky and Socialism and Fascism, but I didn't. I had not appetite to slog myself through the books, I studied Chemistry, that was bad enough.

So, yes, of course, communist East Germany, the Soviet Union was "the evil empire" to us at that time. I think we just walked around silently watching the GIs and the Russian or East German soldiers watching each other and read all about the nuclear arsenal both sides were building up in "Der Spiegel". West Germany was a hunkered down scared, silently watching the madness around them, unable to voice their feelings, as most were burdened with so much feelings of guilt to be without words. So, we became a surviving, rebuilding and taking care of the kids kind of society in the fifties and early sixties. At the same time we listened to what our parent's generation said about Voice of America (Uncle Sam's Propaganda Tool, mostly BS) and BBC (the source to go to, if you wanted to get at least some of the news correctly).

As a child or teenager I just got my clues through little things around me. For example, my parents families had live-in nannies.
A little side note:
(on both sides of my parents, one a bit better off small business man (great- and grandfathers) with its own company, the other a very modest civil servant for the German government after WWI in the Weimar Republic and during the rise of Nazi Germany. Yes, my grandfather on my mother's side was working for the Ministry of the Interior. His job was the only thing he had. He was very poor when he started his family around 1900 and went through the horrors of WWI. He carried the burden of feeding his family (5 kids) and took care of them silently and thus became a "bystander", the so-called "Good German". Privately he voiced his opposition to Hitler. He was no follower and not a guy who tried to resist the Nazis actively either. His wife was much more "taken" by Mr. Hitler apparently. Like the millions of other Germans. About my father's family, all I know is that none of them was in the NSDAP and basically were "The Good German" small, beaming business man, conservative, sports enthusiasts and family oriented. My grandfather's business saved all of the extended family to find a job after WWII. My siblings today don't admit that even their own, very well protected lives and their relative "wealth" was all dependent on the grandpa "grand-fathering" in all of my parents generations and then their kids got grandfathered in by their fathers. Now the grandkids got into it as well.. You could sense a bit of Buddenbrook's anchestyr in my father's side of the family, just that they weren't that rich and came from Berlin and not Northern Germany. None of them is really aware of their privilege. Insecurity and poverty hasn't touched their lives. So, yes, today, from the view point of many Americans , it would be white privilege. Other than my son, none of the grand-kids (my son's cousins) are aware of that fact either. They are untouched by racial encounters in their lives. They have no clue. If they "know" something it's remotely through the intertubes. But that doesn't touch you and it means you don't 'get" t.)

So getting back, both my parents' families had a "live-in Nanny" all their lives. It was not so much a matter of class feature than a matter of necessity for the nannies and for the women in my family, all having lots of kids. They stayed with the families their whole life and were considered beloved family members by the kids.
Another little side note:
(My father never forgot to contact his "nanny" til she died; my mother remembers how her "nanny" became her aunt while they were fleeing during WWII on foot from East to reach the Western zone and got help from US GI's transporting them with their trucks away from of the approaching Russians, who later occupied that area. In order to save the "nanny", she had to become my mother's aunt. No questions asked. I am pretty generous about faking something, when it comes to save your life, for that reason.)

So, it was nothing special for us children again to have a "live-in nanny" in the years after WWII. The first one was a war refugee herself and needed a roof over her head; so my parents let her live in the basement with all of us (three kids) in their tiny two-bedroom rambler right after 1949, the first rental house my father had after returning from Russia. My parents always paid and supported their "nanny/employees/adopted family members" well. When my parents were able to move into a bigger house in 1954, that nanny married and established heir own home. We got a new "nanny", a seventeen year-old girl from East Germany, who left her own family behind.(At that time you could still do it. The iron curtain was not built yet in all its glory and you could move from East to West without getting shot or jumping fences) I was eight years old at that time. She stood with my parents til they both died, ie til 2005. She married and bought a house across the street from my parent's house and was the one of my "mother's kids" that was the closest and most loyal to her. We are in contact still, even across the Atlantic and without the internet.

I am telling you all of that, because it was through her that I got a hint about today's post-Soviet Union regime, the post cold-war Russia, that made me think that I perhaps am not able to grasp today's Russia correctly. After Gorbachev and the fall of the Soviet Union, I had no specific anti-Russian feelings and was very hopeful. I was more upset about the constant anti-Russian, anti-Putin rhetoric here in the US than I was being skeptical of the Russians and Putin.

When my parents got bed-ridden and needed "end-of-life" nursing care, my parents got in-house nursing care through their German health care system. These nurses often were recent remigrants and former Russians with German anchestry, who were allowed to return back to Germany and repatriated. Within a couple of years we had a lot of Russians in our little town of 30,000 and many Russian women got jobs in the nursing aid fields. Here you can read in detail about those remigrates. Returning Back Home? Ethnic German late repatriates remigration - Types and motivations, if you are so inclined. It's detailed, I just scanned it, but I guess it is okay as a source.

I watched (and was amazed) that our "nanny" didn't like the "Russian nurses". She is one of the persons (herself nursing her disabled child with amazing grace and patience for well over 30 years) who you would never believe to have prejudices or feelings of hate. But, yes, she said she doesn't trust those Russian nurses. I wondered why and couldn't grasp what it was that made her feel that way. As I just was visiting Germany, I never could figure out what it was, but I didn't forget her reaction.

Later on, in the US, among my German colleagues, we had two, one from Poland tied to a Russian girl, and one correspondent married to a Russian woman and one other correspondent who had worked in the Moscow studio before. The correspondents had a pretty straight forward down to earth feeling for US and Russian propaganda. They loved both American people and Russian people, and basically weren't shy to see both sides' political lies and name them in appropriate modest tone (public TV). The Polish guy surprised me with a passionate remark saying that Snowden is someone, he would send to hell. Oops, another hint of unexpected hate. I didn't forget that reaction as well, and wondered why he had such feelings. I couldn't ignore those either. Later I read about "feelings" among the population in Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, which were more anti-Russian and tribal than I would have expected. Poland was more difficult for me to understand. With the Ukraine my suspicions just went off the chart. Oh well, what can I say. Confusion and frustration all around in my mind.

So I was surrounded by people, who were neither pro US nor pro Russia, but mostly anti-both with regards to many political issues. Or they were clearly anti-Russian and pro-US patriotic, which was a bit too much to remain unquestioned in my mind. But who cares about my mind anyway. And dummy me, felt I was not anti-Russian enough and I felt it's a nuisance to try to find out through the digital news coverage, what is fair and truthful reporting and what is not. I really started to hate the online news fog. All those smarty (and arrogant) experts roaming around, all those awful comments on blogs by self-identified people in the know, made me think that they all are either jerks, lying naives or covertly CIA and NSA, contracted to disperse paranoia among online readers and TV watchers. I was getting "sick" and on the verge to become one of those paranoids.

That's why I try to read "on both sides of the aisles", if I can recognize, who is on which aisle. That's why I allow myself to post this interview I saw this morning on Deutsche Welle. That guy is anti-Putin. Is DW now "neo-liberal" or a "German progaganda tool"? Can I evaluate this piece, if he is fair? No, I really can't and I am not willing just for the sake of "fitting in" not to read it or post it. So, let me know, what you know and help me out. And if you think I should waste my time to find out what is a lie and what's not, I have to say that There is a limit to my patience and stamina searching for truth on the intertubes. I am at the point where I refuse to get "impressed" by that kind of pressure too.

Putin runs Russia like the Mafia
[video:https://youtu.be/zjCnGli59Lo]

Enough Russian nonsense now.

I can't get the "remote" issue out of my head. All interactions that are important to our livelihood and survival we are forced to handle "over the internet" these days. We buy, sell, converse, research, read, listen, work, discuss, search for work, flirt, and even remotely engaging in sex. We are a living and managing our lives in a "remote" mode. It doesn't feel like "Mens sana in corpore sano" (A healthy mind in a healthy body). I feel people get in larger and larger numbers to a "Mens insania in corpore obesus infirmos" status. (How people like latin is beyond me..)

I have the distinct feelings in my guts that the "remote mode life-style" destroys our minds, humanity, morality, our peaceful survival and is a great danger to us. That's one of the reasons I don't like writing here or posting anything, as I am convinced that the impact on the human mind through digital communication is exponentially more intense and destructive than usually admitted.

I wanted to add more example to point to the "remote-mode life-style issues". But I am tired now. Talked too much along memory lines. So, may be next week. I will see.

Have a good day and may be talk to someone in person and enjoy the good life. It feels good.
[video:https://youtu.be/zJ82mHBtrc8]

P.S. Oh, and as you might have realized, I lived in Berlin in the late sixties to the late seventies, but not in the eighties and nineties and beyond. So, I missed out on the whole "new beginnings" for Berlin. I have found this very nice article as well, which may give you an impression what was so "unique" to Berlin after the fall of The Wall in the nineties.

Revisiting Berlin's wonder years.

Still, after the studied sophistication of London, where I'd lived before, East Berlin was raw and rugged and full of promise. Its appeal had a lot to do with the Japanese concept of "Wabi-sabi," defined by design guru Leonard Koren as "(…) a beauty of things imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete." By the time the Iron Curtain came down, it was a place in a state of advanced decay and its makeover was inevitable.We snuck in just in time to enjoy its dilapidated charms before they disappeared for good. Berlin has turned out fine. But the city I moved to all those years ago no longer exists. It's a lost world.
Now, as Werner Herzog says at the end of his book, "Conquest of the Useless," "All that is to be reported is this: I took part."

Yep, a lost world, that's how my whole home country feels to me these days.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

mimi's picture

how are you this morning? I have stuff to do and as I am not working with a laptop or phone, I might be in and out and rare or late. Forgive me of having rambled along about my personal life. But I think I built my opinions mainly along the experiences I had through my personal encounter with people and not through book learning or remote digital interactions (other than reading comments that usually get me involved).

If you have something to post, please do. Yesterday's EB had lots of stuff.

It's getting a bit colder here during the nights and I start to heat. Now I am afaid of my electrical bills. We have baseboard heaters in these old frame houses and they eat up electricity like there is no tomorrow.

Have a good day all.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Technology news and information site Ars Technica:
After receiving threats, SXSW cancels panel about online harassment ··· SXSW also cancels "Savepoint" panel about "integrity of gaming's journalists"

For people not familiar with the event, SXSW — that is, South by Southwest — is "an annual set of film, interactive media, and music festivals and conferences that take place in mid-March in Austin, Texas."

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

Reading about your growing up in West Berlin was very interesting, mimi. I always wondered what it was like to do so as an island surrounded by Russians. Thank you for sharing it with us.

We are socked in for the next two days with steady rain, the last remnants of hurricane Patricia. Our internet service has been spotty and often worsens in the rain. But I have a lot to do over the next several days so I will probably be off and on too.

Have a great day, all! Smile

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

mimi's picture

ask myself why I still haven't cared to get a rescue boat like this one:
Liferaft -HTB1Su65FFXXXXcUbXXXq6xXFXXX8.jpg
In my day-dreaming activities I build a tiny house which can swim ... Smile ... on an inflatable raft.

Hope the skies will stop raining and give you some blueish hopes.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Putin may very well run Russia like the Mafia.

But, as I keep pointing out, many protegés, allies, and friends of the U.S. and western European countries also run their countries like the Mafia and no one seems to be repulsed or have any pangs of conscience ignoring their deeds and catering to their lies, hatreds, wars, whims, and interests.

Morocco, I posted about yesterday.

Indonesia under Suharto (who incidentally was Helmut Kohl's fishing buddy).

Saudi Arabia, for which yesterday, by coincidence, a kind of parody "advertising campaign" popped into my head:

Sometimes Al-Qaeda. Sometimes Al Capone.
Your friends. Or else.
Saudis™.

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you…

You're probably us. Saudis™.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

now conclude that I believe that "Putin runs Russia like the mafia". What do people conclude about a commentator, who posts videos and articles that the readers are not agreeing with politically. Do they think (by default) the posting commentator just believes in the content of the article, because he/she posted it, or could they imagine otherwise? I want to know how readers build their opinions about other writers and commentators. I do know they build them up easily and often wrongly, which causes "mental wars".

I have come to the conclusion that I build my opinions on little things I actually experience outside the digital world. When I experience a woman's arguments (for example to become a passionate HRC supporter), because I understand, which kind of personal experiences made her believe that HRC is really fighting for what she needs and believes to need changing, I can much more humanely react to her, than I would, just reading her rants online. It's also so much easier to make your own opinions clear in personal one to one talks, because all the clues you offer to the listener by your own body language etc.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Or at least, what I think DW honchos want us (their audience) to think as revealed by their choice of content.

There are all sorts of different messages posting a link can send.

In the absence of clarifying remarks, it's a mistake to assume it means, "Look, this source agrees with me the OP [the original poster] and you should too or else you're a big dummy [replace with insult of choice]." (Everybody assuming and insinuating and getting huffy about what they think others are insinuating is what makes the GOS experience so horrible sometimes.)

Moreover, it's a mistake I myself too often make — going into quick, snippy reaction mode instead of actually absorbing more carefully what the other person is trying to say.

In reality, a link could mean any number of things — "Have any or all of you already seen this?" or "I don't think this reflects very well on that source — what do others think?" or "This source looks at at things from an angle I hadn't considered before. Hmm." Et cetera.

What you say about the importance of face-to-face personal contact and body language sounds right to me.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

so if someone posts and is carefully avoiding to voice a clear position, I am having sometimes difficulties to build an opinion about an article or interview. I found myself posting carefully something to avoid to be too upfront, and usually people don't get then what I was trying to hint at then, the other option that I rant out. Not getting "hints" I tried to make in my "politer" posts happened mainly when it came to issues over feminism, sexism, racism and freedom of speech. I am not that easy to jump on band-wagon issues.

In a personal conversation you could make your intention much clearer without hurting someone's feelings. That's the only problem I have with online conversations. It's hard to be honest and kind at the same time.

up
0 users have voted.

Thanks for sharing your childhood and family with us mimi. I can't say that I can relate to it, but I admire the courage it took for your family to just to face each day. I do know that I would have wilted and died in such an authoritarian environment.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

mimi's picture

my family had not to face anything special that other families wouldn't have had to as well. No courage in that, imo.
I think it's amazing how much misery people are able to "accept" and live with and through. I think most people survive the most shitty regimes and do not die. Survival instinct is too dominant in anything you decide to do, I believe. Unless you are not shot, imprisoned or bombed out and killed out right, people tend to do what they have to do to survive. You can actually see that everywhere around you. At least I do see it that way.

There are the few people, who kill themselves. But it is not the majority.

Swimming against the current is always difficult. I believe it's personal experiences that are the motivators and triggers and catalysts of most of those individuals, who start to risk something to live according to their moral conscience or express their willingness to defend justice.

My family didn't do that. Throughout my life I found out, that no matter which gender, race or ethnicity you belong to, people try to fit in, adapt and hesitate to swim against the current. It's an isolating experience. And somehow people need to belong to somewhere. "Tribal" tendencies are imo mostly determined by the way our DNA makes us tick. Most people don't believe that, I guess. So, often I am conflicted to havea lot of understanding for "tribal" arguments and on the other hand I see them as major conflict points in human interactions. Does that make sense?

That's just my two cents.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

regardless of how neutral we want to appear to be. While we all have preconceived ideas of what or how the political world operates, there are many nuances that should prevent many things from being totally black or white. Our ability to define what something means depends upon our own value systems and what each of us may weigh as being more important than other things within our own personal value system.

Do I think Putin runs Russia like the Mafia? I do not know exactly how that is defined. What I do know is that Putin comes from the KGB which means he comes from a very authoritarian background. So he is an authoritarian ruler. How does that compare to Obama or any other western ruler? In the end, it may a distinction without a huge difference. Our own system has become much more authoritarian than we are willing to admit. The NSA and the cracking down upon dissent are two very powerful examples of how little freedom we really have. We just do not know it until we try to exercise our Constitutional rights like Occupy did.

In my own value system, how Putin runs Russia is far less important than the devastation that this country is wreaking all over the world. We need to clean our own house first before complaining about how dirty someone else's is. However, we cannot close our eyes and ears to what is going on in the rest of the world. Knowledge is always better than not knowing. But we should not make it our first priority to tell every other country how to run their own affairs.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

enhydra lutris's picture

unchanged from the fifties and sixties. We're here, so let's fix here first.to justify

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

mimi's picture

think one shouldn't forget or consider. When you say:

In my own value system, how Putin runs Russia is far less important than the devastation that this country is wreaking all over the world.

I agree with you from a view point of an American citizen, but online lots of people read you from other countries and cultures (and you have lots of them in your so-called melting pot that is always deliberately segregating itself in the various tribes even inside the US literally). I would guess that some Eastern Europeans for example would say that "in my own value system, it's very important how Putin runs Russia" and as long Americans are not bombarding them directly, they simply think that Americans are ok and may even help them. Can you blame them to believe that? They might have had experiences that are very valid to have another opinion than we or you might have had. And we didn't have their experiences, so we don't understand them that easily or do not want to hear what is in opposition to our own beliefs.

I am here in the US and I really have same feelings as you have about how the US is acting overseas. It is not what I like to see. But then I can't forget the voices of those, who are feeling differently. Can you ignore them? Or even know them? Or understand why they feel differently? That's when I get conflicted in my mind.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

I simply find it disingenuous that anyone here in the United States has the moral authority to tell other countries how they should be governed when we are waging war all over the globe and killing people in case they may have future thoughts of harming our country. Every time I hear the President or some other politician say that we must take action to protect our interests, I ask why are our interests in these other countries more important than the interests of the citizens of those countries?

I am not saying that I do not care about the fact that Putin is an authoritarian leader. But we need to clean our own dirty house before we scream about how dirty someone else's is. Instead, we chose the military option first and escalate the instability of every country we venture into. I cannot name one country that is better off today from our military adventures meddling in their internal affairs. Somewhere between 500 thousand and one million Iraqi civilians have died since we "liberated Iraq." Libya which had a very high standard of living before we took down Qaddaffi is now in shambles.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

mimi's picture

than you might believe. I think I got "conditioned" quite a bit throughout my past thirty years living in the US and had to swallow lots of things that went through my mind. I just start out to speak my mind a bit and I still feel scared, not for me, but for my son.
People can easily pressure me. Being a mom is my weak point. I can't help wanting to protect my child. So, I don't risk as much as I think I would, if I were childless.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

to really speak out until I retired. Not having children also helps so I completely understand. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

mimi's picture

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

I love meeting fellow posters in person. Smile Putting a face with a name and comments helps me understand who we all are. I hope someday that you and I will meet. Thank you for your very nice comment, mimi. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

not good

China has reportedly summoned the US ambassador after Washington launched a direct military challenge to Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea with naval manoeuvres near two artificial islands.

State television reported that the Chinese vice-foreign minister, Zhang Yesui, had branded the move “extremely irresponsible” when meeting with the US ambassador to China, Max Baucus.

up
0 users have voted.
cybrestrike's picture

The weather sort of changed down here in Florida over the past few days. My allergies seriously kicked in yesterday. Hopefully today's rain kind of washed all of the ragweed away. And no worries, I've got some local honey that I'm about to eat.

I'm going to Fort Hood for work in December--for about three weeks. The project that I work on has this ridiculous schedule that results in our entire team scrambling to find flights around the holidays. So I fly out in the beginning of December, come back right before Christmas, then fly up to NYC to see family, and fly back before New Year's Eve.

You don't want to be in NYC for NYE. It's messy, you can't get anywhere in the city, and it's just brutally cold. It's like the wind ignores whatever layers you're wearing. And good luck going to the bathroom. NYE in Orlando is tame--but at least I can go to a small house party with close friends and we can ring in the new year together. I can't do the crazy party thing anymore. Well, I can--but in small doses.

My crazy work travel schedule has forced me to miss the past four Super Bowl Sundays. I've spent them in random hotel rooms, lobbies, or bars in whatever city that I'm in. Although the best one was during Super Bowl XLVII--Baltimore vs San Fran. The one with the blackout in the middle of it. I was in downtown Baltimore, Inner Harbor area waiting for my non-sport fan coworkers to fly into town. I wasn't going to wait at the airport for them for six hours, so I headed to the Water Street Tavern, a pub kind of hidden in a cranny across from a CVS. I walked in, the owner greeted me (I stop there once a year), and I caught the first half of the game (right before the stadium blackout). When the Ravens scored, the bartender lined up a round of shots around the entire circular bar, and we all took one. That was a good time.

Over at the GOS, some folks are trying to pretend that DOMA was to prevent a constitutional amendment. That's high comedy. Armando & BBB are being extremely trollish, and while there are some heroic stands being taken--that place is a lost cause. I haven't seen such hyperpartisanship in a long time. Like, they've got their blinders on and don't even care. But oh well--I'll enjoy Tuesday.

up
0 users have voted.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/1440343/58076157

Oh, the horror. From the responses, I gather I'm too blunt?

Maybe they need to learn how to face facts.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/26/1439414/-The-unreality-of-Ameri...

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

Unabashed Liberal's picture

I mostly drop in over there to correct the record when there is a super glaring untruth, or misrepresentation.

What I can't always tell, is if the writers are willfully ignorant, da's, or intentionally misleading. Of course, there's probably some overlap. *Sigh*

Nice diary, Mimi.

Oh, regarding 'why' Southerners are afraid of Senator Sanders--there is a long history of antisemitism in Dixie. Some of my own ancestors changed their surnames out of fear of persecution, both physical and employment discrimination. So, it probably has little to do with Bernie's actual message, and more to do with the demographic (for lack of a better word) that Bernie represents. That would be my 'guess,' anyway.

(This bias is not as prevalent in Florida, at least, when we lived in Temple Terrace. Probably, because of all the northern 'snowbirds.' Of course, because of demographics, etc., I never consider Florida as part of Dixie, or the Deep South.)

Have a nice day, Everyone!

Bye

Mollie


"Integrity and courage are powerful weapons. We have to learn how to use them. We have to stand up for what we believe in. And we have to accept the risks and even the ridicule that comes with this stance. We will not prevail any other way."

Chris Hedges, Journalist/Author/Activist, Truthdig, 9/20/2015

up
0 users have voted.

Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.

mimi's picture

sort of special antisemitism among some in the South. I couldn't have come up with that on my own and it is another piece in the puzzle that helps to make up the whole picture. Thanks, Mollie.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

As of now, there are at least twelve of us who agree with you. Biggrin

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

I didn't call Hillary or anyone else a name. I didn't attack anyone personally. I didn't swear at anyone. I can't help it if her behaviors and positions are corrupt, hypocritical, and appalling, and I can't help it if Democrats are naive and easily led around by the nose. Facts are facts. We may not like them, and they may not sound pretty. It is, however, what it is. I've worked my entire adult life to look reality in the eye and deal with it. I'm not going to sugar coat it now.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

gulfgal98's picture

for those who are afraid of it.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

mimi's picture

and I consider it brave to go in there and make that comment. I feel the same way, but ... I feel as a German I couldn't have done such a comment without inciting a lot of hateful feelings ... so I usually don't be that honest and ... oh yeah... again a "Good German" and bystander. I guess I am having a problem with my nationality... Smile

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

Andrew Schmookler on OpEdNews: Why We're All Obliged to Help the Democrats Prevail

If you accept this ethical argument, then it's easy to slide down the slippery slope to the point where any kind of propaganda, lie, deception, or self-delusion at all is felt to be moral and justified if it helps achieve the higher, overarching goal of electing Democrats instead of Republicans.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

it's blunt stupidity and acceptance of the status quo that the author thinks should never be changed. I would be able to support a Democrat only, if he actually would fight to change the electoral college, campaign finance system and would commit to a real democratic system, in which third parties can play an important role.

Oh well, that sort of article stuff that upsets me.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

But the premises and the kind of logic it is based on is certainly what passes for ethical argument in many quarters.

Blah blah if you don't support the Democrat blah blah Supreme Court blah blah NADER!!1! blah blah and it'll be YOUR FAULT!!1!

If I've seen that argument on DKos once, I've seen it a thousand times — haven't we all?

It's annoying, to put it mildly.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

some regular and longtime kossacks can't resist to be annoying and that's when I would say "enough is enough", at least for me.

up
0 users have voted.

What's good for the goose...

A hospital in north Yemen run by medical aid group Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) was bombed in a Saudi-led air strike, wrecking the facility and lightly wounding two staff members, the group said on Tuesday.

A Saudi-led Arab coalition intervened in Yemen's civil war in March to try to restore its government after its toppling by Iran-allied Houthi forces, but a mounting civilian death toll has alarmed human rights groups.

"Our hospital in the Heedan district of Saada governorate was hit several times. Fortunately, the first hit damaged the operations theater while it was empty and the staff were busy with people in the emergency room. They just had time to run off as another missile hit the maternity ward," MSF country director Hassan Boucenine told Reuters by telephone from Yemen.

"It could be a mistake, but the fact of the matter is it's a war crime. There's no reason to target a hospital. We provided (the coalition) with all of our GPS coordinates about two weeks ago," he said

up
0 users have voted.
cybrestrike's picture

This is what happens when you have one country ignore the fact that they committed a war crime--another country up and does it. And it'll go on...

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

The Guardian: The vanished: the Filipino domestic workers who disappear behind closed doors

Marilyn Restor left her family in the Philippines to work for a Saudi royal — and never returned. What happened to her and others who risk everything to work abroad?

Once or twice a week, without fail, the Restor children would gather around a laptop as Marilyn’s pixelated face appeared on Skype, scolding them about their homework and listening to their test results and friendship woes. Then, one day, without warning, the calls stopped.

The family’s desperate search for Marilyn ended in a morgue in the Saudi Arabian capital, Riyadh, over a year later. Arnulfo, who was working in Saudi as a driver for a different wealthy family, received a phone call asking him to come and identify a body. The Marilyn he had known was robust and strong. When he pulled back the sheet, he found little more than skin and bones.

The reality seems to be, Saudi Arabia has its own unique set of horrors that, if given their fair due, would rank it right down there with North Korea.

Yet, by design, the entire political, economic, and cultural establishment of the United States and western Europe has, as hypnotists do with onstage volunteers, placed their respective publics in a trance and ordered them to be unable to see this.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

These bombings are targeted and are war crimes.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

link

here’s a privacy destroying bill moving through Congress called the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, or CISA, and it’s imperative that the American public stop it in its tracks. Here are a few bullet points on the bill from Fight for the Future:

All privacy policies effectively null and void. Companies can share any private user data with the government, without a warrant, as long as the government says it is being used for a “cybersecurity” purpose.

In exchange, companies are given blanket immunity from civil and criminal laws, like fraud, money laundering, or illegal wiretapping (if a violation was committed or exposed in the process of sharing data).

Data is shared with a wide array of government agencies, from the FBI and NSA, to the IRS and local law enforcement. Many of these agencies have been breached within the last year and have outdated security systems, opening up the doors to even more cyber attacks.

Companies that play along can get otherwise classified intelligence data from the government, including private information about their competitors.
...
Meanwhile, many large tech companies have publicly come out against the bill.

In recent weeks, a number of prominent tech companies, such as Apple, reddit, Twitter, Yelp and Wikimedia have all come out against the bill. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), an influential trade group representing Facebook, also expressed concerns about CISA.

But look which one is missing from the list. The company with the most extensive database of all, and one with a history of egregious privacy abuses: Facebook.
...
Several offices on the Hill have heard from Facebook that they support CISA. As much as we wish we could reveal our sources, we agreed not to (selective leaking is part of how the lobbying game works, unfortunately). But this information matches with everything we know about Facebook’s love for CISA over the years. They backed the bill loudly before it was unpopular and then stayed silent as other big tech companies came out against it. We’ve asked them to state their position publicly, but they have said nothing. Facebook has backed this from day one, and now they’re the lone tech voice still working to make sure it passes.

Facebook wants CISA because they want immunity from privacy lawsuits, but if companies like Apple, Twitter, and Reddit can do the right thing by their users and oppose CISA, Facebook can too.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

this Zuckerberg youngster is getting mightily on my nerves. Facebook has done tons of damage to individuals. It's a platform we don't need to have in that format.

There is another youngster billionaire out there, Evan Spiegel. When I saw him on John Oliver's show, I snapped out over this snapchat guy.

ok, let me forget this, it's not good for me.

up
0 users have voted.

link

Defense Secretary Ash Carter said Tuesday that the U.S. will openly begin "direct action on the ground" against ISIS forces in Iraq and Syria.

In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services committee, Carter said "we won't hold back from supporting capable partners in opportunistic attacks against ISIL...or conducting such mission directly, whether by strikes from the air or direct action on the ground."

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

it's horrible. I wonder if Obama has any control over the military at all? His actions are beyond my comprehension. Is it possible the "secret government", whatever that is, has him in shackles and threaten to teaser him and his kids and wife?

It makes me so angry.

up
0 users have voted.
enhydra lutris's picture

Propaganda, brainwashing and marketing lie on a spectrum and rely heavily upon instinctive mental reactions that lead to easy acceptance of things that it takes a lifetime of reasoning and analysis to penetrate and, when appropriate, reject. One result of this, in our era, is that it is unlikely the we will ever know the full truth, and in many instances very much of the truth at all, with any great degree of certainty. I have simply come to accept this as our fate while trying to ferret out such truth(s) and understanding as I can about things I consider to be of import and interest. In the meantime, I blithely assume that they are all lying if only because the current narrative rests upon a convoluted history at least some of which is specious.

up
0 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

lotlizard's picture

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

the full truth. It just makes me sick and others too and it creates hate and wars. It's a tool to torture people mentally. If you can't trust nobody anymore and can't find out the truth, people get at each other throat, easily. "Fear your next as you fear yourself".

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

It's ridiculous.

It's like, ha ha, hey, Galileo, where's your tinfoil hat? Galileo comes along and isn't afraid to be the first truther, or at least one of the first. Because the word of authorities like Ptolemy, Aristotle, and the Church isn't enough for Galileo. He insists the word of authorities should be independently verifiable, right? He wants to see for himself.

So, this Galileo, what does he do? He dares to think. He thinks about towers and mass and free-fall speed scientifically. He concludes that the authorities' description of matters is untrue, is bad physics. He goes and holds a press conference at the Leaning Tower of Pisa and holds a public demonstration and stuff.

Italy's currency has since been replaced by the euro, but Galileo's likeness does appear on the old 2000 lire note.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

BuzzFeed journalist attacked by far-right Jewish extremists in Paris
÷ Police protect David Perrotin after incident that took place as LDJ activists protested against news agency AFP’s coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict

LDJ = Ligue de Défense Juive, French for "Jewish Defense League"

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

up
0 users have voted.