Email from Sanders, received Monday. Your reactions?

Winning the Senate
Bernie Sanders
Mon 8/29, 4:31 PMYou

"HenryWallace,"

As a result of your activism, our political revolution is responsible for the most progressive Democratic platform in the history of our country. We were victorious in making it a clear priority of the Democratic Party to fight for a $15 an hour federal minimum wage, expand Social Security, abolish the death penalty, put a price on carbon, enact major criminal justice reforms, end for-profit prisons and detention facilities, break up too-big-to-fail banks and create a 21st century Glass-Steagall Act, and so much more.

And just the other day, the Republican leadership in the Senate announced that the TPP would not be coming to the floor this year. Another major victory.

All of that is the direct result of the grassroots activism that you, and millions of others, engaged in over the last 16 months. Now, we must continue our efforts by electing progressive Democrats up and down the ballot so that the policies we have fought for can advance and become law.

For the future of our country, and our progressive agenda, it is imperative that Democrats regain control of the Senate. My guess is that will all come down to which party wins three or four hotly contested races in states like Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Ohio and Nevada.

The Koch brothers know this. That is why they are spending tens of millions of dollars to defeat these four candidates for Senate.

And that's why I'm asking you to support them: Katie McGinty in Pennsylvania, Maggie Hassan in New Hampshire, Ted Strickland in Ohio, and Catherine Cortez Masto in Nevada. If these four Democrats win the tight elections they are currently in, the Democrats will almost certainly take control of the Senate.

And what a world of difference that will make: real campaign finance reform, raising the minimum wage, making public colleges and universities tuition free, addressing the planetary crisis of climate change, progressive taxation, reforming our broken criminal justice system, comprehensive immigration reform and many other important issues.

Split a $___ contribution to help Katie McGinty, Maggie Hassan, Ted Strickland, and Catherine Cortez Masto become senators and take back a progressive majority in the Senate.

I want to be clear: It is very important that our movement holds public officials accountable. The Democratic Party passed an extremely progressive agenda at the convention. Our job is to make sure that platform is implemented. That will not happen without Democratic control of the Senate.

Katie McGinty was one of the first candidates to endorse a $15 minimum wage.
Maggie Hassan, who is a strong supporter of campaign finance reform, increased transparency and disclosure of political contributions as Governor of New Hampshire.
Ted Strickland is a fighter for Ohio’s working families who opposes the TPP and believes that we need to completely change the way we negotiate trade deals.
Catherine Cortez Masto is committed to protecting the environment and knows it’s long past time that we ensure equal pay for women.

Perhaps the most important reason to win a progressive majority in the Senate is because we must support nominees for the Supreme Court who will vote to overturn Citizens United.

It is so important we do everything we can to help these four candidates – Katie McGinty in Pennsylvania, Maggie Hassan in New Hampshire, Ted Strickland in Ohio, and Catherine Cortez Masto in Nevada – win their elections in November.

Your contribution of $___ will help each of these candidates for Senate win. Please split a contribution between them today so we can advance our progressive agenda, defeat the Koch brothers, and take back the Senate.

Thank you as always for everything you do for our political revolution.

In solidarity,

Senator Bernie Sanders

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

It's not new. It's not "Bernie selling out". I had found this old (but they've just updated it, so the date has changed) CNN article on Bernie previously fund raising for dems. He's caucused with them. They don't run a dem against him in Vermont. It is what it is. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/sanders-democratic-fundraisers/

I had just read an article that morning saying how awful these 4 were, and I had checked out Strickland on wiki and knew I won't donate for a damn Dino after supporting Bernie, and figured I could lump the other 3 with him. So no money.

It was stupid for him to send that out though, since the next day we learned the dems had cancelled a planned ad buy for Strickland because he was so far behind. Waste of political capital.

If we've learned anything this past year it's to do our own research, not to let somebody else vet a candidate for us.

As for the argument that we need a dem majority to pass the platform, both Obama & Bill Clinton had dem majorities in both the house & senate part of their terms and accomplished nothing that I'd consider "democratic." 4 more DINOs sure aren't going to help. I'm calling their bluff this election. evidently the last 2 elections haven't gotten rid of all the rot; let's cut some more.

up
0 users have voted.

... knew the backstory, and did not donate.

It's funny - in an alternate universe before I started interacting here, with the Bernie loss I probably would have gone up to NH to knock on doors for Hassan, she's a pretty good conservaDem for NH. Guess I'll let the Hillbots take my spot.

up
0 users have voted.

I knew about Democrats not running anyone against him in return for his support on the administrative side. However, I doubt that any candidate they ran against him would win anyway. Actually, it goes beyond that. They refuse to support any Democrat who challenges him. That is an old bargain and, yes, he has fundraised in the past. Sounds much more like business as usual than a revolution.

However, I was hoping for more input on the four candidates.

up
0 users have voted.

I donated. I have no problem with progressive democrats. I just won't give anything to dlcers or work for them.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

Huh. Well, I'm not an expert on OH politics, so all I can say is, that wasn't what I thought.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

up
0 users have voted.

Strickland haters get your info. From the Portman camp? I've known Ted Strickland for more years than I care to count. I met him before he was even a congressman and I just had lunch with him and his lovely wife Francis a couple of weeks ago. Ted Strickland is a good man. He has always put the people of Ohio first and he has never forgotten his roots. To date, the Koch machine has dumped 42 million to get him beat. If you've seen Ohio TV lately all you see are anti-Strickland ads. When I click on youtube all I see are anti-Strickland ads. Ted most likely will lose and that's going to be a damn shame. Rob Portman has done nothing during his tenure in the senate. He was one of the first to jump on the TPP bandwagon. After all, he was dubya's trade advisor.
I could write a book or a least a long ass essay on what Ted's done for the working people of Ohio and this country. But of course I may be biased because I'm an old Union guy who happened to be in the trenches during strikes and lockouts all across Ohio. Ted was always there for us.
So go on and hate but hate. But not all dems are evil clinton spawns.

up
0 users have voted.

That may be. But when I peruse his Wikipedia page, what I see is a DINO.
And I don't care to donate to DINOs.

Anyways, it's moot. Evidently the DSCC isn't spending any more money on him because he's 15 points down. Could it be a case of "when faced with the choice of a real republican or a republican-lite, they vote for the real republican every time"?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Strickland

up
0 users have voted.

I'm impressed you get your info from Wiki!. Wow. Do you know Strickland and what he stands for? I didn't think so. You calling Ted a "DINO" and repub lite is like me calling you an asshole. I wouldn't do that because I don't know you and haven't known you for 40+ years like I have Ted. Faults? Yeah, who doesn't but like I said he's done more for working people and Labor than most dems in the last 30+ years. 15 points down? Where are you located? Ohio? Could it be he's down so far because the fucking Koch bros have invested, as of today, 42+ million in Portman. We've been bombarded with anti-Strickland ads for the last year. Wake the fuck up.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

Anyone can do that, you know.

up
0 users have voted.

“One of the things I love about the American people is that we can hold many thoughts at once” - Kamala Harris

not equal hate.

I am trying to get info on whether Portman is actually liberal or not so I can decide if I will donate. Can you add anything about that, beyond what was in Bernie's email?

up
0 users have voted.

... so you needn't worry about whether or not he's a proggie.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

are you serious? This motherfucker is as about as liberal as Bush or Cheney. Why in the hell would the Koch bros invest 42+ million in the wormy fucker if he was a liberal? I've never seen him side once with a liberal/progressive/Union cause. Except, after his son came out, he reversed his stance on gay marriage.

up
0 users have voted.

Expressing surprise that Strickland is considered Progressive does not equal hate.

I am trying to get info on whether Strickland is actually liberal or not so I can decide if I will donate. Can you add anything about that, beyond what was in Bernie's email?

up
0 users have voted.

... but my first series of googles was that he was running a terrible campaign, and that national groups on both sides are starting to pull money out of OH, thinking Portman probably has it. It's a missed opportunity for sure.

up
0 users have voted.

bombarded with anti-Strickland ads for the last year. On tv, the internet, newspapers. Everything bad that's happened in Ohio for the last 200 years is Stricklands fault according to the Portman/koch camp. The kochs have invested a fortune in keeping their lackey in his seat. Ted's ran the best campaign he can with the limited money he has.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

If you want to see hate, look at my Clinton comments.
My understanding was that Ted Strickland wasn't a progressive. But I'm not from Ohio, and I don't follow Ohio politics closely, so yes, I'm not sure. And that's what my comment said.

Don't know why there's anything hateful about that.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

up
0 users have voted.

Had my name removed from all mailings.
Very disappointed in how the "revolution" was managed, and now being directed by Jeff Weaver.
No thanks. All just "too little too late."
Let Jeff Weaver raise his "big" money and buy TV ads, or better yet, go back to his comic book store.

up
0 users have voted.

but neither am I ready to say I never will. The Sane Progressive said half the leaders quit and the rest protested. I guess they really oppose Weaver.

Once Weaver took over Our Revolution, Canova could not evenget his calls returned by anyone in the Sanders camp (or by Sanders). That's cold.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/08/canova-revolution-be...

up
0 users have voted.
ggersh's picture

Dear Bernie,

Sorry Bernie, but I'll have to take a pass, I Demexited.

Sincerely,

ggersh

up
0 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

familiar with these four Democrats, though. Are they actually liberal or same old, same old? I don't know.

up
0 users have voted.

I'm from Michigan where we can choose a ballot, either republican, or democrat, the day of a primary. Don't have to be registered in the party. I sometimes cross over to the GOP side so I can vote for local officials. In my County Many offices have no democrats running, so if I want to vote for that office, I have to go to the dark side.

That said, I replied to the request from Our Revolution that I could not, in good conscience support the candidates running as democrats. IMO, the only way we will ever gain an real shot at a third party is to vote with our donations.

After the BS pulled by Clinton, and the DNC, and the disastrous docket presented by the Goppers this cycle, ( and for most of the last 40 years) I will never again donate to any candidate from either of the major parties. Maybe I'm foolish, but it is my way to vote my conscience

up
0 users have voted.

donations mean less and less. A fundraising dinner at $353K a couple? Donations from the likes of Goldman Sachs?

New Democrats consciously made it so that they did not need donations from average people or unions. And they did that so they no longer had to take positions that helped average people and unions.

Simon Rosenberg, the former field director for the DLC who directs the New Democrat Network, a spin-off political action committee, says, "We're trying to raise money to help them lessen their reliance on traditional interest groups in the Democratic Party. In that way," he adds, "they are ideologically freed, frankly, from taking positions that make it difficult for Democrats to win."

http://prospect.org/article/how-dlc-does-i

I think we have to vote with our votes--and even they may not mean anything, given election fraud. But, we have to do what we can.

up
0 users have voted.
ggersh's picture

in the general, being labeled is only for the primaries.

I'm not sure about the foursome you mentioned either. Regardless
my choices aren't progressive at all, but I'm hoping that changes
in the 2018 election. As of now I'm not to optimistic.

up
0 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

My votes really don't matter. However, my donations to these people might. I did look up the wikis, but they were not as helpful as I hoped. Guess I'll get to googling.

up
0 users have voted.
ggersh's picture

I think donating can be a help its just about finding the right candidate
to back. Their aren't many real progressives out there that I can see
at this time, hopefully that changes.

up
0 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

Citizen Of Earth's picture

Whether they threatened his family or he sold out. It doesn't matter. He has a new master now. And that master is for Wall St, for the MIC and for the Corps,... and against us.

up
0 users have voted.

Donnie The #ShitHole Douchebag. Fake Friend to the Working Class. Real Asshole.

Shahryar's picture

and oh, by the way, I'm putting Jeff Weaver in charge of collecting billionaires' money. Do not remember or look up anything I said before July.

up
0 users have voted.

protect its grip on power above all other considerations, like every other powerful organization, this past primary season should have put that doubt to rest. I see no rational reason to try again to force it to become something it has already fought tooth and nail to resist.

I have no interest in that party, or trying to save them from the disaster that they have worked so hard to become. They are clearly a big part of the problem.

up
0 users have voted.

“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024

lotlizard's picture

#DemMatrExit.

up
0 users have voted.
RantingRooster's picture

the platform doesn't mean a hill a beans, no offense, but the 92' platform mentioned the word "revolution" quite a number of times, but we know exactly how that turned out. Shok

Platform, smlatform

up
0 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

It was just the wrong kind!

up
0 users have voted.

Vowing To Oppose Everything Trump Attempts.

DLC style Democrat. Dismantle the New Deal. All traffic in crap mortgage derivatives with no regulation. Pass Poppy's NAFTA. End welfare as we know it. Privatize prisons and surge the drug war. Double down on extraordinary rendition---but don't hit Osama Bin Laden because a couple of civilians will go with him. And so on.

Fundraising for Democrats doesn't seem like a revolution, but maybe I am mistaken.

up
0 users have voted.

Bernie and his people had to negotiate--and they didn't get everything they wanted, either.

up
0 users have voted.

You endorsed Hillary - when pigs fly.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

Our Revolution wasn't created until after he did that, so why did you suscribe to it in the first place?

up
0 users have voted.

I might have just been included because I was a Bernie supporter and contributor.

I also tried to give Bernie the benefit of a doubt as long as I could. I wasn't happy thinking I was snookered. I really don't know why Bernie dropped out, and I won't speculate. I think defeating Hillary and Trump were so important that no reason Bernie could give would be good enough. I think he should have used the Green Party and gone down swinging.

I think Obama and the Clintons are worse than Trump and the Republicans. I expect the GOP to be greedy, religious zealots. I do not expect the party of FDR to blow up the middle east as a business model and to bail out Wall Street while it destroys the middle class and imprisons and starves the poor. I think corrupt Democrats are the lowest of the low, and I hope the Clintons and Chelsea end up in prison until they die.

It takes a Democrat to screw a Democrat, and Bill Clinton and Obama proved that over and over. Bush couldn't privatize Social Security and neither could Trump. Hillary could do it in flash especially if she has majorities in the House and Senate. Harry Reid who kept his powder dry when it mattered, now wants to blow away the filabuster. Fucker. Easier to pass TPP, cut Medicare, and drill baby drill.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

CS in AZ's picture

But I delete them without reading them. One of these days I'll get around to unsubscribing from the list. As for donating to democrats ... ROTFLMFAO.

Yeah, no. Thats not happening.

up
0 users have voted.

the primary.

up
0 users have voted.

Political analysts say that even a Hillary landslide won't give the Dems a filibuster-proof Senate majority, or flip the control of the House. The Tea-GOP will remain in control of most state governments.

up
0 users have voted.

"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."

Easier to pass TPP my dear.

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says Democrats should considering changing the rules to limit the use of the filibuster next year if they win the White House and recapture the Senate.

Reid told Carl Hulse of The New York Times that the days of moving legislation through the Senate with bipartisan super majorities are largely over. http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/294041-reid-says-dems-may-c...

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

Because Congress already passed Fast Track. Straight up or down vote; no amendments allowed.

up
0 users have voted.

that would want to give Obama something he clearly wants. I'm guessing if HRC comes out for TPP after the election, because they added a comma somewhere, R's will treat her the same as they've treated Obama.

If you're for it, I'm ag'in it.

up
0 users have voted.
Shahryar's picture

50+1 is what we call a majority and was in force until it became possible for the Democrats to do something. Not wanting to, they invented the idea of the 60 vote threshold. And even with 60 votes that suddenly became inoperative because, hey, the Blue Dogs that vote with us so often on so much of the legislation, can't be told they have to vote like Democrats on everything! So how many would the Dems need then? 65? 70? 80?

Forgot to mention, 60/70/80/90 isn't enough because it wouldn't be polite to impose our will on the country. I well remember that Franken became the 60th vote and the Dems said they wouldn't push an aggressive agenda because it might affect the mid-terms.

But then we've been through this before, haven't we?

up
0 users have voted.

She had no trouble passing bills re-naming a post office or remembering the American Revolution. Luckily for us, she could not get her two flag burning bills passed, though--even though Republicans love them some flag-burning bills. I'm guessing Democrats let her down on that.

Didn't do well with Democrats with Billarycare, either, even though her husband was President and head of the Party at the time. I guess she must mean when Kennedy and Hatch passed the SCHIP bill for which she takes credit. At first, Kennedy semi- backed up her version of how that bill got passed, by giving her credit for "Pennsylvania Avenue." However, that implies she stopped her husband from vetoing it, which seems implausible, at best. Later, though, Hatch took down her claims and Kennedy said, "Facts are stubborn things."

What a piece of work.

up
0 users have voted.

That statement is huge. It's very much why I'm looking at supporting Statewide Democrats as well. The tea-gop rubs our faces in their feces every year with real pain as the result - pain to the immigrant community, women, educators,our environment, school kids, and on and on. It's very real pain, and the only counter to it, in a semi organized way, is the dem party. The Greens have not built any functional organization here since a hopeful inception in the 80's when a (then high level) Hispanic politician declared as a Green. A lot of politicking and jockeying went on, with some good communication between the progressive dems and some awake Rs. The dem party went to work to quell the rebellion in the same low-level, corrupt way that they still do from bottom to top. Part of the "power" of corruption is that it is just so fucking depressing and unbelievable that it is actually running the show, and not just a minor script. Its poison can dull the sharpest minds and purest hearts. It is a deep, systemic poison that We (Big We) must deal with somehow. That is a daunting "first order of business" to say the least. That said, with apologies for causing more depression, Bernie has changed the narrative at our state level in subtle and mysterious ways. There is a new wind blowing through the stale old story. There is , to my simple mind, a case to be made for electing as many dems as possible to the State legislature. And , at the same time, to keep blowing revolutionary winds through the hopelessness and corruption - really every time we speak. Bernie has empowered this - I can actually feel it, along with the other force to keep things quiet. So the State level, as I see it, is different enough from the national, that I will work for dems. We have to keep breathing and talking ! We can support the Plains Tribes in their struggle v Big Oil, Colin Kaepernick v enforced speech, and on and on. Our words must not be wimpy, fearful, or corrupted in any way. The revolution is borne on winds of true speech.Our very words become the Revolution, so Breathe On! good Brothers and Sisters.

up
0 users have voted.

Apologies for double posting...

up
0 users have voted.

That statement is huge. It's very much why I'm looking at supporting Statewide Democrats as well. The tea-gop rubs our faces in their feces every year with real pain as the result - pain to the immigrant community, women, educators,our environment, school kids, and on and on. It's very real pain, and the only counter to it, in a semi organized way, is the dem party. The Greens have not built any functional organization here since a hopeful inception in the 80's when a (then high level) Hispanic politician declared as a Green. A lot of politicking and jockeying went on, with some good communication between the progressive dems and some awake Rs. The dem party went to work to quell the rebellion in the same low-level, corrupt way that they still do from bottom to top. Part of the "power" of corruption is that it is just so fucking depressing and unbelievable that it is actually running the show, and not just a minor script. Its poison can dull the sharpest minds and purest hearts. It is a deep, systemic poison that We (Big We) must deal with somehow. That is a daunting "first order of business" to say the least. That said, with apologies for causing more depression, Bernie has changed the narrative at our state level in subtle and mysterious ways. There is a new wind blowing through the stale old story. There is , to my simple mind, a case to be made for electing as many dems as possible to the State legislature. And , at the same time, to keep blowing revolutionary winds through the hopelessness and corruption - really every time we speak. Bernie has empowered this - I can actually feel it, along with the other force to keep things quiet. So the State level, as I see it, is different enough from the national, that I will work for dems. We have to keep breathing and talking ! We can support the Plains Tribes in their struggle v Big Oil, Colin Kaepernick v enforced speech, and on and on. Our words must not be wimpy, fearful, or corrupted in any way. The revolution is borne on winds of true speech.Our very words become the Revolution, so Breathe On! good Brothers and Sisters.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

Call it "Not a Sellout Revolution."

up
0 users have voted.

“One of the things I love about the American people is that we can hold many thoughts at once” - Kamala Harris

as he always has, fits the definition of a revolution.

As I posted upthread, Canova said that people stopped returning his calls once Our Revolution opened for business, or whatever it opened for.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

up
0 users have voted.

“One of the things I love about the American people is that we can hold many thoughts at once” - Kamala Harris

Ravensword's picture

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.
Big Al's picture

That's my reaction.

up
0 users have voted.

cynical from the start. So, I guess you don't feel let down, confused, etc. I still do.

up
0 users have voted.
Bollox Ref's picture

/s

up
0 users have voted.

Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.

primary and Our Revolution has raised $300,000. She was not mocking outwardly, but announcing this sure didn't do Our Revolution any favors, even though it's not fair. He started fundraising for the primary around February or March of 2015. Our Revolution hasn't been around anywhere near that long, so she's comparing apples and oranges--and I'm 100% sure she knows it. And of all that MSNBC crew, she's the only one who says over and over, "I'm a liberal." Kudos on hiding it very well, Rachel! If you didn't announce it periodically, we'd never guess.

up
0 users have voted.
mjsmeme's picture

7 million dollars a year appears to have moved this once seemingly political left journalist to a right of center establishment-parrot position whose blatant sucking up to the masters of corruption (that she damn well knows is pervasive and wound around the too-big-to-fail Clinton machine with its smarmy Foundation and bought and paid for surrogates), lost me many months ago. money money mon-nee.

up
0 users have voted.

I read this after I published my latest post. Not trying to rustle the topic. Apologies where appropriate.

up
0 users have voted.

Vowing To Oppose Everything Trump Attempts.

with me. Bernie wrote this. Posting it didn't take me long at all. The more new threads, the merrier, as far as I am concerned. No worries at all! But, considering others is very nice of you.

up
0 users have voted.
Redstella's picture

No longer a dem

up
0 users have voted.
Damnit Janet's picture

basically saying that no one is getting my money because no one could get my vote due to registration fraud

up
0 users have voted.

"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

the most progressive Democratic platform in the history of our country.

Look, I've got a low bar. Just don't rely on inaccuracies and lies.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

when FDR was first elected. When Truman took over from FDR there was no platform. Same for LBJ. I am not sure what was in Truman's platform in 1948 or in LBJ's in 1964. The Civil Rights Act got passed before LBJ had a platform of his own and it may not have been in Kennedy's. The New Deal, the Great Society and the Voting Rights Acts might not have been in the platform. I'm pretty sure Emancipation wasn't in Lincoln's platform because that was not his original agenda and Lincoln was a Republican, anyway. So, it could be a true statement. I don't know. Thing is, though, how much does the platform matter?

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

this looks like a fairly progressive platform to me (using the modern notion of progressive, meaning left-wing, rather than the older notion of progressive, meaning anti-corruption):

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29596

In particular, look at this:

(4) We will act to secure to the consumer fair value, honest sales and a decreased spread between the price he pays and the price the producer receives.
They're talking about setting prices and narrowing profit margins. Can you imagine anyone suggesting that now?

(6) We maintain that our people are entitled to decent, adequate housing at a price which they can afford. In the last three years, the Federal Government, having saved more than two million homes from foreclosure, has taken the first steps in our history to provide decent housing for people of meagre incomes. We believe every encouragement should be given to the building of new homes by private enterprise; and that the Government should steadily extend its housing program toward the goal of adequate housing for those forced through economic necessities to live in unhealthy and slum conditions.

Entitled to decent, adequate housing? The current pols don't think we're entitled to anything much at all, as far as I can tell. In fact "entitled" has become an insult they throw at us.

But of course you probably remember all this, since you were his vice-president! Smile

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Yes, I was his vice president, but the pribbling fat-kidneyed pignut (Shakespearean insult) threw me over. So, I ran against Truman. I lost (duh. Never run against the guy who ended World War II, so soon after the end of World War II). Incredibly enough, I ended up supporting Eisenhower and Nixon and writing whine-y letters. But, I also became a billionaire, when a billion was really a billion. So, there's that.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

too much rewriting of even recent history.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Did Bernie really write that, though, or have they got a ringer out while Bernie/some family member languishes in Gitmo? (possible snark, hope so anyway)

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

up
0 users have voted.
RDSVermont's picture

just plain revolting?

Fortunately, I opted out of all Sanders-related emails right before the HRC-Dem Party ass-kissing went into full gear and did not receive the letter in question or anything else since. As far as I'm concerned, and in spite of all the "excuses" offered, he became one of the biggest sell-outs that I have ever seen.

It's all in the initials: B.S.!

up
0 users have voted.

Our village and town are so small that we don't have a village idiot or a town drunk. Nope, we all take turns.

elenacarlena's picture

to them directly. When you donate to the group, they decide who gets the money.

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

n/t

up
0 users have voted.

it hasn't so far.

Basically, he's duplicating the work the candidates, Hillary (?), the DNC and DSCC already do.

All I know is, I am really confused at this point.

up
0 users have voted.
elenacarlena's picture

authority or persuasion he still holds over us (or his voice is being added for him). Given how many of us loved Sanders and hated what the Dems did to him, this will probably be reasonably effective. Many of us will just ignore, but I imagine many who loved Bern but didn't get that involved will support candidates that he now seems to support.

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

would be at least as angry about what Democrats did to him and to his supporters and donors as we are and the left surely did not need further fragmenting. That may well be not what he intended, but it's what is.

up
0 users have voted.
elenacarlena's picture

confused. Bern's doing what he thinks is right and I'm doing something totally different.

I think he feels he would lose all prominence if he doesn't go along with the Dems. So he goes along. I doubt he thinks politically aware activists will continue to follow him.

Considering how aware we have become, I think the majority will not continue to follow him. If we build a strong progressive movement, we will attract the few who continue to follow Bernie because they want something they can follow without a lot of effort.

We do have to figure out how not to fragment. Since the bare bones of a structure is already there, I think we should become the Green party. Try to elect Jill this year, even if she loses the party will still have more strength and we can build from there.

If something happens to Hill and Bern is given the Dem nom, we can always switch back, at least for now. I doubt that'll happen, though.

up
0 users have voted.

Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.

a recent blog entry. I've said I will and I've urged others to do the same. Many would say that is fragmenting because most of the people who are not rightists will be voting for Hillary and even Bernie endorsed Hillary.

up
0 users have voted.
mouselander's picture

We're all familiar with the old saying that actions speak louder than words. With that in mind, I was reviewing your speech of July 12 in which you made the following assertions about Hillary Clinton:

  • Hillary Clinton understands that we must fix an economy in America that is rigged and that sends almost all new wealth and income to the top one percent.
  • Hillary Clinton understands that if someone in America works 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty.
  • [Hillary] believes that we should raise the minimum wage to a living wage. And she wants to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. – our roads, bridges, water systems and wastewater plants.
  • Hillary Clinton wants to see that all Americans have the right to choose a public option in their health care exchange, which will lower the cost of health care.
  • [Hillary] believes that anyone 55 years or older should be able to opt in to Medicare and she wants to see millions more Americans gain access to primary health care, dental care, mental health counseling and low-cost prescription drugs through a major expansion of community health centers throughout this country.
  • Hillary is committed to seeing thousands of young doctors, nurses, psychologists, dentists and other medical professionals practice in underserved areas as we follow through on President Obama’s idea of tripling funding for the National Health Service Corps.
  • Hillary Clinton also understands that millions of seniors, disabled vets and others are struggling with the outrageously high cost of prescription drugs. She and I are in agreement that Medicare must negotiate drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry and that we must expand the use of generic medicine. Drug companies should not be making billions in profits while one in five Americans are unable to afford the medicine they need. The greed of the drug companies must end.
  • Hillary Clinton knows that something is very wrong when the very rich become richer while many others are working longer hours for lower wages.
  • [Hillary] knows that it is absurd that middle-class Americans are paying an effective tax rate higher than hedge fund millionaires, and that there are corporations in this country making billions in profit while they pay no federal income taxes in a given year because of loopholes their lobbyists created.
  • Hillary Clinton believes that we must substantially lower student debt, and that we must make public colleges and universities tuition free for the middle class and working families of this country.
  • Hillary Clinton is listening to the scientists who tell us that if we do not act boldly in the very near future there will be more drought, more floods, more acidification of the oceans, more rising sea levels.
  • [Hillary] understands that we must work with countries around the world in transforming our energy system away from fossil fuels and into energy efficiency and sustainable energy – and that when we do that we can create a whole lot of good paying jobs.
  • Secretary Clinton understands that we don’t need to have more people in jail than any other country on earth, at an expense of $80 billion a year.
  • I have known Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I remember her as a great first lady who broke precedent in terms of the role that a first lady was supposed to play as she helped lead the fight for universal health care. I served with her in the United States Senate and know her as a fierce advocate for the rights of children. Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding president and I am proud to stand with her here today.

What's notable is that based on Hillary Clinton's own past actions, every single one of these assertions - that is, that she will actually do something to ameliorate the problems you enumerate - is a lie. I don't think it takes a crystal ball to realize that in four years time, none of these grim realities you referred to will have in any way changed for the better. In fact, quite the opposite. That's because the people signing the checks are the ones who like things just the way they are - or more accurately, aspire to make things even worse for the many in order to make things even more obscenely profitable for the privileged few.

You're not stupid. You know this full well. Up until you gave this speech, I considered you to be one of that exceedingly rare breed of politicians who are actually willing to speak truth to power. But now I see you're just another lying hack who has no problem slinging bullshit on behalf of what is surely one of the most venal, corrupt, and malignant individuals ever to seek the presidency.

All I can say is, your "revolution" is thankfully not mine.

up
0 users have voted.

inactive account

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

Your penultimate sentence.

But that's hardly the most important sentence up there. Lies are lies, regardless of what one thinks Sanders' motivation for telling them is.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Senator Sanders is under some very serious coercion. It seems likely to me, given that he has a record for being non-violent, and caring about his constituents, that he is cooperating based on threats of individual, or even mass, violence. We already saw the Dems willingness to spread the Big Lie with the Nevada caucus, and "The Chair Thrown Round The World". I for one think them perfectly capable of having promised him a militarized-police blood-bath for his followers at the Convention if he didn't play along. Given that the Clintons have tended to leave a trail of mysteriously dead associates behind, and that hasn't stopped, I don't think it's that far-fetched.

Another possibility is that he is kidding himself that the platform matters, and will be adhered to and respected going forward. He may also honestly believe that he was beaten fair and square, at least enough so that he does not feel justified in screaming "Fraud!" A lot of people are not ready to face this new reality of computerized voter fraud and suppression. It spits in their holy water of American Democracy.

Sanders' past speech and actions have been quite consistent, and by all accounts, have always been in favor of his constituents. Such a major deviation as supporting the antithesis of what he has been championing for decades tells me that something is very wrong with this picture. I think that characterizing him as a "lying hack" is inaccurate and unnecessary.

He's only human. What he started is not. It's a call to necessary change that is far overdue. I'd rather carry it forward, than spend any more time prevaricating against the man.

up
0 users have voted.

"Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all."
- John Maynard Keynes