Here is the article that Nina Turner linked on her FB page.

Filmmaker Josh Fox talked about the cultural differences between the supporters of the campaigns. He nailed it: the Clinton delegates were dressed in suits and expensive dresses, while the Sanders delegates were in shorts and t-shirts.

It makes some really good points and also an observation I made here yesterday. Below is my observation.

And what struck me was how the Clinton delegates all looked alike. It did not matter if they were male or female, black or brown or white, young or old. They all looked alike, beautifully dressed to the nines with perfectly coifed hair and makeup for the women. They all looked like very financially successful business types or politicians. It was in stark contrast to the Bernie people who looked like regular people you would see every day on the street or in a store.

Thank you for the link to the article. Those video interviews were powerful, informative.
Especially thank you, I'd never have found that article. Have almost stopped looking at the "usual sources" and now building up a new bookmark collection.
Thank you.

Hi,

Here is the story on US Uncut

She has been offered VP and is considering it. Convention starts Thursday, so answer will be soon.

Potentially tough decision for a young politician. Huge opportunity/profile point if they can swing it...but could be D-Party suicide for further offices unless GP or other new coalition party forms to oppose the D's.

If she chooses to work from within the D's she could easily get US congressional seat or more with Bernies inside revolution. But is that a lost cause?

Inside the gate, or outside the gate? as Brother West would say.

this morning with a quote that has no link to the article and can be taken out of context.

Jill Stein claims, "If you have to lose an election in order to establish your power, you have to do that."

I have no idea what she meant by this because there isn't a link to put in context. But the diarist decided that it means gloom and doom and all the bots agreed with him in the comments.

I love it when someone like Jill Stein calls for a revolution in which their own life and comfort is NOT AT RISK. This type of attitude reads to me like, “If it can’t be a flawless, pure and perfect representation of my opinion, then people other than me should die for the cause.” Call me intolerant, but I hate fundamentalism and the quest for ideological purity.
How many women's deaths, with the loss of Planned Parenthood and the Affordable Care Act under Trump, would it take to extinguish the raging fire of Jill Stein's willful ignorance?
Are we to ignore the catastrophic and long term risks to the environment that Trump poses?
Since when is the elimination of all environmental regulation an acceptable outcome?

Many of the diaries about Stein say that she will get things done by using executive orders, but then think that a president Trump is going to accomplish these things by himself while congress just sits by and lets him.
I have already debunked her being an anti vaxxer but they came up in the comments again.
Sigh, when all you have is fear of the other candidate, then imo, your candidate is very weak.