that eventually the Supreme Court would have to decide whether or not the fetus is a legal person? It's going to happen. Remember, folks, that once the fetus is a legal person, what we'll have is not only an overturning of Roe v. Wade, but in fact a reversal -- that abortion will become illegal in all fifty states. Got any friends who have to travel out of state to get abortions? I do.

Anyway, it's just a stupid political commentator, but here we go. The total broadcast is more than two hours, but I've skipped to the important part. You won't have to watch much to get the point.

What happens, then, when you have diminutive intellects such as Bill Maher or the Due Dissidence crew trying to reason through abortion, you get garbage like this. The real issue at hand is that, when a fetus is part of her or his mother, is, in physical fact, an organ within the mother's body, is the mother obliged to carry the fetus to term?

Once again, from the New Yorker:

Anyone who can get pregnant must now face the reality that half of the country is in the hands of legislators who believe that your personhood and autonomy are conditional—who believe that, if you are impregnated by another person, under any circumstance, you have a legal and moral duty to undergo pregnancy, delivery, and, in all likelihood, two decades or more of caregiving, no matter the permanent and potentially devastating consequences for your body, your heart, your mind, your family, your ability to put food on the table, your plans, your aspirations, your life.

Next on the chopping block: miscarriage. Once we put women on trial for miscarriages, we'll have made the full transition back to 1692 and the Salem Witch Trials.