This is my first blog entry here at C99. Fingers crossed that the formatting comes out right.

As we've discussed in previous blog entries, the judge in the DNC Fraud Lawsuit (Wilding, et al vs. DNC Services Corporation and Debbie Wasserman Schulz) dismissed the case a few weeks ago, on procedural grounds pertaining to jurisdiction and standing.

Lots of legal issues to unpack in the dismissal order, but the crux of the judge Zloch's argument rests on a specious and wholly unsupported legal theory of consumer protection that places an unconscionable burden on political donors to prove they actually heard a politician say he or she was honest, before the donor can sue the politician for being dishonest.

DNC FRAUD LAWSUIT DISMISSED yesterday:

Well, hello, mighty C99!! If anyone is interested, there's a note on "where the hell has Luna been?" below--but trust me, this is way more important than moi. For now, I absolutely had to (reset my password, it's been that long) come out here and share some DNC-lawsuit-related thoughts amongst the fine denizens of the only blog I really trust at this point....