"Volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants"
this pretty much sums up how things appear from this end of the telescope.
But wait there's more...
“Hillary Clinton is now poised to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States, but she simply lacks the integrity and temperament to serve in the office,” he adds.
“From the bottom of my soul I know this to be true. And with Hillary’s latest rise, I realize that her own leadership style – volcanic, impulsive, enabled by sycophants and disdainful of the rule set for everyone else – hasn’t changed a bit.”
Gary Byrnes is not the only one to have made these types of claims re Clinton's temper, arrogance, disdain for the rule of law (in other words the little people).
How can anyone in their right mind think that Clinton is a good candidate for the Whitehouse. I honestly do not get it.
Comments
Goddamned right wing talking point!!!!
sorry I could not resist, we R borg and all my basses R mislaid
Now
if my s/o and I disagree about something the other will invariably accuse the other of using RW talking points. It's something that's just sort of taken hold in this household - the more insignificant and banal the subject the funnier the end result.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Zerohedge has an article on this with a link
to 17 pages of the book. Pretty interesting, and some more detail. The article is on ZH's third page now.
Interesting and thanks
- Here is the Zerohedge piece
Scribd extract (easier to read)
Buried in the Scribd extract is one phrase that says a lot -'The Clintons are crass' The author paints them as money grubbing low rent hucksters. Interesting stuff.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Amazon.com
think Amazon has more excerpts - keeping clicking on "surprise me" in left menu
There's gonna be a long line at every Costco if they get this one. Must be selling like mad, price keeps dropping at Amazon. Such interesting timing.
Who's gonna send a copy to Bill's brother to read if he's still in jail?
Sorry, couldn't resist. BTW, didn't Bill pardon his brother for some drug offenses too?
What a family. And her brothers, and their "business" deals - yuck.
hmm
Well, two out of three ain't bad.
He touched objects soiled by The Clenis!
He has a hard-on for old man Bush!
Maybe next we'll be linking to The Clinton Chronicles. Yeehaw.
He's a fine one
To speak of loyalty, if he destroyed evidence to help the Cintons. His oath as a federal employee was to protect the Constitution, not the Clintons.
Classic.
I saw how the Clinton Machine's appalling leadership style endangered law enforcement officers, the military, and the American people in general.
Well, two out of three ain't bad.
You read my mind. Rec'd!
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
And there you go again
A tactic of yours is to address the source and not the issues. Second time you've responded to one of my comments and the second time that you have sneered at the source used.
Intended for Hecate
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
I won't knock sources anymore.
Enquirer got the John Edwards story first, and correct. With pic of him holding his out of wedlock child.
Drudge, of course, got the Monica Story.
Enquirer still running with some things which ( when I lived in DC for about 20 years) were considered "CW" but the MSM won't (yet) mention. Sure Trump will.
This time, Drudge first our with the latest book.
i
quoted additional wisdom-nuggets from the book by this titan of truth. There is a problem with that?
Too, perhaps you would like to "address the issue" of the author cuddling up to "Papa Bush" as "class," and his recounting of fondling objects stained with emanations of The Clenis.
One might think there would be plenty of grounds upon which to oppose The Mad Bomber without flinging feces offered up by some winger cop fuck.
also,
none of this is new. The rudeness, the paranoia, the rule-breaking, the sycophants, the violence, the vase-throwing, the alleged contempt for the military and law enforcement, the semen spraying everywhere—all this has already been endlessly set forth in books by people like Aldrich, Oakley, Morris. And Roger Stone, master ratfucker (the Brooks Brothers riot was his) and advisor to Trump; both of them proteges of Roy Cohn. Stone's book appeared just last year.
Sound familiar?
These sorts of winger tomes endlessly recur. Like herpes.
I think you've made your point
about the source.
Now what do you think about the idea that Clinton thinks that rules are for little people, is prone to fits of temper and surrounds herself with sycophants?
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
sounds
about right to me. All points that can easily be made without climbing aboard one of The Eggman's goofy clown cars. Classic Eggman rollout, this one.
Anyone interested in a group project?
It could fund this site for a time. Dirty money from us, to us.
Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.
I think that my head just exploded
Suspect that the emphasis here is on
new and novel ways to kill people'revolutionary new military technologies'Could be wrong though.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Peace?
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass
I so love the burgeoning use
of undefined acronyms. Military seems to love them also, too.
Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.
It was in the article I was responding to:
Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative (MURI)
Not that it really helps as most titles nowadays tend to obscure more than they reveal.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.--Aristotle
If there is no struggle there is no progress.--Frederick Douglass
I've got one
How about we research a military application of jokes?
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ienp4J3pW7U]
Economic growth through
Counter-intuitive means, especially in the face of TeaBuggerNomics.
Supported by sycophants too,
Supported by sycophants too, there appears to be nothing bad she could do that her supporters would have a problem with, like Trump she could shoot people in NYC and not lose their support.
That seems to be the case
Interesting that many of her supporters are now condoning things that had them up in arms when the Bush administration did them - especially, but not only, regarding NatSec.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
We've had lots of practice with Obama
Keeping Guantanamo open, rodent fornicating the Middle East, looking forward not back (IOW, letting Bush and Cheney get away with torture), etc.
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
two good pieces...
from the last few days that sum up the scene-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/-clintons-speech-shows-th_b_...
By Jeffrey Sachs, Director, Earth Institute at Columbia University
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/06/03/hillary-clinton-email-s...
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Some 71% of Democrats want Clinton to run even if indicted.
That just boggles the brain.
One thing this year has taught me.............. I'm no Democrat.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
Agreed- I have woke up
I thought my former party was better than all this crap. Well this year with all the "issues" and finger pointing and name calling it has woken me up. No longer will I support one of the establishment parties they are just in it for themselves. They do not serve the public, they only try keep their power and money.
Holy crap
I'd reached the same conclusion as you but this certainly confirms it. The Democratic party is the enemy of the progressive movement.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Holy crap
indeed!
I will not...
vote for her. The party has become everything I work against...corrupt corporate capitalist.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
THIS is the Hillary I had to deal with years ago.
Glad to see she is consistent.
She and her staffers made things miserable for us, for no reason whatsoever. As cochair of an ABA subcommittee which had her forced down our throats as keynote stinker, I will always recall and cherish just what manipulative, demanding, lying, arrogant piece of work she was.
Condolences - and this ties in with
what I've heard from others who have had the misfortune of booking her for speaking engagements. She really is not a nice person by all accounts.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Just watching recent video of her
is all I need to know that she's a thoroughly repellent individual.
(Confirmed by her policy 'stances'.)
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
She is Wall Street's choice
nothing else about her matters very much. That's my take on it, anyway.
To thine own self be true.
That she is the MIC's
choice worries me just as much as her Wall St connections.
Her appalling personality and temperament are not as important but are still cause for concern though as they can have a direct impact on those things.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
Hi Steve, I remember her during the Clinton admin
I admired her ability to carry on. I thought she had character. Then one day I read about how she treated her staff. She had temper tantrums, yelled and screamed at her staff. That was very important to me: how she was behind the scenes, how she treated people who were not "important." I never liked her after that.
To thine own self be true.
Good morning Marilyn
Couldn't agree more. They way people treat others who hold no power over them is a great indication of character. Clinton fails that test.
To extrapolate a little - she is an old fashioned post WWII type American Exceptionalist - therefore by definition she sees all other nationalities as being inherently inferior and therefore won't think twice about dropping bombs on them. That scares me.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire