Covid and Coffee

On August 17th, after more than a year of painful litigation, the South African high court forced its government to release the original 2021 jab contracts. So the public can now view the full scope of maladroit, malignant, and mendacious government misfeasance in a fully-disclosed, unredacted Pfizer “Manufacturing and Supply” agreements.

The newly-disclosed contract between Pfizer and the Republic of South Africa is dated March 30th, 2021 — four months after the jab rollout started in America. Both the South African government and Pfizer hysterically opposed releasing the contract. A heroic South African citizens group spent over a year and who knows how much money forcing its release; meanwhile the government and Pfizer used TAXPAYER money to slow it down and try to stop it.

The agreement defines “Purchaser” as the government of the Republic of South Africa. Under Section 5.5 (“Purchaser Acknowledgement”), clearly spelled out in black and white, Pfizer admitted it had no idea what the jabs might do or might not do in the long run, or whether they would even work at all, shifting all the risk completely to the South African government.

Source: https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za

Purchaser Acknowledgement.

Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement. Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. Further, to the extent applicable, Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized.

In Section 5.5’s first sentence, Pfizer admitted it hadn’t even yet finished studying the vaccines’ “components and constituent materials.” Think about that. Turn that around in your mind and pitilessly examine it from every angle. Compare that admission to all the public messaging from the CDC and all its white-coated, grant-grabbing pretend doctors.

In English, Pfizer was saying, look, we’re not even sure what’s in these things.

And South Africa said, sure, that’s cool with us.

Not to belabor the point but, while in its confidential legal agreements Pfizer was saying they weren’t even sure what the shots included, what we were being publicly assured was that the shots were the most studied vaccines in history, not to mention the safest and most effective ones — ever. Ever, ever. Ninety-five percent effective. You remember.

Section 5.5’s second sentence is arguably even worse. It included two different disclaimers. The first disclaimer expressly says that South Africa AGREED that “the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known.”

“Not currently known.” In other words, Pfizer said we have no idea what it’s going to do to people, or whether it even works.

Haha! There it is, in black and white, three months after first responders and healthcare workers in the U.S. had all gotten the jabs and just before the “vaccinate or terminate” mandates started rolling out. Do you remember our vaunted public officials saying anything about unknown long-term effects? Did President Robert L. Peters ever say “the long-term effects and efficacy” were unknown? Did anyone in charge ever say that?

Nope. They said the reverse opposite.

(Actually President Robert L Peters (AKA Biden) did say just that, but that was before the jabs came out and it was during Trump’s presidency. Both he and Kamala said that they would not get jabbed because there were no long term studies on whether they were safe. -snoopdawg)

The second disclaimer may be the most reprehensible of all. On behalf of its citizens, South Africa obsequiously agreed that “there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.”

Oh. Thanks for letting us know.

That’s bad enough. But combine the two sentences together, and what you get is Pfizer saying they don’t know what’s in the jabs, what it’s going to do to people, and it might even kill them, for all Pfizer knew.

And South Africa said, Sounds great! How many can we get?
….

And, since South Africa agreed the jabs might not work, and agreed Pfizer wasn’t guaranteeing the jabs wouldn’t hurt people, South Africa cannot ever claim it was fraudulently induced into the contract, or that Pfizer has provided a defective product.

So. Now we know why the governments are working so hard to deny the jabs are dangerous and gaslight the victims, for the simple reason they don’t want to have to pay for the massive claims. You couldn’t conceive a more diabolical agreement if you tried. All the incentives are completely backwards.

How on Earth could this happen? It happened through a dark, demonic combination of two anti-democratic factors: executive authority and government secrecy. Emergency executive authority meant that rank-and-file legislators were kept out of the loop. Had this contract been debated in South Africa’s congress, it never would have been approved.

Second, official secrecy — keeping the Pfizer agreement’s terms ‘confidential’ — allowed the executive health authorities to agree to anything, even something this bad, because they faced no public scrutiny or outcry. Citizens were forced to assume good faith, that the contract was carefully-negotiated and included normal buyer protections.

The citizens were 100% wrong, of course, but they had no way to know it. The critical terms of their mandated jabs were officially “confidential.”

How is that “informed consent?”

More damning information.

They KNEW: Biden Admin Hid Military Investigation Exposing Spike in Covid Among Vaccinated

Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration kept the bombshell results of a U.S. military investigation hidden from the public, newly unsealed documents have revealed.

The military probe exposed vaccine failures as early as January 2021.

The documents show that the Biden admin was made aware that the military warned of a spike in Covid cases among those who had received mRNA shots, but the findings were covered up.

The docs were unsealed by the non-profit organization Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

According to the FOIA docs, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were presented with the findings but they were disregarded.

The documents show that the CDC and FDA ignored crucial information regarding the efficacy of vaccines that were exposed in the military investigation conducted in January 2021.

The probe found that the majority of Covid cases were among those classed as “fully vaccinated.”

According to the investigation, there were “increased infection rates” among “fully vaccinated individuals.”

Nevertheless, the CDC and FDA ignored the findings and pushed the shots out for public use.

“Through FOIA requests, ICAN’s attorneys have obtained a September 2021 presentation delivered to FDA and NIH higher-ups, including Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Peter Marks, and Janet Woodcock, which indicated shocking levels of waning immunity and breakthrough infection among the vaccinated as early as July 2021,” according to the press release.

The U.S. military awarded a contract to Humetrix Cloud Services to conduct a comprehensive analysis of vaccine data.

The company is known for its expertise in healthcare technology solutions.

It played a crucial role in helping the military gain valuable insights into the effectiveness and distribution of vaccines.

The study revealed that most hospitalizations in the 65-and-over age group were “fully vaccinated.”

The emergence of breakthrough cases can be traced back to January 2021, the data in the newly unsealed documents shows. According to ICAN, the docs show that top White House officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, were aware of the findings but still pushed the false narrative onto the public that the mRNA shots would take “control of the virus.”

ICAN issued a statement detailing the findings from the FOIA documents:

In fact, the data shows that for the final week of July, fully vaccinated individuals made up an estimated 73% of COVID-19 cases and 63% of COVID-19 hospitalizations in the 65+ age group.

The presentation goes on to show evidence of rapidly waning immunity, as infection rates 5-6 months post vaccination were twice as high as infection rates 3-4 months post vaccination.

Despite having this data on hand—certainly by the date of the September 13, 2021 presentation, (but likely earlier, as a September 15, 2021 email states that the data had been “brought to the CDC three weeks ago”) — public health officials, like Fauci, continued to double-down on the message that vaccines were the key to getting “control of the virus.”

Meanwhile, on September 16, 2021, Collins noted about the data: “Interesting and pretty compelling evidence that VE [vaccine efficacy] is falling 5-6 months post vaccination for both infection and hospitalization for those over 65. Even for those 3-4 months out there is a trend toward worsening VE.”

But the CDC didn’t let the evidence get in the way of its messaging.

As late as December 2021, the CDC kept up the outrageous façade that the vaccines offered “similar protection in real-world conditions as they have in clinical trial settings, reducing the risk of COVID-19, including severe illness by 90 percent or more among people who are fully vaccinated.”

CDC apparently went as far as keeping the data from FDA, evidenced by the Director of CBER, Peter Marks’, comment to Janet Woodcock, Acting Commissioner of FDA, that, it “might have been nice for CDC to share the data.”

This news has emerged as the CDC quietly updated its Covid vaccine policy to state that Americans who have been vaccinated are now at a higher risk of contracting new variants of the virus than those who are unvaccinated.