Error message

Deprecated function: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in include_once() (line 20 of /home/caucusni/public_html/includes/file.phar.inc).

Sessions does not appoint second special counsel to review FBI misconduct claims

Sessions does not appoint second special counsel to review FBI misconduct claims

By Laura Jarrett, CNN
Updated 6:49 PM EDT, Thu March 29, 2018

CNN) Attorney General Jeff Sessions is not naming a new special counsel to investigate Republican-driven accusations against the FBI -- at least for now.

Instead, Sessions revealed Thursday that Utah's top federal prosecutor, John Huber, is looking into allegations that the FBI abused its powers in surveilling a former Trump campaign adviser, and more should have been done to investigate Hillary Clinton's ties to a Russian nuclear energy agency.

Sessions' decision to stop short of formally appointing a special counsel like Robert Mueller, detailed in a lengthy written response to three Republican chairmen on Capitol Hill, will likely anger those in the GOP who have recently ramped up calls to investigate claims of political bias at the nation's top law enforcement agencies.

*

The announcement comes one day after the Justice Department's internal watchdog office confirmed it would review how the FBI obtained a warrant to monitor Trump foreign policy aide Carter Page, as well as the bureau's relationship with Christopher Steele, the author of the Trump dossier.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/03/29/politics/sessions-prosecutor-fbi-misc...

One silver lining to J. Beauregard III’s decision on not expanding the DOJ’s investigation right now is maybe, just maybe they can shut down this RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! noise and show what a bunch of BS it all is. Maybe they can really dig up PROOF of shenanigans between the Empty Suit, Comey, Fusion GPS, Steele, certain FBI personnel, ANNNDDD The Clinton Creature herself. Maybe they can put the charges of ‘collusion’ where they belong.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

snoopydawg's picture

The GOP asked him to form one to look into whether the FBI was naughty when they got the FISA warrant, Hillary's emails and uranium one. This is a legitimate investigation and it's the one that needs to be done, not this fake Russia Gate plot that Hillary created. During the time that the Obama administration was working on the uranium deal there were a lot of people who were under investigation on the Russian side and Mueller's hands are very dirty as well as a lot of other people. What would be funny as hell is that the players who decided to make up Russia Russia .... will be found to have broken a lot of rules and they get taken down. I'll not hold my breath on any punishment, but just getting the truth about the uranium deal would be okay. The Clintons made millions off the deal and it's time for the foundation to be exposed for the sham it is. Rumors are that there is an investigation into it.

Documents suggest possible coordination between CIA, FBI, Obama WH and Dem officials early in Trump-Russia probe: investigators

Newly uncovered text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page suggest a possible coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in the early stages of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to GOP congressional investigators on Wednesday.

(yes I know that this is Fox snooze, but no other media will cover anything that isn't towing the Russia Gate line)

up
0 users have voted.

The message echoes from Gaza back to the US. “Starving people is fine.”

Amanda Matthews's picture

@snoopydawg

The expansion I’m talking about is a ‘Special Counsel’ appointment like Robert Mueller. Sessions said not at this time, he would rather concentrate on the FISA warrants connected to the Page surveillance and the Uranium One deal. There were a number of Repubbies who wanted a Special Prosecutor appointed NOW to look into malfeasance by employees of federal agencies, like the FBI regarding the investigation into her emails. (And a lot of others not connected to the Republican party do too.) BUT Sessions decided to hold back on a Special Prosecutor and to go back to the beginning, the first (known) overt act of fraud committed by TCC, the DNC, the Obama administration, and the FBI. Sessions (little weasel that he is) is right in deciding to hold back on a Special Prosecutor and to go back to the source of all this RUSSIA! mess and investigate the justification used to spy on Page, which is where the real corruption starts. It needs to be established that there was NEVER any truth to the reason used (the Dossier) to justify getting the FISA warrants in the first place. Proving that was based on KNOWINGLY false information and testimony is necessary to establish the major element of the DIMs malfeasance, intent. Without all that they can investigate until Hell freezes over and nothing will happen. If you can’t prove that the warrants were based on lies and deceit, you have nothing to bring any charges on. No underlying criminal act, no basis for an investigation.

Sessions letter explaining his decision:

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/03/29/ag.letter.re.ig.and.huber.revie...

The REAL bonus for sane people is that an investigation into the wiretaps of Page, etc., will show that this RUSSIA! ploy of theirs was just a smokescreen to cover up for corruption in the ‘Democratic’ party itself.

up
0 users have voted.

I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa

snoopydawg's picture

This was why the FBI spied on Trump before he won, so did they find the collusion during that time period? No they did not. Why not? Because there wasn't any. Mueller has been investigating this for how long now and he hasn't found anything yet? Then I'd say that he isn't going to be finding anything even if he continues to spend money on it. Sheesh.

Flynn lied. Manafort and Gates laundered money and didn't register as foreign lobbyists and they worked with some Russians. Charge them for the first two and let the country go. This has gone on long enough!

up
0 users have voted.

The message echoes from Gaza back to the US. “Starving people is fine.”

Alligator Ed's picture

@snoopydawg M and G were in cahoots with Podestas by 2014 when the laundering occurred. They didn't register as representatives of of foreign powers either. Although those crimes are not germaine to Trump-Russia collusion, they are crimes.

Flynn's lies may not have been lies to the FBI although apparently he didn't tell Pence the truth either. Strzok changed Flynn's 302's per McCabe or perhaps Comey. We don't know if they was a transcript of the Flynn-Strzok interview--probably not, since both Come and McCabe played fast and loose with laws and guidelines. No crime if Flynn lied to Pence, although certainly politically unwise.

Flynn isn't sentenced and the charges may be dropped before Flynn turns the tables on the Feebs with a planned countersuit.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@Alligator Ed

Flynn is charged with lying probably because he couldn't remember exactly what he said and they had him on tape. In the link I gave you the ex FBI agent said that he is owed a huge apology for what has been said about him.

This is an interesting article about the Mueller investigation. It talks about the DNC computers and how VIPS shows that it wasn't hacked because of the transfer rate of the files and how Comey didn't get a warrant to look at the computer even though the whole damn case started with the accusations that Russia hacked it. D'oh! I'd think that people would be asking about this, but no .... the accusation stands.

The DNCs refusal to cooperate

Will he investigate whether the DNC files were stolen by someone who had direct physical access to the DNC server? Will he try to determine who at the DNC had a motive to leak the files? Could it be someone who wanted to make public Clinton and the DNC’s underhanded treatment of Bernie Sanders?

This ends with asking if Mueller will be honest with his findings ...Or not?

up
0 users have voted.

The message echoes from Gaza back to the US. “Starving people is fine.”

Alligator Ed's picture

@snoopydawg

But, in their coverage, the mainstream media have downplayed the very odd behavior of the DNC, the putative target of the alleged hack. For, when the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI learned of the hacking claim, they asked to examine the server.

And the DNC refused.

It would seem to my non-lawyer brain, that failing to provide evidence in a criminal case (USA vs Trump/Russia) is obstruction of justice. If the DNC server still exists, it baffles me why it has never been seized by the Feebs as part of their so-called investigation.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@Alligator Ed

First it wasn't inspected by the FBI and then after they started Russia Gate they still never look at it. If I was going to believe in something that could lead to war, I'd ask myself why they didn't do that.

up
0 users have voted.

The message echoes from Gaza back to the US. “Starving people is fine.”