Questions About the FBI's Role in 1/6 Are Mocked Because the FBI Shapes Liberal Corporate Media

CNN, June 16, 2021, with scandal-plagued anchor Chris Cuomo and disgraced former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe

The axis of liberal media outlets and their allied activist groups — CNN, NBC News, The Washington Post, Media Matters — are in an angry uproar over a recent report questioning the foreknowledge and involvement of the FBI in the January 6 Capitol riot. As soon as that new report was published on Monday, a consensus instantly emerged in these liberal media precincts that this is an unhinged, ignorant and insane conspiracy theory that deserves no consideration.

The original report, published by Revolver News and then amplified by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, documented ample evidence of FBI infiltration of the three key groups at the center of the 1/6 investigation — the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters — and noted how many alleged riot leaders from these groups have not yet been indicted. While low-level protesters have been aggressively charged with major felonies and held without bail, many of the alleged plot leaders have thus far been shielded from charges.

The implications of these facts are obvious. It seems extremely likely that the FBI had numerous ways to know of any organized plots regarding the January 6 riot (just as the U.S. intelligence community, by its own admission, had ample advanced clues of the 9/11 attack but, according to their excuse, tragically failed to “connect the dots”). There is no doubt that the FBI has infiltrated at least some if not all of these groups — which it has been warning for years pose a grave national security threat — with informants and/or undercover spies. It is known that Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio has served as an FBI informant in the past, and the disrupted 2020 plot by Three Percenters members to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) was shaped and driven by what The Wall Street Journal reported were the FBI’s “undercover agents and confidential informants.”

What would be shocking and strange is not if the FBI had embedded informants and other infiltrators in the groups planning the January 6 Capitol riot. What would be shocking and strange — bizarre and inexplicable — is if the FBI did not have those groups under tight control. And yet the suggestion that FBI informants may have played some role in the planning of the January 6 riot was instantly depicted as something akin to, say, 9/11 truth theories or questions about the CIA’s role in JFK’s assassination or, until a few weeks ago, the COVID lab-leak theory: as something that, from the perspective of Respectable Serious Circles, only a barely-sane, tin-foil-hat-wearing lunatic would even entertain.

This reaction is particularly confounding given how often the FBI did exactly this during the first War on Terror, and how commonplace discussions of this tactic were in mainstream liberal circles. Over the last decade, I reported on countless cases for The Guardian and The Intercept where the FBI targeted some young American Muslims they viewed as easily manipulated — due to financial distress, emotional problems, or both — and then deployed informants and undercover agents to dupe them into agreeing to join terrorist plots that had been created, designed and funded by the FBI itself, only to then congratulate themselves for breaking up the plot which they themselves initiated. As I asked in one headline about a particularly egregious entrapment case: “Why Does the FBI Have to Manufacture its Own Plots if Terrorism and ISIS Are Such Grave Threats?”
…
So far from being some warped conspiracy theory, that the FBI purposely targets vulnerable people and infiltrates groups in order to create attacks and direct targets to engage in them is indisputably true, well established, and a commonly reported fact in mainstream liberal media. Exactly that has been happening for decades.

Yet the DNC-loyal sector of the corporate media reacted to the Revolver News article and Carlson’s segment which raised these questions as though they were positing something that no sentient being could possibly regard as viable. CNN — which spent years leading its viewers to believe that the Kremlin controlled the U.S. Government through sexual and financial blackmail — published what they labeled a “fact-check” that denounced this as a “haywire theory” that “is nothing more than a conspiratorial web of unproven claims, half-truths and inaccurate drivel about perceived bombshells in court filings.”

Lots more to read if you’re so inclined. Good essay and it confirms my suspicions that 1/6 was allowed to happen so that they can finally bring the war of terror home like we all knew would happen one day.

Here is the current plan for the patriot act part 2.

Animal rights activists have been considered domestic terrorism since before Feinstein lost her mind too and got a bill passed stating it so. Imagine that. People who are concerned about how horrifically animals at factory farms and elsewhere are considered violent extremists in the USA. Unreal.

But what the HELL!?!

Check out the ‘other domestic terrorists' and see how loosely defined it is. This looks like a grab bag of ideas waiting for laws to say that they are out of bounds here from now on. I’m wondering if Cheney's FEMA camps are still considered CT?

I posted this a few days ago if you missed it and I highly recommend you read it too. It’s also details what Biden’s team of misfits are going to be focusing on.

US lays out plan to confront white supremacist violence

How many of Trump’s people would have gone to the capital that day if Trump hadn’t told them to march on down there and make yourselves nuisances to stop the vote thing? Lots of people planned on the speeches, but weren’t considering more mayhem or violence. I think a lot of them got caught up in the excitement and it got way out of control. But many of them thought that when they walked past cops who didn’t try to stop them they weren’t doing anything wrong? They even stayed inside the rope lines in some rooms. Then most of them were allowed to just leave and go home. For an 'unsuccessful coup' attempt that seems kinda odd don’t you think? But if Trump walks then they all should unless there is damning evidence against them. Especially if the FBI helped others plan the event?

I think it’s the speaker of the house who is in charge of security for congress. Why then did she not make sure that it was in place just in case? Did none of them pick up a newspaper or turn on the media mouthpieces and see how many warning signs there were that something might happen? After the person in charge talked to another person in charge why did it take so many hours for help to arrive? What if they had been armed and serious or dawg forbid real terrorists? Washington DC is the capital of government and yet people were allowed to riot for hours uninterrupted? Really? Gee it kinda reminds me of the day hijacked planes flew for over an hour over the most guarded air space on the planet without any military jets being scrambled. How long did Payne Stuart's plane fly unescorted after it lost touch with the tower? And even though the riots had gone on for some time, VP Pence was ‘saved at the last minute' by a guard redirecting people away from the room he was in. Phew….what great timing huh?

In a whisper: "Mr. Vice President does your stand down order still stand? I’m getting lots of calls…"

Bonus material:

Do not come. Do not come! If you come to our border you will be turned back.

She then goes on to deride Trump for what he said to immigrants thinking of taking the trip. Obama told immigrant kids that if they come here they would be sent back home. Biden has deported more immigrants in just a few months than Trump did all last year. Close to 500,000. Many were released back in Mexico thousands of miles away from where they entered the country from it.. but phew we got rid of Trump just in time.

Yes you do want to watch it for it’s hypocrisy quota.