What do I mean by this?

https://thinkprogress.org/al-gore-dont-vote-third-party-15711ce062e7#.s9...

Read the article, but basically, they use words from Al Gore, who as a party elite is used to scare people to vote for Hillary as bad as she is, ignoring how pro-corporate she is, and that Gore is not a true climate activists with his mine companies and other pollution corporations with his name attached.

First of all I understand their feelings and misgivings. But if they are interested in my personal advice. I am voting for Hillary Clinton. I urge everyone else to do the same.

Basically he feels he is still relevant today as he used to be then, and that he acts as if he understands that people are pissed, disappointed and angry at the DNC since they stole a primary election for the coronation prospects of Her Heinous. Of course he, a party apparatchik will vote for her.

I particularly urge anyone who is concerned about the climate crisis, sees it as the kind of priority that I see it as, to look at the sharp contrast between the solar plan that Secretary Clinton has put forward, and her stated commitment to support the Clean Power Plan, and the contrast between what she has said and is proposing with the statements of the Republican nominee, which give me great concern.

Yeah right! like she won't turn back to her pals at Fossil Fuels Inc and trash alternative funding as she is so Pro-Corporate and he thinks he can fool folks into voting for the knowledgeable evil named Hellery. And that to woo the Republicans, she is likely to do so, and more swiftly than Obama the other corporate puppet has done to us.

Then, the author like many of the MSM have done is to ignore the WAPO article that said Nader had nothing to do with Gore's Florida defeat, but still he trots out:

Readers may recall that in the 2000 election, Democrat Al Gore actually won the popular vote but narrowly lost the Electoral College to a guy named George W. Bush in part because of votes lost to third-party candidates — intentional votes for Green party candidate Ralph Nader (and, tragically, unintentional votes for Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan).

Author totally ignores that 300,000 Democrats were so inspired by Al that they voted for Bush directly! that Nader had actually taken votes away from Bush as WaPo stated, and the fact that Republican Florida SoS also colluded for Bush.

Certainly, given the closeness of the election, many other factors influenced its outcome, including the untimely intervention of the Supreme Court to stop the vote recounting in Florida. But a 2006 “ballot-level” analysis concluded votes for Nader in Florida “did indeed spoil the 2000 presidential election for Gore.” For more, see this recent analysis and this mea culpa from a Nader voter

WaPo exonerated Nader at a much later date, so use a 10yr old analysis which was still too close to 2000 and the Dems still sought a scape goat (which will always be 3rd parties as far as they are concerned why they lose), the Dem Party in my mind cannot see that they are the ones responsible for their own loses and lack luster enthusiasm for their candidates.
Hmmmm, Hillary was having trouble in polls, and seen as most untrustworthy, Bernie fired up folks, got the enthusiasm sparked, and even polled strongly,,,who did they pick? Yep, Hellery was picked before the Primaries started, the game was rigged from the start, but it is looking like the Dems are worried, they pushed the candidate that had the people going ho-hum, and stealing and rigging an election is supposed to make people desire to vote for your criminal organization? Puhlease!

And some one they pulled to say they are sorry they voted 3rd party is another touch to push some away from a 3rd party just so they can keep us enthralled to the duopoly of the corporate parties.

“Clinton’s margin over Trump among this age group is lower than we’d expect given how Obama did in the last two election cycles,” explains Enten. A key reason is the “unusually high share of under-30 voters saying they’ll vote third party.”

Of course nothing ab out that fact that the DNC and DWS helped do everything that was not legal this primary and people are holding the party to that, the DNC is going to pay dearly for the illegal primary crap they pulled and they deserve it, I for one would love to see a 3rd party crack that fence around the Beltway and shock the shit out of the Establishment.

The bottom line: As Gore told me, he understands the “feelings and misgivings” of anyone considering voting for a third-party candidate this time around. He just considers it a mistake — especially if you care about the climate crisis.

If folks care, we need to galvanize the voters again and get Jill elected as she actually cares about the environment, Hillary is in bed with Fracking and other Fossil Fuel FatCats, Trump and Hellery are no good for the Environment! also, a vote for Hillary is bad for the environment as she foments regime change and more wars, wars which impact the environment in a negative way. I am not falling for the MSM tactics of playing on our fears, I am sad to see that even Think Progress is getting in on the MNSM Fear-train for the Dems. They should be getting called Think Regress.

No Thanks Al, my conscience will be clear as I send my ballot Jill not Hill 2016, fuck Hillary and the horse she rode in on!