A Dose Type Conversation - 4-23-2022

Submitted by studentofearth on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 5:46am

A few articles of interest.

Birds have been useful in warfare to carry messages (carrier pigeon), direct attack (falcon)and now possibly to spread infectious agents.

Migratory birds of mass destruction Indian Punchline April 21, 2022 by M.K. Bhadrakumar

The UN Security Council held an extraordinary event on April 6 under the rubric Arria Formula Meeting on Biological Security regarding the biological activities in countries including Ukraine. Predictably, the US and UK representatives didn’t show up at the event and the western media also blacked out the proceedings. But that does not detract from the profound significance of what transpired.

The highlight of the Security Council proceedings lasting over two hours was the disclosure by General Igor Kirillov, chief of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defense Forces of the Russian Armed Forces, that Washington is creating biological laboratories in different countries and connecting them to a unified system.
...
Russia has made specific allegations, pointing finger at:

Pentagon funding for the bio-labs in Ukraine;
Location of these bio-labs(not only in Ukraine but in 36 countries around the world);
Diseases and epidemics on which research work is going on, focusing on the means for their release, the countries where they are being tested (even without the knowledge of the governments of these countries); and, of course,
Experiments relating to coronavirus (and bats used to transmit this virus).

However, the US has so far point-blank refused to accept any supervision and verification of such incriminatory evidences and has stonewalled the demand for a verification mechanism.
...
A mind-boggling “discovery” that Russian forces in Ukraine stumbled upon is the use of numbered birds by the Pentagon-funded labs. This almost falls out of science fiction and Sir Alfred Hitchcock could have made an epic movie out of it where deception mixes with innocence and man’s cruelty to nature becomes unbearably grotesque. The project works like this:

To begin with, the Pentagon accesses the scientific data available with environmental specialists and zoologists after studying the migration of birds and observing them throughout the seasons, relating to the path these birds take each year on their seasonal journey from one country to another and even from one continent to another.

On the basis of this data, groups of migratory birds are caught, digitised and capsules of germs are attached to them that carry a chip to be controlled through computers. They birds are then released to the flock of the migratory birds in those target countries toward which the US intelligence has malevolent intentions.
...
During the long flight of the birds that have been digitised in the Pentagon bio-labs, their movement is monitored step by step by means of satellites and the exact locations are determined. The idea is that if the Biden Administration (or the CIA) has a requirement to inflict harm on, say, Russia or China (or India for that matter), the chip is destroyed when the bird is in their skies.
...
To return to reality, once the “digitised” bird is killed and the capsule of germs it carries is released, the disease spreads in the “X” or “Y” country. It becomes a highly cost-effective method of harming an enemy country without any need of war or coup d’état or colour revolution.

The Russians have made the shocking claim that they are actually in possession of such migratory birds digitised in the Pentagon’s bio-labs.
...
The bottom line is that only the US intelligence — and President Biden, perhaps, if he remembers — would know where all humans have been infected so far in this century by the Birds of Mass Destruction. Was Ebola that devastated Africa a test case and precursor of things to come?

What about Covid-19, which is known to have originated from funded laboratories that were administered by the US? It is very likely that the US might have used migratory birds to kill Chinese citizens. Clearly, the US in its desperation to reverse its global decline is pulling out all the stops to restore its hegemony in a world order that is inexorably moving toward multipolarity.

________

Arria-formula meeting of the UN Security Council hosted by the Russian Federation on the topic "Threats to international peace and security emanating from military biological activities in regions across the globe", April 6, 2022 referenced in above article (2 hrs, 18 min total)(Russian presentation 0:31-1:23:41 and 2:08:38-2:18-50)

[video:https://youtu.be/Gu6fUrbjHeU?t=31]

Tags:

#Covid

Vote

Comments

Submitted by Lookout on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 7:00am

Using birds to spread disease is deplorable...

So it sounds just like something we might do. The US is drunk with its failing power and too arrogant to see our own decline on so many levels.

What about Covid-19, which is known to have originated from funded laboratories that were administered by the US? It is very likely that the US might have used migratory birds to kill Chinese citizens. Clearly, the US in its desperation to reverse its global decline is pulling out all the stops to restore its hegemony in a world order that is inexorably moving toward multipolarity.

—

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

Submitted by QMS on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 7:08am

This is a very scary scenario tho not surprising

The spooks in the shadowy US gov military / CIA are not above this type of evil.

I had heard they also tried those tricks on ticks against Cuba.

These programs must be stopped.

Thanks for posting!

Submitted by ovals49 on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 7:41am

About those lipid nano particle mRNA ‘envelopes’……

Jessica Rose (Unacceptable Jessica), finds some alarming MSDS safety information on SM-102 (used in Pfizer mRNA vaccines) that indicates that

SM-102 is more dangerous from a health (blue) point of view than both gas and diesel.

Notice in the SDS for the LNP-102 kit materials that the Application of the substance / the mixture reads, quote:

This product is for research use - Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic.

Now then. Are you sitting down?

You can read the rest of the SubStack piece here.
Go ahead, continue rolling up your sleeve for multiple ‘boosters’. They’re “safe and effective”, aren’t they?

I wonder what other black box worthy information is being withheld in order to minimize vaccine hesitancy. This helps explain the unusual preemptive product liability waivers. We, those of us who have had these mRNA products injected in our bodies, are the lab animals.

—

Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work for the benefit of all."
- John Maynard Keynes

Submitted by Tall Bald and Ugly on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 12:03pm

OBummer

actually let the cat out of the bag the other day
saying that NOW that they’ve been clinically tested on
1.5Billion people. . .

so yeah, all the peeps that got Jabbed were part of an Experiment(in So many ways) that they were never informed(consent?) about

mengele(sp?) must be Dancing in his grave

so, so Sad

—

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

Submitted by snoopydawg on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 12:55pm

Obummer is also attacking free speech along with HerHeinous

@Tall Bald and Ugly

He’s upset that lots of people are refusing to take part in the big pharma trials. He calls it disinformation which is rich coming from the president that made it legal for the government to spread propaganda. This from the guy who stayed silent about Trump’s war crimes and derailed the NCA walkout that would have been very costly to the owners and might have seen some actual change to the way cops can kill us. He got blasted on the Twit for his remarks. People really despise him.

—

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Submitted by Pluto's Republic on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 5:46pm

I never thought about this.

@snoopydawg

This from the guy who stayed silent about Trump’s war crimes

Do former Presidents have an obligation to publicize the war crimes of their predecessor? Obama didn't publicize Bush's war crimes, and Bush didn't mention Clinton's war crimes. My guess is that US Presidents have always covered-up the crimes of former Presidents. Biden is certainly no exception. Of course, a President could be impeached — but never for committing a war crime. Impeachment in the US is limited to the wagging of tongues or the wagging of wee-wees. The actual reality of Trump's war crimes never touched the consciousness of Americans.

The legal framework for War crimes was invented in the twentieth century — when wars became international and profitable, due to industrialization. The handy legal designation of "war criminal" became a useful tool for seizing the profits and wealth of one's opponents. But after the one, and only, serious war crimes tribunal was held in 1945 — "war crimes" lost some if its glam and ultimately became a big nothing burger. Here's why:

If you showed Americans a list of official war crimes, they would go into cognitive shock, at first. Then, they would go into a state of denial.

War Crimes

Atrocities or offences against persons or property, constituting violations of the laws or customs of war

murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population in occupied territory

murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas

killing of hostages

torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments

plunder of public or private property

wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages

devastation not justified by military necessity

Any American who has played Super Mario Brothers on a computing device has probably been committing virtual war crimes — for fun and pleasure — for most of his or her life.

The State Department will use the term "war crimes" as a slur to defame another country, but the US would never pursue the crime in courts. Besides, the US can freely use US "sanctions" — without due process — to immediately steal the wealth of any nation it cares to. In a multi-polar world, such corruption would be impossible.

War crimes is how the US rolls, and thus "war crimes" is not a permitted topic for public discussion. It's very much like "critical race theory" — if Americans think about it too hard, it can cause a mental health disorder. While the disorder may not be as severe as PTSD, they are both caused by the same cognitive crisis.

Shitlibs: "I'd rather wear a pussy hat than discuss US war crimes."

• • •

Another suppressed topic on the roster of permitted public discussions is "human rights." You won't find "human rights" anywhere in the curriculum of public education in the US. The term "human rights" is primarily used by the State Department (and its army of DC think tanks) in propaganda misinformation that is designed to defame a targeted enemy. In other words, the US will concocts lies about human rights deficiencies in an enemy nation, in order to attack its economy and seize its assets.

Meanwhile, gullible Americans know almost nothing about human rights. (Americans have been polled frequently on this phenomenon, over the years.) Try it yourself: There are 30 established human rights. How many can you name without looking?

The typical American can name seven, at most — and half of their guesses are not human rights, at all. They will often name civil rights, which vary from nation-to-nation. Sometimes they name concepts or attributes, like "Liberty", which are so abstract that they defy definition.

In the end, of the 30 human rights that were universally accepted over 70 years ago, and that are consistently defended to the present day — Americans possess only 10 of them. Which is another reason why human rights is a suppressed topic in public discussions. The current status quo in the US cannot be sustained without widespread Internet censorship.

And that's where we are today.

—

____________________

The political system is what it is because the People are who they are. — Plato

Submitted by QMS on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 6:04pm

So, does that mean war crimes are a human right?

@Pluto's Republic

Bad humor on my part, sorry.
Very good post Pluto.
Thanks for boiling down the gristle.

#4.1

This from the guy who stayed silent about Trump’s war crimes

Do former Presidents have an obligation to publicize the war crimes of their predecessor? Obama didn't publicize Bush's war crimes, and Bush didn't mention Clinton's war crimes. My guess is that US Presidents have always covered-up the crimes of former Presidents. Biden is certainly no exception. Of course, a President could be impeached — but never for committing a war crime. Impeachment in the US is limited to the wagging of tongues or the wagging of wee-wees. The actual reality of Trump's war crimes never touched the consciousness of Americans.

The legal framework for War crimes was invented in the twentieth century — when wars became international and profitable, due to industrialization. The handy legal designation of "war criminal" became a useful tool for seizing the profits and wealth of one's opponents. But after the one, and only, serious war crimes tribunal was held in 1945 — "war crimes" lost some if its glam and ultimately became a big nothing burger. Here's why:

If you showed Americans a list of official war crimes, they would go into cognitive shock, at first. Then, they would go into a state of denial.

War Crimes

Atrocities or offences against persons or property, constituting violations of the laws or customs of war

murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population in occupied territory

murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas

killing of hostages

torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments

plunder of public or private property

wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages

devastation not justified by military necessity

Any American who has played Super Mario Brothers on a computing device has probably been committing virtual war crimes — for fun and pleasure — for most of his or her life.

The State Department will use the term "war crimes" as a slur to defame another country, but the US would never pursue the crime in courts. Besides, the US can freely use US "sanctions" — without due process — to immediately steal the wealth of any nation it cares to. In a multi-polar world, such corruption would be impossible.

War crimes is how the US rolls, and thus "war crimes" is not a permitted topic for public discussion. It's very much like "critical race theory" — if Americans think about it too hard, it can cause a mental health disorder. While the disorder may not be as severe as PTSD, they are both caused by the same cognitive crisis.

Shitlibs: "I'd rather wear a pussy hat than discuss US war crimes."

• • •

Another suppressed topic on the roster of permitted public discussions is "human rights." You won't find "human rights" anywhere in the curriculum of public education in the US. The term "human rights" is primarily used by the State Department (and its army of DC think tanks) in propaganda misinformation that is designed to defame a targeted enemy. In other words, the US will concocts lies about human rights deficiencies in an enemy nation, in order to attack its economy and seize its assets.

Meanwhile, gullible Americans know almost nothing about human rights. (Americans have been polled frequently on this phenomenon, over the years.) Try it yourself: There are 30 established human rights. How many can you name without looking?

The typical American can name seven, at most — and half of their guesses are not human rights, at all. They will often name civil rights, which vary from nation-to-nation. Sometimes they name concepts or attributes, like "Liberty", which are so abstract that they defy definition.

In the end, of the 30 human rights that were universally accepted over 70 years ago, and that are consistently defended to the present day — Americans possess only 10 of them. Which is another reason why human rights is a suppressed topic in public discussions. The current status quo in the US cannot be sustained without widespread Internet censorship.

And that's where we are today.

Submitted by Tall Bald and Ugly on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 8:29pm

You piqued

my interest @Pluto's Republic and I only got 9 of 30
had to look up the rest
probably still couldn’t get all after looking
would be good to know them all to name at the drop
of a hat

#4.1

This from the guy who stayed silent about Trump’s war crimes

Do former Presidents have an obligation to publicize the war crimes of their predecessor? Obama didn't publicize Bush's war crimes, and Bush didn't mention Clinton's war crimes. My guess is that US Presidents have always covered-up the crimes of former Presidents. Biden is certainly no exception. Of course, a President could be impeached — but never for committing a war crime. Impeachment in the US is limited to the wagging of tongues or the wagging of wee-wees. The actual reality of Trump's war crimes never touched the consciousness of Americans.

The legal framework for War crimes was invented in the twentieth century — when wars became international and profitable, due to industrialization. The handy legal designation of "war criminal" became a useful tool for seizing the profits and wealth of one's opponents. But after the one, and only, serious war crimes tribunal was held in 1945 — "war crimes" lost some if its glam and ultimately became a big nothing burger. Here's why:

If you showed Americans a list of official war crimes, they would go into cognitive shock, at first. Then, they would go into a state of denial.

War Crimes

Atrocities or offences against persons or property, constituting violations of the laws or customs of war

murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population in occupied territory

murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas

killing of hostages

torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments

plunder of public or private property

wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages

devastation not justified by military necessity

Any American who has played Super Mario Brothers on a computing device has probably been committing virtual war crimes — for fun and pleasure — for most of his or her life.

The State Department will use the term "war crimes" as a slur to defame another country, but the US would never pursue the crime in courts. Besides, the US can freely use US "sanctions" — without due process — to immediately steal the wealth of any nation it cares to. In a multi-polar world, such corruption would be impossible.

War crimes is how the US rolls, and thus "war crimes" is not a permitted topic for public discussion. It's very much like "critical race theory" — if Americans think about it too hard, it can cause a mental health disorder. While the disorder may not be as severe as PTSD, they are both caused by the same cognitive crisis.

Shitlibs: "I'd rather wear a pussy hat than discuss US war crimes."

• • •

Another suppressed topic on the roster of permitted public discussions is "human rights." You won't find "human rights" anywhere in the curriculum of public education in the US. The term "human rights" is primarily used by the State Department (and its army of DC think tanks) in propaganda misinformation that is designed to defame a targeted enemy. In other words, the US will concocts lies about human rights deficiencies in an enemy nation, in order to attack its economy and seize its assets.

Meanwhile, gullible Americans know almost nothing about human rights. (Americans have been polled frequently on this phenomenon, over the years.) Try it yourself: There are 30 established human rights. How many can you name without looking?

The typical American can name seven, at most — and half of their guesses are not human rights, at all. They will often name civil rights, which vary from nation-to-nation. Sometimes they name concepts or attributes, like "Liberty", which are so abstract that they defy definition.

In the end, of the 30 human rights that were universally accepted over 70 years ago, and that are consistently defended to the present day — Americans possess only 10 of them. Which is another reason why human rights is a suppressed topic in public discussions. The current status quo in the US cannot be sustained without widespread Internet censorship.

And that's where we are today.

—

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

Submitted by snoopydawg on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 1:45pm

Straight from the horse’s mouth

@Tall Bald and Ugly

Obama: Jab Campaign A "Clinical Trial of BILLIONS of People"

There wasn't any testing (Phase 1, 2, or 3) before they used the public as lab rats. Here's what they don't want the lab rats to see.#Vaccine

WATCH:https://t.co/bHBLqz6Jbh

— David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F (@libertytarian) April 22, 2022

—

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Submitted by snoopydawg on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 9:21pm

FWIW

@Tall Bald and Ugly

Here’s a detailed report on the jabs effects on the innate immune systems. Not for the faint of heart to be sure.

Link

—

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Submitted by Tall Bald and Ugly on Sat, 04/23/2022 - 10:37pm

thanks for

the link @snoopydawg not much to say beyond
oh shit

hope you get the wiring straightened out
had my own experience with a horse trailer drive me nuts(short drive)
turns out it was the truck wiring(two different trucks) that was jacked
learned a lot but if your trailer was re-wired for genny I got nothing to help
sounds to me like your tech might have fumbled(?)
but old trailers and old wiring are Never fun nor easy
bon chance

—

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

Submitted by QMS on Sun, 04/24/2022 - 6:25am

Thanks for the link snoop

@snoopydawg

In this paper, we explore the scientific literature suggesting that vaccination with an mRNA vaccine initiates a set of biological events that are not only different from that induced by infection but are in several ways demonstrably counterproductive to both short- and long-term immune competence and normal cellular function.

Yikes! What were these mad scientists thinking?