David Sirota became persona non grata with the establishment media
This is how a newspaper has chosen to use its oped page in the last 16 days pic.twitter.com/KMjnZOIlmQ
— David Sirota (@davidsirota) April 3, 2019
David Sirota just can't help repeatedly making the mistake of doing his job.
This has got him into trouble with the establishment media and the Democratic Party.
When the establishment decided that Beto O'Rourke was going to be the new Obama, and that he could be sold as some sort of progressive, Sirota foolishly pointed out reality.
It didn't go over well.
Oh look. A supporter of Bernie Sanders attacking a Democrat. This is seriously dangerous. We know Trump is in the White House and attacking Dems is doing Trump’s bidding. I hope Senator Sanders repudiates these attacks in 2019. https://t.co/41A4uxtWGY
— Neera Tanden (@neeratanden) December 4, 2018
At that point the Democratic establishment freaked out.
Several other pundits and journalists—even television writer David Simon, creator of The Wire—echoed Tanden's bizarre framing, describing Sirota's tweet as the start of a war on Beto and proof of an alleged coordinated smear campaign that could be traced back to Bernie Sanders. "Inside Bernie-world's war on Beto O'Rourke," reported NBC. "Democrats trying to annihilate an O'Rourke Campaign," Vanity Fair cried. Channeling his inner Borat, columnist Jonathan Chait wrote, “"Why the Bernie Movement Must Crush Beto O'Rourke," at New York Magazine. Meanwhile, Charles Pierce at Esquire fretted over "a concerted effort from the Bernie Sanders camp to paint O'Rourke as a tool of the oil and gas industry." The Hill, no stranger to smear campaigns they usually aim at Sanders, reported that "Sanders supporters deny coordinated attacks on O'Rourke's progressive credentials."
Sirota is an actual investigative journalist, which is rare in this day and age.
It's so rare that the people who call themselves "journalists" not only don't recognize one when they see one, but they don't even know (or care to know) what an investigative journalist is.
Which explains why this article came out a few weeks ago.
Sirota’s hiring as a senior adviser and speechwriter was announced by the Sanders campaign on Tuesday morning after The Atlantic contacted the campaign and inquired about the undisclosed role Sirota held while attacking other Democrats.
It's an impressive scoop by the Atlantic (the same outfit that wrote Here Comes the Berniebro in 2015).
There was only two problem's with the article:
1) It failed to provide any evidence to back up it's claim.
But there was a problem with Dovere’s bombshell: It wasn’t supported by any real evidence.The story hinged on an unverifiable quote which the speaker claims was misrepresented, along with innuendo stemming from the fact that Sirota deleted thousands of tweets following his employment. Paste spoke to multiple campaign insiders familiar with the matter, all of whom disputed Dovere’s timeline and narrative.
2) It wasn't true.
But it is not merely the Atlantic’s lack of evidence for its core claim, the obvious errors in its article, the Guardian’s public denials and demands for a correction, the ongoing tweaking of its storyline, or the vehement denials of multiple people that call into serious question the Atlantic’s core claims. Documentary evidence does the same.
...There was one fact and one fact only that made the Atlantic article so seemingly damaging: that Sirota was operating with an explicit agreement as an informal adviser and speechwriter during his controversial investigative reporting about O’Rourke and others in December and January. And that claim is manifestly false.It’s hard to overstate how many other media outlets uncritically repeated the Atlantic’s false timeline with no attempt made to verify whether it was true.
Comments
lol
Raise your hand if you read Soledad O'Brian's tweet calling Tulsi idiotic? Or heard about diaries on ToP that are so anti Tulsi that if people there had said things like that about Hillary they would have been banned before they hit 'submit'?
Or the ones where people say horrible things about Bernie. You know that they get away with it because he's Not A Democrat!!
I had some fun replying to Neera's tweet and others in the thread.
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.
(No subject)
“Tips for a post-Mueller media from 9 Russiagate skeptics” —FAIR
https://fair.org/home/tips-for-a-post-mueller-media-from-nine-russiagate...
It seems like David Sirota was an early test case or “proof of concept.” Now the elites have put the model into mass production, deplatforming everyone who doesn’t toe the line, while making multi-millionaires of the most popular among those who do.
That was a great video of Aaron Mate'
I could recite the story in my sleep, but I like the way Aaron tells it best.
Sirota worked for AIPAC and was a fellow at John Podesta’s CAP
(Center for American Progress).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sirota
If even a David Sirota can fall out of favor, what chance would those journalists have who’ve been in Israel backers’ and neocon-neolib Dems’ sights from the start?
Also,
After the 2016 election, Sirota was slated to become CEO of True Blue Media, the outfit owned by David Brock that operates ShareBlue. (ShareBlue was formerly known as Correct the Record.) At that point, Brock was calling True Blue "the Breitbart of the left".
Before taking the position, Sirota backed out, saying the circumstances of the job had changed. It would be interesting to know the backstory.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stevenperlberg/david-sirota-has-bac...
"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi
"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone
Sneerat Random...
still playing the victim on behalf of moneyed interests.
Of course, Neera herself would NEVER say anything derogatory about other Democrats:
Sounds like Hillary's attack dog is on the outs with Hillary and looking for a new job. Would she dare go work for an Obama spokesmodel like Beto? What would Her think about that betrayal?
Or maybe she's just freelancing on behalf of Big Oil, earning brownie points with her future lobbying clients for hippie punching 'disloyal' media types.
In any event, nice to see Sirota cutting ties with Neera's CAP snake pit. He's far better off in Bernie's camp than with those Clinton creeps.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
I sure remember when Hillary turned nasty
during her campaign with Obama. I made quite a few phone calls to her campaign about it.
This was just unbelievable that she would even go there.
"Hey, why should I back out now? There is always the chance that someone might do an RFK on Obama."
Scientists are concerned that conspiracy theories may die out if they keep coming true at the current alarming rate.