Conservative religious intend to make transgender existence unsustainable
Not content with challenging the right of transgender people to have safe use of public restrooms and the right of transgender students to have equal access to public education, religious conservatives have now filed suit challenging an Obama administration ruling that transgender people deserve equal access to medical treatment.
Five states, a Catholic health network and other Christian health-care providers sued the federal government on Tuesday, hoping to block a new rule they say could require doctors to provide gender-transition treatments and procedures that conflict with their beliefs.
Religiously affiliated hospital systems and doctors, the lawsuit’s plaintiffs said, could be required to perform gender-transition procedures that they find morally objectionable, including hormone therapies, gender-reassignment surgery or hysterectomies for transgender men.
The regulation leaves doctors and hospitals in a very difficult position.
--Luke Goodrich, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which filed the suit
Transgender advocates say the antibias rules are necessary simply to ensure transgender patients are able to access basic care in some states.
The states of Texas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Kansas and Kentucky all joined the suit, along with several religiously affiliated health-care organizations, including the Franciscan Alliance, a Catholic health-care network in Indiana.
Travis Weber, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, which isn’t involved in the suit, said the Obama administration’s push on transgender issues makes the matter a “top echelon concern” for social conservatives.
So their anti-Obama agenda just happens to be a full-on attack on the rights of transgender people.
The administration—in laying out guidelines for health care and bathroom access at schools—has said that existing civil-rights laws barring sex discrimination extend protections to transgender people as well.
Conservative groups have argued this is a misinterpretation of the law, which protects only against discrimination based on biological sex.
The Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v Hopkins is apparently null and void in conservative circles.
Harper Jean Tobin, policy director for the National Center for Transgender Equality, said transgender people face discrimination in health care, including frequent denial of care for everything from cancer to the common cold.
The lawsuit is an attempt to slander and attack transgender people and prevent them from having access to health care, while pretending that the plaintiffs are the victims.
--Tobin
The American Medical Association, along with other major medical organizations, has said gender-transition procedures are medically necessary in some cases, and can help transgender avoid depression and other medical problems.
Treatment is often literally lifesaving.
--Sasha Buchert, Transgender Law Center
Religious groups had lobbied for an explicit exemption from the nondiscrimination rules on the grounds that providers shouldn’t be compelled to provide care they believed to be inappropriate.
The administration rejected that request, saying in the final rule, “We believe that the government has a compelling interest in ensuring that individuals have nondiscriminatory access to health care and health coverage.”
Thing is, these so-called religious conservatives refuse to believe that transgender people really exist (we are, to them, a hoax)...and if we don't exist, we need no medical treatment whatsoever, transition related or not.
It’s a very clear warning signal that religious doctors and hospitals across the country, if patients come in and request these procedures, and they cannot perform these procedures because of their conscience and medical judgment, they can be sued and exposed to massive liability.
--Mr. Goodrich
Or they could, you know, stop accepting federal payments for what they do provide...or cease practicing medicine (if a doctor) or close their doors (if a hospital).
The point of all this is, of course, to sustain their "religious belief" that being transgender is not a real thing, and that interfering with our ability to live healthy, happy lives, will force us to abandon who we are in order to conform with those beliefs.
Transgender people only have freedom of religion in so far as we adapt to the beliefs of others.
Comments
Well, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised
but I am. Some guy who says he worships Jesus Christ wants to deny medical treatment to people because of that?
You know, even if you believe that somebody who feels they were born in the wrong sort of body is committing a sin by saying so, that isn't compatible with what Christianity is supposed to be about it. In fact, I don't believe that anyone who learns to be a physician and then chooses to deny treatment to anyone can honestly claim to be a Christian.
These guys have been worshiping the dollar for so long they don't even know who they are anymore.
and also too...
I don't believe that anyone who learns to be a physician and then chooses to deny treatment to anyone can honestly claim to be a
Christianphysician... or human."Love One Another" ~ George Harrison
We must have religious freedom
Unless your religion is anything outside of Judeo-Christian orthodoxy. And maybe not Judaism. Unless you agree to convert after the Battle of Armageddon. Not too sure about Mormons either...
" In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a bad move. -- Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy "
"And maybe not Judaism...."
Unless it's the AIPAC/Likud approved version.
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
-- John Lennon
Please don't play the following video
if you are easily offended.... but if there was ever a topic that just *begs* for this, it'd be this one. I have TG friends, and am beyond appalled at what these "religious" "conservatives" are trying to do. If that is what religion is all about, I want no fucking part of it.
From the 1981 EP "In God We Trust, Inc.", here's Jello Biafra and the Dead Kennedys at their finest:
Damn that band SUCKS
If it wasn't for the words scrolling over I would only understand about 1/4 of what they actually "sang", if you can even call that singing. Sounds more like a bunch of screaming drunken idiots!
When I was a kid, Republicans used to red scare people, now it's the Democrats. I am getting too damn old for this crap!
Ya hadda be there, I guess... n/t
freedom of religion
No one has any more freedom of religion than that in the USA. Although the government is legally prohibited from discriminating against non-conformers, your remarks about trans folks apply equally to Muslims, Hindus, Atheists, Pagans, Buddhists, followers of Native Nation religions, etc. The so-called "Christian social conservatives" demand that everyone in the country live as their religion demands, despite the rather glaring lack of real evidence supporting the alleged existence of their God.
I might add that the demand for that evidence is the fault of the "Christian social conservatives" alone. If they were willing to live in a genuinely secular culture like all the rest of us, that demand wouldn't exist. But once you venture outside of Thomas Jefferson's "it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg" envelope -- and these have -- then the existence of your God becomes the business of the general secular public,
I point this out because I maintain that if correctly worked, this can and should become a national alliance directed at stripping the fundamentalists from the undeserved power they wield because they exist in, and dominate, the private (and especially the private charitable) sector.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
In Canada, this comes under Provincial Law
or medical code of ethics which must conform to the Federal human rights of both the doctor and the patient.
Taking the largest Province of Ontario:
Under Federal Freedom of Religion rights, the doctor is allowed to refuse to perform certain procedures which includes abortion and gender transition surgery that are against her religion. But in great detail the Provincial code explains that the doctor must accommodate the patient. That means she must remain neutral and non-judgemental towards the patient while giving them information about referrals for the medical procedures they require.
Bravo for this
To thine own self be true.
If only there was some way
to make the existence of these so-called christians 'unsustainable'.
I'm really, really tired of listening to the dribble that emanates from these unthinking pod people and their ridiculous, money-grubbing mega 'churches'.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
lions
I used to suggest throwing them to hungry lions, like the old-time Romans did.
But today I can't do that any more. My big red Rufus kitteh thinks he's a lion, knows that lions are his kinfolks, and resents the crap out of the idea that anyone would even consider feeding his relatives such tasteless garbage!
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides