Communism on the March!
(Part 42, wherein we once again attack the practice of Mega-Coroprations expropriating Public Assets and marketing them for their own profit.)
Comerades! Our glorious Socialist Revolution once again advances against Capitalist Imperialism under the banner of our Trotskyite leader, Jeremy Corbyn!
His Radical Plan to actually make Public Scientific Research... well, Public will surely bring the Running Dogs and their Dead Parrot Media to their Knees!
Knees! I tells yah.
Jeremy Corbyn just announced a plan to end one of the biggest scams in modern history
by James Wright, The Canary
August 30th, 2016
At present, the British people are paying twice for education and information. Once, to create research (for example, through Research Council funding) and then again to buy back the research through online journal subscriptions, university fees and public library costs. Despite funding the research, the taxpayer must pay again for access.
...
In a move that will anger private digital libraries like JSTOR, Corbyn’s Labour has vowed to end their sneaky profiteering on the back of the taxpayer. Publicly funded research would, accordingly, become publicly available.Without such access, we are currently paying extortionate fees to expand our knowledge through research we have already funded. Single journals on JSTOR can cost up to $50 to access without a university affiliation. If they are available at all.
If you happen to be a student at university, then you may sidestep the online paywalls, but not the scam. Research funded publicly and by universities themselves is then sold back to universities at inflated prices.
...
Each UK university loses up to £3.38m (PDF, page 6) per year buying back research they themselves have funded. Meanwhile, access to digital libraries for students costs universities an annual fortune. Students therefore join the general people in forking out once again for publicly funded research, but through tuition fees rather than paywalls.Like students, if you happen to be at a public library then you may sidestep the online paywalls, but not the scam. In 2008, access to journals and subscriptions cost UK libraries £235m (PDF, page 1) of taxpayer money. Hence, even if you are at a library, the library has paid a second time for publicly funded research.
...
Open source information is a no-brainer. As the rights to the research are bought by digital libraries like JSTOR, removing these companies and their paywalls does not mean that the researchers and writers do not get paid. It only means huge profits are not siphoned off by these unnecessary gatekeepers. It means we are not paying twice for information.And crucially, the more people who have access to research, the higher the chance we have of scientific, philosophical and artistic breakthroughs. 150 million attempts to read JSTOR content are denied every year. This is not including the other private digital library giants. Imagine the expansion of human knowledge and progress should these attempts have been granted.
(Of course it's cross posted from The Stars Hollow Gazette and DocuDharma)

Comments
Vent Hole
This is a Nice End Around Corporate Sponsored Public Policy.
Public Research is Public.
Public is, you know, public.
This hits on corporate taking advantage of all public institutions, and avoids the hackneyed "privatization" frame.
It follows that private entities extort the public after using and abusing our infrastructure. That is "not fair" in a bipartisan way.
Responsibility and stewardship for public information could also cross the aisle. Begging the questions of opportunity and prosperity.
This move here, Teachout's calling out of the corporate sponsors of her opponent, dovetail quite nicely with Bernie's primary success.
We could craft an actual strategy and create a common thread here...
“Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” ~ Sun Tzu
As a doer, rhe fees required to publish scientific work
were stiff. Page fees. Once I left univ, I lost library privileges, --.edu use except as an alum, and I would have to pay for reprints (as did many). It's the researchers who wrote who pay for reprints of their own published work and then distribute the "free" reprints to requestors. I used to favor sending reprints to researchers where I guessed their libraries were lacking.
PLOS began to change that, but few of the PLOS journals are considered prestigious. Plus, of course, researchers got underpaid, too.
Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.
Not a university-based researcher --
just a practitioner in the field, but one who has, from time-to-time, had an interesting story to tell. Published quite a bit (and paid the page fees); then, when accessing JSTOR (or other repositories) from the university library, often STILL have to pay an access fee - and sometimes even to download MY OWN WORK!!
When Cicero had finished speaking, the people said “How well he spoke”.
When Demosthenes had finished speaking, the people said “Let us march”.
OMG. What a sad, sad story that video tells. .
Bill Clinton was and is slime, but Obama is a murderer. Obama crossed a line with his drones and persecution of whistle blowers that will never be walked back. I didn't think it was possible to elevate the Clinton record, but Aaron's video and fucking Obama just did that.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
The ramped up persecution of whistleblowers, in spite of laws to
the contrary, is an under-reported story and a tragedy for the country. Obama is making an effort to cover up the corruption in government and government contractors to a degree greater than W Bush. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility(PEER) documents and supports whistleblowers, especially in land management agencies. Their web site is worth a visit.
The "constitutional scholar" must have majored in loopholes.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
I have never seen this movie and it may be
one of the most important one for me to have come across. I couldn't help to start crying watching it and just wondered why I never was exposed to it before. I could pull together some of the dots I hadn't before.
I feel so old and so helpless, but there is always hope in some 14 year old kid to "get it". Let's just work on protecting them from being killed. And let's not forget to "make some kids", because what would the world be without them. Wow. What a hammer to watch this on a Sunday Morning unexpectedly. I think that will stick with me for a long time.
Thank you, ek hornbeck. You did good to spread it out to some old folks like me, who could see some code and always was terrified about it, because it meant to me that millions and millions of people would never be able to understand what kind of a mess and bliss that code could create in their lives. The mess starts to win over ...
From the end of the film
I guess it's a moral imperative that we find out what we can do, is the answer to the last question.
I have to take a walk, Thanks and have a loving weekend with whomever you happen to have around to love.
https://www.euronews.com/live
I watched is too mimi and cried like a baby.
ek had me in tears, and I didn't know if I wanted to applaud or throw rocks at him for bumming me out with the Aaron Swartz film. Once I quit crying, I could truly appreciate how masterfully he integrated the parts of his essay.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
oh, god
Started this comment and then realized I can't actually think about Aaron Swartz right now. It's like ocean acidification; sometimes I just can't deal.
Good diary, though.
"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha
"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver
That video was so powerful
I don't know what else to say.