The Amazon deal is much worse than first thought

AMAZON HQ2 WILL COST TAXPAYERS AT LEAST $4.6 BILLION, MORE THAN TWICE WHAT THE COMPANY CLAIMED, NEW STUDY SHOWS

AMAZON’S ANNOUNCEMENT THIS week that it will open its new headquarters in New York City and northern Virginia came with the mind-boggling revelation that the corporate giant will rake in $2.1 billion in local government subsidies. But an analysis by the nation’s leading tracker of corporate subsidies finds that the government handouts will actually amount to at least $4.6 billion.

But even that figure, which accounts for state and local perks, doesn’t take into account a gift that Amazon will also enjoy from the federal government, a testament to the old adage that in Washington, bad ideas never die.

The Amazon location in Long Island City, in the New York City borough of Queens, is situated in a federal opportunity zone, a Jack Kemp-era concept resurrected in the 2017 tax law that, in theory, is supposed to bring money into poverty-stricken areas. The northern Virginia site, in the Arlington neighborhood of Crystal City (which developers and local officials have rebranded as “National Landing”), is not directly in an opportunity zone but is virtually surrounded by other geographic areas that are.

Under the tax overhaul signed by President Donald Trump last year, investors in opportunity zones can defer payments of capital gains taxes until 2026, and if they hold them for seven years, they can exclude 15 percent of the gains from taxation. If investors carry the opportunity zone investment for 10 years, they eliminate taxes on future appreciation entirely. Investment managers have been salivating at the chance to take advantage of opportunity zones. Special funds have been built to cater to people holding unrealized capital gains — such as Amazon employees with large holdings of company stock.

**
Amazon’s press release cited two New York state incentives, a $1.2 billion grant over the next decade from the Excelsior Program and a $325 million, 10-year grant from Empire State Development. But Amazon did not quantify proceeds from two other city incentives, the Industrial & Commercial Abatement Program, or ICAP, and the Relocation and Employment Assistance Program, or REAP.

ICAP gives a partial tax abatement for 25 years, and based on the expected $3.6 billion campus in Long Island City, Good Jobs First estimates that value at $386 million. REAP, a per-employee tax credit of $3,000 per year for 12 years, comes out to $897 million if Amazon meets its projection of hiring 25,000 employees.

Those estimates, combined with what Amazon already cited for the Long Island City location, brings the total to $2.808 billion. That results in a cost per job of $112,000, far more than the $48,000 per job Amazon claimed they would get in the Long Island City deal.

The cities that give Amazon these deals should say that it comes with strings attached. A living wage that is in line with what costs of living are as well as full time work and benefits. Why should citizens have to pay for Amazon employee's government funded programs? If not then Amazon should have to pay for those programs.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Big Al's picture

because Amazon is just being smart. Isn't that what he said to Clinton during the debates about himself not paying the appropriate taxes. And here it's something that Trump played a part in allowing them to do. These kind of contradictions are the kind of stuff those who give Trump ANY credit seem to oversee.

up
0 users have voted.

@Big Al credit and I don't overlook contradictions.

I have no idea why city officials, largely democratic - I notice you don't note the dems' roles in these ripoffs - continue to toss so much taxpayer money at businesses. It outrages the citizens, and past experiences with such deals indicate that the businesses don't fulfill their obligations anyway.

And repubs supposedly don't like it when the government 'chooses winners and losers,' yet the govs are doing just that.

So, I figure that kickbacks must be involved.

up
0 users have voted.

dfarrah

Daenerys's picture

Richest man in history, they should make him pay for it himself. That's how it's supposed to work, right? CEO-founder pays his/her own money to expand their business. In theory. End corporate welfare!! Diablo

up
0 users have voted.

This shit is bananas.

snoopydawg's picture

@Daenerys

People bitch and moan about their taxes going to people who are on social programs, but have no problem with companies that get welfare because "they create the jobs" and other bullshit.

IMG_2373_0.JPG

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@snoopydawg I had this, ahem, conversation with my BIL last weekend. It didn't go well. I'm going to let it sit, but for future reference, right?

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

Jeff Bezos is the richest man in the world and his corporation,Amazon earned nearly $6 billion in profits but paid zero in federal incomes taxes in 2017. And it is not going to get any better under Trump's new tax law which was signed into law last December.

Amazon will receive approximately $789 million from the tax cuts, but according to filings, the company’s 2017 taxes do not factor in the impact of that second big tax disclosure. While the tax cuts generally took effect on Jan. 1, some companies, including Amazon, have managed to deter or postpone tax liability from prior years as part of a grandfather clause included in the law, ITEP reported.

Amazon is not alone. A number of the most profitable corporations in the US pay little to zero federal taxes each year. While I cannot verify the number in snoopydawg's meme above, I believe that it is very fair to say that corporations as profitable as Amazon should not need or be getting massive tax breaks from our local, state, or federal governments.

Further, what we can say is that as a percentage of total federal tax revenues, the share paid by corporations has steadily decreased. This is partly due to changes in the tax system in which some corporate profits are passed through to individual incomes, but for large corporations,this would not be the case. Bernie Sanders has been railing on the fact that corporations are not carrying their fair share of the tax burden for years.

So, corporate taxes accounted for 33 percent of all tax revenue in 1952 but just 10 percent in 2013. The 2013 figure is slightly higher than what Sanders said, but his claim is basically accurate on the numbers.

That said, the measurement Sanders used may not be the best. Economists told us that it would be more useful to know what corporate taxes were as a percentage of gross domestic product.

But looking at it that way, the general pattern also holds. In 1952, corporate taxes accounted for 5.9 percent of GDP, a figure that has fallen to 1.6 percent today.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

No matter who you vote for, eventually it's against your own self interest.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

He and Ron take on HQ2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REIafMQIgIs (11.5 min)

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

gulfgal98's picture

@Lookout And Jimmy and Ron were right on the money with it. Thank you for sharing.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

It makes poor and working-class people better off. Only you rich snobs rate trees as more important than working-class people, who will be so much better off if you just let rich industrialists get their way.

The rich snobs aren't elitist; you are.

Always remember that.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

But how will we pay for it?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

but how will we pay for it?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

but how will we pay for it?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

but how will we pay for it?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

but how will we pay for it?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Which is actually in Bezos's own interest. That way Bezos still has customers after everybody's money has been stashed in the bank accounts of the oligarchs and their sycophants.

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.