US Intel Agencies: ISIS No Weaker After Year of US Bombings

Military 'Not Disputing' Assessment

According to officials familiar with the situation, US intelligence agencies have offered a new assessment of ISIS, cautioning that a solid year of US airstrikes against them in Iraq and Syria hasn’t left ISIS any weaker than they were when the strikes began.
Surprisingly, even though the military has been bragging about how great the war is going throughout the year, military commanders aren’t disputing the assessment, and are simply saying that they believe progress will come at some point in the future, when Iraq retakes Ramadi.

Haven't we been told repeatedly that we are winning?

U.S. intelligence agencies see the overall situation as a strategic stalemate: The Islamic State remains a well-funded extremist army able to replenish its ranks with foreign jihadis as quickly as the U.S. can eliminate them. Meanwhile, the group has expanded to other countries, including Libya, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula and Afghanistan.
The assessments by the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and others appear to contradict the optimistic line taken by the Obama administration's special envoy, retired Gen. John Allen, who told a forum in Aspen, Colorado, last week that "ISIS is losing" in Iraq and Syria.

It all seems to pointless, until you consider this.

(Reuters) - The number of U.S. troops deployed in battle zones is at its lowest level since before the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Still, Congress has authorized a 38 percent increase in the war budget over last year.

So you see, there is a silver-lining.

Tags: 
Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

joe shikspack's picture

"military-industrial complex beating isis"

compare rates of funding increase. include productivity measure of profit per soldier deployed.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

Awesome comment Joe! Good

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

snoopydawg's picture

Not when we allow Turkey to arm and supply them. Huge, miles long convoys leave Turkey and take those supplies into Iraq or Syria. If the US was seriously trying to fight them how hard would it be to drop a few bombs on them?
And why hasn't the U.S. leaned on Saudi Arabia, Turkey and our other allies to quit funding and supporting them?
It's because people were tired of Azq being the boogeyman and had to create a bigger enemy.
It's all kabuki theater to topple Assad.
The war on terror is a made up fight.
Why do we even have to spend all that money to fight them in the place? It's not like they are going to invade the U.S.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

MarilynW's picture

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 10.37.48 AM.png
Photo Credit: Reuters
Little boy injured in crash of Syrian fighter jet into his neighbourhood.

I'm thinking ISIS may not be any weaker, but the bombs have surely weakened the population. More people to add to the massive list of refugees.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.